<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease</title>
    <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/</link>
    <description>Recent content on The Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder in Health and Disease</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>© 1998 &lt;a href=&#34;mailto:keet@keet.net&#34;&gt;AD Keet&lt;/A&gt; All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
    <atom:link href="https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>1 - Introduction</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_1/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_1/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Introduction&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#introduction&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;There has long been disagreement about various aspects of the structure and function of &#xA;the &#34;gatekeeper&#34; (&lt;EM&gt;Greek pyloros&lt;/EM&gt;, from &lt;EM&gt;pyle&lt;/EM&gt; = gate and &lt;EM&gt;ouros&lt;/EM&gt; = guard).  In recent years the &#xA;problem has often been mentioned in anatomy, physiology, gastroenterology, radiology &#xA;and even in nuclear medicine.  For instance, while referring to manometric and gastric &#xA;emptying studies, Schuurkes and van Nuenten (1984) pointed out that there was &#xA;considerable controversy as to whether a true pyloric sphincter existed in most species, &#xA;and especially in man.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Reeve (1981) many functional aspects of sphincters are poorly understood;  &#xA;the exact mechanism of control of the transfer of chyme from stomach to duodenum &#xA;through the pylorus is still not clear.  Malagelada (1983) states that controversy surrounds &#xA;the motor activity and function of the antroduodenal junction;  there is disagreement as to &#xA;whether the pylorus functions as a separate unit or as an integral part of the distal antrum.  &#xA;Ehrlein et al. (l984) reiterate that pyloric motility is poorly understood, and according to &#xA;Funch-Jensen (l987) there are many unsolved questions.  Malagelada (1990) states that &#xA;the stomach performs multiple functions with a deceivingly simple anatomy;  this is &#xA;regarded as the key to the investigator&#39;s frustration when trying to uncover its secrets.  &#xA;One source of the many controversies surrounding the pylorus may be species &#xA;differences, according to Schulze-Delrieu et al. (1984).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In view of the divergent and sometimes conflicting views expressed, the aim of the &#xA;present investigation is to examine, firstly, certain aspects of the anatomy and physiology &#xA;of the gastroduodenal junction and secondly, to try and elucidate some aspects of the &#xA;more common pathological conditions affecting the region.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In their investigations Camilleri et al. (l985) stated that radionuclide and manometric &#xA;emptying studies provided closely interrelated physiological studies and might be &#xA;regarded as complementary diagnostic tools in the investigation of some of these &#xA;problems.  It is our submission that radiographic studies, provided they are integrated &#xA;with other modes of investigation, may similarly be regarded as an important and &#xA;complementary diagnostic tool.  It is recognized that radiology has certain demerits.  For &#xA;instance, it is hardly possible to quantify gastric emptying radiologically;  barium &#xA;sulphate in suspension, although non-soluble, non-absorbable and non-toxic, may &#xA;separate from solids and liquids, rendering radiographic emptying studies of little value.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;On the other hand upper gastrointestinal radiography has certain advantages.  For &#xA;instance, it displays anatomic detail exquisitely (Velchik et al l989).  One may add that &#xA;the same holds true for movements of the stomach and duodenum;  these are clearly &#xA;observable and recordable under physiological conditions in the intact stomach as well as &#xA;after pharmacological modification.  The absence of intraluminal tubes eliminates &#xA;the possibility that they may modify physiological contractions or prevent sphincters &#xA;from closing properly. Also, in experimental motility studies &#xA;it has not been determined, as far as we are aware, what effects gastrostomy or &#xA;duodenostomy has on motility.  In radiology this is not a complicating factor.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;There is a tendency, especially in physiology, to dismiss radiological investigations as &#xA;&#34;purely visual observations.&#34;  This sounds rather illogical, as observation, by the nature &#xA;of things, is a visual impression.  On the other hand it would not be unreasonable to &#xA;question the &lt;EM&gt;interpretation&lt;/EM&gt; of these visual observations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Texter (l963) radiology has been so successful in the demonstration of &#xA;pathological processes, that there has been a tendency to overlook its application as an &#xA;investigative aid in the exploration of normal physiological forms of movement.  &#xA;Edwards and Rowlands (l968) pointed out that various methods had been applied to the &#xA;study of antral and pyloric movements and the transport of contents, but that each had its &#xA;own limitations and interfered in some way with the mechanism.  No single method had &#xA;given a clear, acceptable picture, although radiology kept the best perspective.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The present investigation originated in, and was conducted from, the Radiological &#xA;Department.  The image or action observed, was regarded as a fact;  its interpretation &#xA;might be open to question.  At all times radiological findings were critically evaluated &#xA;and, where possible, considered in conjunction with other findings.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The designation &#34;barium meal&#34; appears to be something of a misnomer, as it implies the &#xA;swallowing of solids, while a liquid is in fact imbibed.  In view of the important &#xA;differences between gastric emptying of solids and liquids, the term was considered to be &#xA;ambiguous and was avoided where possible.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In descriptions of cases the clinical features were either not discussed or kept to a &#xA;minimum, as the aim of the investigation is the discussion of anatomical, physiological &#xA;and radiological features and of the pathogenesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In background descriptions and reviews of the literature the method followed was to &#xA;present quotations in chronological order so as to obtain an historical perspective.  &#xA;Quotations were not identified by superscript number but by authors&#39; names and dates for ready &#xA;identification and a brief historical overview.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A number of intriguing entities will be encountered, such as the &lt;EM&gt;fickle pylorus&lt;/EM&gt; and the &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;sphincteric paradox&lt;/EM&gt; of Winans (l976) (Chap. 15), the &lt;EM&gt;errant or wandering antrum&lt;/EM&gt; (Chap. &#xA;2), and the &lt;EM&gt;Janus-like sphincteric mechanism&lt;/EM&gt;, looking backwards (into the stomach) as &#xA;well as forwards (into the duodenum) (Chap. 3).  An &lt;EM&gt;event horizon&lt;/EM&gt; is described (Chap. 14), &#xA;which is perhaps another way of saying &#34;we &#xA;don&#39;t know.&#34;  In addition the &lt;EM&gt;vagaries of the vagus nerves&lt;/EM&gt; described by Skandalakis et al. (l986) &#xA;(Chap. 8) will have to be faced.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;But first of all it is necessary to consider some uncertain and almost undefinable &#xA;concepts, viz. the &#34;pyloric antrum,&#34; &#34;sphincters,&#34; and &#34;peristalsis.&#34;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Camilleri M, Malagelada JR, Brown ML, et al.  Relation between antral motility &#xA;and gastric emptying of solids and liquids in humans. &lt;EM&gt;Am J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l985, 249 &#xA;(Gastrointest Liver Physiol 12): G580-G585.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Edwards DAW, Rowlands EN.  Physiology of the gastroduodenal junction.  In:  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Handbook of Physiology&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Code C.F. Sect 6, Vol 4.  American Physiological Society, &#xA;Washington l968, pp 1985-2000.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ehrlein HJ, Keinke O, Schemann M.  Studies on the process of gastric emptying.  &#xA;In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gastrointestinal Motility&lt;/EM&gt;, edit RomanÿC.  MTP Press, Lancaster l984, pp 111-118.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Funch-Jensen P.  Basal upper gastrointestinal motility in healthy people. &lt;EM&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt; l987, 22 Suppl 128, 52-61.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Malagelada JR.  Gastric, pancreatic and biliary responses to a meal.  In:  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract&lt;/EM&gt;, Vol 2, edit Johnson LR.  Raven Press, New &#xA;York l983, pp 893-924.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Malagelada JR.  Where do we stand on gastric motility?  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt;&#xA;l990, 25 Suppl l75, 42-51.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Reeve DRE.  Anatomy of the sphincters of the alimentary canal.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Alimentary &#xA;Sphincters and their Disorders&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Thomas PA, Mann CV.  MacMillan Publ, London &#xA;l98l, pp 1-26.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schulze-Delrieu K, Ehrlein HJ, Blum AL.  Mechanics of the pylorus.  In: &lt;EM&gt;Gastric &#xA;and Gastroduodenal Motility&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Akkermans LMA, Johnson AG, Read NW.  Praeger &#xA;Publ, New York l984, pp 87-102.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schuurkes JAJ, van Nueten JM.  Gastroduodenal co-ordination.  In:&lt;EM&gt;Gastric and &#xA;Gastroduodenal Motility&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Akkermans LMA, Johnson AG, Read NW.  Praeger Publ, &#xA;New York l984, p 119.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skandalakis LJ, Gray SW, Skandalakis JE.  The history and surgical anatomy of &#xA;the vagus nerve.  &lt;EM&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/EM&gt; l986, 162, 75-85.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Texter EC.  Motility in the gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;EM&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/EM&gt; l963, 184, &#xA;640-647.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Velchik MG, Reynolds JC, Alavi A.  The effect of meal energy content on gastric &#xA;emptying.  &lt;EM&gt;J Nucl Med&lt;/EM&gt; l989, 30, 1106-1110.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Winans CS.  The fickle pylorus (Editorial).  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l976, 70, 622-623.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2 - Some Uncertain Concepts</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_2/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_2/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;some-uncertain-concepts&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Some Uncertain Concepts&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#some-uncertain-concepts&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;1-the-pyloric-antrum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  1. The Pyloric Antrum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#1-the-pyloric-antrum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Willis (l682) introduced the term &#34;antrum pylori&#34; (Greek &lt;em&gt;antron&lt;/em&gt; = cave) to indicate the &#xA;part of the stomach adjoining the pylorus;  no further demarcation was given.  &#xA;Cunningham (1906) pointed out that the term was ambiguous and that it was rarely &#xA;possible to obtain a clear anatomical conception of what it meant;  it was largely &#xA;responsible for much of the obscurity associated with the pyloric part of the stomach.  &#xA;Lewis (1912) also drew attention to the confusion caused by the term.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Forssell (1913) was totally opposed to the designation &#34;antrum,&#34; as, in his view, it was &#xA;vague and had no foundation in anatomical fact.  M&amp;#252;ller (l921) pointed out that the word &#xA;was used in different senses;  some authors used it to denote a small area close to the &#xA;pylorus while others considered it to be the entire &#34;transverse&#34; stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cole et al. (l932) defined &#34;antrum&#34; as the portion of the stomach between the sulcus &#xA;angularis and the pyloric valve;  the fan-shaped muscle constituted a small portion of its &#xA;distal end (Fig. 3.4).  Golden (l937), on the other hand, used the term as a synonym for &#xA;Forssell&#39;s canalis egestorius (i.e., the fan-shaped muscle) (Fig. 3.3).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While discussing a series of cases of gastric carcinoma, Coller et al. (l941) stated that in &#xA;the majority the lesion was located either in the prepyloric region or in the pyloric &#xA;antrum, from which it is concluded that these are different entities.  In view of the &#xA;ambiguities and lack of anatomical definition, Torgersen (l942) advocated abolition of &#xA;the term &#34;antrum.&#34;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Clarity is not forthcoming from the descriptions of Jenkinson (l955), who stated that the &#xA;pyloric canal, approximately 3.0 cm in length, was located on the oral side of the &#34;pyloric &#xA;sphincter&#34;;  the antrum was said to be the region extending from the pyloric canal to the &#xA;incisura angularis on the lesser curvature (Fig. 2.1).  In another sentence the antrum was &#xA;defined as the part of the stomach between the sulcus intermedius and the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/2-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 2.1.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Pyloric antrum according to Jenkinson. &#xA;P.S., pyloric sphincter; P.C., pyloric canal; &#xA;S.I., sulcus intermedius; I.A., incisura angularis. &#xA;(In another sentence the antrum was said to be the &#xA;region between the sulcus intermedius and the duodenum.)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Not only do anatomists disagree among themselves about the concept &#34;antrum&#34;, but &#xA;Foulk et al (l957) pointed out that gastric landmarks and boundaries differed in their &#xA;details for the pathologist, the surgeon, the endoscopist and the radiologist.  Grossman &#xA;(l958) stated that many writers had commented on the lack of uniformity of terms and the &#xA;ambiguity of some of them;  according to him the pyloric portion was usually divided &#xA;into the pyloric canal adjacent to the sphincter, and the pyloric vestibule or antrum &#xA;adjacent to the corpus.  He preferred to name functional divisions of the stomach in terms &#xA;of their secretory characteristics;  &#34;pyloric gland area&#34; was suggested for the mucus &#xA;secreting, gastrin producing zone and &#34;oxyntic gland area&#34; for the acid producing region.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Edwards (l96l) it was widely accepted that the antrum represented the &#xA;portion of the stomach distal to the incisura, which approximately defined the boundaries &#xA;of the pyloric mucosal zone.  Although some anatomists and clinicians adhered to this &#xA;definition, du Plessis (l963), as a surgeon, was concerned with the fact that the pyloric &#xA;mucosal zone was often larger than the anatomical antrum.  Tanner (l964) pointed out &#xA;that there was extreme variability in the extent of antral mucosa;  if it were equated with &#xA;the antrum, the boundaries of the latter would also be variable.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Moe et al. (l965) looked upon &#34;antrum&#34; as the pyloric mucosal zone.  According to &#xA;Capper et al (l966) the antrum was more of a physiologic concept than an anatomical one, &#xA;and was best defined as the distal part of the stomach which contained and released &#xA;gastrin;  for antrectomy to be adequate, this zone had to be defined accurately and all of &#xA;the gastrin-secreting mucosa had to be removed.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Carlson et al. (l966) and Code and Carlson (l968) defined the antrum as the region &#xA;caudad to the incisura angularis.  In terms of motor function it was divided into two &#xA;segments of varying length (Fig. 2.2).  The more caudad portion, called the terminal &#xA;segment, participated in a simultaneous, segmental contraction called terminal antral &#xA;contraction (TAC);  the length of the segment was not fixed and its dimensions might &#xA;change.  The cephalad segment of the antrum was not involved in TAC but the two &#xA;segments constituted a functional motor unit and contracted in a coordinated way.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Edwards and Rowlands (l968) again drew attention to the confusion in nomenclature;  in &#xA;their view the term &#34;antrum&#34; denoted the proximal part of the thickened muscle mass &#xA;adjacent to the pylorus, and not the part of the stomach distal to the incisura angularis.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/2-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 2.2.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Pyloric antrum according to Carlson et al. &#xA;I.A., incisura angularis; T.A., terminal antrum&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/2-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 2.3.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Pyloric antrum according to &lt;em&gt;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&lt;/em&gt; (American Edition).&#xA;P.A., pyloric aperture; S.I., sulcus intermedius; P.V., pyloric vestibule;&#xA;I.A., incisura angularis&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Different definitions of the pyloric antrum were encountered in the American and British &#xA;editions of an anatomical textbook, both published in the same year.  In the 29th &#xA;American edition of &lt;em&gt;Gray&#39;s Anatomy of the Human Body&lt;/em&gt; (l973) the antrum was said to &#xA;be located on the caudal side of the sulcus intermedius, the latter being 2.5cm from the &#xA;aperture (Fig 2.3);  the pyloric vestibule was said to be on the oral side of the sulcus, &#xA;extending to the incisura angularis.  It was also stated categorically that the antrum was &#xA;much smaller than the pyloric mucosal zone.  In the 35th British edition of &lt;em&gt;Gray&#39;s &#xA;Anatomy&lt;/em&gt; (l973) the antrum was said to be on the oral side of the sulcus intermedius (Fig &#xA;2.4).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/2-4.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 2.4.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Pyloric antrum according to &lt;em&gt;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&lt;/em&gt; (British Edition).&#xA;P.A., pyloric aperture; S.I., sulcus intermedius&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Strickland and Mackay (l973) again equated &#34;antrum&#34; with the pyloric mucosal zone.  &#xA;According to Spiro (l977) the antrum was too loosely defined, but was usually considered &#xA;to be the portion of the stomach beyond the angulus.  It differed from the remainder of &#xA;the stomach in that its motor activity was greater, its mucosa was different (being the &#xA;source of gastrin production) and it had an absence of mucosal folds  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The &#xA;angulus, seen endoscopically, corresponds to the incisura angularis.  Radiology shows &#xA;that mucosal folds are by no means absent in the normal living, distal stomach.)&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Stave and Brandtzaeg (l978) considered the &#34;distal&#34; antrum to be the region extending &#xA;proximally from the pylorus for a distance of 3.0 cm.  Polak et al. (l977), Royston et al &#xA;(l978) and Dockray (l978) equated &#34;antrum&#34; with the pyloric mucosal zone.  According &#xA;to Ito (l98l) the antrum is proximal to the pyloric canal.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  Ito&#39;s pyloric canal &#xA;would have been considered to be the terminal antrum by Stave and Brandtzaeg.)  &#xA;Szurszewski (l98l) defined the antrum by drawing an imaginary line from the incisura &#xA;angularis to a point opposite it on the greater curvature;  the region between the line and &#xA;the gastroduodenal junction was looked upon as the antrum (Fig. 2.5).  The muscular &#xA;zone between the intermediate sphincter (sulcus intermedius) and the gastroduodenal &#xA;junction formed the terminal antrum.  Bolondi et al (l984) considered the antrum to be the &#xA;region extending from the angulus to the pyloric aperture.  The terminal antrum was &#xA;described as the immediate prepyloric region by King et al (l984).  Ganong (l985) again &#xA;equated &#34;antrum&#34; with the gastrin secreting mucosal zone.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/2-5.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 2.5.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Pyloric antrum according to Szurszewski. P.A., pyloric aperture; &#xA;S.I., sulcus intermedius; I.A., incisura angularis; T.A., terminal antrum&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to K.L. Moore (l985) the pyloric part of the stomach consists of a narrow &#xA;portion 1.0 to 2.0 cm long, which is continuous with the pylorus and called the pyloric &#xA;canal, and a wider pyloric antrum on the oral side of the canal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;J.G. Moore et al (l986) described a midgastric transverse band in humans, which, in their &#xA;view, represented an anatomic separation between the gastric reservoir (the fornix and &#xA;corpus) and the antrum;  the entire region between the transverse band and pylorus was &#xA;considered to be the antrum.  Collins et al. (1991) ascribed an important role to the &#xA;transverse band in differential emptying of solids and liquids;  it appeared to be &#xA;responsible for the initial retention of solids.  (It appears if the transverse band may &#xA;correspond to the musculus sphincter antri, i.e. a loop at the termination of the oblique &#xA;fibres of the muscularis  externa, described by Torgersen in l942.  It was also called the &#xA;lower segmental loop and formed the oral boundary of the sinus.)&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;One has to agree with Cunningham (1906), Forssell (1913) and Torgersen (1942) that the &#xA;term &#34;antrum&#34; has been used in many different senses, that it is ambiguous and &#xA;responsible for much of the obscurity associated with the pyloric part of the stomach.  For &#xA;instance, a number of authors equated &#34;antrum&#34; with the pyloric mucosal zone (Moe et al &#xA;1965;  Strickland and Mackay 1973;  Polak et al. 1977;  Ryston et al. 1978;  Dockray &#xA;1978;  Ganong 1985), yet it has been shown that this zone is not constant  and may &#xA;migrate up and down the stomach in cases of gastric and duodenal ulceration (Chap. 5).  &#xA;Tanner (1964) mentioned the &#34;extreme variability&#34; in the extent of pyloric mucosa.  In &#xA;anatomy again, it has been stated categorically that the antrum is much smaller than the &#xA;pyloric mucosal zone (Gray 1973).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Numerous other examples of conflicting views have been quoted above.  It seems that the &#xA;antrum may be errant or wandering in more ways than one, and that for this reason it is a &#xA;designation which is best avoided.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Bolondi L, Bortolotti M, Santi V, et al.  Measurement of gastric emptying time by &#xA;real-time ultrasonography.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l985, 90, 752-759.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Capper WM, Butler TJ, Buckler KG, et al.  Variation in size of the gastric antrum:  &#xA;measurement of alkaline area associated with ulceration and pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l966, 163, 281-290.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Carlson HC, Code CF, Nelson RA.  Motor action of the canine gastroduodenal &#xA;junction:  a cineradiographic, pressure and electrical study.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l966, ll, 155-&#xA;172.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Code CF, Carlson HC.  Motor activity of the stomach.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Handbook of &#xA;Physiology&lt;/em&gt; Sect 6:  Alimentary Canal, Vol 4:  Motility.  Amer Physiol Soc, Washington &#xA;DC l968, pp 1903-1916.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Cole LG and Collaborators.  Important anatomical data of the digestive tract.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l932, l8, 471-520.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Coller FA, Kay EB, McIntyre RS.  Regional lymphatic metastases of carcinoma &#xA;of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; l941, 43, 748-761.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Collins PJ, Houghton LA, Read NW, et al.  Role of the proximal and distal &#xA;stomach in mixed solid and liquid meal emptying.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; 1991, 32, 615-619.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Dockray GJ.  Gastrin overview.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/em&gt;, edit Bloom SR, Grossman &#xA;MI, Churchill Livingstone, London l978, pp 129-139.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Du Plessis DJ. The importance of the pyloric antrum in peptic ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;South &#xA;Afr J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l963, 1, 3-11.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Edwards D.  Some radiological aspects of pyloric disease.  &lt;em&gt;Proc Roy Soc Med&lt;/em&gt;&#xA;l96l, 54, 933-937.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Edwards DAW, Rowlands EN.  Physiology of the gastroduodenal junction.  In:  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Handbook of Physiology&lt;/em&gt; Sect 6:  Alimentary Canal Vol 4:  Motility.  Amer Physiol Soc, &#xA;Washington DC l968, l985-2000.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen Magens zu &#xA;seinem anatomischen Bau.  Fortschr Geb R&amp;#246;ntgenstr l9l3, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Foulk WT, Comfort MW, Butt HR, et al.  Peptic ulcer near the pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l957, 32, 395-403.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ganong WF.  &lt;em&gt;Review of Medical Physiology&lt;/em&gt;.  Lange Medical Publications, Los &#xA;Altos l985, 12th Edit, p 401.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Golden R.  Antral gastritis and spasm.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/em&gt; l937, 109, 1497-1500.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Gray H.  &lt;em&gt;Anatomy of the Human Body&lt;/em&gt;.  29th American Edition, ed Goss CM.  &#xA;Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia l973, p 1220.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Gray H.  &lt;em&gt;Gray&#39;s Anatomy&lt;/em&gt;.  35th British Edition, ed Warwick R, Williams PH.  &#xA;Longman Co, Edinburgh l973, p 1273.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Grossman MI.  The names of the parts of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l958, 34, &#xA;1159-1162.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ham AW.  &lt;em&gt;Histology&lt;/em&gt;.  JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia l969, 7th edit, p 655.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ito S.  Functional gastric morphology.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Physiology of the Gastrointestinal &#xA;Tract&lt;/em&gt;.  Ed Johnson LR, Raven Press, New York l98l, Vol 1, pp 517-550.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Jenkinson EL.  The pyloric antrum of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentgen Rad Ther&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l955, 73, 905-937.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;King PM, Adam RD, Pryde A, et al.  Relationships of human antroduodenal &#xA;motility and transpyloric fluid movement:  non-invasive observations with real-time &#xA;ultrasound.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l984, 25, 1384-1391.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Lewis FT.  The form of the stomach in human embryos with notes upon the &#xA;nomenclature of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Anat&lt;/em&gt; l9l2, 13, 477-503.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Moe RE, Klopper PJ, Nyhus LM.  Demonstration of the functional anatomy of the &#xA;canine gastric antrum.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l965, 110, 277-285.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Moore KL.  &lt;em&gt;Clinically Oriented Anatomy&lt;/em&gt;.  Williams and Wilkins Publ, Baltimore &#xA;2nd ed, 1985.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Moore JG, Dubois A, Christian PE, et al.  Evidence for a midgastric transverse &#xA;band in humans.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; 1986, 91, 540-545.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;M�ller E.  Anatomischen und r�ntgenologischen Untersuchungen &amp;#252;ber Form, Bau &#xA;und Lage des Magens.  &lt;em&gt;Erg Anat&lt;/em&gt; l921, 23, 310.  &lt;em&gt;Quoted by Torgersen&lt;/em&gt; (l942).&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Polak JM, Sullivan SN, Bloom SR, et al.  Enkephalin-like immunoreactivity in &#xA;the human gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l977, l, 972-974.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Royston CMS, Polak J, Bloom SR, et al.  G cell population of the gastric antrum, &#xA;plasma gastrin, and gastric acid secretion in patients with and without duodenal ulcer.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l978, l9, 689-698.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Spiro HM.  &lt;em&gt;Clinical Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt;.  Macmillan Publ, New York l977, 2nd ed, &#xA;p 148.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Stave R, Brandtzaeg P.  Immunohistochemical investigation of gastrin producing &#xA;cells (G cells).  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroent&lt;/em&gt; l978, 13, 199-203.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Strickland RG, Mackay IR.  A reappraisal of the nature and significance of &#xA;chronic atrophic gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l973, 18, 426-440.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Szurszewski JH.  Electrical basis for gastrointestinal motility.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Physiology of &#xA;the Gastrointestinal Tract&lt;/em&gt;.  Ed Johnson LR, Raven Press, New York l98l, Vol 2, pp 1435-&#xA;1466.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Tanner NC.  The surgical treatment of peptic ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l964, 51, 5-23.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, l-191.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Willis T.  &lt;em&gt;Opera omnia&lt;/em&gt;.  Amstelaedami l682.  &lt;em&gt;Quoted by Cunningham&lt;/em&gt; (1906).&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;2-what-is-a-sphincter&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  2 What is a Sphincter?&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#2-what-is-a-sphincter&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The definition of sphincter (&lt;em&gt;Greek sphinkter&lt;/em&gt; = that which binds tight, binder) remains&#xA;elusive.  Williams (l962) pointed out that early anatomists and surgeons saw and felt a&#xA;narrow powerful band of muscle enclosing the distal end of the stomach and concluded&#xA;that it was a sphincter controlling the width of the lumen;  later observers thought the&#xA;sphincter could be part of the circular musculature of the pyloric canal, constituting an&#xA;inherent part of the gastroduodenal pump.  He called the pyloric sphincter a muscularis&#xA;propria ring, consisting mainly of circular but also containing some longitudinal fibres,&#xA;which surrounds the pyloric aperture;  it narrows the distal end of the stomach to the&#xA;point at which the lumen can be occluded by a mucosal plug.  The sphincter also takes&#xA;part in pump-like contractions of the fan-shaped muscle to close the pyloric canal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>3 - The Walls of the Stomach and Duodenum</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_3/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_3/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-walls-of-the-stomach-and-duodenum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  The Walls of the Stomach and Duodenum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#the-walls-of-the-stomach-and-duodenum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At upper abdominal operations, with the organs in situ, a slight groove may be seen in the &#xA;glistening serosal surface at the gastroduodenal junction.  In the groove a small, &#xA;superficial subserosal vein, lying vertically across the front of the gut, may be evident;  &#xA;this is the prepyloric vein, draining into the right gastric vein (Chap. 7).  The groove and &#xA;the prepyloric vein indicate the position of the pyloric ring.  At palpation a sudden &#xA;transition is felt at the ring between the thick walls of the pyloric region and the thin &#xA;walls of the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The wall of the pyloric part of the stomach and of the proximal 2.0 to 3.0 cm of the&#xA;duodenum is composed of four coats.  From without inwards these are the serous,&#xA;muscular, submucous and mucous coats.  The mucous coat is separated from the luminal&#xA;contents by a layer of gastric mucus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>4 - The Submucous Coat</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_4/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_4/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-submucous-coat&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  The Submucous Coat&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#the-submucous-coat&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The submucous coat is a layer of strong but loose areolar tissue with some elastic fibres, &#xA;lying between the muscularis mucosae and the muscularis externa;  it is rich in mast cells, &#xA;macrophages, lymphocytes, eosinophilic leucocytes and plasma cells.  It forms a bed in &#xA;which the vessels and nerves break up before entering the mucous membrane;  &#xA;consequently it contains arteries, veins, lymphatics and Meissner&#39;s nerve plexuses.  The &#xA;plexuses form part of the autonomic nervous system and contain postganglionic &#xA;sympathetic fibres as well as pre- and postglanglionic parasympathetic fibres.  The nerve &#xA;cells are all parasympathetic.&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;s&#34;&gt;Stomach&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the stomach the submucous layer does not contain any glands.  It is wider than that of &#xA;the duodenum and extends into the rugae of the stomach, forming the core of each &#xA;&#34;mucosal&#34; fold.  A gastric mucosal fold, in other words, consists of a central core of &#xA;submucous tissue (constituting the major part of the fold), with a layer of mucosa on each &#xA;surface.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During injection of the submucous lymphatic plexus of the pyloric region, Jamieson and &#xA;Dobson (1907) found that fluid ran most readily in an orad direction;  however, it also &#xA;filled a plexus on the orad side of the pyloric ring, and spread into the duodenal plexus.  &#xA;This was ascribed to well-marked continuity of the gastric and duodenal submucous &#xA;lymphatic plexuses.  The findings differ from those of Horton (l928, l931) who &#xA;investigated the spread of India ink injected into the submucous layer of the pyloric part &#xA;of the stomach.  While it spread out in all directions from the needle point, it was halted &#xA;at the pyloric ring, none passing into the submucosa of the duodenum.  To Horton (l928, &#xA;l931) this indicated a complete block between the submucous coat of the stomach and &#xA;that of the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Williams (l962) examined aspects of the mucosa and submucosa of the pyloro-duodenal &#xA;junction in 48 fresh post-operative partial gastrectomy specimens.  The gastric &#xA;submucosa contained loosely knit connective tissue and was found to be considerably &#xA;wider than that of the duodenum.  The muscularis mucosae on the gastric side was clearly &#xA;visible as a thin, continuous band closely applied to the mucosa, thickening as it &#xA;approached the pylorus.  At the pyloric ring it split up, sending fibres into the mucosa, &#xA;and finally petering out in a washer-like band of fibrous tissue applied to the muscular &#xA;ring;  in this way the mucosa was firmly bound to the muscle.  Injection of India ink into &#xA;the submucosal layer of the stomach showed that its flow was halted abruptly at the &#xA;pylorus, none passing into the submucosa of the duodenum;  the band of fibrous tissue &#xA;was the point at which the flow stopped.  This point was situated either at the apex of the &#xA;pyloric muscular ring, or on the duodenal or gastric aspect of the ring.  According to &#xA;Williams (l962) these findings as well as those of Horton (l928, l931) confirmed the fact &#xA;that the gastric mucosa was firmly bound to the muscle at the &#34;sphincter&#34;, and that there &#xA;was no direct communication between the submucosal compartments of the stomach and &#xA;the duodenum.  (&lt;EM&gt;Comment&lt;/EM&gt;:  the sphincter was equated with the pyloric ring).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;duodenum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Duodenum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#duodenum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The submucous coat of the duodenum is appreciably narrower than that of the stomach;  &#xA;it also differs from the gastric submucosa in that it contains glands, viz. the duodenal &#xA;glands of Brunner.  (&lt;EM&gt;Comment&lt;/EM&gt;:  As a possible link between Brunner&#39;s glands and &#xA;transpyloric extension of gastric carcinoma cannot be excluded, as described in Chapter &#xA;33, they will be discussed in some detail).  Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), substance &#xA;P and met-enkephalin immunoreactive neuronal elements are present in the duodenal &#xA;submucosa (vide infra).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Brunner&#39;s glands are small acino-tubular glands in the submucosa of the duodenum.  &#xA;Their deep, secretory portions consist of branched and coiled tubules which extend to the &#xA;circular muscularis externa.  Their ducts pierce the muscularis mucosae to open on the &#xA;luminal surface of the mucosa, in the depths of the crypts between the intestinal glands.  &#xA;Brunner&#39;s glands are composed of tall cuboidal cells with dark basal nuclei and a clear &#xA;cytoplasm, their glandular portions extending into the ducts.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the majority of subjects they commence at the pyloro-duodenal junction and are most &#xA;numerous in the first part of the duodenum, gradually decreasing in number toward the &#xA;third and fourth parts.  Occasionally they extend into the upper part of the jejunum;  in &#xA;exceptional cases some Brunner&#39;s glands may be present in the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.  Horton (l928) examined 84 anatomical specimens and found that they &#xA;commenced abruptly at the distal portion of the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; in all subjects except &#xA;one;  in this single instance they extended for a distance of 8.0 mm across the &#34;sphincter&#34; &#xA;into the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Landboe-Christensen (l944) examined the proximal delimitation of the Brunner gland &#xA;area in 53 anatomical specimens of various age groups.  It was found that the border &#xA;might lie:  (1) on the duodenal steep, i.e. the almost perpendicular duodenal side of the &#xA;pyloric ring,  (2) at the top of the ring itself and (3) on the sloping gastric side of the ring.  &#xA;The border between Brunner&#39;s glands and pyloric mucosa might run in a regular circle, &#xA;might be wavy or dentate, or might present one or more tongues or linear extensions.  &#xA;The border might be sharp but in some cases there was a narrow transitional zone, usually &#xA;on the duodenal side of the ring.  Occasionally scattered or solitary islets of Brunner&#39;s &#xA;glands were seen in the pyloric mucosa.  In the age group of 25 years and under, the &#xA;border was on the duodenal side of the ring in half the cases;  as age advanced, the border &#xA;tended to spread on to the pyloric ring and in subjects over 50 years of age the pyloric &#xA;ring was crossed by Brunner islets in up to four-fifths of the cases.  The border also &#xA;tended to become less sharp with advancing age.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Brunner&#39;s glands produce a mucous secretion which forms a protective lining on the &#xA;duodenal mucosa, preventing epithelial damage by chemical or mechanical trauma &#xA;(Florey and Harding l934;  Griffith and Harkins l956).  The mucin secreted has a high &#xA;bicarbonate content, rendering it alkaline and affording further protection against acid &#xA;gastric chyme (Griffith and Harkins l956).  However, it is possible that the alkaline &#xA;secretion in the duodenum originates from the surface epithelium and not from Brunner&#39;s &#xA;glands (Flemstr�m and Garner l984).  In man Brunner&#39;s glands have been shown to &#xA;contain and secrete epidermal growth factor (EGF) (Elder et al. l978;  Heitz et al. l978), a &#xA;peptide comprising 53 amino acids (Gregory l975).  EGF is also produced in the &#xA;submandibular salivary glands (Hollenberg l979).  Mouse EGF is chemically similar to &#xA;human urogastrone, a polypeptide prepared from urine (Elder et al. l978).  Mouse EGF &#xA;and human urogastrone are closely related structures and seem to be identical in biologic &#xA;activity;  physical data on human EGF suggest that the material is urogastrone (Elder et &#xA;al. l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Both polypeptides have a number of biologic effects in common, including inhibition of &#xA;gastric acid secretion and a cytoprotective effect on the gastroduodenal mucosa.  &#xA;Intraduodenal as well as intragastric instillation of EGF prevents the development of &#xA;experimental duodenal and gastric ulcers in the rat (Kirkegaard et al l983).  Both &#xA;substances are powerful mitogens, causing epithelial proliferation and keratinization of &#xA;squamous epithelial cells in tissue cultures (Elder et al. l978).  Experimental intragastric &#xA;installation of EGF increases the synthesis and contents of DNA and RNA in the &#xA;gastroduodenal mucosa (Dembinski et al. l982).  It was suggested that EGF and &#xA;urogastrone might have a role in the control of gastric secretion as well as in mucosal &#xA;growth and the known rapid turnover of cells lining the gut (Elder et al. l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;By means of immunohistochemical studies in the rat Kirkegaard et al (l98l) demonstrated &#xA;a dense network of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) immunoreactive nerve fibres &#xA;around the acini of Brunner&#39;s glands as well as small ganglia with VIP immunoreactive &#xA;nerve-cell bodies close to the glands.  Intravenous infusions of VIP increased &#xA;bicarbonate, protein and mucin output from the Brunner&#39;s glands, and it was suggested &#xA;that physiological secretion from these glands might be stimulated by the VIP nerves.  &#xA;Ferri et al. (l984) studied the innervation of Brunner&#39;s glands in humans in specimens &#xA;obtained during gastrectomy for gastric or extragastric carcinoma.  In the duodenal &#xA;submucosa numerous VIP and substance P nerve fibres were noted in the ganglia of &#xA;Meissner&#39;s plexus and in the internodal strands.  VIP immunostaining also revealed a rich &#xA;supply of fibres at the periphery of Brunner&#39;s glands, but only a few of these were seen to &#xA;enter the glands and reach the acinar cells.  Nerve bundles immunostained for met-&#xA;enkephalin ran in the internodal strands of the duodenal submucosa and formed dense &#xA;networks in occasional ganglia.  The study showed that in cases of gastric carcinoma in &#xA;man, the Brunner&#39;s glands did not have the rich supply of VIP containing nerves as was &#xA;the case in rats.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Immunohistochemical studies in the rat showed that as in man, EGF was almost &#xA;exclusively present in the secretory cells of Brunner&#39;s glands (Kirkegaard et al. l984).  It &#xA;was shown that VIP stimulated secretion of EGF and bicarbonate from Brunner&#39;s glands, &#xA;an effect which was inhibited by somatostatin.  According to Kirkegaard et al. (l984) the &#xA;mechanism controlling Brunner&#39;s gland secretion was complex and not fully elucidated.  &#xA;The autonomic nervous system, local factors and a hormonal mechanism were probably &#xA;all involved.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Skov Olsen et al. (l985) evidence has accumulated to show that cholinergic, &#xA;adrenergic and VIP-containing nerves innervate and thereby influence the secretion from &#xA;Brunner&#39;s glands.  They confirmed the presence of VIP containing nerves in these glands &#xA;in the rat.  The influence of the sympathetic nervous system and adrenergic agonists on &#xA;basal and VIP stimulated flow rate and secretion of EGF from Brunner&#39;s glands was &#xA;studied.  It was confirmed that the sympathetic nervous system had an inhibitory effect &#xA;on Brunner&#39;s gland secretion.  Chemical sympathectomy increased the flow rate and &#xA;output of EGF (but depleted the glands of EGF) whereas the alpha-adrenergic agonist &#xA;noradrenaline inhibited the secretion.  VIP was found to increase Brunner&#39;s gland &#xA;secretion and total output of EGF;  VIP probably also increased the synthesis of EGF.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fuse et al. (l990) determined the thickness of Brunner&#39;s glands in surgically resected &#xA;duodenal ulcer specimens and normal controls.  The maximum mean thickness in &#xA;controls was l.54 � 0.38 mm;  in duodenal ulceration it varied widely from 0.5 to 5.0 mm.  &#xA;In most duodenal ulcer cases the glands were thickest within 1.0 cm of the centre of the &#xA;ulcer;  in a small minority of cases of duodenal ulceration the layer of Brunner&#39;s glands &#xA;remained diffusely thin.  It was concluded that Brunner&#39;s glands became hyperplastic in &#xA;duodenal ulceration, especially near the ulcer;  this was probably a defense mechanism &#xA;against acid and peptic digestion.  In cases of healed duodenal ulceration Brunner&#39;s &#xA;glands were thin at the centre of the scar;  this histological finding corresponded to the &#xA;depressed, scarred area observed endoscopically, and suggested decreased mucosal &#xA;resistance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The fact that the submucosa of the first part of the duodenum is much narrower than that &#xA;of the stomach, and that it contains multiple Brunner&#39;s glands which pierce the muscularis &#xA;mucosae (thus virtually attaching the mucosa to the muscular layer), means that its &#xA;inherent ability to move is much less than that of the submucosa of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder. &#xA;This may be of some importance in transpyloric prolapse of gastric mucosa &#xA;(Chap. 38).  It probably also accounts for the fact that normally duodenal mucosal folds &#xA;are smaller, and less mobile, than mucosal folds of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Brunner&#39;s glands have been shown to become hyperplastic in duodenal ulceration;  this &#xA;was considered to be a defense mechanism against digestion by acid gastric juice.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a few cases of pyloric adenocarcinoma, where extension into the duodenum had &#xA;occurred, we have noted that Brunner&#39;s glands were not infiltrated (Chap. 33).  The &#xA;question arises whether this signifies that Brunner&#39;s glands, by virtue of their secretions &#xA;or some other mechanism, act as a biological or anatomical barrier preventing further &#xA;spread of gastric carcinoma down the duodenum;  this aspect will be discussed in more &#xA;detail in Chapter 33.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dembinski A, Gregory H, Konturek SJ, et al.  Trophic action of epidermal growth &#xA;factor on the pancreas and gastroduodenal mucosa in rats.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l982, 325, 35-42.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Elder JB, Williams G, Lacey E, et al.  Cellular localization of human urogastrone &#xA;- epidermal growth factor.  &lt;EM&gt;Nature&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 271, 466-467.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ferri GL, Botti P, Biliotti G, et al.  VIP, substance P and metenkaphalin &#xA;immunoreactive innervation of the human gastrodudodenal mucosa and Brunner&#39;s glands.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l984, 25, 948-952.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Flemstr&amp;#246;m G, Garner A.  Some characteristics of duodenal epithelium.  In:  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Mucus and Mucosa&lt;/EM&gt;.  Pitman, London l984.  Ciba Foundation Symposium 109, 94-108.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Florey HW, Harding HE.  Further observations on the secretion of Brunner&#39;s &#xA;glands.  &lt;EM&gt;J Path Bact&lt;/EM&gt; l934, 39, 255-276.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fuse Y, Tsuchihashi Y, Takamasu M, et al.  Thickness of Brunner&#39;s glands and its &#xA;clinical significance in duodenal ulcer disease.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt; l990, 25, 165-172.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gregory H.  Isolation and structure of urogastrone and its relationship to &#xA;epidermal growth factor.  &lt;EM&gt;Nature&lt;/EM&gt; l975, 257, 325-327.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Griffith CA, Harkins HN.  The role of Brunner&#39;s glands in the intrinsic resistance &#xA;of the duodenum to acid-pepsin digestion.  &lt;EM&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/EM&gt; l956, 243, 160-172.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Heitz PU, Kasper M, Van Noorden S, et al.  Immunohistochemical localization of &#xA;urogastrone to human duodenal and submandibular glands.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; 1978, 19, 408-413.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hollenberg MD.  Epidermal growth factor - urogastrone, a polypeptide acquiring &#xA;hormonal status.  &lt;EM&gt;Vitam Horm&lt;/EM&gt; l979, 37, 69-110.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horton BT.  Pyloric musculature, with special reference to pyloric block.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J &#xA;Anat&lt;/EM&gt; l928, 41, 197-225.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horton BT.  Pyloric block with special reference to the musculature, myenteric &#xA;plexus and lymphatic vessels.  &lt;EM&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/EM&gt; l931, 22, 438-462.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Jamieson JK, Dobson JF.  The lymphatic system of the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;Lancet&lt;/EM&gt; l907, 1, &#xA;1061-1066.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kirkegaard P, Lundberg JM, Poulsen SS, et al.  Vasoactive intestinal peptidergic &#xA;nerves and Brunner&#39;s gland secretion in the rat.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l98l, 8l, 872-878.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kirkegaard P, Skov Olsen P, Poulsen SS, et al.  Epidermal growth factor inhibits &#xA;cystamine induced duodenal ulcers.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l983, 85, 1277-1283.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kirkegaard P, Skov Olsen P, Poulsen SS, et al.  Exocrine secretion of epidermal &#xA;growth factor from Brunner&#39;s glands:  stimulation by VIP and acetylcholine.  &lt;EM&gt;Regulatory &#xA;Peptides&lt;/EM&gt; l983, 7, 367-372.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kirkegaard P, Olsen PS, Nexo E, et al.  Effect of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide &#xA;and somatostatin on secretion of epidermal growth factor and bicarbonate from Brunner&#39;s &#xA;glands.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l984, 25, 1225-1229.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Landboe-Christensen E.  The duodenal glands of Brunner in man:  their &#xA;distribution and quantity.  &lt;EM&gt;Acta Path Microbiol Scand&lt;/EM&gt; l944, Suppl 52, ll-267.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skov Olsen P, Poulsen SS, Kirkegaard P.  Adrenergic effects on secretion of &#xA;epidermal growth factor from Brunner&#39;s glands.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l985, 26, 920-927.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Williams I.  Closure of the pylorus.  &lt;EM&gt;Brit J Rad&lt;/EM&gt; l962, 35, 653-670.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 - The Mucous Membrane or Mucosa</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_5/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_5/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-mucous-membrane-or-mucosa&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  The Mucous Membrane or Mucosa&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#the-mucous-membrane-or-mucosa&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The mucous membrane of the stomach and first part of the duodenum consists of 3 &#xA;layers;  an outermost muscularis mucosae, a middle lamina propria and an innermost &#xA;glandular epithelial lining, bordering the lumen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;stomach&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Stomach&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#stomach&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;muscularis-mucosae&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Muscularis Mucosae&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#muscularis-mucosae&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The muscularis mucosae, a thin layer of smooth muscle, forms the border between the &#xA;mucosa and submucosa.  It consists of outer longitudinal and inner circular fibres;  from &#xA;the inner layer strands of smooth muscle cells extend through the lamina propria toward &#xA;the luminal surface between the gastric glands.  It is surmized that contraction of these &#xA;strands may compress the glands, thereby facilitating their emptying (Bloom and Fawcett &#xA;l975).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;lamina-propria&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Lamina Propria&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#lamina-propria&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The lamina propria occupies the narrow region between the muscularis mucosae and the &#xA;surface epithelial cells with their glands.  It extends into the area between the necks of the &#xA;glands and forms a basement membrane on which the epithelial cells rest.  There is little &#xA;lamina propria in the fornix and body, where the gastric glands are numerous and closely &#xA;packed;  it is more prominent in the cardiac and pyloric zones (Ito l967).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The lamina propria consists of a delicate network of collagenous and reticular fibres and &#xA;a few fibroblasts or reticular cells.  The meshes of the network contain plasma cells, mast &#xA;cells, eosinophilic leucocytes and lymphocytes.  Local accumulations of lymphocytes &#xA;may occur in the cardiac and pyloric regions.  Strands of smooth muscle traverse this &#xA;layer, which also contains fine capillaries, lymphatic vessels and nerve fibres.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;epithelial-lining&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Epithelial Lining&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#epithelial-lining&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The entire luminal surface of the mucosa is covered by a layer of simple columnar cells, &#xA;called the surface mucus cells.  Numerous tubular invaginations of the surface, the gastric &#xA;pits or foveolae, are lined by the same type of cell (Ito l967).  In the pyloric region the &#xA;pits are deeper than in the remainder of the stomach, extending at least halfway to the &#xA;muscularis mucosae.  They are V-shaped, tapering off into the glands that open into them &#xA;(Bevelander and Ramaley l979).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The mucus-secreting columnar cells lining the luminal surface and the pits are joined &#xA;near their free surfaces to each other by tight junctions (Ham l974).  It is surmized that &#xA;this arrangement forms one of the mechanisms by which the underlying layers are &#xA;protected against luminal acid.  The supranuclear portions of the cells just below their &#xA;free surfaces contain dense, homogeneous, spherical or ovoid granules consisting of a &#xA;type of mucigen (Bloom and Fawcett l975).  Upon release into the lumen, the granules &#xA;give rise to the layer of mucus that covers the luminal surface of the mucosa.  In the cells &#xA;of the gastric pits, the granules become progressively less abundant at deeper levels, and &#xA;in the bottom of the pits they from only a thin layer immediately beneath the cell surface.  &#xA;Cells of this kind continue into the necks of the gastric glands.  Under physiological &#xA;conditions, the surface mucus cells are continuously desquamated into the lumen and are &#xA;completely replaced every 3 days (Ham l974;  Bloom and Fawcett l975).  Newly formed &#xA;cells appear in the deeper parts of the foveolae and in the necks of the glands;  these are &#xA;slowly displaced upward and continually replace those lost on the surface.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;three-mucosal-zones&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Three Mucosal Zones&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#three-mucosal-zones&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The entire thickness of the mucous membrane in all parts of the stomach is occupied by a &#xA;multitude of glands which open into the bottom of the gastric pits.  The blind ends of the &#xA;glands extending into the mucosa are slightly expanded and coiled, sometimes dividing &#xA;into 2 or 3 branches.  On the basis of the cell population in the glands, the gastric mucosal &#xA;coat is differentiated into 3 zones:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;cardiac-zone&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Cardiac Zone&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#cardiac-zone&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;This zone consists of a narrow, ring-shaped area around the gastro-oesophageal junction, &#xA;containing the cardiac glands.  These glands have wide lumina and shallow pits and are &#xA;composed overwhelmingly of mucus-secreting cells.  They may contain a few &#xA;neuroendocrine cells, also called APUD cells on account of their capacity to synthesize &#xA;monoamines through a process of Amine Precursor Uptake and Decarboxylation (vide &#xA;infra).  In the transitional area, where this zone is continuous with the second or oxyntic &#xA;zone, a few parietal cells may be present. The glands of the cardiac zone secrete mucus &#xA;and very little, if any, enzymes.&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;oxyntic-zone&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Oxyntic Zone&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#oxyntic-zone&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;This zone comprises the greater part of the fornix and corpus, i.e. the proximal two-thirds &#xA;or more of the stomach.  The glands are variously known as fundic glands, proper gastric &#xA;glands or principal gastric glands.  As one of their most important properties is the &#xA;secretion of gastric acid, Grossman (l958) suggested the term &#34;oxyntic&#34; (&lt;EM&gt;Greek: acid-&#xA;forming&lt;/EM&gt;) as an appropriate indicator of this glandular zone.  The mucosa here is much &#xA;deeper than in the cardiac zone and contains a greater number of glands.  The pits are &#xA;shallow and the glands extending from the bottoms of the pits are 2 to 3 times as long as &#xA;the pits are deep.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Each principal gastric gland is composed of 4 kinds of cells (Bevelander and Ramaley &#xA;l979):&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Chief, zymogenic or peptic cells.  These are situated mostly in the deeper parts of &#xA;the glands.  They exhibit secretory granules containing the precursors of pepsin.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Parietal or oxyntic cells.  These are most numerous in the necks of the glands.  &#xA;They do not border directly on the lumen, but are crowded away from it by peptic cells.  &#xA;Each cell is roughly triangular in shape, with the apex projecting towards the lumen &#xA;between the sides of two peptic cells that border it.  These cells are intensely acidophilic, &#xA;contain the gastric proton pump mechanism, and produce the antecedent of hydrochloric &#xA;acid;  they are also believed to elaborate intrinsic factor.  The secretion of oxyntic cells &#xA;must pass between adjacent peptic cells that almost cover them, to reach the lumen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Neck mucous cells.  These cells resemble the mucous cells of the cardiac and &#xA;pyloric zones.  They are relatively few in number and are lodged between the parietal &#xA;cells in the necks of the glands;  they are smaller than the surface mucous cells and their &#xA;mucigen granules are larger and less dense than those of the surface cells (Bevelander &#xA;and Ramaley l979).  The secreted mucus is somewhat different from that secreted by the &#xA;surface mucous cells (Leeson l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Neuroendocrine or APUD cells.  These small, granulated cells occur singly in the &#xA;epithelium of the gastric mucosa (Bloom and Fawcett l975).  They are scattered between &#xA;the peptic cells and are few in number.  It is accepted that some of these cells are the site &#xA;of synthesis and storage of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine).  Cells of the APUD line are &#xA;much more numerous in the pyloric mucosal zone and will be described separately &#xA;(Chap. 9).&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#x9;The glands of the oxyntic zone produce nearly all the enzymes and hydrochloric &#xA;acid secreted in the stomach;  they also produce some of the mucus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;pyloric-zone&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pyloric Zone&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pyloric-zone&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;This zone comprises roughly the distal third of the stomach.  Normally it extends further &#xA;along the lesser curvature than the greater, but its boundaries may vary (vide infra).  The &#xA;pits are deeper in this zone than elsewhere in the stomach, extending into the mucous &#xA;membrane for half its thickness.  The glands are also of a simple, branched tubular type, &#xA;but they branch more extensively and the tubules are coiled.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The glands contain the following types of cells:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Mucous cells resembling the neck mucous cells of the oxyntic glands.  These &#xA;large, mucus-secreting cells constitute the overwhelming number of cells in the pyloric &#xA;glands.  They have a pale cytoplasm containing indistinct granules, the nucleus is often &#xA;flattened against the base of a cell, and short microvilli covered by a layer of mucus, are &#xA;present on the luminal surface.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Parietal cells.  A few isolated parietal cells may be present among the mucous &#xA;cells (Ito l967).  Parietal cells also occur in the transitional region between the pyloric and &#xA;oxyntic zones (Bevelander and Ramaley l979).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Neuroendocrine or APUD cells.  These cells are much more numerous in the &#xA;pyloric than in the cardiac and oxyntic zones;  when compared with the mucous cells they &#xA;are still relatively few in number.  With light microscopy they have been called &#xA;enterochromaffin cells.  With electron microscopy their cytoplasmic granules are clearly &#xA;visible after staining with chromium or silver salts.  On the basis of their staining &#xA;reactions, the cells have been divided into two types, viz. argentaffin cells, in which the &#xA;granules reduce silver without pretreatment, and argyrophilic cells, in which a reducing &#xA;substance is required before the granules will react with silver (Bloom and Fawcett l975) &#xA;(Chap. 9).&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The glands of the pyloric mucosal zone do not produce enzymes, but secrete mucus;  this &#xA;zone is also an important producer of endocrine, paracrine or neurocrine regulatory &#xA;peptides by virtue of the APUD cells contained in its glands (Chap 9).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;anatomical-extent-and-boundaries-of-the-pyloric-mucosal-zone&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Anatomical Extent and Boundaries of the Pyloric Mucosal Zone&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#anatomical-extent-and-boundaries-of-the-pyloric-mucosal-zone&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The various mucosal zones of the stomach are not sharply delimited, and along the &#xA;borderlines the glands of one region mingle with those of the adjoining region;  &#xA;intermediate glands may be present between the pyloric and body (i.e. oxyntic) mucosal &#xA;zones (Bloom and Fawcett l975).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The extent of the pyloric mucosal zone, and its boundaries on the oral and&#xA;aboral sides, may be determined by microscopic, macroscopic, surgical and other&#xA;methods. The microscopic identification of the pyloric mucosa in morbid &#xA;anatomical specimens is probably the most accurate method of determining the&#xA;boundaries of this zone. For instance, it has been stated in histology that &#xA;the pyloric mucosal zone usually comprises the distal 4-5cm of the stomach, and&#xA;that it extends farther along the lesser curvature than the greater (Bloom and&#xA;Fawcett 1975).&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;boas&#34;&gt;Border on Aboral Side&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using macroscopic techniques in 53 fresh, non-diseased post-mortem specimens, &#xA;Landboe-Christensen (l944) found that the border between pyloric and duodenal mucosa &#xA;might lie either on the perpendicular, duodenal side of the pyloric ring, at the top of the &#xA;ring, or on the sloping gastric side of the ring.  With ageing there was a tendency for the &#xA;border to shift from the duodenal to the gastric side of the ring.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using microscopic methods in 110 cases of partial gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer, Oi &#xA;and Sakurai (l959) came to essentially similar conclusions.  In all specimens the border &#xA;was within 5.0 mm of the summit of the pyloric &#34;sphincter muscle&#34; (presumably the &#xA;pyloric ring), either on the duodenal or on the gastric side.  The pyloric mucosa was in &#xA;direct contact with the duodenal mucosa, i.e. the border could be identified as a line, in &#xA;contrast to the border between pyloric and oxyntic mucosa, which consisted of a &#xA;transitional zone of varying width.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;boos&#34;&gt;Border on Oral Side&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Landboe-Christensen (l944) studied the extent of the pyloric mucosal zone on the oral &#xA;side by macroscopic tehcniques in 47 non-diseased, fresh post-mortem specimens.  In all &#xA;instances this zone was longer on the lesser than on the greater curvature, covering on &#xA;average 7.2 cm of the lesser, and 5.2 cm of the greater curvature.  The average percentage &#xA;of the lesser curvature covered was 44 percent, and the average percentage of the greater &#xA;curvature covered was 12 percent.  The border between pyloric and oxyntic mucosa was &#xA;irregular, often dentate or tortuous, and as a rule a number of islets of oxyntic mucosa &#xA;were encountered in the pyloric zone.  There was a transitional area of varying width &#xA;between the two zones.  In practice, a line drawn from the junction of the upper three-&#xA;fifths and lower two-fifths of the lesser curvature, running downwards and to the right, &#xA;indicates the approximate boundary of pyloric mucosa (Fig. 5.1).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dean and Mason (l964) studied 117 fresh gastric resection specimens microscopically &#xA;(resected for either duodenal or gastric ulcer).  In l8 cases of duodenal ulcer the average &#xA;length of pyloric mucosa along the lesser curvature was 9.0cm, and along the greater &#xA;curvature 7.4 cm.  On an average the pyloric mucosa extended for l.5cm further up the &#xA;lesser than the greater curvature.  In the majority of all duodenal ulcer specimens the &#xA;transitional zone between pyloric and oxyntic mucosa varied from 0.5 to 5.0 cm in width, &#xA;the average width being 1.0cm.  The upper limit of the pyloric mucosa showed wide &#xA;individual variations.  Patients with gastric ulcers tended to have a greater extent of &#xA;pyloric mucosa than those with duodenal ulcers, and women with gastric ulcers had more &#xA;pyloric mucosa than men with gastric ulcers.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/5-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 5.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Relationship between pyloric sphincteric cylinder and pyloric mucosal zone in&#xA;normal stomach.  Arrows, contracted sphincteric cylinder; broken line, &#xA;approximate border between pyloric and oxyntic mucosal zones.&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;            &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schrager et al. (l967) studied the &#34;antrum&#34; microscopically in 45 normal stomachs &#xA;obtained at necropsy, in 75 resection specimens of duodenal ulcer and in 40 specimens of &#xA;gastric ulcer.  Normal stomachs showing clear histology were not easily obtained due to &#xA;the speed with which autolysis occurs after death;  in only 13 could measurements be &#xA;made.  Normally the average length of pyloric mucosa between the &#34;sphincter&#34; (i.e. the &#xA;pyloric ring) and the boundary zone on the lesser curvature was 8.9 cm, with an average &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34; to cardia distance of 22.5 cm.  Thus the pyloric zone encompassed 40 percent &#xA;of the lesser curvature.  On the greater curvature the average figures were 4.8 cm, 39 cm &#xA;and 12 percent respectively.  Comparative studies showed that in the majority of &#xA;duodenal ulcer patients the pyloric zone was larger than in normal controls, and in the &#xA;majority of gastric ulcer cases it was almost twice the normal size.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In surgical pH monitoring tests, Capper et al. (l962, l966) found a wide variation in size &#xA;between the small pyloric zone of duodenal ulcer and the larger zone of gastric ulcer &#xA;cases.  With duodenal ulceration the zone was usually of normal size or smaller, &#xA;extending to a line 3.0 to 4.0 cm from the pylorus.  (In their only normal subject, the &#xA;pyloric zone was 4.0 to 5.0 cm in length.)  In gastric ulcer cases the pyloric zone was &#xA;very much larger, at times encompassing the whole of the lesser curvature.  Capper et al. &#xA;concluded that the junction between the distal alkaline, pyloric zone and the proximal &#xA;oxyntic zone was not static, but that it might migrate up and down the stomach.  The &#xA;alkaline zone could have been a normal &#34;antrum&#34;, but it could also have represented &#xA;oxyntic mucosa which had been altered by gastritis.&#xA;Royston et al. (l978) found in patients with duodenal ulcer, that the mean area of the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, as defined histologically, was double the mean antral area defined as the &#xA;alkaline zone in the pH studies of Capper et al. (l962, l966).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The test of Moe et al (l965, l966) was based on the differential excretion of dyestuffs &#xA;from the gastric corpus and the &#34;antrum&#34; in dogs.  The mean area of the &#34;antrum&#34; was &#xA;found to occupy 20 percent of the total gastric area, with a range of 10 to 30 percent.  A &#xA;modification of the test was used by Hedenstedt et al (l967) in humans, the results being &#xA;controlled histologically.  On the whole, the pyloric zone was found to be larger than that &#xA;determined by Moe&#39;s test.  In all cases the extent of pyloric mucosa was greater on the &#xA;lesser than on the greater curvature.  Amdrup et al (l972) used the congo red test for a &#xA;precise determination of the &#34;antrum&#34; prior to antrectomy for gastric ulcers.  In their &#xA;experience the &#34;antrum&#34; in gastric ulcer cases was often larger than in duodenal ulcer &#xA;cases, sometimes extending high up on the lesser curvature and occasionally as far as the &#xA;cardia.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;duodenum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Duodenum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#duodenum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The duodenal mucous membrane also consists of 3 layers, but these differ from those of&#xA;the stomach in several respects.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 - Electrical Potential Difference at the Gastroduodenal Mucosal Junction</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_6/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_6/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;electrical-potential-difference-at-the-gastroduodenal-mucosal-junction&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Electrical Potential Difference at the Gastroduodenal Mucosal Junction&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#electrical-potential-difference-at-the-gastroduodenal-mucosal-junction&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It has long been known that the mucosal surface of the upper gastrointestinal tract is &#xA;electrically negative with respect to serosa, skin and blood.  The size of the electrical &#xA;potential difference (PD), measured in millivolts (mv), is greatest in the oxyntic mucosal &#xA;zone in the corpus of the stomach.  Andersson and Grossman (1965) found that the &#xA;mucosal surface of the corpus was at a potential of -44mV with respect to blood, while the &#xA;figures for the &#34;antrum&#34; and duodenal bulb were -35mV and -7mV respectively.  When an &#xA;intraluminal electrode was manipulated from the duodenum into the stomach, there was a &#xA;change to a more negative potential in the stomach.  The greatest change in PD occurred &#xA;as the electrode passed from the duodenum into the stomach.  It occurred abruptly, was &#xA;uniform, sharp, well-defined and coincided with what they called the anatomical &#xA;sphincter (the pyloric ring) and the mucosal border.  It was shown by these authors as &#xA;well as by Durbin (1967) that the change in PD was a reliable means of identifying the &#xA;gastroduodenal junction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During endoscopic studies of the pylorus, Blackwood (1969) correlated visual &#xA;identification of the pyloric ring with PD measurements.  In all 7 normal subjects a &#xA;significant PD change occurred within 1.0 cm of the true pyloric ring.  In 2 studies in &#xA;which a PD change occurred 3.0 to 4.0 cm beyond a visualized ring, the latter was shown &#xA;to be a false ring, mimicking the pylorus and caused by antral deformity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Geall et al (1970) confirmed that PD measurements between the mucosal surface and &#xA;venous blood gave identical values to the PD between mucosa and serosa, but that &#xA;mucosa-skin PD measurements varied and were less reliable.  They thought that the &#xA;technique might have various applications, e.g. in the investigation of transport &#xA;mechanisms.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During experimental studies PD measurements were used as an accurate method of &#xA;identifying the gastroduodenal mucosal junction in canines by Isenberg and Csendes &#xA;(1972).  Fisher and Cohen (1973) confirmed that the junction of the stomach and &#xA;duodenum as seen radiologically in normal human subjects (Chap. 11, 13), was marked &#xA;by a PD change of -33mV.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kaye et al (1976) and White et al (1981) used PD measurements to determine the &#xA;gastroduodenal mucosal junction in humans.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A significant change in electrical potential difference (PD) occurs at the gastroduodenal &#xA;mucosal junction, located on, or close to, the top of the pyloric ring (the right pyloric &#xA;loop) (Chaps. 3, 5).  PD measurements are a reliable means of determining the &#xA;gastroduodenal mucosal junctions in the intact, living canine and human stomachs.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Andersson S, Grossman MI.  Profile of pH, pressure and potential difference at &#xA;gastroduodenal junction in man. &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l965, 49, 364-371.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blackwood WD.  Pylorus identification.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l969, 57, 163-167.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Durbin RP.  Electrical potential difference of the gastric mucosa.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Handbook &#xA;of Physiology&lt;/EM&gt; Sect 6:  Alimentary Canal, Vol 2 : Secretion, edit Code CF, Heidel &#xA;W.  Amer Physiol Soc, Washington DC l968, pp 879-888.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fisher R, Cohen S.  Physiological characteristics of the human pyloric sphincter.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l973, 64, 67-75.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Geall MG, Code CF, McIlraith DC, et al.  Measurement of gastrointestinal &#xA;transmural electric potential difference in man. &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l970, 11, 34-37.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Isenberg JI, Csendes A.  Effect of octapeptide of cholecystokinin on canine &#xA;pyloric pressure.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l972, 222, 428-431.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kaye MD, Mehta SJ, Showalter JP.  Manometric studies of the human pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l976, 70, 477-480.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;White CM, Poxon V, Alexander-Williams J.  A study of motility of normal &#xA;human gastroduodenal region.  &lt;EM&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/EM&gt; l98l, 26, 609-617.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7 - Arteries, Veins, Lymphatics</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_7/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_7/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;arteries-veins-lymphatics&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Arteries, Veins, Lymphatics&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#arteries-veins-lymphatics&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;arterial-supply&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Arterial Supply&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#arterial-supply&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The arterial supply of the stomach is derived from all three branches of the coeliac artery, &#xA;which arises from the front of the aorta between the crura of the diaphragm (Last l984).  &#xA;It is a short wide trunk, surrounded by the coeliac lymph nodes and flanked by the coeliac &#xA;ganglia of the sympathetic system.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The first branch, the left gastric artery, runs to the left, giving off an ascending &#xA;oesophageal branch, and supplying the upper part of the stomach;  it may also give rise to &#xA;the left hepatic artery (Moore l980).  It then turns downwards between the two layers of &#xA;the lesser omentum, running to the right along the lesser curvature.  It divides into two &#xA;parallel branches, which give off branches to the anterior and posterior gastric walls and &#xA;which anastomose freely with arteries from the greater curvature.  The two branches of &#xA;the left gastic artery then anastomose with the two branches of the right gastric artery in &#xA;the region of the incisura angularis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The second branch of the coeliac trunk, the hepatic artery, passes downwards as far as the &#xA;first part of the duodenum.  It then turns forwards at the opening into the lesser sac &#xA;(epiploic foramen) and curves upwards into the space between the two layers of the lesser &#xA;omentum towards the porta hepatis, to supply the liver.  As it turns into the lesser &#xA;omentum the hepatic artery gives off the gastro-duodenal and right gastric arteries.  The &#xA;latter passes to the left between the two layers of the lesser omentum, along the lesser &#xA;curvature of the stomach, dividing into two branches which anastomose with the &#xA;branches of the left gastric artery.  The right gastric artery also gives off branches to the &#xA;anterior and posterior gastric walls, anastomosing with branches from the right gastro-&#xA;epiploic artery.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The gastro-duodenal artery passes downwards behind the first part of the duodenum, &#xA;which it supplies by multiple small branches;  it then divides into the superior &#xA;pancreatico-duodenal artery, supplying the second part of the duodenum and head of the &#xA;pancreas, and the right gastro-epiploic artery.  The latter turns to the left, passes along the &#xA;greater curvature of the stomach between the layers of the greater omentum, giving off &#xA;branches to the anterior and posterior gastric walls.  It anastomoses with the left gastro-&#xA;epiploic artery at about the midportion of the greater curvature (Menguy l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The third branch of the coeliac trunk, the splenic artery, passes to the left along the upper &#xA;border of the pancreas, behind the peritoneum and the stomach, to supply the spleen.  &#xA;During its course it gives off branches to the pancreas;  just before entering the splenic &#xA;hilum it gives off the short gastric arteries supplying the gastric fornix, and the left &#xA;gastro-epiploic artery.  The latter passes downwards and to the right along the greater &#xA;curvature of the stomach, between the two layers of the greater omentum, to anastomose &#xA;with the right gastro-epiploic artery at the midportion of the greater curvature.  It gives &#xA;off branches to the anterior and posterior gastric walls, which anastomose with branches &#xA;of the gastric arteries along the lesser curvature.  Other branches, the epiploic arteries, &#xA;pass downwards between the layers of the greater omentum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Branches from the arterial arcades on the lesser and greater curvatures ramify through the &#xA;submucosa, forming a rich arterial network from which branches arise to supply the &#xA;mucus membrane.  Because of this arrangement the mucosa is not supplied by end &#xA;arteries, with the possible exception of the mucosa along the lesser curvature, which &#xA;appears to receive its arterial supply directly from branches of the right and left gastric &#xA;arteries (Menguy l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The first 2 cm of the duodenum is supplied by multiple small branches from the hepatic &#xA;and gastroduodenal arteries (Last l984).  According to Cunningham (l947) the first part of &#xA;the duodenum occupies the frontier zone between the coeliac and superior mesenteric &#xA;vascular supplies, and the vessels which supply it vary considerably in their size and &#xA;mode of origin;  the peculiarity of its blood supply may partly account for the frequency &#xA;with which it is the seat of ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;venous-drainage&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Venous Drainage&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#venous-drainage&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The position of the gastric veins is similar to that of the arteries along the lesser and &#xA;greater curvatures.  All the gastric veins drain either directly or indirectly into the portal &#xA;system, which carries venous blood to the liver.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The left gastric vein runs to the left along the lesser curvature, receiving the oesophageal &#xA;veins below the oesophageal hiatus in the diaphragm.  Usually it drains directly into the &#xA;portal vein at the superior border of the pancreas.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The right gastric vein runs along the lesser curvature to the right, towards the pylorus, &#xA;joining the portal vein behind the first part of the duodenum.  It receives the prepyloric &#xA;vein, a small vein running vertically across the anterior surface of the gastro-duodenal &#xA;junction on the pyloric ring;  it is an important visual guide to the situation of the ring &#xA;(Chap. 3).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The left gastro-epiploic vein, running to the left along the greater curvature, and the short &#xA;gastric veins, drain into the splenic vein or its tributaries.  Having received tributaries &#xA;from the pancreas as well as the inferior mesenteric vein, the splenic ultimately joins the &#xA;superior mesenteric vein to form the portal vein.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The right gastro-epiploic vein runs to the right as far as the head of the pancreas.  Usually &#xA;it turns downwards to join the superior mesenteric vein, draining into the portal vein.  &#xA;Considerable variations may occur and the right gastro-epiploic may enter the portal vein &#xA;directly, or it may join the splenic vein.  There is no gastroduodenal vein.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The veins from the first 2 cm of the duodenum drain into the prepyloric vein (Last &#xA;l984).&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;lymphatic-drainage&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Lymphatic Drainage&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#lymphatic-drainage&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a meticulous study of 30 post-mortem specimens, Jamieson and Dobson (l907) found &#xA;that the lymph vessels in the walls of the stomach arise in the subepithelial interglandular &#xA;tissue of the mucosa, from where they pass outwards between the glands to communicate &#xA;with each other in the peri-glandular plexus.  Vessels proceed from here into the &#xA;subglandular plexus between the glands and muscularis mucosae.  Short vessels then &#xA;pierce the muscularis mucosae to break up on its outer surface to form the submucous &#xA;plexus.  Large vessels draining this plexus pass outwards through the muscular coats, &#xA;communicating with the networks among the muscle fibres, and open into the subserous &#xA;plexus.  From the latter valved collecting vessels radiate to the curvatures of the stomach &#xA;to enter the omenta.  By means of injection techniques it was shown that fluid passed &#xA;from the submucous to the subserous plexus, but not in the reverse direction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Doubt had been expressed by previous authors as to the continuity of the gastric and &#xA;duodenal plexuses.  Jamieson and Dobson (l907) found that injection of the gastric &#xA;submucous plexus showed free communication with the submucous plexus of the &#xA;duodenum.  Injection of the gastric subserous plexus showed a sharp demarcation at the &#xA;pyloric ring, with the fluid flowing in the direction of the gastric curvatures.  In only one &#xA;specimen could direct communication between the gastric and duodenal subserous &#xA;plexuses be demonstrated.  However, many of the collecting vessels from the pyloric &#xA;subserous network ran downwards over the duodenum to reach the subpyloric glands, &#xA;and as they received vessels from the duodenum it was surmized that an indirect &#xA;communication was formed in this way.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Horton (l928) on the other hand, demonstrated by means of injections of India ink that an &#xA;almost complete block existed between the submucous lymphatics of the stomach and &#xA;those of the duodenum at the pylorus.  In contrast, the subserous lymphatics of the &#xA;pyloric region were continuous with those of the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Coller et al. (l94l) divided the lymphatics of the stomach into intramural, intermediary &#xA;and extramural systems.  The intramural system consists of 3 networks, viz. submucosal, &#xA;intermuscular and subserosal.  The submucosal lymphatic channels communicate freely &#xA;throughout the submucosa of the stomach and to a lesser degree with the submucosal &#xA;lymphatics of the duodenum;  they also communicate freely with the intermuscular and &#xA;subserosal networks.  The intermediary system consists of numerous small channels &#xA;between the subserosal network and the extramural collecting systems.  The extramural &#xA;system consists of four major zones of lymphatic drainage, corresponding to the arterial &#xA;supply of the stomach.  Ultimately all zones drain into the coeliac nodes around the &#xA;coeliac arterial trunk on the anterior aspect of the aorta.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Eker (l951) the stomach should be considered to have the following 4 zones &#xA;of lymphatic drainage:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The first zone comprises the upper two-thirds of the lesser curvature and a large part &#xA;of the body of the stomach.  The lymphatic drainage is into the left gastric nodes lying &#xA;along the left gastric artery.  These nodes are joined by lymphatics coming down from the &#xA;lower part of the oesophagus, and their efferents proceed to the coeliac nodes.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The second zone of lymphatic drainage is from the distal part of the lesser curvature, &#xA;including the lesser curvature of the pyloric region, to the suprapyloric nodes along the &#xA;right gastric artery.  Eker (l951) stressed the fact that this zone consists of &#34;only a small &#xA;area in the lower part of the pyloric region&#34;.  Efferent channels from the suprapyloric &#xA;nodes drain to the hepatic and ultimately to the coeliac and aortic nodes.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Most of the pyloric part of the stomach as well as the right (i.e. lower) half of the &#xA;greater curvature constitute the third zone.  The extramural lymphatics from these areas &#xA;drain into the right gastro-epiploic nodes in the gastrocolic ligament, lying along the right &#xA;gastro-epiploic vessels, and into the pyloric nodes on the anterior surface of the head of &#xA;the pancreas.  The direction of lymph flow is from above downwards, towards the &#xA;pylorus and the nodes between the head of the pancreas and second part of the &#xA;duodenum.  From these groups, collectively called the subpyloric glands (which also &#xA;drain the first part of the duodenum), efferent vessels pass along the gastro-duodenal &#xA;artery to the hepatic nodes along the hepatic artery, and thence to the coeliac nodes.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The fourth zone is from the left (i.e. upper) half of the greater curvature and the gastric &#xA;fornix.  From here lymph vessels pass to the left gastro-epiploic nodes, lying along the &#xA;left gastro-epiploic artery, proceed to the pancreatico-lienal nodes along the splenic &#xA;artery, and ultimately to the coeliac nodes.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lehnert et al. (l985) studied the distribution of lymph and blood capillaries by light and &#xA;transmission electron microscopy in 16 endoscopic biopsy and surgical resection &#xA;specimens of human gastric mucosa and submucosa.  Four were normal and 12 showed &#xA;evidence of gastritis.  A clear distinction between small mucosal blood and lymph &#xA;capillaries was not always possible with light microscopy;  a distinction could be made &#xA;by electron microscopy.  This showed blood capillaries at all levels of the lamina propria, &#xA;and especially at its upper levels, as well as in the submucosa.  Lymph capillaries on the &#xA;other hand, could not be demonstrated in the upper and middle regions of the lamina &#xA;propria;  lymphatics were only present in the deep lamina propria adjacent to the &#xA;muscularis mucosae.  Larger lymph vessels were observed in the submucosa.  It was &#xA;concluded that the entire human gastric mucosa had a rich supply of blood capillaries, &#xA;many of which were adjacent to the gastric glands and surface epithelium, but that &#xA;lymphatic capillaries were present only in the deep lamina propria.  It seemed if earlier &#xA;descriptions, derived from light microscopy, needed revision.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Investigators differ on the question of continuity of gastric and duodenal lymphatics.  &#xA;According to Jamieson and Dobson (l907), who injected lymph plexuses in the gastric &#xA;submucosa, free communication existed between gastric and duodenal submucosal &#xA;lymphatics;  this was also the view of Coller et al. (l941).  Horton (l928, l931) and &#xA;Williams (l962) on the other hand, during injections of India ink into the gastric &#xA;submucosal space, found a complete block at the pylorus, with no communication &#xA;between gastric and duodenal submucosal lymphatics.  The differing results could be due &#xA;to differences in methodology;  whereas Jamieson and Dobson (l907) injected lymphatic &#xA;plexuses, it seems that the injections of Horton (l928, l931) and Williams (l962) were &#xA;done into the submucosal space.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Jamieson and Dobson (l907) the gastric and duodenal subserous lymphatics &#xA;did not communicate, while Horton (l928, l931) found that they were continuous.  All &#xA;authors agree that the gastric submucous and gastric subserous lymphatic systems &#xA;communicate freely.  There is general agreement about extramural lymphatic drainage &#xA;away from the stomach.  These factors are of importance in the spread of gastric &#xA;carcinoma, and especially when spread of pyloric carcinoma into the duodenum has to be &#xA;considered (Chap. 33).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The findings of Eker (l951) show that extramural lymphatic drainage from the region of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder is downwards, to the suprapyloric and subpyloric glands.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lehnert et al. (l985) thought that the low incidence of lymph node metastasis in early &#xA;gastric carcinoma, where the lesion is confined to the mucosa, could be due to the rarity &#xA;of lymph capillaries (as opposed to blood capillaries) in the mucosa.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Coller FA, Kay EB, McIntyre RS.  Regional lymphatic metastases of carcinoma &#xA;of the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/EM&gt; l941, 43, 748-761.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  &lt;EM&gt;Text-book of Anatomy&lt;/EM&gt;.  Edit Brash JC, Jamieson EB.  Oxford &#xA;Univ Press, 8th ed, London l947, p 1457.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Eker R.  Carcinomas of the stomach:  investigation of the lymphatic spread from &#xA;gastric carcinomas after total and partial gastrectomy.  &lt;EM&gt;Acta Chir Scand&lt;/EM&gt; l951, 101, &#xA;112-126.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horton BT.  Pyloric musculature, with special reference to pyloric block.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J &#xA;Anat&lt;/EM&gt; l928, 41, 197-225.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horton BT.  Pyloric block with special reference to the musculature, myenteric &#xA;plexus and lymphatic vessels.  &lt;EM&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/EM&gt; l931, 22, 438-462.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Jamieson JK, Dobson JF.  The lymphatic system of the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;Lancet&lt;/EM&gt; l907, l, &#xA;l061-l066.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Last RJ.  &lt;EM&gt;Anatomy: Regional and Applied&lt;/EM&gt;.  Churchill Livingstone, 7th ed, London &#xA;l984, p 280.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lehnert T, Erlandson RA, Decosse JJ.  Lymph and blood capillaries of the human &#xA;gastric mucosa:  a morphologic basis for metastasis in early gastric carcinoma.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l985, 89, 939-950.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Menguy R.  &lt;EM&gt;Surgery of Peptic Ulcer&lt;/EM&gt;.  WB Saunders Co, Philadelphia l976, p 4.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Moore KL.  &lt;EM&gt;Clinically Oriented Anatomy&lt;/EM&gt;.  Williams Wilkins Co, Baltimore l980, &#xA;p 176.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Williams I.  Closure of the pylorus.  &lt;EM&gt;Brit J Rad&lt;/EM&gt; l962, 35, 653-670.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8 - Nerves</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_8/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_8/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;nerves&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Nerves&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#nerves&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Classically the autonomic nervous system consists of two components, cholinergic and &#xA;adrenergic nerves;  the former are contained mostly in the parasympathetic, and the latter &#xA;mostly in the sympathetic division.  For the past 4 decades a third component of the &#xA;autonomic system, which is neither cholinergic nor adrenergic, has been recogized;  the &#xA;principal active substance released from these nerves in the gastrointestinal tract is a &#xA;purine nucleotide;  they have been called purigenic nerves by Burnstock (l972).  An &#xA;increasing number of peptides with a dual localization in endocrine cells and peripheral &#xA;nerves in the walls of the gastrointestinal tract has now been recognized.  This has led to &#xA;the concept of a three-part autonomic control system consisting of cholinergic, adrenergic &#xA;and peptidergic nerves (Bishop et al. l977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;parasympathetic-nerve-supply&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Parasympathetic Nerve Supply&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#parasympathetic-nerve-supply&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The parasympathetic nerve supply to the stomach is derived from the anterior and &#xA;posterior vagal trunks and their branches.  Afferent fibres are also present in the vagi, &#xA;which are mixed nerves.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;anterior-vagus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Anterior Vagus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#anterior-vagus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The anterior vagal trunk, which is derived mainly from the left vagus nerve but which &#xA;includes fibres from the right vagus and also some sympathetic fibres from the splanchnic &#xA;nerves, enters the abdominal cavity through the oesophageal hiatus in the diaphragm.  It &#xA;is usually single but may be divided into two or even three trunks.  The manner of &#xA;distribution of its branches is in the main constant (Latarjet et al. l921;  McCrea l924).  &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Having supplied several fine twigs to the lower end of the oesophagus and cardiac part of &#xA;the stomach, the anterior trunk breaks up into its main branches.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Latarjet three main sets of branches are present:&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The first set, consisting of 4 to 5 direct branches, emanating &#34;one below the &#xA;other&#34;, supplies the upper part of the lesser curvature.  These nerves do not form a plexus &#xA;and can be dissected separately.  A few filaments from the sympathetic supply join these &#xA;direct branches via the coeliac plexus.  One of the branches in this group is always bigger &#xA;than the others and very distinct;  Latarjet (l921) called it the principal anterior nerve of &#xA;the lesser curvature.  It innervates the area from the cardia to the pyloric vestibule, and &#xA;does not proceed beyond the latter (Fig 8.1).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Branches emanating from the vagal supply to the liver.  These branches, usually 3 &#xA;to 5 in number, descending in the lesser omentum, &#34;fall like rain&#34; on the superior margin &#xA;of the pylorus and first part of the duodenum.  Latarjet called them the superior pyloric &#xA;nerves (Fig 8.1).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The third set consists of vagal filaments from the hepatic branches, accompanying &#xA;the sympathetic nerves along the right gastroepiploic artery next to the greater curvature.  &#xA;They provide a few vagal twigs to the inferior margin of the pylorus.  Latarjet called &#xA;these the inferior pyloric nerves (Fig 8.1).&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Latarjet (l921) the anterior vagus can be divided into two distinct functional &#xA;divisions.  The first division, consisting of the direct branches, supplies the fornix and &#xA;body, i.e. the &#34;reservoir&#34; part of the stomach.  The second division, through the hepatic &#xA;branches, supplies the pylorus and first part of the duodenum, i.e. the &#34;sphincteric&#34; part of &#xA;the stomach.  (&lt;EM&gt;Comment&lt;/EM&gt;:  According to Latarjet, the principal anterior nerve of the lesser &#xA;curvature does not supply the pylorus;  the pylorus and first part of the duodenum are &#xA;innervated by the superior and inferior pyloric nerves, emanating from the hepatic &#xA;branches).  Latarjet found the innervation in dogs to be similar to that in man.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The papers of McCrea (l924), Mitchell (l940) and Jackson (l948) describe personal &#xA;investigations and provide an analysis of the literature.  The following findings are &#xA;pertinent to the present discussion.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to McCrea (l924) the anterior vagal trunk breaks up into 3 to 6 main branches.  &#xA;To the left a group of gastric branches arise, supplying the anterior surface of the cardia, &#xA;the fornix and proximal portion of the body of the stomach.  These may or may not form &#xA;an anterior gastric plexus.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/8-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 8.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Diagram of gastric branches of anterior vagus.  1., Direct branches;  &#xA;2., branches emanating from vagal supply to liver (superior pyloric nerves); &#xA;3., branches emanating from vagal supply to liver (inferior pyloric nerves);&#xA;H., hepatic branch or branches; A.L., anterior nerve of Latarjet &#xA;(principal anterior nerve of lesser curvature)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &#xA;On the right there are the following three main groups of branches:&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The first or hepatic branch proceeds laterally in the lesser omentum towards the &#xA;porta hepatis;  it is frequently duplicated.  Its terminal twigs are divided into 2 series, viz. &#xA;a proximal which supplies the porta hepatis, and a distal, which turns downwards towards &#xA;the pylorus.  From the latter twigs pass (a) to the pylorus and first part of the duodenum;  &#xA;(b) along the right gastric artery to the region of the pyloric canal;  (c) to run deep to the &#xA;pylorus with the gastroduodenal artery towards the head of the pancreas and second part &#xA;of the duodenum;  (d) to run proximally on the wall of the hepatic artery, and (e) to &#xA;communicate with sympathetic twigs passing to the gall bladder.  Communications with &#xA;sympathetic twigs are common.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The second branch on the right, a large nerve, passes downwards between the &#xA;layers of the lesser omentum, a short distance from, and parallel to, the lesser curvature of &#xA;the stomach.  It is distributed to the anterior surface of the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34; and body of &#xA;the stomach, but does not reach the pyloric &#34;canal&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The third branch lies on and follows the lesser curvature along the attachment of &#xA;the lesser omentum;  it descends as far as the incisura angularis.  All these branches may &#xA;communicate with the coeliac sympathetic plexus, and in the region of the fornix &#xA;communications are received from the posterior vagal trunk.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;McCrea (l924) concludes that the pyloric canal, pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; and first part of the &#xA;duodenum are supplied by the hepatic branches of the anterior vagus.  The remainder of &#xA;the stomach is supplied by the gastric, and second and third right branches.  It is stated &#xA;specifically that the second branch supplies the anterior surface of the &#34;antrum&#34; and body, &#xA;but that it does not reach the pyloric &#34;canal&#34;.  McCrea found the distribution of the vagi &#xA;in the abdomen of the cat, dog and rabbit to be essentially similar to that of man.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Mitchell&#39;s (l940) findings differ in certain minor respects from those of McCrea (l924).  &#xA;According to Mitchell some of the lowermost gastric branches (which primarily supply &#xA;the cardia, fornix and upper lesser curvature) reach almost, but not quite, to the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The hepatic branches (of which there are two to four), running towards the right to the porta &#xA;hepatis, divide at the hepatic artery, one branch passing upwards to the liver and the other &#xA;downwards to the pylorus and coeliac plexus.  In one out of 15 specimens the uppermost &#xA;hepatic branch divided into three:  one to the porta hepatis, one to the cystic duct and gall &#xA;bladder, and the third to the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The greater anterior gastric nerve (i.e. McCrea&#39;s second branch) supplies two pyloric &#xA;twigs according to Mitchell (l940).  The first arises near the upper end of the lesser &#xA;curvature, passes almost horizontally between the layers of the lesser omentum as far as &#xA;the hepatic artery, then turns downwards on the left side of the hepatic artery to reach the &#xA;pylorus and proximal part of the duodenum.  It often bifurcates, sending one branch &#xA;upwards to the liver and the other downwards to the pylorus, and it is connected to the &#xA;hepatic plexus.  The other pyloric twig usually arises from the greater anterior gastric &#xA;nerve about halfway along the lesser curvature, and passes obliquely between the layers &#xA;of the lesser omentum to the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;, some fibres reaching the pyloric &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34;.  This twig arises at a lower level, but supplies the pylorus proximal to the &#xA;branch first described.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Thus according to McCrea (l924) and Mitchell (1940), the main innervation of the &#xA;pyloric region from the anterior vagus occurs via its hepatic branches.  According to &#xA;Mitchell (l940) the pylorus is also innervated by twigs arising in the greater anterior &#xA;gastric vagal branch, running between the layers of the lesser omentum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Jackson (l948) studied the distribution of the vagus in 50 cadavers.  The hepatic branches &#xA;of the anterior trunk, running to the porta hepatis, were identified in 43 cases.  In the first &#xA;case the hepatic branch was followed to its termination and was found to supply the first &#xA;few centimeters proximal to the pylorus, the pylorus itself and the first part of the &#xA;duodenum.  In the remainder of the dissections attention was concentrated on the more &#xA;proximal parts of the branches, and the hepatic branches were followed only to the fissure &#xA;of the ductus venosus.  The principal anterior nerve of the lesser curvature described by &#xA;Latarjet (l921) was found in 28 instances.  From its origin it passed along the lesser &#xA;curvature, returning to the stomach generally from 2.5-9 cm proximal to the pylorus;  &#xA;the closest any branch of this nerve came to the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; was 2.5 cm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Skandalakis et al. (l986) reiterate that separation of the anterior vagal trunk into anterior &#xA;gastric and hepatic divisions is usually found on the surface of the distal oesophagus at &#xA;the gastro-oesophageal junction.  Usually a major branch of the anterior gastric division &#xA;forms the principal anterior nerve of the lesser curvature (nerve of Latarjet).  In most &#xA;instances it can be traced to the level of the incisura;  occasionally it may proceed as far &#xA;as the first part of the duodenum (in these cases the pylorus is still innervated via the &#xA;hepatic branch).  It may also be absent, the &#34;antrum&#34; being supplied by branches arising &#xA;from the anterior vagal trunk proximal to the origin of the hepatic division.  Many &#xA;variations exist, and Skandalakis et al. (l986) referred to &#34;the vagaries of the vagus nerve&#34;.  &#xA;However, these authors point out that the usual supply to the pylorus is a descending &#xA;branch (or branches) from the hepatic division before it reaches the liver;  occasionally &#xA;the pyloric branch may arise from the anterior gastric division.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;posterior-vagus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Posterior Vagus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#posterior-vagus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The posterior vagal trunk, which is derived mainly from the right vagus nerve but &#xA;includes fibres from the left vagus and some sympathetic fibres, enters the abdomen &#xA;through the oesophageal hiatus in the diaphragm on the posterior surface of the &#xA;oesophagus.  The number and direction of its branches is more constant than that of the &#xA;anterior vagus (Latarjet l921;  Skandalakis et al. l986).  Shortly after entering the &#xA;abdomen it divides into 2 main divisions.  The larger or coeliac division proceeds to the &#xA;coeliac and other abdominal sympathetic plexuses.  The smaller or posterior gastric &#xA;division first gives off fine twigs to the lower oesophagus and fornix.  &#xA;It then continues &#xA;along the lesser curvature, giving off 4 to 6 posterior gastric branches.  Latarjet (l921) &#xA;called the most inferior and also the largest of these branches the principal posterior nerve &#xA;of the lesser curvature;  this has subsequently become known as the posterior nerve of &#xA;Latarjet.  Together with the other posterior branches it innervates the posterior wall of the &#xA;stomach, with the exception of the pylorus and immediate prepyloric region.  It also &#xA;anastomoses with sympathetic twigs from the coeliac plexus, as well as with the principal &#xA;anterior nerve of the lesser curvature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;McCrea&#39;s (l924) findings are similar to those of Latarjet, but he terms the branch from &#xA;which the posterior gastric twigs arise, the &#34;stem&#34;.  Thus the stem gives off branches to &#xA;the posterior aspect of the proximal portion of the body of the stomach.  It then continues &#xA;downwards, giving off branches to the posterior surface of the body and pyloric &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, the most distal being distributed in the region of the incisura angularis.  &#xA;According to McCrea the posterior vagus does not reach the pyloric canal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Mitchell&#39;s (l940) findings are almost identical.  What he calles the posterior gastric nerve &#xA;(McCrea&#39;s &#34;stem&#34;) gives off branches at intervals which pass to the stomach, but the &#xA;terminal branches extend only to the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;, failing to reach the pyloric &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34;.  Slender hepatic twigs may also be given off towards the porta hepatis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 50 dissections of the posterior vagal trunk, Jackson (l948) charted the gastric branches &#xA;and determined the point of origin of the coeliac branch.  The principal posterior nerve of &#xA;the lesser curvature (nerve of Latarjet) was identified in 19 instances.  It proceeded along &#xA;the lesser curvature in the direction of the pylorus, but, before reaching it, turned across &#xA;the posterior surface of the stomach towards the greater curvature.  Jackson concluded &#xA;that the vagal supply to the pylorus was via the hepatic branches of the anterior vagus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Skandalakis et al. (l986) the posterior gastric division forms the posterior &#xA;nerve of Latarjet.  The posterior gastric division usually terminates higher on the lesser &#xA;curvature than the anterior gastric division;  in a small minority of cases it reaches the &#xA;pylorus.  The most frequent pattern of the posterior gastric division is that described by &#xA;McCrea (l924), which is a typical, but not universal, pattern.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;parasympathetic-ganglia&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Parasympathetic Ganglia&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#parasympathetic-ganglia&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The left vagus supplies efferent preganglionic fibres mainly to the anterior surface, and &#xA;the right vagus mainly to the posterior surface of the stomach.  In addition both vagi send &#xA;branches to the coeliac plexus.  The parasympathetic preganglionic vagal fibres penetrate &#xA;the layers of the gastric wall, to form synapses in the ganglion cells of the plexus of &#xA;Auerbach between the longitudinal and circular muscle coats, and in the plexus of &#xA;Meissner in the submucosa.  From the ganglia postganglionic fibres emerge to supply the &#xA;musculature and mucosa.  According to Horton (l928), Auerbach&#39;s plexus is continuous &#xA;from the pyloric region to the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In addition to the myenteric (Auerbach&#39;s) and submucous (Meissner&#39;s) plexuses, Rash and &#xA;Thomas (l962) described a third group, namely the subserous plexuses;  they also &#xA;mentioned the differentiation of enteric neurones into argyrophilic Dogiel Type I cells &#xA;with short dendrites, and argyrophobic Dogiel Type II with fewer but longer dendrites.  &#xA;According to Smith (l970) the axons of argyrophilic neurones do not leave the plexuses &#xA;and do not reach muscle fibres;  their function is to coordinate peristalsis.  The axons of &#xA;argyrophobic cells, which are strongly cholinergic, form secondary and tertiary plexuses &#xA;and supply muscle fibres;  they act by initiating contractions.  The general effect of &#xA;myenteric plexus damage is loss of coordinated muscular contractions which serve to &#xA;propel luminal contents caudally;  this may lead to local muscular hypertrophy, e.g. &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (Chap 23).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The investigators quoted, namely Latarjet (l921), McCrea (l924), Mitchell (l940), &#xA;Jackson (l948) and Skandalakis et al. (l986), found that the main, and in most cases the &#xA;only, nerve supply from the anterior vagus to the pylorus is via its hepatic branch or &#xA;branches.  The region supplied in this way encompasses the distal &#34;few centimetres&#34; of &#xA;the stomach, the pylorus and first part of the duodenum.  While none of the authors &#xA;referred to the findings of Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) or Torgersen (l942), it is &#xA;clear that the region of the pylorus innervated in this way, corresponds to the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the vast majority of cases the principal anterior nerve of the lesser curvature (nerve of &#xA;Latarjet) does not innervate the sphincteric cylinder.  A few exceptions were mentioned.  &#xA;Mitchell (l940) stated that in some cases a few fibres from the anterior vagus might reach &#xA;the pylorus directly from gastric branches higher up.  Skandalakis et al. (l986) found that &#xA;Latarjet&#39;s nerve might occasionally proceed as far as the duodenum;  in these cases there &#xA;was still a separate branch from the hepatic division to the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The investigators quoted found that the posterior vagus (including the posterior nerve of &#xA;Latarjet) does not usually innervate the pylorus and prepyloric region, the most distal &#xA;twigs extending only as far as the incisura angularis or the &#34;commencement of the &#xA;antrum&#34;.  It is clear that the region which is not innervated by the posterior vagus, &#xA;corresponds to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  One of the few exceptions was &#xA;mentioned by Skandalakis et al. (l986);  in a small minority of cases they found that fibres &#xA;of the posterior gastric division could reach the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that the vagal supply to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (which includes &#xA;the pyloric ring musculature) and to the first part of the duodenum, occurs via the hepatic &#xA;branch of the anterior vagus in the vast majority of cases;  the hepatic branch (or &#xA;branches) breaks up into the superior and inferior pyloric nerves, supplying the cylinder.&#xA;It is of interest to note that, when first describing the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in l906, &#xA;Cunningham surmized that its powerful musculature was probably under control of a &#xA;special innervation.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;sympathetic-nerve-supply&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Sympathetic Nerve Supply&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#sympathetic-nerve-supply&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The sympathetic nerve supply to the stomach is almost entirely derived from the coeliac &#xA;plexus.  The gastric branches of the coeliac plexus accompany the vessels supplying the &#xA;stomach, and the maximum number are found alongside the left gastric, hepatic and &#xA;phrenic arteries, while others accompany the splenic, right gastric and gastro-epiploic &#xA;vessels.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to McCrea (l924) these nerves can be grouped as follows:&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fibres from the coeliac plexus accompany the left inferior phrenic artery, wind &#xA;across the anterior aspect of the lower oesophagus, communicate with branches of the &#xA;anterior vagus, and are distributed to the cardia and fornix.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fibres from the coeliac plexus pass with the left gastric artery and divide into &#xA;three groups:  (a) Fibres passing with the oesophageal and superior branches of this artery &#xA;to the cardia and proximal part of the body of the stomach;  these twigs communicate &#xA;with branches of the anterior and posterior vagal trunks.  (b) Fibres passing with the main &#xA;stem of the artery along the lesser curvature to supply the anterior and posterior surfaces &#xA;of the body of the stomach and pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;.  (c) Fibres passing between the layers &#xA;of the lesser omentum towards the porta hepatis, communicating with hepatic branches of &#xA;the anterior vagal trunk in most instances.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fibres passing from the coeliac plexus along the hepatic artery and distributed &#xA;with its branches.  They reach the pyloric region of the stomach with the right gastric and &#xA;right gastroepiploic arteries.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In all major respects Mitchell&#39;s (l940) description agrees with that of McCrea, although &#xA;he adds some exceptions.  According to Mitchell the terminal twigs accompanying the &#xA;main branch of the left gastric artery, i.e. group 2b of McCrea, did not reach the pylorus &#xA;in any of the 15 specimens examined by him, but united with the nerve filaments lying &#xA;alongside the right gastric artery.  The right gastric branches, (group 3 of McCrea) supply &#xA;the upper parts of the pyloric region.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;sympathetic-ganglia&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Sympathetic Ganglia&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#sympathetic-ganglia&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Preganglionic sympathetic fibres end in the coeliac ganglia;  efferent fibres emerging &#xA;from the coeliac ganglia to accompany the arteries are postganglionic.  Even though they &#xA;traverse the enteric ganglia they probably have no functional relationship to the enteric &#xA;plexuses;  they are distributed with the postganglionic vagal fibres emerging from the &#xA;plexuses.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Afferent visceral fibres from the stomach travel the same course in reverse, to ganglion &#xA;cells in the posterior spinal nerve roots.  They do not synapse in, or arise from, &#xA;sympathetic ganglia.  Although the sympathetic nerves are motor, they also carry fibres &#xA;from sense organs in the viscera.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It seems that the main sympathetic supply to the pyloric region occurs via fibres &#xA;accompanying the hepatic artery and its branches.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;peptidergic-system&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Peptidergic System&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#peptidergic-system&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The peptidergic system refers to a widespread group of cells, derived from &#xA;neuroectoderm embryologically and having certain biochemical features in common.  &#xA;They are also referred to as neuroendocrine cells and belong to the APUD cell line, based &#xA;on their capacity to synthesize monoamines through a process of amine precursor &#xA;uptake and decarboxylation.  During recent years a large number of biologically active &#xA;peptides, produced by APUD cells, have been demonstrated in central and peripheral &#xA;neurogenic tissues as well as in the walls of the gastrointestinal tract (Chap. 9).  Some of &#xA;the peptides, notably gastrin and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), were first detected in &#xA;the gut and subsequently in the brain;  others, such as somatostatin, enkephalin and &#xA;neurotensin were first identified in brain tissue and subsequently in the walls of the &#xA;alimentary tract.  Substance P has long been known to be present in both locations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Most of the monoamines have several molecular forms or sizes.  Some types are released &#xA;into the circulation, producing their biological effects in distant target organs;  these can &#xA;be looked upon as true hormones acting in an endocrine way.  Others act locally in the &#xA;vicinity of their site of origin in a paracrine way.  A third group functions as &#xA;neurotransmitters, acting in a neurocrine way.  A clearcut separation of endocrine, &#xA;paracrine and neurocrine functions is not always feasible.  Burnstock (l986) pointed out &#xA;that thinking mainly in terms of antagonistic parasympathetic cholinergic and &#xA;sympathetic adrenergic control of functions, is no longer tenable.  The involvement of a &#xA;multiplicity of neurotransmitters and of sophisticated peripheral control mechanisms such &#xA;as neuromodulation and co-transmission, has to be recognized.  This is accomplished &#xA;through non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic nerves of the purigenic system.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;APUD cells and regulatory peptides in the pyloric region of the stomach will be &#xA;discussed in somewhat greater detail in the next chapter.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bishop AC, Polak JM, Buchan AMJ, et al.  Third division of the autonomic &#xA;nervous system:  an important element in gut control.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 18, A962.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Burnstock G.  Purigenic nerves.  &lt;EM&gt;Pharm Rev&lt;/EM&gt; l972, 24, 509-581.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Burnstock G.  Autonomic neuromuscular junctions:  current developments and &#xA;future directions.  &lt;EM&gt;J Anat&lt;/EM&gt; l986, 146, 1-30.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;EM&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/EM&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G. &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen Magens zu &#xA;seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;EM&gt;Fortschr Geb R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/EM&gt; l913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horton BT.  Pyloric musculature with special reference to pyloric block.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J &#xA;Anat&lt;/EM&gt; l928, 41, 213.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Jackson RG.  Anatomic study of the vagus nerves.  &lt;EM&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/EM&gt; l948, 57, 333-352.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Latarjet A, Wertheimer P.  L&#39;&amp;#233;nervation gastrique.  Donn&amp;#233;es exp&amp;#233;rimentales.  &#xA;D&amp;#233;ductions cliniques.  &lt;EM&gt;J M&amp;#233;d Lyon&lt;/EM&gt; l921, 36, 1289-1302.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Latarjet A.  Note pr&amp;#233;liminaire sur l&#39;innervation et l&#39;&amp;#233;nervation de l&#39;estomac.  &lt;EM&gt;Lyon &#xA;M&amp;#233;d&lt;/EM&gt; l921, 130, 166-167.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Latarjet A, Cluzet M, Wertheimer P.  Effects de la section et de l&#39;excitation des &#xA;nerfs propres de l&#39;estomac sur la motricit&amp;#233; de cet organe.  &lt;EM&gt;C R Soc Biol&lt;/EM&gt; l921, 84, 985-987.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Latarjet A.  Section des rameaux gastriques du vague.  &lt;EM&gt;La Presse Med&lt;/EM&gt; l921, 41, &#xA;409.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;McCrea ED.  The abdominal distribution of the vagus.  &lt;EM&gt;J Anat (London)&lt;/EM&gt; l924, 59, &#xA;l8-40.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Mitchell GAC.  A macroscopic study of the nerve supply of the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;J Anat &#xA;(London)&lt;/EM&gt; l940, 75, 50-63.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rash RM, Thomas MD.  The intrinsic innervation of the gastro-oesophageal and &#xA;pyloro-duodenal junctions. &lt;EM&gt; J Anat&lt;/EM&gt; l962, 96, 389-396.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skandalakis LJ, Gray SW, Skandalakis JE.  The history and surgical anatomy of &#xA;the vagus nerve.  &lt;EM&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/EM&gt; l986, 162, 75-85.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Smith B.  Disorders of the myenteric plexus.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l970, ll, 271-274.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgerson J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal bulb.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/EM&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>9 - Regulatory Peptides</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_9/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_9/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;regulatory-peptides&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Regulatory Peptides&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#regulatory-peptides&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;For a brief historical review of the regulatory peptides, one is indebted to Royston et al &#xA;(l978) and others.  It was pointed out that Solcia and his colleagues (l967) described &#xA;endocrine-like cells in the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; which were argyrophilic, but non-argentaffin &#xA;in quality.  The next year McGuigan (l968), by means of an immunofluorescent &#xA;technique, identified gastrin in cells of the antral mucosa, which he named G cells.  &#xA;Bussolati and Pearse (l970), using immunofluorescent and silver techniques, showed that &#xA;these two types of cell were the same.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;G cells belong to the APUD cell line;  the technique of immunocytochemistry shows the &#xA;precise localization of the cells in the walls of the gastrointestinal tract.  Individual cells &#xA;contain secretory granules in the basal part of the cytoplasm, whereas the Golgi complex &#xA;is supranuclear.  In the pyloric mucosal zone most of the cells extend to the lumen in a &#xA;pyramidal way, with tufts of microvilli at the apex;  these probably act as receptor sites.  &#xA;Secreted peptides are demonstrated by radioimmunoassay of tissue extracts.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following regulatory peptides appear to be among the more important in the present &#xA;context.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;gastrin&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastrin&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastrin&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Edkins (1906) showed that an extract of pyloric mucosa administered intravenously &#xA;stimulated secretion of gastric acid and pepsinogen;  he suggested that the active &#xA;principle was of hormonal origin and named it gastrin.  It was soon apparent that this &#xA;action was similar to that of histamine, and many authorities considered gastrin and &#xA;histamine to be the same substance.  As pointed out by Dockray (l978), nearly 60 years of &#xA;uncertainty about the existence, nature and specificity of the antral hormone gastrin, and &#xA;its relationship to histamine, followed.  This was resolved when Gregory and Tracy (l96l, &#xA;l964) isolated two related heptadecapeptides from hog antral mucosa, which proved to be &#xA;gastrin.  It was shown to occur in highest concentration in the pyloric mucosal zone, &#xA;where its concentration was 500 times higher than in the corpus of the stomach &#xA;(McGuigan l968).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gastrin producing G cells originate from neuroectoderm together with other cells of the &#xA;APUD series.  They have a clear appearance, are piriform in shape and located in the mid &#xA;and deep zones of the pyloric mucosal glands;  electronmicroscopy shows that they &#xA;possess microvilli extending into the lumen and that secretory granules are present in the &#xA;basal parts of the cells.  This organisation allows for secretion of hormone into the &#xA;bloodsteam in response to luminal stimuli (Dockray l978).  Normally there are &#xA;approximately half a million G cells per cm&amp;#170; in the stomach in man, amounting to a total &#xA;of approximately 10 million G cells (Mortensen l980).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Synthesis of gastrin I and II occurs predominantly in the G cells of the pyloric mucosal &#xA;zone;  less important sources are G cells in the duodenum, D cells in the islands of &#xA;Langerhans in the pancreas, and isolated G cells in the proximal acid producing region of &#xA;the fornix and body of the stomach.  Some authorities hold that normally G cells do not &#xA;occur in the oxyntic zone of the stomach;  they may however, be present in pathological &#xA;conditions (Stave and Brandtzaeg l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While G cells are interspersed among the more frequent mucus producing cells, the &#xA;question arises whether their spatial distribution is equal to that of the pyloric mucosal &#xA;zone;  are G cells found throughout the pyloric mucosa, or are they confined to certain &#xA;areas of this zone?  Stave and Brandtzaeg (l976) pointed out that there were few &#xA;quantitative data on the actual G cell mass of the stomach at that time;  however, &#xA;variations in the numbers of antral G cells had been reported in relation to pathological &#xA;states.  By means of immunohistochemical methods these authors attempted a systematic &#xA;mapping of the numerical distribution of G cells in the human stomach and duodenum in &#xA;specimens resected for peptic ulcer.  In a small series (8 gastric ulcer cases and 8 cases of &#xA;duodenal ulcer with uraemia), no G cells were found in the oxyntic zone of the stomach.  &#xA;A low number occurred in the transitional zone at the proximal border of the antrum &#xA;(&lt;EM&gt;Comment&lt;/EM&gt;:  The term &#34;antrum&#34; was not defined, but appeared to be equated with the &#xA;pyloric mucosal zone).  In the gastric ulcer group no significant difference was found &#xA;between the numbers of G cells at various levels of the &#34;antrum&#34;;  in the cases of &#xA;duodenal ulcer with uraemia there was a statistically significant increase in the number of &#xA;G cells from the proximal to the distal part of the &#34;antrum&#34;.  The first part of the &#xA;duodenum contained considerably fewer G cells than the &#34;antrum&#34;, and the numbers in &#xA;the duodenum were virtually equal in the two groups.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a second and larger series of cases, Stave and Brandtzaeg (l978) determined the antral &#xA;density, mucosal distribution and total mass of G cells in gastric resection specimens.  &#xA;The series of 42 cases consisted of 12 cases of gastric ulcer, 14 cases of duodenal ulcer &#xA;with uremia, 11 cases of duodenal ulcer without uremia, and 5 cases of gastric carcinoma.  &#xA;Immuno-reactive G cells were not seen in the oxyntic zone of the stomach in any of the &#xA;cases, and low numbers occurred in the transitional zone along the proximal border of the &#xA;pyloric antrum.  The first part of the duodenum contained only a fifth to an eighth of the &#xA;number in the &#34;distal antrum&#34;.  (The distal antrum was now said to be the area extending &#xA;proximally from the pylorus for a distance of 3.0cm).  In the duodenal ulcer group, as &#xA;well as in the group of duodenal ulcer with uraemia, and the gastric carcinoma group, the &#xA;density of G cells increased from the proximal to the distal part of the antrum;  in the &#xA;group of gastric ulceration the overall density in various parts of the antrum remained the &#xA;same.&#xA;G cell density was found to be significantly lower along the lesser curvature and &#xA;on the anterior and posterior walls than along the greater curvature.  This held true in all &#xA;patient groups excepting that of duodenal ulcer with uraemia.  It was concluded that the &#xA;densest concentration of G cells occurred in the terminal antrum, i.e. the distal 3.0cm of &#xA;the stomach;  that the G cell density was significantly higher along the greater than along &#xA;the lesser curvature;  that individual variations existed in the antral G cell density, the &#xA;total G cell mass and the spatial distribution of G cells in the antrum;  that a transitional &#xA;zone, of varying width, occurred in all patients;  and that the G cell density in the distal &#xA;antrum was lower in patients with gastric ulceration than in the other patient categories.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A study by Royston et al. (l978) showed results similar to those of Stave and Brandtzaeg &#xA;(l976, l978).  The highest density of G cells was found in &#34;antral&#34; mucosal glands near &#xA;the pylorus, the number gradually decreasing in an orad direction until the junctional &#xA;zone between antrum and corpus was reached, where a marked decrease in numbers &#xA;occurred.  These authors found significant direct correlations between antral area and G &#xA;cell density, between peak acid output and G cell population, and between basal plasma &#xA;gastrin and G cell density.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;G cells act in an endocrine rather than a paracrine or neurocrine way;  being secreted into &#xA;the bloodstream, circulating gastrin (consisting of different molecular types) produces its &#xA;effects on distant target cells.  It should therefore be looked upon as a hormone.  There is &#xA;evidence that some gastrin is also secreted into the lumen, but the physiological &#xA;significance of this is not clear (Uvn&amp;#228;s-Wallensten l978).  Gastrin or its synthetic &#xA;analogues has a number of effects on the upper gastrointestinal tract, some of the most &#xA;important being stimulation of hydrochloric acid, pepsinogen and intrinsic factor &#xA;secretion by the stomach;  stimulation of bicarbonate and enzyme secretion by the &#xA;pancreas;  increase in tone of the lower esophageal sphincter;  increase in amplitude of &#xA;smooth muscle contractions in the stomach and jejunum (Theron and Meyer l976);  and &#xA;trophic action on the fundic mucosa, pentagastrin inducing hypertrophy of the mucosa &#xA;and increases in DNA, RNA and protein synthesis (Johnson and Guthrie l976;  Dockray &#xA;l978).  Removal of the &#34;antrum&#34; leads to atrophy of the oxyntic glandular zone (Dockray &#xA;l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gastrin release is induced by vagal activity, mechanical distension of the stomach, certain &#xA;food constituents, and is controlled by intra-antral pH (Uvn&amp;#228;s-Wallensten l978).  &#xA;Acidification of antral mucosa inhibits release of gastrin and is probably an important &#xA;physiological mechanism for the control of gastrin secretion (Walsh and Grossman l975).  &#xA;The kidneys and small intestine catabolise gastrin (Dockray l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hypergastrinaemia is produced by the following conditions:  (1) gastrinomas, which &#xA;generally arise in the pancreas, occasionally in the duodenum and only rarely in the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34; (Yalow and Berson l970;  Gregory and Tracy l975;  Dockray l978);  (2) &#xA;removal or disease of organs participating in the catabolism of gastrin, e.g. after loss of &#xA;kidney function or after extensive small bowel resection (Dockray l978);  (3) pernicious &#xA;anaemia, in which the atrophic gastritis may spare the antrum and in which there is a &#xA;tendency toward hyperplasia of G cells, resulting in serum gastrin concentrations which &#xA;may be in the gastrinoma range (Yalow and Berson l970;  Dockray l978).  Achlorhydric &#xA;and hypochlorhydric patients also tend to have high circulating gastrin concentrations due &#xA;to diminished acid inhibition (Dockray l978);  (4) increased secretion from antral G cells &#xA;(Walsh and Grossman l975).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;somatostatin&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Somatostatin&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#somatostatin&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Krulich et al. (l968, l969) and Brazeau et al (l973) isolated a tetradecapeptide from ovine, &#xA;and Schally et al (l976) from porcine hypothalamic tissue, which was shown to inhibit &#xA;release of growth hormone (GH) from the pituitary gland.  Later named somatostatin, it &#xA;has subsequently been found to be widely distributed in the central nervous system &#xA;(Brownstein et al. l975;  Arimura et al. l978;  Forssmann et al. l979), the gastrointestinal &#xA;tract (Arimura et al. l975, l978) and other organs in experimental animals and man.  &#xA;Using radioimmunoassay the distribution in rat organs other than the central nervous &#xA;system was determined (Arimura et al. l975, l978);  it was shown that the pancreas had &#xA;the highest concentration, namely 34ng/mg protein, followed by the stomach with a &#xA;concentration of 12ng/mg.  In the stomach the hormone was found in the pyloric and &#xA;oxyntic mucosal zones but not in the cardiac zone.  The total amount in either the &#xA;pancreas or stomach was greater than in the hypothalamus;  the duodenum, jejunum and &#xA;ileum contained lesser amounts, ranging from 1.2 to 1.8ng/mg protein.  Other organs &#xA;such as the liver, spleen, kidneys and adrenals did not contain significant amounts.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Combined immunocytochemical and histological methods for demonstrating endocrine &#xA;granules showed that somatostatin was present in D cells in the islet system of the &#xA;pancreas (Polak et al. l975) and in morphologically similar D cells in the gastrointestinal &#xA;tract (Polak et al. l976), localized predominantly in the midzone of the mucosal glands.  &#xA;According to Bloom and Polak (l978) the highest concentration of D cells occurs in the &#xA;pancreas and pyloric mucosal zone, where the incidence is more than 31 cells per mm&amp;#178;.  &#xA;In the remainder of the stomach and duodenum there are 11 to 30 cells per mm&amp;#178;, and  in &#xA;the jejunum 1 to 10 cells per mm&amp;#178;;  in the ileum and colon the number is zero.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Somatostatin not only suppresses the secretion of growth hormone, but possesses a wide &#xA;variety of inhibitory actions on other pituitary and extra-pituitary secretions.  It &#xA;suppresses the release of thyroid-stimulating hormone by the pituitary, the release of &#xA;glucagon, insulin and exocrine secretions by the pancreas, the secretion of &#xA;cholecystokinin, motilin and secretin by the intestine, and the secretion of gastrin, gastric &#xA;acid and pepsin by the stomach (Pearse et al. l977;  Konturek et al. l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Experimental lowering of &#34;antral&#34; pH induces a release of somatostatin by D cells in the &#xA;pyloric mucosal zone.  It appears that somatostatin suppresses gastric acid secretion by &#xA;direct action on the parietal cells of the cardiac and oxyntic mucosal zones (Arimura et al. &#xA;l978).  Lowering the pH also inhibits the secretion of gastrin;  consequently low pH &#xA;suppresses both gastric acid and gastrin secretion (Arimura et al. l978).&#xA;Somatostatin is considered to be a potent vasoconstrictor of the intestinal circulation, and &#xA;some of the inhibitory effects in the gastrointestinal tract may be the result of diminished &#xA;mesenteric blood flow (Konturek et al. l978).  It also suppresses motility of the intestine &#xA;and contractions of the gall bladder and it possesses neurotrophic effects.  The findings &#xA;suggest that somatostatin not only serves as a hypophysiotrophic hormone, but also as a &#xA;neurotransmitter (Vale et al. l977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Somatostatinomas of the pancreas have been documented;  patients had &#xA;hypoglucagonaemia, hypoinsulinaemia and mild diabetes, with remission of &#xA;hyperglycaemia after removal of the tumor (Ganda et al. l977;  Larsson et al. l977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Holle et al. (l985) determined the number of somatostatin-secreting D cells in the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, pre- and post-operatively, in 20 patients with duodenal and 8 with gastric &#xA;ulceration.  In patients with a normal population of gastrin-immunoreactive G cells, the D &#xA;cells were within the normal range.  High G cell values were accompanied by high D cell &#xA;values and low G cell values by low D cell values.  The G cell to D cell ratio was 8:1 in &#xA;duodenal, and 6.6:1 in gastric ulceration.  Morphologic coupling of the gastrin-&#xA;somatostatin system in the &#34;antrum&#34; was assumed;  this was constant in ulcer disease &#xA;both before and after vagotomy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Holle et al. (l985) the almost exclusively inhibitory function of &#xA;somatostatin, combined with the proximity to glucagon A and insulin B cells in the &#xA;pancreas, as well as to parietal and gastrin G cells in the stomach, raises the question of a &#xA;paracrine-like mechanism.  However, in addition to the direct interaction of somatostatin &#xA;D cells with neighbouring cells, adrenergic and cholinergic pathways also appear to exist.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-vip&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide (VIP)&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-vip&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Said and Mutt (l970) isolated a polypeptide with strong vascular effects from porcine &#xA;small intestine.  Termed vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), it was subsequently purified &#xA;by Said and Mutt (l972).  For some time VIP was considered to be a solely &#xA;gastrointestinal hormone;  later studies, however, demonstrated VIP in central and &#xA;peripheral neurons, suggesting a neurotransmitter function (Larsson et al. l976).  It is now &#xA;known that VIP nerves have an ubiquitous occurrence in the body, being particularly &#xA;numerous in the gastrointestinal, genito-urinary and respiratory tracts (Alumets et al. &#xA;l978).  In the peripheral autonomic system these nerves were shown to occur in various &#xA;regions, including the superior and inferior mesenteric ganglia, and the submucous &#xA;(Meissner&#39;s) and myenteric (Auerbach&#39;s) plexuses of the intestinal wall (Said l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Structures believed to exert a sphincteric function receive a particularly rich supply of &#xA;VIP nerves, more so than the smooth muscle of adjacent regions.  Among these are the &#xA;oesophago-gastric junction, the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34;, sphincter of Oddi, internal anal &#xA;sphincter, and the openings of the ureters and urethra into the trigonum of the bladder.  &#xA;The very rich supply of VIP nerves is a consistent finding in the smooth muscle of all &#xA;recognized sphincters;  it is thought that an evaluation of the density of VIP innervation &#xA;may assist in anatomically defining a sphincter (Alumets et al. l978) (Chap. 2).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using immuno-fluorescent techniques, Polak et al (l974) determined the cellular &#xA;distribution of VIP in the mammalian (dog, pig and baboon) gastrointestinal tract, &#xA;mucosal samples being taken from the gastric fornix, pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;, duodenum, &#xA;jejunum, ileum and colon.  The distribution of cells was found to be wide;  they were &#xA;present in all regions examined, the highest number occurring in the colon in all three &#xA;species.  According to Bloom and Polak (l978) the highest concentration of VIP cells, &#xA;more than 31 per mm&amp;#178;, occurred in the colon.  There were 11 to 30 cells per mm&amp;#178; in the &#xA;duodenum, and in the stomach, including the pyloric mucosal zone, the concentration &#xA;was 1 to 10 cells per mm&amp;#178;.  The relative numerical frequency of these cells in the &#xA;different gastric mucosal zones was not determined in detail.  Small numbers of cells &#xA;occurred in the pancreas.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Walsh (l983) pointed out that while VIP was originally thought to be located in &#xA;gastrointestinal endocrine-type cells, later data were consistent with a purely neural &#xA;localization in the gut;  VIP was also distributed throughout the brain and in peripheral &#xA;nerves outside the gastrointestinal tract.  In the stomach Ferri et al. (l984) found a dense &#xA;VIP-containing nerve supply around oxyntic and pyloric mucosal glands.  In the &#xA;duodenum VIP (and substance P) were present in striking nerve networks in the villi and &#xA;muscularis mucosae and around blood vessels.  VIP was also immunostained in nerve &#xA;bundles and neuronal perikarya between the lobules of Brunner&#39;s glands, while very few &#xA;fibres reached the proximity of the acinar cells of these glands (Chap. 4).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The biological actions of VIP are numerous and include vasodilatation, lowered blood &#xA;pressure, increased cardiac output, glycogenolysis and relaxation of smooth muscle &#xA;(Piper et al. l970).  VIP release from the gut was demonstrated upon electric stimulation &#xA;of the vagus in pigs;  significant inhibition of gastric secretion was associated with &#xA;enhanced VIP release (Said l978).  The physiological role of VIP, however, was &#xA;uncertain (Said l978), but it appeared to be implicated in the following actions:  it might &#xA;serve as a neurotransmitter in the central nervous as well as the peripheral autonomic &#xA;systems;  its wide distribution in many tissues and the relatively constant plasma values &#xA;suggested that it probably acted as a neurotransmitter in a paracrine, rather than in an &#xA;endocrine, way (Modlin et al. l978).  The VIP neurons have been shown to be under dual &#xA;(both vagal and splanchnic) control of the autonomic system;  release of VIP into venous &#xA;effluent has been correlated with specific physiological mechanisms known to be &#xA;mediated via non-cholinergic and non-adrenergic nerve fibres, and elicited by electrical &#xA;stimulation of the vagus nerves (Fahrenkrug et al. l977).  Vagal stimulation caused a &#xA;frequency-dependent increase in the release of VIP;  splanchnic stimulation caused a &#xA;decrease in the release of VIP, an action which was annulled by alpha-adrenergic &#xA;blockade.  The inhibitory effect of splanchnic stimulation significantly diminished &#xA;vagally induced VIP release.&#xA;It was suggested that VIP functioned as the mediator of &#xA;actions in the gastrointestinal tract known to be elicited via non-cholinergic, non-&#xA;adrenergic vagal fibres (Fahrenkrug et al. l977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;VIP may participate in the regulation of gastrointestinal tone, motility and secretion (Said &#xA;l978).  It has been proposed as a possible neurotransmitter of inhibitory nerves of the gut &#xA;(Fahrenkrug et al. l977, l978) and it appears likely that it is involved in sphincter &#xA;relaxation (Alumets et al. l978).  It is a strong candidate as a neurotransmitter responsible &#xA;for relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter (Goyal et al. l980) and the internal anal &#xA;sphincter in some vertebrates (Biancani et al. l985).  It inhibits the amplitude of smooth &#xA;muscle contractions of the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; in canines (Morgan et al. l978);  its usual &#xA;effect on gastrointestinal smooth muscle is relaxation (Walsh l983).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;VIP appears to be an important mediator of paraneoplastic syndromes associated with &#xA;islet-cell tumors of the pancreas, especially the watery diarrhoea hypokalaemia &#xA;achlorhydria (WDHA or Verner-Morrison) syndrome.  Although disputed by some &#xA;authors, the findings of Welbourn et al (l978) left little doubt that a WDHA syndrome &#xA;could occur in association with a pancreatic or certain neural tumors.  Other tumors &#xA;which may secrete large amounts of VIP or VIP-like peptides are neuroblastoma, &#xA;ganglioneuroma, pheochromocytoma, medullary thyroid carcinoma and bronchogenic &#xA;carcinoma (Said l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;substance-p&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Substance P&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#substance-p&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While studying the biological effects of extracts of intestinal wall on isolated jejunum &#xA;preparations, Von Euler and Gaddum (l930) described contractions occurring as a result &#xA;of a &#34;novel&#34; or unknown substance. Its effects were two fold:  it lowered arterial pressure &#xA;(presumably as a result of vasodilatation), and it caused contraction of smooth muscle in &#xA;various organs.  Fourty years later Chang and Leeman (l970) isolated and identified the &#xA;unknown factor as an 11-amino-acid peptide called substance P.  It was shown to be &#xA;present in various tissues, including the central nervous system;  particularly high &#xA;concentrations occurred in the posterior horns of the spinal cord.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the gastrointestinal tract, substance P containing nerve fibres and cell bodies are &#xA;encountered along its entire length;  they are least prominent in the oesophagus and upper &#xA;part of the stomach (Polak and Bloom l98l).  According to Walsh (l983) the highest &#xA;concentrations occur in the duodenum.  Substance P neuronal cell bodies are mainly &#xA;located in the myenteric plexuses;  their nerve fibres richly innervate the circular &#xA;musculature, whereas the longitudinal muscle contains only a sparse network of fibres.  &#xA;Substance P nerve fibres are also in close contact with the blood vessels (Polak and &#xA;Bloom l98l).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the human gastric mucosa Ferri et al. (l984) demonstrated substance P &#xA;immunoreactivity in the oxyntic zone in a few, thin fibres only.  Fibres containing this &#xA;peptide were more numerous and interconnecting in the &#34;antrum&#34; 3.0cm above the &#xA;pyloric aperture.  In the duodenum substance P (and VIP) were present in striking nerve &#xA;networks in the villi as well as in the muscularis mucosae and around blood vessels.  The &#xA;peptide was also immunostained in nerve fibres in the submucosa, in neuronal perikarya &#xA;between the lobules of Brunner&#39;s glands and in Meissner&#39;s plexus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Substance P has been found to cause contraction of the muscularis mucosae;  it is also a &#xA;well-known vasodilator (Ferri et al. l984).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;enkephalin&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Enkephalin&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#enkephalin&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hughes et al (l975) isolated two endogenous opiate-like compounds from pig brain.  The &#xA;two pentapeptides, endorphin and enkephalin, were subsequently demonstrated in other &#xA;mammalian species (Polak et al. l977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The distribution of endorphins and enkephalins in man was studied by a combination of &#xA;immunocytochemistry and radioimmunoassay (Polak et al l977, l978).  Endorphin &#xA;immuno-reactivity was found to be confined to the intermediate and anterior lobes of the &#xA;pituitary.  Enkephalins on the other hand, were found to have a much wider distribution, &#xA;being present in many areas of the central nervous sytem, spinal cord and peripheral &#xA;nerves and being widely distributed in the gastrointestinal tract (Polak et al. l977;  Skov &#xA;Olsen et al. l98l).  It was of interest that enkephalins were absent from the pituitary.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the gastrointestinal tract enkephalin was found in most areas, the highest concentration &#xA;being in the &#34;antrum&#34; (i.e. the pyloric mucosal zone) with lesser amounts in the &#xA;duodenum and jejunum and even less in the colon;  it was not present in the gastric &#xA;fornix.  The &#34;antrum&#34; contained 31 to 103 ng/gm wet weight, the duodenum l7 to 93 &#xA;ng/gm, and the colon 6 to 15 ng/gm;  the gall bladder and pancreas contained smaller &#xA;amounts (Polak et al. l977, l978).  Distribution of enkephalin cells closely paralleled the &#xA;localization as determined by radioimmunoassay.  According to Polak et al (l977) &#xA;enkephalin was found in endocrine cells of the &#34;antrum&#34; and duodenum similar to G &#xA;cells;  it was presumed that the peptide could be stored either within gastrin containing &#xA;granules or in different granules, as several granule types might occur in the same cell.  &#xA;However, the exact intracellular localization of these peptides was not clear;  according to &#xA;Skov Olsen (l98l) enkephalins were localized to specific endocrine-paracrine cells (other &#xA;than G cells) of the APUD series, as well as to nerve fibres of the myenteric plexuses.  &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the human gastric mucosa Ferri et al (l984) found metenkephalin immunoreactivity in &#xA;a few scattered nerve bundles in the basal parts of the mucosa and in the muscularis &#xA;mucosae.  Enkephalins were rapidly degraded by blood and were unlikely to have a &#xA;hormonal function;  a paracrine function was more probable (Skov Olsen l98l).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The localization of enkephalins in neural tissue parallels that of opiate receptor sites &#xA;(Polak et al. l978).  Both are found in high concentrations in areas associated with &#xA;sensory input of pain signals;  the small molecular size and short half-life of this peptide &#xA;suggest a neurotransmittive function.&#xA;The pharmacology of morphia probably provides &#xA;the best clue as to the role of enkephalins.  Morphia acts by increasing muscle tone, &#xA;delaying gastric emptying and slowing intestinal transit.  In the gastrointestinal tract &#xA;enkephalins may act in a similar manner;  gastrointestinal enkephalins may aid in the &#xA;control of intestinal motility, whereas brain enkephalins are thought to be involved in &#xA;pain tolerance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Konturek et al. (l978, l980) determined the effects of enkephalin on the gastrointestinal &#xA;tract in canines.  The results showed that enkephalin mimicked most of the motor effects &#xA;of opiates;  following administration there was a decrease in the rate, but increase in the &#xA;amplitude of gastric contractions, with a delay in gastric emptying.  In the small bowel &#xA;enkephalin caused a marked reduction in postprandial spike potential activity, and &#xA;conversion of the fed pattern of activity to a fasting pattern.  Intra-arterial enkephalin and &#xA;morphia increased intraluminal pressure values dose dependently, and decreased &#xA;mesenteric vascular resistance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;galanin&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Galanin&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#galanin&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bishop et al (l986) showed that galanin immunoreactivity was localized exclusively to &#xA;neuronal elements in the walls of the gastrointestinal tract in the rat, pig and man, and &#xA;that it occurred at all levels of the tract.  Galanin immunoreactive neuronal cells were &#xA;noted in the submucous plexuses and immunoreactive nerves were present in all layers of &#xA;the wall, with the possible exception of the mucosa;  most fibres were located in the &#xA;muscle layers.  In the human stomach galanin immunoreactive nerves were equally &#xA;numerous in the &#34;antrum&#34; and fornix.  Preliminary pharmacological experiments showed &#xA;that galanin caused smooth muscle contractions in the rat intestine and induced mild &#xA;hyperglycaemia (Bishop et al. l986);  it appeared to act as a regulatory factor in the &#xA;control of gastrointestinal motility.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A close relationship existed between galanin and VIP immunoreactivity, both peptides &#xA;occurring in the same ganglion cells of the submucous plexuses.  The distribution of &#xA;galanin and VIP immunoreactive nerves in the walls of the gastrointestinal tract was also &#xA;similar, with the following exceptions:  galanin fibres were infrequent in the mucosal &#xA;layer as compared with VIP fibres, which formed dense mucosal plexuses;  and galanin &#xA;nerves did not appear to be associated with the vascular system of the gastrointestinal &#xA;tract.  (Bishop et al. 1986).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;neurotensin&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Neurotensin&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#neurotensin&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Buchan et al. (l977) the neurotensin secreting N cell is a typical endocrine &#xA;cell with a connection to the lumen via microvilli and electron dense secretory granules &#xA;grouped at the basement membrane.  Radioimmunoassay and immunocytochemistry of &#xA;fresh surgical and endoscopic samples showed that the highest concentration of &#xA;neurotensin occurs in ileal mucosa, with significant amounts in the jejunum and only &#xA;traces in the pyloric mucosal zone and duodenum.  The concentration of neurotensin in &#xA;plasma rises after a meal, but its function is still unclear.  In the belief that it is a &#xA;modulator of secretory and motor functions of the stomach, Blackburn et al (l980) &#xA;infused it intravenously into healthy volunteers at a dose of 2.4 pmol/kg/min, designed to &#xA;mimic postprandial levels.  It was found that neurotensin caused significant inhibition of &#xA;pentagastrin stimulated gastric acid and pepsin secretion.  It also caused significant delay &#xA;in gastric emptying, making it one more candidate for the hormone postulated to be &#xA;released from the small intestine and to cause a feedback delay in gastric emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although individual variations in the distribution of APUD cells in the gastrointestinal &#xA;tract exist, it is generally agreed that the highest density of gastrin producing G cells &#xA;occurs in the distal 3.0cm of the stomach, i.e. in that part of the pyloric mucosal zone &#xA;which lines the sphincteric cylinder.  The number gradually decreases in an orad direction &#xA;until the junctional zone between pyloric and oxyntic mucosa is reached, where a marked &#xA;decrease in numbers occurs.  The first part of the duodenum contains a fifth to an eighth &#xA;of the number of G cells in the distal stomach.  The physiological effects of gastrins, and &#xA;the sequelae of overproduction in gastrinomas, are well known and need no &#xA;recapitulation.  In a small series of cases of gastric carcinoma Stave and Brandtzaeg &#xA;(l978) found that the density of G cells increased from the proximal to the distal part of &#xA;the &#34;antrum&#34;, as in normal subjects.  In acid corrosive injury to the gastric mucosa &#xA;damage of G cells may produce histamine-fast achlorhydria, occurring as part of a &#xA;delayed gastric syndrome (Chap. 39).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the stomach somatostatin occurs mainly in the pyloric and oxyntic, and not in the &#xA;cardiac mucosal zones.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Vasoactive intestinal peptide has a predominantly neural localization in the &#xA;gastrointestinal tract.  A dense VIP containing nerve supply occurs around glands in the &#xA;pyloric and oxyntic mucosal zones;  in the duodenum VIP is encountered in neuronal &#xA;elements between the lobules of Brunner&#39;s glands.  A particularly rich supply of VIP &#xA;nerves occurs in structures believed to exert a sphincteric function, a factor which may &#xA;assist in anatomically defining a sphincter.  To the best of our knowledge this finding has &#xA;not yet been utilized to determine the exact roles of the pyloric ring and pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder in the mechanism at the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Substance P-containing nerve fibres in the gastrointestinal tract occur in highest density &#xA;in the duodenal villi, muscularis mucosae, blood vessels, Meissner&#39;s plexuses and &#xA;between the lobules of Brunner&#39;s glands. In the stomach these fibres have been found to &#xA;be numerous and interconnecting in the &#34;antrum&#34; 3.0 cm proximal to the pyloric aperture.  &#xA;This is the region of the left pyloric loop in man;  whether the occurrence is of any &#xA;significance in relation to the sphincteric cylinder is not known.  Substance P fibres are &#xA;much less prominent in the upper part of the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the gastrointestinal tract enkephalin occurs in highest concentration in the pyloric &#xA;mucosal zone.  Like morphia it causes a decrease in rate, but increase in amplitude of &#xA;gastric contractions, with delay in emptying.  Its effect on cyclical contractions of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder has not been determined;  it is surmized that it will be of a similar &#xA;nature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Galanin immunoreactive fibres are equally numerous in the &#34;antrum&#34; and fornix;  the &#xA;peptide causes smooth muscle contractions and appears to act as a regulatory factor in &#xA;motility.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Alumets J, Hakanson R, Sundler F, et al.  VIP innervation of sphincters.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroent&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 13, Suppl 49, 6 (abstract).&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Arimura A, Sato H, Dupont A, et al.  Somatostatin:  abundance of &#xA;immunoreactive hormone in rat stomach and pancreas.  &lt;EM&gt;Science&lt;/EM&gt; l975, l89, 1007-&#xA;1009.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;&#x9;Arimura A, Coy DH, Chihara M, et al.  Somatostatin.  In: &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit  &#xA;Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, New York l978, pp 437-445.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Biancani P, Walsh J, Behar J.  Vasoactive intestinal peptide:  a neurotransmitter &#xA;for relaxation of the rabbit internal anal sphincter.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l985, 89, &#xA;867-874.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bishop AE, Polak JM, Bauer FE, et al.  Occurrence and distribution of a newly &#xA;discovered peptide, galanin, in the mammalian enteric nervous system.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l986, &#xA;27, 849-857.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blackburn AM, Fletcher DR, Bloom SR, et al.  Effect of neurotensin on gastric &#xA;function in man.  &lt;EM&gt;Lancet&lt;/EM&gt; l980, 1, 987-989.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bloom SR, Polak JM.  Gut hormone overview.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom &#xA;SR.  Churchill Livingstone, New York l978, pp 3-17.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Brazeau P, Vale W, Burgus R, et al.  Hypothalamic polypeptide that inhibits the &#xA;secretion of immunoreactive pituitary growth hormone.  &lt;EM&gt;Science&lt;/EM&gt; l973, 179, 77-79.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Brownstein M, Arimura A, Sato H, et al.  The regional distribution of &#xA;somatostatin in the rat brain.  &lt;EM&gt;Endocrinology&lt;/EM&gt; l975, 96, 1456-1461.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Buchan AMJ, Polak JM, Sullivan S, et al.  Distribution of neurotensin in man:  a &#xA;peptide hormone affecting carbohydrate metabolism.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l977, l8, A943.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bussolati G, Pearse AGE.  Immunofluorescent localization of the gastrin secreting &#xA;G cells in the pyloric antrum of the pig.  &lt;EM&gt;Histochemie&lt;/EM&gt; l970, 21, 1-4.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Chang MM, Leeman SE.  Isolation of a sialogogic peptide from bovine &#xA;hypothalamic tissue and its characterization as substance P.  &lt;EM&gt;J Biol Chem&lt;/EM&gt; l970, &#xA;245, 4784-4790.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dockray GJ.  Gastrin overview.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom SR, Grossman &#xA;MI, Churchill Livingstone, London l978, pp 129-139.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Edkins JS.  The chemical mechanism of gastric secretion.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l906, 34, &#xA;133-144.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fahrenkrug J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB.  Radioimmunoassay of vasoactive &#xA;intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in plasma.  &lt;EM&gt;J Lab Clin Med&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 89, 1379-1388.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fahrenkrug J, Galbo H, Holst JJ, et al.  Influence of the autonomic nervous &#xA;system on the release of vasoactive intestinal polypeptide from the porcine &#xA;gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 280, 405-422.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fahrenkrug J, Haglund U, Jodal M, et al.  Nervous release of vasoactive intestinal &#xA;polypeptide in the gastrointestinal tract of cats:  possible physiological &#xA;implications.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 284, 291-305.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fahrenkrug J, Haglund U, Jodal M, et al.  Possible physiological implications of &#xA;nervously released vasoactive intestinal polypeptide in the gastrointestinal tract.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Scand J Gastroent&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 13, Suppl 49, 56 (abstract).&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fahrenkrug J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB, Holst JJ.  Autonomic nervous &#xA;influence on VIP release.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 13, Suppl 49, 58 (abstract).&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ferri GL, Botti P, Biliotti G, et al.  VIP, substance P and met-enkephalin &#xA;immunoreactive innervation of the human gastroduodenal mucosa and Brunner&#39;s &#xA;glands.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l984, 25, 948-952.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssman WG, Burnweit C, Shehab T, et al.  Somatostatin-immunoreactive nerve &#xA;cell bodies and fibres in the medulla oblongata et spinalis.  &lt;/EM&gt;J Histochem &#xA;Cytochem&lt;/EM&gt; l979, 27, 1391-1393.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ganda OP, Weir GC, Soeldner JS, et al.  &#34;Somatostatinoma&#34;: a somatostatin &#xA;containing tumor of the endocrine pancreas.  &lt;EM&gt;New Eng J Med&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 296, 963-967.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Goyal RK, Rattan S, Said SI.  VIP as a possible neurotransmitter of non-&#xA;cholinergic, non-adrenergic inhibitory neurones.  &lt;EM&gt;Nature&lt;/EM&gt; l980, 288, 378-380.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gregory RA, Tracy HJ.  The preparation and properties of gastrin.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l96l, &#xA;156, 523-543.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gregory RA, Tracy HJ.  The constitution and properties of two gastrins extracted &#xA;from hog antral mucosa.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l964, 5, 103-117.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gregory RA, Tracy HJ.  The chemistry of gastrins.  In: &lt;EM&gt;Gastrointestinal &#xA;Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;.  edit Thompson JC.  Univ Texas Press, Austin l975, pp 13-24.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Holle GE, Buck E, Pradayrol L, et al.  Behavior of somatostatin-immunoreactive &#xA;cells in the gastric mucosa before and after selective proximal vagotomy and &#xA;pyloroplasty in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; &#xA;l985, 89, 736-745.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hughes J, Smith TW, Kosterlitz HW, et al.  Identification of two related &#xA;pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity.  &lt;EM&gt;Nature&lt;/EM&gt; l975, &#xA;258, 577-579.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Johnson LR, Guthrie PD.  Stimulation of DNA synthesis by big and little gastrin.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l976, 71, 599-602.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Konturek SJ, Krol R, Pawlik W, et al.  Pharmacology of somatostatin.  In: &lt;EM&gt;Gut &#xA;Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, New York l978, pp 457-462.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Konturek SJ. Pawlik E, Tasler J, et al.  Effects of enkephalin on the &#xA;gastrointestinal tract.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, &#xA;London l978, pp 507-512.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Konturek SJ.  Opiates and gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt; l980, 74, &#xA;285-291.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Krulich L, Dhariwal APS, McCann S.  Stimulatory and inhibitory effects of &#xA;purified hypothalamic extracts on growth hormone release from rat pituitary in &#xA;vitro.  &lt;EM&gt;Endocrinology&lt;/EM&gt; l968, 83, 783-790.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Krulich L, McCann S.  Effect of GH-releasing factor and GH-inhibiting factor on &#xA;the release and concentration of GH in pituitaries incubated in vitro.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Endocrinology&lt;/EM&gt; l969, 85, 319-324.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Larsson LI, Fahrenkrug J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell O, et al.  Localization of &#xA;vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) to central and peripheral neurons.  &lt;EM&gt;Proc &#xA;Nat Acad Science&lt;/EM&gt; l976, 73, 3197-3200.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Larsson LI, Hirsch MA, Holst JJ, et al.  Pancreatic somatostatinoma:  clinical &#xA;features and physiological implications.  &lt;EM&gt;Lancet&lt;/EM&gt; l977, l, 666-668.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;McGuigan JE.  Gastric mucosal intracellular localization of gastrin by &#xA;immunofluorescence.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l968, 55, 315-327.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Modlin IM, Mitchell SJ, Bloom SR.  The systemic release and pharmacokinetics &#xA;of VIP.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, New York &#xA;l978, pp 470-474.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Morgan KF, Schmalz PF, Szurszewski JH.  The inhibitory effects of vasoactive &#xA;intestinal polypeptide on the mechanical and electrical activity of canine antral &#xA;smooth muscle.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 282, 437-450.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Mortensen NJM.  The anatomy of the gastrin cell.  &lt;EM&gt;Ann Roy Coll Surg&lt;/EM&gt; l980, 62, &#xA;462-469.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Pearse AGE, Polak JM, Bloom SR.  The newer gut hormones:  cellular sources, &#xA;physiology and clinical aspects.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 72, 746-761.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Piper PJ, Said SI, Vane JR.  Effects on smooth muscle preparations of &#xA;unidentified vasoactive peptides from intestine and lung.  &lt;EM&gt;Nature&lt;/EM&gt; l970, 225, 1144-&#xA;1146.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Polak JL, Pearse AGE, Garand JC, et al.  Cellular localization of a vasoactive &#xA;intestinal peptide in the mammalian and avian gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l974, 15, &#xA;720-724.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Polak JM, Pearse AGE, Grimelius L, et al.  Growth-hormone release-inhibiting &#xA;hormone (GH-RIH) gastrointestinal and pancreatic D cells.  &lt;EM&gt;Lancet&lt;/EM&gt; l975, 1, 1220-&#xA;1222.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Polak JM, Bloom SR, McCrossan M, et al.  Studies in gastric D cell pathology.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l976, l7, 400-401.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Polak JM, Sullivan SN, Bloom SR, et al.  Enkephalin-like immunoreactivity in &#xA;the human gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;EM&gt;Lancet&lt;/EM&gt; l977, l, 972-974.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Polak JM, Sullivan SN, Buchan AMJ, et al.  Endorphins.  In: &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit &#xA;Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, London l978, pp 501-506.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Polak JM, Bloom SR.  Organization of the gut peptidergic innervation.  In: &lt;EM&gt;Gut &#xA;Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;.  Edit Bloom SR, Polak JM.  Churchill Livingstone, London l98l, pp &#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Royston CMS, Polak J, Bloom SR, et al.  G cell population of the gastric antrum, &#xA;plasma gastrin, and gastric acid secretion in patients with and without duodenal &#xA;ulcer.  &lt;EM&gt;Gut&lt;/EM&gt; l978, l9, 689-698.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Said SI, Mutt V.  Potent peripheral and splanchnic vasodilator peptide from &#xA;normal gut.  &lt;EM&gt;Nature&lt;/EM&gt; l970, 225, 863-864.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Said SI, Mutt V.  Polypeptide with broad biological activity:  isolation from small &#xA;intestine.  &lt;EM&gt;Science&lt;/EM&gt; l970, 169, 1217-1218.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Said SI, Mutt V. Isolation from porcine intestinal wall of a vasoactive &#xA;octacosapeptide related to secretin and glucagon.  &lt;EM&gt;Eur J Biochem&lt;/EM&gt; l972, 28, 190-&#xA;204.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Said SI.  VIP overview.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom SR.  Churchill &#xA;Livingstone, New York l978, pp 465-469.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schally AV, Dupont A, Arimura A, et al.  Isolation and structure of growth &#xA;hormone release inhibiting hormone (somatostatin) from porcine hypothalami.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Biochemistry&lt;/EM&gt; l976, 15, 509-514.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skov Olsen P, Kirkegaard P, Petersen B, et al.  The effect of a synthetic met-&#xA;enkephalin analogue (FK 33-824) on gastric acid secretion and serum gastrin in &#xA;man.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt; l98l, 16, 531-533.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Solcia E, Vassallo G, Sampietro R.  Endocrine cells in the antropyloric mucosa of &#xA;the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;Zeitschr Zellforsch Mikr Anat&lt;/EM&gt; l967, 81, 474-486.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stave R, Brandtzaeg P.  Immunohistochemical investigation of gastrin producing &#xA;cells (G cells).  The distribution of G cells in resected human stomachs.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroent&lt;/EM&gt; l976, 11, 705-712.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stave R, Brandtzaeg P.  Immunohistochemical investigation of gastrin producing &#xA;cells (G cells).  Estimation of antral density, mucosal distribution, and total mass &#xA;of G cells in resected stomachs from patients with peptic ulcer disease.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroent&lt;/EM&gt; l978, 13, 199-203.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Theron JJ, Meyer BJ.  Die maag.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Die Fisiologiese Basis van Geneeskunde&lt;/EM&gt;, &#xA;edit Meyer BJ, HAUM, Pretoria l976, pp 53.1-53.10.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Uvn&amp;#228;s-Wallensten K.  Vagal release of antral hormones.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit &#xA;Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, London l978, pp 389-393.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Vale W, Rivier C, Brown M.  Regulatory peptides of the hypothalamus.  &lt;EM&gt;Ann Rev &#xA;Physiol&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 39, 473-527.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Von Euler US, Gaddum JH.  An unidentified depressor substance in certain tissue &#xA;extracts.  &lt;EM&gt;J Physiol (Lond)&lt;/EM&gt; l930, 72, 74-87.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Walsh JA, Grossman MI.  Gastrin.  &lt;EM&gt;New Engl J Med&lt;/EM&gt; l975, 292, 1324-1332.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Walsh JH.  Gastrointestinal hormones and peptides.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Physiology of the &#xA;Gastrointestinal Tract&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Johnson LR, Raven Press, New York l983, pp 59-144.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Welbourn RB, Polak JM, Bloom SR, et al.  Apudomas of the pancreas.  In:  &lt;EM&gt;Gut &#xA;Hormones&lt;/EM&gt;, edit Bloom SR, Churchill Livingstone, New York l978, pp 561-567.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Yalow RS, Berson SA.  Size and charge distinctions between endogenous human &#xA;plasma gastrin in peripheral blood and heptadecapeptide gastrins.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/EM&gt; 1970, 58, 609-615.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 - Ultrasonography of Normal Anatomy</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_10/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_10/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;ultrasonography-of-normal-anatomy&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Ultrasonography of Normal Anatomy&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#ultrasonography-of-normal-anatomy&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;conventional-surface-ultrasonography-of-the-normal-infantile-pylorus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Conventional surface Ultrasonography of the Normal Infantile Pylorus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#conventional-surface-ultrasonography-of-the-normal-infantile-pylorus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The sonographic appearance of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) was first &#xA;described by Teele and Smith (l977) (Chap. 23).  Subsequently a number of authors &#xA;investigated the sonographic features of the normal infantile pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In transverse section the normal pylorus presents as a hypoechoic ring with a central &#xA;echogenic core, resembling a &#34;doughnut&#34; or &#34;target&#34; (Fig. 10.1).  By comparing &#xA;sonographic images with histological sections Blumhagen and Coombs (l98l) were able &#xA;to show that the hypoechoic ring coresponded to the muscular layer in the wall, while the &#xA;more echogenic central core was formed by the mucosal and submucosal layers, &#xA;including the muscularis mucosae.  On these views the overall diameter of the ring, as &#xA;well as the thickness of the sonolucent muscular layer, could be measured.  The width of &#xA;the hypoechoic muscular layer in normal infants between the ages of 2 and 10 weeks, was &#xA;found to be approximately 3.0 mm.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/10-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 10.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Transverse ultrasonic section of normal pyloric ring showing &#34;doughnut&#34; &#xA;(arrow).  The hypoechoic ring is the muscular, and the inner echogenic core the &#xA;mucosal/submucosal component of the ring&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Strauss et al. (l98l), using a static gray-scale B-scan unit and subsequently a real-time unit &#xA;with a 5MHz focused transducer, considered the infantile pylorus to be within normal &#xA;limits if its overall diameter measured 1.5cm or less.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Longitudinal sections of the normal pylorus, on which the canal length can be measured, &#xA;may also be obtained.  In tracing the thin, hypoechoic muscular layer distally to the &#xA;gastric outlet, Blumhagen and Noble (l983) found the &#34;antral&#34; muscular layer to vary &#xA;from 1.5 to 3.0 mm in thickness in normal infants.  Khamapirad and Athey (l983), using &#xA;digital gray-scale static equipment and a 5MHz focused transducer, studied transverse &#xA;and longitudinal sonographic images of the pylorus in 12 normal infants between the ages &#xA;of one and 6 weeks.  The normal pyloric ring was similar in appearance to the mass of &#xA;IHPS but was less than 1.0cm in diameter.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#x9;In a control group of 24 normal infants ranging in age from 2 days to 32 weeks, &#xA;Graif et al. (l984) found the mean and standard deviation for the transverse diameter to be &#xA;7.45 � 2.2 mm.  The mean single wall thickness was 2.3 mm with a standard deviation of &#xA;� 0.7 mm, while the mean length of the pylorus was 12.0 mm with a standard deviation &#xA;of � 3.7 mm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wilson and Vanhoutte (l984) measured what they called the true pyloric muscle length in &#xA;l7 normal babies, and found the range to vary from 12.0 to 15.0 mm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Stunden et al. (l986), in 88 normal infants under the age of 5 months, found the mean &#xA;overall diameter of the pylorus to be 9.1 � 1.1mm, the mean muscle thickness 1.6  � 0.4 &#xA;mm, and the mean canal length 8.3 � 2.5 mm.  These measurements were all obtained &#xA;with the pylorus in its most contracted state.  Additional information could be obtained &#xA;when the pylorus was viewed in real-time.  Normally the pyloric &#34;canal&#34; was seen to &#xA;relax, allowing fluid to pass from stomach to duodenum.  Some variation in overall &#xA;diameter and muscle thickness did occur, probably representing alterations in muscle &#xA;tone.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Stringer et al. (l986) the thickness of the inner echogenic layer, consisting &#xA;of the mucosa, muscularis mucosae and submucosa, normally varies between 2.5 and 3.5 &#xA;mm in infants.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Swischuk (l989) found the hypoechoic outer muscular layer to measure only 1.0 mm in &#xA;normal infants.  At times it was too thin to be measureable.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The anatomy of the pyloric ring may be determined accurately by means of non-ionizing, &#xA;non-invasive sonography in normal human subjects.  This has been done in a number of &#xA;volunteers, in whom it was confirmed that the ring consists mainly of mucosal and &#xA;submucosal tissues, surrounded by a relatively thin, peripheral muscular ring (Chap. 11).  &#xA;The relative paucity of muscular fibres in the pyloric ring suggests that it is unlikely to be &#xA;a sphincter in the usually accepted sense of the word.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blumhagen JD, Coombs JB.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;EM&gt;J Clin Ultrasound&lt;/EM&gt; l98l, 9, 289-292.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blumhagen JD, Noble HGS.  Muscle thickness in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: &#xA;sonographic determination.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J Roentg&lt;/EM&gt; l983, 140, 221-223.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Graif M, Itzchak Y, Avigad I. et al.  The pylorus in infancy:  overall sonographic &#xA;asssessment.  &lt;EM&gt;Pediatr Radiol&lt;/EM&gt; l984, 14, 14-17.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Khamapirad T, Athey PA.  Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &#xA;&lt;EM&gt;J Pediatr&lt;/EM&gt; l983, 102, 23-26.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Strauss S, Itzchak Y, Manor A, et al.  Sonography of hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;EM&gt;Amer J Roentg&lt;/EM&gt; l98l, 135, 1057-1058.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stringer DA, Daneman A, Brunelle F, et al.  Sonography of the normal and &#xA;abnormal stomach (excluding hypertrophic pyloric stenosis) in children.  &lt;EM&gt;J Ultrasound &#xA;Med&lt;/EM&gt; l986, 5, 183-188.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stunden RJ, Le Quensne GW, Little KET.  The improved ultrasound diagnosis of &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;EM&gt;Pediatr Radiol&lt;/EM&gt; l986, 16, 200-205.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Swischuk LE.  &lt;EM&gt;Imaging of the Newborn, Infant and Young Child&lt;/EM&gt;.  Williams and &#xA;Wilkins, Baltimore, 3rd ed l989, pp 394-413.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Teele RL, Smith EH.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic &#xA;pyloric stenosis.  &lt;EM&gt;New Engl J Med&lt;/EM&gt; l977, 296, 1149-1150.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wilson DA, Vanhoutte JJ.  The reliable sonographic diagnosis of hypertrophic &#xA;pyloric stenosis.  &lt;EM&gt;J Clin Ultrasound&lt;/EM&gt; l984, 12, 201-204&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;endoscopic-ultrasonography-of-the-layer-structure-of-the-gastric-walls&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Endoscopic Ultrasonography of the Layer Structure of the Gastric Walls&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#endoscopic-ultrasonography-of-the-layer-structure-of-the-gastric-walls&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;B-mode and real-time ultrasonography is a well-established and valuable diagnostic&#xA;procedure in the examination of various intra-abdominal conditions.  However, factors&#xA;such as obesity, alimentary gas and ribs may limit the resolution and field of view in&#xA;conventional surface echography.  Hisanaga et al (l980) developed a sonographic scanner&#xA;which could be introduced into the lumen of the stomach;  as the gastric walls are quite&#xA;thin, adjacent organs such as the pancreas could be observed from within the gastric&#xA;lumen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>11 - Anatomy of the Pyloric Ring</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_11/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_11/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;anatomy-of-the-pyloric-ring&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Anatomy of the Pyloric Ring&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#anatomy-of-the-pyloric-ring&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In fresh specimens a narrow (3.0mm to 4.0 mm) annular thickening, the pyloric ring, &#xA;is felt in the wall of the gut at the gastro-duodenal junction.  At laparotomy it may be &#xA;difficult to palpate (Edwards and Rowlands l968), due to the effects of muscle &#xA;relaxants administered during anaesthesia.  On radiographs taken during the motor &#xA;quiescent phase of the interdigestive myoelectric complex, the ring presents as a deep, &#xA;clearcut, annular indentation separating the barium in the lumen of the stomach from &#xA;that in the duodenum (Fig 11.1).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 11.1.&lt;/b&gt; Radiograph of normal&#xA;pyloric ring (arrow) in motor quiescent phase of interdigestive myoelectric complex&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/11-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;radiographic-anatomy&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Radiographic Anatomy&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#radiographic-anatomy&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Edwards (l96l) found the length of the ring, as measured on radiographs, to vary &#xA;between 1.0mm and 12.0mm;  the mean length was 1.7mm.  It was not stated whether &#xA;these measurements were taken during motor quiescent or during contraction phases.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  the term &#34;width&#34; is preferred to &#34;length&#34; as used by Edwards.  Normally, &#xA;the width of the pyloric ring may vary, depending on the stage of contraction of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder, as described in Chapter 13).&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;present-investigations&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Present Investigations&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#present-investigations&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The width and height of the pyloric ring, and the diameters of the pyloric aperture, &#xA;sphincteric cylinder and duodenal bulb, were measured on radiographs of 10 adult &#xA;subjects, taken at a time when no visible motor activity was evident, i.e. during the &#xA;motor quiescent phase of the interdigestive myoelectric complex (Fig 11.2, Table &#xA;11.1).  All subjects had been referred for radiographic examination because of vague &#xA;upper abdominal symptoms.  In none could an organic lesion be demonstrated;  &#xA;clinically and radiologically the stomach and duodenum were considered to be normal &#xA;in all.  The mean width of the ring was 4.7mm and the mean height 11.1mm;  the &#xA;depth was approximately the same on the greater and lesser curvature sides.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/11-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 11.2.&lt;/b&gt; Diagram of &#xA;pyloric ring in motor quiescent phase. W, width; H, height; DB, duodenal bulb; PA, pyloric&#xA;aperture; PSC, pyloric sphicteric cylinder&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The inner margin of the ring surrounds the pyloric aperture, i.e. the opening by which &#xA;the lumen of the stomach communicates with that of the duodenum.  In the motor &#xA;quiescent phase the diameter of the aperture varied from 5.0 to 13.0mm, with a mean &#xA;of 8.7mm.  The mean diameter of the sphincteric cylinder was 57.1mm, and the mean &#xA;diameter of the duodenal bulb 35.8mm.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  Owing to magnification factors &#xA;the real measurements will be approximately four-fifths of the figures given).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;tt&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Table 11.1&lt;/b&gt; Radiographic measurements during the motor quiescent phase of the &#xA;interdigestive complex&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=100%&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=6&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Case&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Width of ring (mm)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Height of ring (mm)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Diameter Aperture&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;Diameter sphincteric cylinder (mm)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Diameter duodenal bulb (mm)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=6&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;15.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;60.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;45.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;13.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;10.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;61.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;38.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;54.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;26.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;64.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;30.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;14.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;50.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;40.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;8.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;13.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;13.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;74.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;40.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;60.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;50.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;10.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;40.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;35.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;9.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;45.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;26.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;12.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;63.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;28.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;Average&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;4.70&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;11.1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;8.7&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;57.1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;35.8&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=6&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;h4&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;c&#34;&gt;Conclusion&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/h4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that the pyloric ring causes an appreciable constriction of the lumen at &#xA;the gastroduodenal junction.  Furthermore it is seen that the pyloric aperture is patent &#xA;during the motor quiescent phase.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;microscopic-anatomy&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Microscopic Anatomy&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#microscopic-anatomy&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Illustrations of microscopic sections of the normal pyloric ring are occasionally &#xA;encountered in published papers.  In most instances the purpose is to illustrate some &#xA;feature of the stomach in the vicinity of the pylorus and the ring is seen incidentally.  &#xA;On examining such illustrations the anatomical build of the ring may be studied.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Horton (l928) illustrated 3 normal stomachs sectioned 6 hours post-mortem.  In all it &#xA;is seen that the pyloric ring is not a structure consisting solely of muscular tissue.  &#xA;While its &#34;base&#34; is formed by muscularis externa, the top or inner part of the ring( i.e. &#xA;the part surrounding the aperture) consists of a mucosal fold (made up of a core of &#xA;submucosa with a layer of mucosa on each surface, as described in Chapter 5).  In &#xA;Horton&#39;s illustration of a 6 months old foetus the height of the outer muscular &#xA;component of the pyloric ring is 14.0mm and the height of the inner mucosal fold, or &#xA;mucosal component, also 14.0mm.  In a 4 month old infant the muscular division of &#xA;the ring measures 3.4cm in height and the mucosal division 2.0cm.  In a one year old &#xA;child the measurements are 3.5cm and 1.5cm respectively.  It is clear in these subjects &#xA;that the inner part of the pyloric ring consists of mucosal and submucosal, and not of &#xA;muscular tissue.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cole (l928) held that the abrupt interruption separating the lumen of the stomach from &#xA;that of the duodenum (i.e. the pyloric ring) is a muco-membranous fold consisting &#xA;solely of mucosa and submucosa with its acompanying muscularis mucosae.  The &#xA;circular fibres of the muscularis externa end at the base of the &#34;pyloric fold&#34;, which &#xA;should be looked upon as a valve and not as a sphincter, according to Cole (l928).  &#xA;Scott&#39;s (l946) observations led him to conclude that normally a thick mucosal fold &#xA;caps the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; (from which it may be concluded that the ring consists of &#xA;both the &#34;sphincter&#34; and an overlying mucosal fold).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In illustrations of Manning and Gunter (l950) the following measurements may be &#xA;made:  in a 66 year old subject the external muscular component of the ring is 3.0cm &#xA;in height, and the inner mucosal/submucosal component 2.5 cm.  In a 78 year old &#xA;subject the figures are 2.5cm and 2.0cm respectively, and in a 58 year old subject &#xA;3.5cm and 2.0cm respectively.  Williams (l962) illustrated two fresh, adult, partial &#xA;gastrectomy specimens.  In one the muscular component of the ring measures l8.0mm &#xA;in height and the mucosal/submucosal component 9.0mm.  In the other the figures are &#xA;21.0mm and 11.0mm respectively.&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;present-investigations-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Present investigations&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#present-investigations-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although the nature and function of the pyloric ring is often debated, few deliberate &#xA;attempts have been made to determine its microscopic anatomy.  Consequently &#xA;sections of the ring were done more than 6 hours post-mortem in 7 subjects varying in &#xA;age from 9 months to 83 years, who had succumbed to non-gastrointestinal causes;  a &#xA;total of 20 sections were examined (Table 11.2).  In all cases the pyloric ring is seen &#xA;to consist of muscular and mucosal/submucosal components (Fig 11.3).  For instance, &#xA;in a 9 month old subject the muscular component is seen to be 2.0mm in height, and &#xA;the overlying mucosal component 1.0mm.  In a 5 year old subject the approximate &#xA;figures are 5.5mm and 1.5mm respectively, and in a 44 year old subject 5.5mm and &#xA;1.5mm respectively.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/11-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 11.3.&lt;/b&gt; Microscopic section of &#xA;normal pyloric ring. The muscular component measures 4.5 mm, the mucosal/submucosal component 1.5 mm &#xA;in height&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Table 11.2&lt;/b&gt; Results of postmortem examination in seven subjects&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/11-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 11.3.&lt;/b&gt; Microscopic section of&#xA;normal pyloric ring. The muscular component measures 4.5 mm, the mucosal/submucosal component 1.5 mm&#xA;in height&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Table 11.2&lt;/b&gt; Results of postmortem examination in seven subjects&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=100%&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=7&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td width=12%&gt;Subject&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td width=12%&gt;Age&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td width=12%&gt;Sex&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td width=12%&gt;Specimen number&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td width=15%&gt;Total wall thickness (mm)&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;td width=12%&gt;Thickness of muscle layers&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Thickness of mucosal/submucosal component&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=7&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;A.R.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;9m&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;M&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;C.J.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5y&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;M&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;A.W.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;34y&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;M&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;D.J.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;44y&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;M&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;10&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;12&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;7.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;13&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;14&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;K.P.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;55y&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;F&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;15&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;16&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;17&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;4.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;L.S.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;76y&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;M&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;18&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;9.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;A.W.&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;83y&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;F&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;19&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;20&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5.5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;1.0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=7&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;y = years&lt;br&gt;&#xA;m = months&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12 - The Pylorus at Rest: Open or Closed?</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_12/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_12/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-pylorus-at-rest-open-or-closed&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  The Pylorus at Rest: Open or Closed?&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#the-pylorus-at-rest-open-or-closed&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In considering the mechanism of the pylorus it is of importance to determine, first of all, &#xA;if the aperture is open or closed at rest.  By &amp;#147;at rest&amp;#148; is meant conditions &#xA;pertaining after an overnight fast, in which the stomach is empty except for normally &#xA;occurring intraluminal gas, swallowed saliva and gastric secretions;  it denotes the motor &#xA;quiescent phase of the interdigestive myo-electric complex, with absence of &#xA;radiologically discernible motor activity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As indicated in Chap. 15, a number of authors held the view that the canine and human &#xA;pylorus was surrounded by a narrow zone of raised pressure which was tonically &#xA;contracted &#34;at rest&#34;, closing the aperture;  with the advent of an &amp;#147;antral&amp;#148; &#xA;peristaltic wave the aperture relaxed &amp;#40;Brink et al. l965;  Isenberg and Csendes l972;  &#xA;Fisher and Cohen l973&amp;#41;.  Other authors found or inferred that the pylorus was patent &#xA;under fasting conditions, that it was not surrounded by a zone of elevated basal pressure, &#xA;and that it did not act antagonistically to oncoming peristaltic waves &amp;#40;Atkinson et al. &#xA;l957;  Andersson and Grossman l965;  Kaye et al. l976;  McShane et al. l980;  White et &#xA;al. l98l;  Gaffney et al. l987&amp;#41;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It can be assumed that an open pyloric aperture will allow the passage of liquids, while a &#xA;closed pylorus will not.  For this reason a fluid barium suspension has been used to &#xA;determine the patency, or otherwise, of the aperture.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;present-investigations&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Present Investigations&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#present-investigations&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A total of 100 adult, ambulatory outpatients were examined radiologically after an &#xA;overnight fast.  All had been referred for routine radiographic studies because of vague &#xA;abdominal symptoms;  patients with definite clinical symptoms and signs such as &#xA;recurrent epigastric pain, weight loss, vomiting, haematemesis, melaena or a palpable &#xA;mass, were excluded from the study.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Patients were examined in the erect and supine positions, each being asked to swallow &#xA;three mouthfuls &amp;#40;45 ml&amp;#41; of a barium suspension in quick succession.  The &#xA;viscosity of the suspension was approximately four times that of water, the specific &#xA;gravity was 2.004 and the consistency that of thick soup.  These features ensured a &#xA;fluidity which was less than that of water, but probably slightly more than that of chyme.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The state of the pylorus was determined by TV fluoroscopy and radiography, not more &#xA;than one or two &amp;#147;spot&amp;#148; films being exposed &amp;#40;size of radiation field 14.5 &#xA;x ll.5 cm&amp;#41;.  As soon as this had been done, more barium was swallowed &#xA;&amp;#40;usually with the addition of effervescent salts&amp;#41;), and the conventional barium &#xA;examination, for which the patient had been referred, was completed.  If this revealed an &#xA;organic lesion, the case was also excluded.  In this group of 100 patients, in other words, &#xA;the upper gastrointestinal tract was considered to be normal clinically as well as &#xA;radiologically.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Ethical Considerations.&lt;/EM&gt;&#xA;In 52 patients the screening time due to the procedure varied from 5 to 15 seconds; in 48 &#xA;patients it was longer, varying from 25 to 60 seconds.  &amp;#40;In all the technique of &#xA;intermittent screening was used&amp;#41;.  The anterior and posterior skin doses of x-&#xA;radiation were measured and found to be negligible.  As a small field &amp;#40;14.5 x ll.5 &#xA;cm&amp;#41; limited to the upper abdomen was involved, it was felt that the extra radiation, &#xA;received as a result of the procedure, could be discounted.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;results&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Results&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#results&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 52 of the 100 patients the swallowed, liquid barium suspension passed rapidly down &#xA;the oesophagus, traversed the stomach and flowed through the pyloric aperture in one &#xA;smooth movement, without any delay or hold-up at the pylorus.  This occurred in the &#xA;absence of visible motor movements in the stomach.  In many cases the head of barium &#xA;was in the duodenum while the &amp;#147;tail end&amp;#148; was still in the oesophagus &#xA;&amp;#40;Fig. 12.1&amp;#41;.  In all cases the normal, deep annular indentation of the pyloric &#xA;ring between the stomach and duodenum became clearly visible as soon as the barium &#xA;had traversed the aperture &amp;#40;Fig. 11.1&amp;#41;.  The part of the stomach on the &#xA;immediate oral side of the ring &amp;#40;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder&amp;#41; was &#xA;expanded without being unduly distended.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The width of the barium column in the pyloric aperture, between the lips of the ring, &#xA;indicated the diameter of the aperture.  It was measured on the films and varied from a &#xA;minimum of 4.0mm to a maximum of 10.0 mm between subjects, the diameter in the &#xA;majority being in the 5.0 to 10.0 mm range.  &amp;#40;Owing to technical factors minor &#xA;geometrical magnification occurs during radiographic filming, and the true measurements &#xA;will be approximately four-fifths of those measured on the films&amp;#41;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 48 patients there was some delay or hold-up at the ring;  in the majority the delay &#xA;varied from approximately 40 to 90 seconds;  in a few it lasted for 2 or 3 minutes. The &#xA;following are representative cases:&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/12-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 12.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Rapid swallowing in fasting stomach.  Barium suspension traverses pyloric&#xA;aperture, which is patent &amp;#40;arrow&amp;#41;.  &amp;#147;Tail end&amp;#148; of barium still in&#xA;oesophagus.  Absence of gastric motor movements&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;cr&#34;&gt;Case Reports&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;UL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 12.1&lt;/EM&gt; J.S., male aged 28 years.  Having swallowed 3 mouthfuls of barium &#xA;suspension, a hold-up lasting 41 seconds occurred at the pyloric ring &#xA;&amp;#40;counting had started as soon as the barium entered the gastric &#xA;fornix&amp;#41;.  For the first 20 seconds of this period no gastric motor &#xA;movements were seen;  the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the stomach was &#xA;expanded without being unduly distended.  At 20 seconds two successive, &#xA;incomplete, &amp;#147;segmental&amp;#148; or &amp;#147;cylindrical&amp;#148; &#xA;contractions of this region occurred &amp;#40;see Chap. 13&amp;#41;, followed &#xA;by commencing emptying into the duodenum at 41 seconds &amp;#40;Fig &#xA;12.2&amp;#41;.  &amp;#40;By &amp;#147;incomplete&amp;#148; is meant a minor to &#xA;moderate degree of narrowing of the lumen, i.e. not bisecting the barium &#xA;column&amp;#41;.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 12.2&lt;/EM&gt; S.A., female aged 28 years.  There was a hold-up at the pyloric ring lasting &#xA;85 seconds.  For the first 30 seconds of this period no gastric contractions &#xA;were seen.  Subsequently two incomplete cylindrical contractions of the &#xA;distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm occurred, followed by commencing emptying into the &#xA;duodenum at 85 seconds.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 12.3&lt;/EM&gt;&#x9;H.A., male aged 61 years.  The hold-up at the pyloric ring lasted 128 &#xA;seconds.  At l8 seconds 2 or 3 incomplete contractions occurred, followed &#xA;by a long period of inactivity.  Eventually a few contractions reappeared, &#xA;associated with emptying at 128 seconds.&#xA;&lt;/UL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 align=center width=460&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/12-2a.gif&#34; align=right&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/12-2b.gif&#34; align=left&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/12-2c.gif&#34; align=right&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/12-2d.gif&#34; align=left&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 12.2 A-D.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Patient J.S.  Initial hold-up at pyloric ring (&lt;B&gt;A, B&lt;/B&gt;).  Successive, &#xA;incomplete contractions of pyloric sphincteric cylinder &amp;#40;arrow&amp;#41;.  Emptying &#xA;into duodenum (&lt;B&gt;C, D&lt;/B&gt;)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Generally speaking a similar sequence of events was seen in the majority &#xA;of patients in this group, namely a short hold-up at the pyloric ring, &#xA;followed by 2 or 3 incomplete &amp;#40;or occasionally maximal&amp;#41; &#xA;contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and commencing emptying &#xA;into the duodenum &amp;#40;Fig. 12.3&amp;#41;.  The degree of dynamic &#xA;narrowing of the lumen, as seen radiologically, probably corresponds to &#xA;the amplitude as measured manometrically.  This varied greatly among &#xA;subjects.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/12-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 12.3.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;The first of two or three maximal contractions of pyloric sphincteric cylinder&#xA;&amp;#40;arrows&amp;#41; preceding emptying into duodenum&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt; &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a minority of subjects in this group the period of hold-up at the pyloric &#xA;ring was longer, lasting at least 90 seconds and sometimes as long as 2 to &#xA;3 minutes.  In these patients the stomach invariably had a long, hanging, &#xA;fish-hook shape, with a sagging greater curvature, which is evidence of &#xA;hypotonia &amp;#40;Chap. 19&amp;#41;.  Tilting the table to an angle of 45 &#xA;degrees, and turning the patient into the left anterior oblique position &#xA;&amp;#40;i.e. with the right side down&amp;#41;, invariably caused immediate &#xA;emptying into the duodenum even in the absence of visible motor activity.  &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following case is an example:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;UL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 12.4&lt;/EM&gt; S.M., female aged 50 years.  In the erect position there was sagging of the &#xA;greater curvature, which was located low down in the abdomen opposite &#xA;the 5th lumbar vertebra;  the shape of the stomach was compatible with &#xA;hypotonicity.  The first incomplete contraction of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder was seen at 60 seconds, with another occurring at 100 seconds.  &#xA;Up to 230 seconds no emptying had occurred.  The table was then tilted to &#xA;45 degrees and the patient turned into the left anterior oblique position.  &#xA;Immediate emptying occurred in this position in the absence of visible &#xA;contractions of the pyloric region, indicating patency of the pyloric &#xA;aperture.&#xA;&lt;/UL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that the pyloric aperture was open at rest in 52 of 100 normal subjects.  Its &#xA;diameter, as measured on the films, varied from a minimum of 4.0 mm to a maximum of &#xA;10.0mm in different subjects.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the remaining 48 subjects some delay or hold-up occurred at the pyloric ring.  In the &#xA;majority of these the hold-up lasted from 40 to 90 seconds; in a few the hold-up was &#xA;longer, lasting from 90 seconds to 3 minutes.  In this latter subgroup the delay at the &#xA;pylorus was associated with hypotonicity or sagging of the greater curvature of the &#xA;stomach.  Tilting the table by 45 degrees and turning the patient into the left anterior &#xA;oblique position, caused immediate gastric emptying in the absence of radiologically &#xA;visible contractions.  It is concluded that visible contractions are not necessary for &#xA;emptying of liquid barium in this position.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It appears that the delay in emptying in these 48 subjects was either due to hypotonicity &#xA;of the gastric musculature &amp;#40;Chap. l9&amp;#41;, or to closure of the pyloric aperture.  &#xA;Different types of closure of the aperture may occur &amp;#40;Chap. 13&amp;#41;; in the present &#xA;cases the pyloric sphincteric cylinder was expanded, and the radiological features suggest &#xA;that closure of the aperture was due to converging or spiral &amp;#40;&amp;#147;iris-like&amp;#148;&amp;#41; gastric mucosal folds &amp;#40;Chap. 13&amp;#41;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Andersson S, Grossman MI.  Profile of pH, pressure and potential difference at &#xA;gastroduodenal junction in man.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l965, 49, 364-371.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Atkinson M, Edwards DAW, Honour AJ, et al.  Comparison of cardiac and &#xA;pyloric sphincters.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l957, 273, 918-922.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Brink BM, Schlegel JF, Code CF.  The pressure profile of the gastroduodenal &#xA;junctional zone in dogs.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l965, 6, 163-171.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fisher RS, Cohen S.  Physiological characteristics of the human pyloric sphincter.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l973, 64, 67-75.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gaffney PR, Gleeson DJ, Hall JW, et al.  The manometric findings at the human &#xA;pylorus:  the evidence against the presence of a tonic sphincter.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l987, 22, 525-532.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Isenberg JI, Csendes A.  Effect of octapeptide of cholecystokinin on canine &#xA;pyloric pressure.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l972, 222, 428-431.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kaye MD, Mehta SJ, Showalter JP.  Manometric studies of the human pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, 70, 477-480.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;McShane AJ, O&#39;Morain C, Lennon JR, et al.  Atraumatic non-distorting pyloric &#xA;sphincter pressure studies.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l980, 21, 826-828.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;White CM, Poxon V, Alexander-Williams J.  A study of motility of normal &#xA;human gastroduodenal region.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 26, 609-617.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>13 - Radiographic Examination of Normal Motility</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_13/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_13/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;radiographic-examination-of-normal-motility&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Radiographic Examination of Normal Motility&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#radiographic-examination-of-normal-motility&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;introduction&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Introduction&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#introduction&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In radiographic studies of the upper gastrointestinal tract, only the contrast material in the &#xA;lumen is visible, the actual walls of the tract being invisible.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The contrast material usually consists of one or more of the following:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Insoluble, non-absorbable barium sulphate in fluid suspension.  Where such a &#xA;suspension is used, it represents the luminal contents, and being radio-opaque, is &#xA;visualized as an image of positive contrast.  In the &#34;conventional&#34; radiographic &#xA;study a low density barium suspension is used with a specific gravity of 2.004 and &#xA;a viscosity approximately four times that of water.  The consistency approximates &#xA;that of thick soup but may, if required, be increased to that of a paste.  &#xA;Commercial preparations contain additives regulating consistency and taste.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Water soluble, absorbable iodine-containing solutions, also providing images of &#xA;positive contrast, but with lower radio-opacity than barium.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Air, which may be swallowed or introduced via tubes, providing negative &#xA;contrast.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Carbondioxide gas, affording an intraluminal, negative contrast agent.  The gas is &#xA;liberated in the lumen by swallowed, commercially available gas-producing &#xA;granules or powders.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the &#34;conventional&#34; radiographic study, barium sulphate with or without the addition of &#xA;air or gas is used, affording clear and sharply defined images of the contrast column in &#xA;the lumen.  As pharmacologically active substances are not usually administered, &#xA;normally occurring, physiological movements of the contrast column may be studied.  &#xA;While the rate of flow of a fluid contrast agent depends to a large extent on its viscosity, &#xA;we noted no naked eye differences in the type or range of movements, whether &#xA;&#34;conventional&#34; fluid barium suspension, barium paste or a watery iodine solution was &#xA;used as contrast agent.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The &#34;range&#34; of movement seen &#xA;radiologically roughly corresponds to the amplitude as determined at manometry).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The comparatively large volume of barium used in the conventional radiographic study &#xA;(much less being used in the double-contrast method) may obscure some of the &#xA;intraluminal features, confirming the dictum that &#34;barium reveals but also conceals&#34;.  &#xA;Consequently use is made of compression techniques, by which some of the suspension is &#xA;pressed away, to reveal the macroscopic mucosal folds and other intraluminal features.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the double-contrast radiographic study, a coating of the luminal surface of the mucosa &#xA;is obtained by swallowing a small volume of a micropulverized, dense, more viscous &#xA;barium preparation;  positioning the patient ensures equal allround coating.  The &#xA;parenteral administration of an antimuscarinic pharmacological agent causes temporary &#xA;paralysis of the muscular walls with expansion of the lumen;  this is enchanced by &#xA;introducing a large volume of carbondioxide gas into the lumen.  Under these &#xA;circumstances naked-eye movements are no longer discernible;  moreover, distension of &#xA;the lumen with stretching of the walls effaces the macroscopic mucosal folds.  The &#xA;micropulverized barium enters minute furrows between the areae gastricae on the inner &#xA;surface of the mucosa, thus rendering the areae gastricae, or surface mucosal pattern, &#xA;visible (Fig. 13.1).  In the present investigation, whenever motility patterns were studied, &#xA;the conventional barium examination was used.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/13-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 13.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Double contrast study with gas distended lumen.  Fine, reticular pattern &#xA;indicates areae gastricae or surface mucosal pattern&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;validation-studies&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Validation Studies&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#validation-studies&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is regarded as axiomatic in radiology that a temporary, circumferential, physiological &#xA;narrowing of the barium column in the lumen of a hollow muscular tube is due to &#xA;contraction of the walls of the tube.  This supposition has not always been accepted &#xA;universally.  It has been argued, especially in physiology, that a barium column may &#xA;appear to be narrowed in cases of incomplete filling of the lumen.  Alternatively, even &#xA;with complete filling, a passive &#34;falling together&#34; of the walls (as opposed to active &#xA;contraction) may narrow the column.  Whether these objections are valid or not may be &#xA;determined by combining alternative modes of investigation, e.g. manometry, with &#xA;radiological imaging procedures.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the present context intraluminal pressure profiles and specially devised living &#xA;anatomical studies have been done in an effort to validate the radiological observations.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;intraluminal-pressure-profiles&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Intraluminal Pressure Profiles&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#intraluminal-pressure-profiles&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While investigating mucosal fold movements in the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the stomach, &#xA;i.e. within the confines of the anatomical pyloric sphincteric cylinder, as well as in the &#xA;duodenum, intraluminal pressure studies were combined with radiological imaging &#xA;procedures in 11 normal subjects (Keet et al l978) (Chap. 15).  These investigations may, &#xA;at the same time, be utilized to determine the relationship between intraluminal pressures &#xA;and radiologically demonstrable, physiological movements of the circumference of the &#xA;barium column in these regions.  (In this context &#34;movements&#34; do not imply propulsion &#xA;or retropulsion of contents).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Ethical Considerations.&lt;/EM&gt;&#xA;All subjects taking part were informed, volunteer, adult, male ambulatory outpatients &#xA;who had been referred for an upper gastro-intestinal radiographic study because of vague &#xA;abdominal symptoms.  None had had any significant clinical signs at the preliminary &#xA;clinical examination.  Only patients in whom no organic lesion could be demonstrated in &#xA;the oesophagus, stomach and duodenum at the radiological examination were admitted to &#xA;the study;  it was cleared by the Ethical Committee.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-materials-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients, Materials and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-materials-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Pressure recordings were obtained by means of an air-filled system and a miniature &#xA;balloon, placed on the immediate oral side of the pyloric aperture (i.e. in the lumen of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder) in 5 subjects, and in the second or third parts of the &#xA;duodenum in 6 other subjects.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A pressure sensitive system usually used for cardiovascular physiology, with some &#xA;modifications, was employed.  It consisted of a monitor (Statham SP1400) (Statham &#xA;Instruments Inc., Los Angeles), a miniature transducer (Statham P37B), a recorder &#xA;(Statham SP2006) and a catheter, 125 cm in length, with an outside diameter of 2.0mm.  &#xA;A miniature balloon 38 mm in length and 8.0 mm in diameter, covered the 6 endholes of &#xA;the catheter.  The volume of air introduced into the balloon to achieve zero pressure was &#xA;0.8 ml.  After an overnight fast the balloon was manipulated into position under TV &#xA;screening, with the subject in the erect position.  Four mouthfulls of a fluid barium &#xA;suspension were swallowed to delineate the lumen and for purposes of localization.  In &#xA;the absence of visible motor activity the diameter of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder was &#xA;approximately eight times the diameter of the balloon (visible because of its air content), &#xA;and the diameter of the duodenum three times that of the balloon.  Artifacts such as &#xA;subject movement, coughing and pressure increases produced during compression &#xA;procedures were identified and excluded.  Pressure increases were correlated with &#xA;motility of the barium column as viewed radiographically, and vice versa.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;results-in-stomach&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Results in Stomach&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#results-in-stomach&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the pyloric sphincteric cylinder the base line of the curve represented intraluminal &#xA;pressure while the cylinder was distended, in the absence of radiologically visible motor &#xA;activity (Fig. 15.1).  The following two distinct waves of pressure increase were noted &#xA;manometrically:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Irregularly occurring, nonrhythmic contractions, causing intraluminal pressure &#xA;increases varying from 9.0 to 34 mm Hg (the majority being in the range of 12 to &#xA;25 mm Hg).  These waves lasted for 5 to 21 seconds (the majority being in the 6 &#xA;to 10 second range) (Fig. 15.1), occurred repeatedly in all subjects and conform to &#xA;Type II contractions (Code and Carlson l968;  Shepard l97l).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;In two of the subjects compound waves, consisting of a rise in base line pressure &#xA;of 3.0 to 5.0mm Hg and lasting for 10 to 40 seconds, on which were &#xA;superimposed waves of shorter duration (3 to 5 seconds) and higher amplitude (up &#xA;to 12 mm Hg), were recorded;  these conform to Type III waves (Shepard l97l).&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Simultaneous radiological TV monitoring showed that both waves of pressure &#xA;increase were associated with a concentric narrowing of the barium column &#xA;characteristically occurring in this situation (see below).  The higher the &#xA;amplitude of the pressure wave, the greater the luminal narrowing appeared to be &#xA;radiologically.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;conclusion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Conclusion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#conclusion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It was concluded that the narrowing of the barium column was due to active contraction &#xA;of the walls.&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;results-in-duodenum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Results in Duodenum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#results-in-duodenum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the second and third parts of the duodenum the base line again represented &#xA;intraluminal pressure in the absence of radiologically visible motor activity.  Two waves &#xA;of pressure increase were noted manometrically:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Nonrhythmic, simple, brief monophasic waves, causing intraluminal pressure &#xA;increases of 4.0 to 35 mm Hg (the majority being in the 7.0 to 34 mm Hg range), &#xA;and lasting 2 to 8 seconds (Fig. 13.2).  These waves occurred repeatedly in all &#xA;subjects and conform to Type I duodenal waves (Foulk et al. l954;  Vantrappen et &#xA;al. l965;  Friedman et al l965);  it was suggested that they should be designated &#xA;phasic waves (Texter l968).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;In two of the subjects nonrhythmic, complex waves consisting of a rise in base &#xA;line pressure of 3.0 to 4.0 mm Hg and lasting from 40 seconds to 2&amp;#189; &#xA;minutes, with superadded peaks of l9 to 23 mm Hg lasting for 5 to 6 seconds, &#xA;were seen occasionally.  These conform to Type III duodenal waves (Foulk et al. &#xA;l954;  Vantrappen et al. l965;  Friedman et al. l965);  it was suggested that they &#xA;should be designated tonic waves (Texter l968).&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During both types of waves radiologically visible, circumferential narrowing of &#xA;the luminal barium column occurred simultaneously with the increases in pressure &#xA;(see also Chap. 15).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/13-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 13.2.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Four monophasic duodenal pressure waves.  Each was associated with a &#xA;radiologically visible contraction.  During each wave mucosal folds changed in direction &#xA;to become longitudinal.  Base line indicates intraluminal pressure in absence of motor &#xA;activity.  Ten-second marker on zero line&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;conclusion-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Conclusion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#conclusion-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It was concluded that the narrowing of the intraluminal barium column was due to active &#xA;contraction of the walls.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;living-anatomical-studies&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Living Anatomical Studies&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#living-anatomical-studies&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The living anatomy was investigated in a number of patients who had to undergo &#xA;cholecystectomy during the ordinary course of events (Keet and Heydenrych l982).  The &#xA;investigation was designed to determine the spatial relationship between the barium &#xA;column in the lumen and the walls.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Ethical Considerations.&lt;/EM&gt;&#xA;The study was undertaken in informed, adult, white, volunteer patients who had been &#xA;admitted to hospital with definite indications for cholecystectomy.  All aspects of the &#xA;procedure had been considered carefully beforehand by ourselves, our peers and the Head &#xA;of the Department of Surgery;  no objections were raised.  The Ethical Committee &#xA;indicated that it could find no objection to the procedure.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-materials-and-methods-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients, materials and methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-materials-and-methods-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Six patients were examined.  On completion of the cholecystectomy, and before closure &#xA;of the abdomen, the stomach and duodenum were shown to be normal by means of direct &#xA;inspection and palpation.  Two fine, flexible stainless metal wires, similar to the wires &#xA;used in the leads of myocardial pacemakers, were attached to the serosal surface of the &#xA;pyloric region of the stomach and first part of the duodenum by means of superficial, &#xA;interrupted, absorbable sutures (Fig. 13.3).  One wire was attached to the lesser and the &#xA;other to the greater curvature, the free &#34;duodenal&#34; ends of both wires being brought to the &#xA;surface (as in the case of a postoperative T-tube) through the cholecystectomy incision, &#xA;which was subsequently closed in the usual way.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Approximately 8 days later, on the day before discharge, each patient had a limited &#xA;radiographic study as follows:  after an overnight fast 4 to 5 mouthfulls of the usual liquid &#xA;barium suspension was swallowed in the erect position, so as to outline the horizontal &#xA;part of the gastric lumen and to extend well up into the vertical part.  The space between &#xA;the metal wires on the serosal surfaces and the luminal barium indicated the thickness of &#xA;the wall;  during the motor quiescent stage it was approximately 4.0 to 5.0 mm.  After &#xA;emptying into the duodenum had commenced, gastric contractions were studied by means &#xA;of radiographic TV monitoring and appropriate radiographs.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/13-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 13.3.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Radiograph showing living anatomy.  Two fine, flexible metal wires &#xA;(retouched) are attached to serosal surfaces of lesser and greater curvatures.  The space &#xA;between the wires and intraluminal barium indicates the cylindrical muscular contraction&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;results&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Results&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#results&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Narrow, circumferential indentations of the barium column appeared in the body of the &#xA;stomach and proceeded to move in a caudal direction.  Opposite the indentations the fine, &#xA;flexible wires remained in their original position, showing that these indentations were &#xA;due to contraction waves in the walls and not &#34;falling together&#34; of the walls.  At a point &#xA;3.0 to 4.0 cm orally to the pyloric ring each wave became stationary, at the same time &#xA;initiating a concentric, cylindrical narrowing of the barium column in the remaining part &#xA;of the stomach, as far as and including the area of the ring.  Again the wires were seen to &#xA;remain in their original position.  During a contraction the space between the wires and &#xA;the luminal barium widened to approximately 8.0 to 10.0 mm all round, indicating an &#xA;active, tube-like or cylindrical contraction of the muscular walls, 3.0 to 4.0 cm in length &#xA;(Fig. 13.3).  After a second or two of maximal contraction, the walls relaxed and the &#xA;cycle was repeated.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;On completion of the radiological examination the wires were removed by gentle traction &#xA;on their external ends.  None of the patients suffered any discomfort or untoward &#xA;sequelae;  recovery was normal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;conclusion-2&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Conclusion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#conclusion-2&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that the narrowing of the intraluminal barium column was not due to a &#xA;passive falling together of the walls, as the fine, flexible wires on the serosal surface &#xA;remained in their original positions.  The narrowing of the column was due to active &#xA;contraction of the walls between the serosa and the barium containing lumen.  &#xA;(Endoscopic ultrasonography confirms that &#34;peristaltic&#34; contraction of the wall produces &#xA;wall thickening, as mentioned in Chapter 10).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;motor-divisions-of-stomach&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Motor Divisions of Stomach&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#motor-divisions-of-stomach&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Code and Carlson (l968) the stomach has 3 functional regions &#xA;corresponding to its anatomic divisions, namely the fundus, corpus and pyloric antrum, &#xA;which, in their view, is the region stretching from the incisura angularis to the pylorus.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  While the concept of these &#34;anatomical&#34; divisions appears to be &#xA;widely accepted, it is shown in Chapters 2 and 3 that the division is of an arbitrary nature &#xA;and not based on anatomical facts).  In terms of motor activity Code and Carlson  (l968) &#xA;divided the antrum into two segments of varying length.  The caudal portion participates &#xA;in a simultaneous segmental contraction called the terminal antral contraction (TAC), &#xA;previously described by Carlson, Code and Nelson (l966).  The cephalad portion of the &#xA;antrum, according to these authors, is not usually involved in TAC;  however, at times &#xA;TAC involves only the distal one to two centimeters of the antrum, and at other times &#xA;almost the entire antrum.  During TAC a simultaneous contraction of the terminal &#xA;segment of the antrum occurs, a phenomenon which corresponds to antral systole &#xA;previously described by Golden (l937).  The cephalad and terminal (or caudal) segments &#xA;of the antrum, together with the pylorus (also called the pyloric canal or pyloric &#xA;sphincter) constitute a functional motor unit according to Code and Carlson (1968);  the &#xA;separate parts vary in their dimensions but contract in a co-ordinated way.  The pyloric &#xA;canal closes vigorously with contraction of the terminal antrum.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  &#xA;According to these authors the pyloric ring constitutes the pyloric sphincter.  The pyloric &#xA;canal is equated with the aperture).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Ruch and Patton (l973) state that morphologically, histologically and functionally the &#xA;stomach is divided into 3 parts, viz. the fundus, corpus and pyloric antrum or pars &#xA;pylorus, a narrower, more muscular, non-acid secreting region.  The fundus and corpus &#xA;together form a somewhat bulbous, thin-walled storage and secretory chamber, while &#xA;food is fragmented and mixed with digestive juices in the &#34;antrum&#34;.  There is no &#xA;structural discontinuity between these regions, which are only modifications of a basic &#xA;pattern.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;From the point of view of motility, other authors divided the stomach into two parts, &#xA;namely a proximal one third and a distal two thirds (Kelly l98l;  Funch-Jensen l987).  The &#xA;division was said to be based not on the usually accepted anatomical considerations, but &#xA;on the type of smooth muscle activity.  During swallowing the proximal part of the &#xA;stomach relaxes, which allows filling without a significant increase in pressure.  It acts as &#xA;a receptacle and determines to a large extent the emptying of liquids.  The distal two &#xA;thirds shows active peristalsis which propagate luminal contents towards the pylorus, &#xA;thereby effecting the emptying of solids.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In terms of motor function, based on the muscular anatomy, radiologically visible &#xA;contraction patterns, manometrically recordable pressure waves and myoelectric activity, &#xA;it is our view that the stomach should be divided into three parts namely (1) the fornix, &#xA;(2) the corpus and sinus and (3) the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm (Keet l957) (Fig. 13.4).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/13-4.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 13.4.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;In terms of motor activity the stomach should be divided into three parts.  1., &#xA;fornix;  2., corpus and sinus;  3., distal 3-4 cm&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;fornix&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Fornix&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#fornix&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;This region roughly encompasses the proximal one sixth of the stomach.  The muscular &#xA;coat is at its thinnest in this region and consists of outer longitudinal, middle circular and &#xA;inner oblique fibres.  The entire cardiac mucosal zone as well as the upper part of the &#xA;oxyntic zone are located in this region.  During radiographic examinations this part of the &#xA;stomach is seen to be capable of slow expansion and contraction (depending on the &#xA;degree of filling), but no other intrinsic motility, such as peristaltic activity, is discernible.  &#xA;This correlates well with manometric findings, in which it has been shown that motor &#xA;activity in the fornix consists almost entirely of slow, low amplitude phasic changes in &#xA;pressure or tone (Lind et al. l961;  Code and Carlson l968;  Granger et al. l985).  It has &#xA;also been found that myoelectric activity is absent in the fornix (Kelly and Code l97l;  &#xA;Koch et al. l987).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;corpus-and-sinus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Corpus and Sinus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#corpus-and-sinus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;This region extends from the base of the fornix as far as an imaginary line 3.0 to 4.0 cm &#xA;orally to the pyloric aperture.  The muscular coat in its proximal part again consists of &#xA;outer longitudinal, middle circular and inner oblique fibres, while the oblique layer &#xA;terminates in its distal part.  The major part of the oxyntic mucosal zone as well as the &#xA;proximal part of the pyloric mucosal zone are located in this region.  (The extent of the &#xA;pyloric mucosal zone is discussed in Chap. 5).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During radiological examinations narrow, annular constricting waves, moving in a caudal &#xA;direction (i.e. peristaltic waves) are seen in this part.  They commence as shallow &#xA;circumferential indentations of the barium column in the corpus, some distance above the &#xA;incisura angularis, and may or may not become deeper as they proceed.  This agrees with &#xA;manometric and other physiological findings, where it has been shown that peristaltic &#xA;contractions originate in the orad part of the corpus and migrate towards the pylorus &#xA;(Smith et al. l957;  Rhodes et al. l966;  Carlson et al. l966;  Granger et al. l985;  Koch et &#xA;al. l987).  On the basis of intraluminal pressure changes, these peristaltic waves are &#xA;divided into Type I waves (producing pressure increases of less than 5.0 cm of water) and &#xA;Type II waves (producing pressure increases of more than 5.0 cm of water) (Code et al. &#xA;l952;  Smith et al. l957;  Carlson et al. l966).  The two types are essentially similar, being &#xA;simple, monophasic waves, differing only in amplitude (Code and Carlson l968).  It was &#xA;surmised that the main function of Type I waves was mixing (with a secondary function &#xA;of propulsion) and the main function of Type II waves propulsion (and secondarily &#xA;mixing).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While both Type I and Type II waves are of a peristaltic nature, a third type namely Type &#xA;III waves, may occur.  These are complex waves, characterized by a rise in base-line &#xA;pressure on which either Type I or Type II waves are superimposed.  They are seldom &#xA;present and of little consequence in the stomach (Code et al. l952).  Radiologically Type &#xA;III waves are usually not recognizable in the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The frequency of barium-induced peristaltic (i.e. Type I and Type II) waves in this part of &#xA;the stomach, as seen radiologically, is approximately 3 per minute in man and 5 per &#xA;minute in dogs (Smith et al l957;  Rhodes et al. l966;  Carlson et al. l966).  Underlying &#xA;myoelectric activity occurring here consists of slow waves (also known as basic electrical &#xA;rhythm, pacesetter potential or electrical control activity) and spike activity (spike bursts, &#xA;action potential or electrical response activity) (Chap. 16).  Slow waves originate on the &#xA;greater curvature in the upper part of the corpus, where spontaneous depolarizations &#xA;occur at a frequency of 3 cycles per minute in man (Kwong et al. l970;  Couturier et al. &#xA;l972;  Funch-Jensen l987), and 5 cycles per minute in canines (Weber and Kohatsu l970;  &#xA;Kelly et al. l97l).  Contraction occurs when spike activity is superimposed on slow &#xA;waves.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;distal-3-4-cm&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Distal 3-4 cm&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#distal-3-4-cm&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The muscular coat is at its thickest in this part of the stomach and consists of outer &#xA;longitudinal and inner circular fibres.  The thickening of the circular musculature &#xA;commences almost imperceptibly 3.0 to 4.0 cm from the pylorus, increases gradually in &#xA;an aboral direction and ends abruptly in the muscular ring (i.e. the muscular component &#xA;of the pyloric ring) which surrounds the aperture.  There is no structural discontinuity &#xA;between the musculature of this region and that of the more proximal part of the stomach &#xA;on its oral side (the sinus).  Aborally the circular musculature of the ring is sharply &#xA;demarcated from that of the duodenum by a fibrous septum (Chap. 3).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The musculature of the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the stomach forms the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder, as described by Cunningham (l906), the circular musculature of which consists &#xA;of a system of rings or loops according to Forssell (l913), Cole (l928) and Torgersen &#xA;(l942) (Chap. 3).  It was shown that the loops deviate from the lesser curvature, where &#xA;they meet in a muscle torus or knot, to encircle the greater curvature in a fan-like shape.  &#xA;The right muscular loop forms the peripheral part of the pyloric ring (Chap. 11).  The &#xA;greater curvature part of the left loop (which is less well-developed than the right) is &#xA;situated 3.0 to 4.0 cm orally to the right loop and corresponds to the sulcus intermedius;  &#xA;the circular loops are connected by intervening circular as well as by the overlying &#xA;longitudinal fibres.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The interior of this part of the stomach is lined by pyloric mucosa.  However, the pyloric &#xA;mucosal zone is not limited to this region, but extends orally into the more proximal part &#xA;of the stomach (i.e. the sinus) for a variable distance (Chap. 5).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Myoelectric activity in the distal 3.0 cm of the stomach differs from that in the corpus &#xA;and sinus in that a marked velocity increase in basic electrical rhythm occurs here (Chap. &#xA;16).  This is associated with a &#34;rapid spread of peristalsis&#34; or a &#34;nearly simultaneous &#xA;contraction&#34; of this part of the stomach, responsible for its behaviour as a motor unit &#xA;(Chap. 16).&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;do-gastric-peristaltic-waves-progress-as-far-as-the-pyloric-aperture&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Do Gastric Peristaltic Waves Progress as far as the Pyloric Aperture?&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#do-gastric-peristaltic-waves-progress-as-far-as-the-pyloric-aperture&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a consideration of motility patterns of the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the stomach, it is &#xA;necessary to determine if gastric peristaltic waves normally proceed as far as the pyloric &#xA;aperture.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Golden (l937) stated that each narrow peristaltic wave proceeding down the stomach &#xA;terminated in &#34;antral systole&#34;, i.e. a segmental or concentric contraction of the entire &#xA;canalis egestorius described by Forssell (l913), which corresponds to the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Other authors differed.  During simultaneous cineradiographic and kymographic studies&#xA;in man, Smith et al. (l957) found that both Type I and Type II waves invariably&#xA;progressed over the antrum toward the pylorus in a peristaltic manner.  In some cases the&#xA;pylorus failed to relax as barium was driven towards it (which implied that the waves&#xA;proceeded as far as the pylorus);  in other cases the wave faded just proximal to the&#xA;pylorus.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>14 - The Pylorus at Gastroscopy</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_14/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_14/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-pylorus-at-gastroscopy&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  The Pylorus at Gastroscopy&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#the-pylorus-at-gastroscopy&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schindler (l936) described the interior of the stomach as seen at gastroscopy in patients &#xA;lying on their left side.  In this position the pyloric part falls to the left and forward &#xA;towards the anterior abdominal wall.  While radiologists perceive the incisura angularis &#xA;as an indentation of the lesser curvature side of the barium column, gastroscopists see it &#xA;as a prominence or &#34;kind of fold&#34; in the inside of the stomach, called the angulus or &#xA;angle.  According to Schindler the stomach could be divided into two parts:  the part &#xA;above the angulus or pars digestoria, and the part between the angulus and pylorus or pars &#xA;egestoria.  If little air is used for inflation at gastroscopy, another prominent fold, the &#xA;musculus sphincter antri, becomes visible on the anterior and posterior walls and greater &#xA;curvature at the level of the angulus.  It is a separate entity from the angulus, is probably &#xA;formed by contraction of the muscularis externa and is usually not demonstrable &#xA;radiologically.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Schindler (l936) peristaltic waves always commence distally to the &#xA;musculus sphincter antri.  Gastroscopically these waves are seen as circular elevations &#xA;moving towards the pylorus and accompanied by a shortening of the &#34;antrum&#34; until &#xA;closure of the pylorus is complete.  This is often accompanied by the formation of radial &#xA;mucosal folds, giving the closed pylorus a stellate appearance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Torgersen (l942) showed that the musculus sphincter antri consisted of a loop at the &#xA;termination of the oblique fibres of the muscularis externa of the corpus.  It was also &#xA;called the lower segmental loop and formed the oral boundary of the sinus (Chap. 3).  &#xA;Consequently it did not take part in the contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gastroscopically the pylorus is seen to be open most of the time, according to Johnson &#xA;(l961).  As a wave of peristalsis passes down the &#34;antrum&#34; and reaches the pylorus, the &#xA;latter is seen to close.  It remains closed for only a few seconds, then relaxes, remaining &#xA;open until it is reached by the next peristaltic wave.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rider et al. (l967) described the dynamic anatomy of the &#34;antrum&#34; and pylorus.  &#xA;Numerous combined fluroscopic and gastroscopic studies showed that peristaltic waves &#xA;proceeded through the corpus and proximal part of the &#34;antrum&#34; towards the pylorus.  &#xA;Each wave caused a &#34;pinch-off&#34; in the antrum, creating the appearance of a rosette-like &#xA;sphincter, called the proximal sphincter.  The area beyond this sphincteric action was still &#xA;part of the stomach and represented the &#34;distal antrum&#34; or &#34;pyloric channel&#34;.  With &#xA;relaxation of the proximal sphincter a small, circular distal opening became evident &#xA;beyond it, which was the pyloric aperture surrounded by the true pyloric ring.  It was &#xA;pointed out that the proximal sphincter could easily be mistaken for the pyloric ring, and &#xA;in such cases it could erroneously be concluded that a gastroscope which had passed this &#xA;area was in the duodenal bulb.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  From the above description it is clear that contraction of the &#xA;&#34;proximal sphincter&#34; is the same occurrence as contraction of the left pyloric loop as seen &#xA;radiologically (Chap.13).  The dynamic anatomy seen at gastroscopy and radiology tallies &#xA;with the morbid anatomy described by Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen &#xA;(l942).  The part of the stomach on the caudal side of the &#34;proximal sphincter&#34;, called the &#xA;&#34;distal antrum&#34; or &#34;pyloric channel&#34;, is the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Code and Carlson (l968) each terminal antral contraction (TAC) seen at &#xA;gastroscopy, produces a diaphragm across the stomach with a central orifice.  The size of &#xA;the orifice depends on the strength of the contraction.  Retropelled contents are forced &#xA;with varying degrees of vigor through this orifice in an oral direction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  The diaphragm across the stomach with a central orifice again &#xA;corresponds, in our view, to contraction of the left pyloric loop (Chap. 13).  Not only &#xA;gastric contents, but at times also gastric mucosal folds, are retropelled through the &#xA;contraction ring of the left loop, by powerful contractions of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder (Chaps. 13, 36).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At gastroscopy Edwards and Rowlands (l968) found that ripples of contraction &#xA;sometimes moved down the gastric wall to a well-defined ring where the large bag of the &#xA;stomach joined the commencement of the &#34;antral funnel&#34;.  The ring often contracted to a &#xA;narrow bore, at times obliterating the lumen, and could be mistaken for the pylorus.  The &#xA;true pylorus was situated at the end of the funnel.  At times annular contraction waves &#xA;with a frequency of 3 per minute moved long the &#34;antrum&#34; to the gastro-duodenal &#xA;junction, propelling mucus.  Sometimes the mucus would be retropelled from the funnel &#xA;in an oral direction.  The findings were ascribed to intermittent and possibly haphazard &#xA;activity of the stomach due to the conditions pertaining at gastroscopy, such as the &#xA;distension of the stomach, the stress of the subject, and the administration of sedative &#xA;drugs.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt; In our view the well-defined ring at the commencement of the &#xA;&#34;pyloric funnel&#34;, which could be mistaken for the pylorus, again corresponds to the left &#xA;pyloric loop, while the &#34;pyloric funnel&#34; corresponds to the sphincteric cylinder.  The &#xA;retropulsion of mucus through the ring is the result of normal contractile activity of the &#xA;cylinder;  normal retropulsion of barium occurs in the same way (Chap. 13).&#xA;Blackwood (l969) pointed out that the correct interpretation of a ring structure in the &#xA;pyloric region could present problems at gastroscopy, especially when it had an unusually &#xA;large diameter, when a second ring was seen beyond it, or when radiology revealed a &#xA;gastric lesion obviously distal to the ring structure visualized.  In such cases it could be &#xA;difficult to determine if one was dealing with the pyloric ring or with a different ring.  In &#xA;an attempt to improve the endoscopic evaluation of the pyloric region, he localized the &#xA;pylorus by electrical potential difference (PD) measurements under direct gastroscopic &#xA;vision.  Of 9 studies, 7 revealed a significant PD change within 1.0 cm of the visualized &#xA;ring, confirming the visual diagnosis of a normal pyloric ring.  In all 7 cases the &#xA;radiological appearance was normal.  Two studies showed the PD change 3.0 to 4.0 cm &#xA;beyond the visualized ring.  In both, radiological abnormalities were evident in the &#xA;stomach (one had an &#34;antral&#34; ulcer with narrowing, the other a &#34;narrowed antrum&#34;).  &#xA;These were regarded as cases of antral deformity mimicking the pylorus, i.e. false pyloric &#xA;rings.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  From the published radiographs of the 2 abnormal cases, it seems &#xA;that the pyloric sphincteric cylinder was contracted in both.  The &#34;antral&#34; ulcer in the first &#xA;case was located within the cylinder.  The rings visualized in these 2 cases must have &#xA;been at the oral end of the contracted cylinder, i.e. in the situation of the left pyloric loop.  &#xA;The PD change 3.0 to 4.0 cm distal to the visualized rings confirms the above &#xA;interpretation.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Of a total of l8 ring-like structures seen in the &#34;distal antrum&#34; at gastroscopy, Blackwood &#xA;(l969) found 14 to be normal pyloric rings.  Four of the l8 were &#34;antral&#34; deformities &#xA;mimicking the true pyloric ring.  It was concluded that about 4 out of 5 ring structures &#xA;seen in the &#34;distal antrum&#34; would be pylorus, while about 1 out of 5 would be a different &#xA;ring.  The following criteria were suggested as aids in identifying rings in the distal &#xA;antrum:  the normal pylorus should be visualized distal to the occlusive portion of the &#xA;&#34;antral peristaltic wave&#34; and remain patent and immobile between antral contractions.  It &#xA;should have the appearance of a sharply defined circumferential mucosal diaphragm &#xA;projecting at nearly right angles to the antral wall.  In cases of antral narrowing however, &#xA;the wall would be observed to taper gradually to a narrowed area.  An antral contraction &#xA;wave might be seen to move smoothly in a caudal direction, distal to a ring-like structure.  &#xA;If mucosa distal to a ring was extruded proximally, it was likely that &#34;antrum&#34; was &#xA;present distal to this particular ring.  Blackwood (l969) finally defined the normal pylorus &#xA;as a localized circumferential narrowing formed by a thin septum of mucosa with a small &#xA;central aperture seen only, and remaining patent, between antral contractions, without &#xA;mucosa or other landmarks being visualized distally.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Dagradi (l969), once the tipe of the gastroscope has been insinuated beyond &#xA;the angulus, deep, rhythmic, sequential propagative waves of the &#34;antrum&#34; are commonly &#xA;observed.  These originate at the angulus, traverse the &#34;antrum&#34; and recede into the &#xA;distance.  On advancing the fiberoptic instrument, the waves are seen to terminate at a &#xA;certain point of closure, where longitudinal mucosal folds are drawn together as if by a &#xA;purse string.  From this point a retrograde prolapse of bunched-up mucosa develops, &#xA;somewhat resembling the opening of the petals of a flower bud;  the point of closure has &#xA;been likened to a rosette or &#34;fleurette&#34;.  Relaxation of the contraction ring follows, &#xA;revealing the cavity of the &#34;prepyloric antrum&#34; and at its distal end the pyloric orifice.  &#xA;Normally the orifice is ring-like in configuration when seen head-on or oval if seen &#xA;tangentially;  at times it may be observed to contract or expand, changing slowly in &#xA;diameter.  Occasionally a false pyloric orifice may be seen which can be confusing.  This &#xA;usually occurs in association with a distal &#34;antral&#34; ulcer;  the true nature of such a &#xA;localized, unrelenting contraction ring becomes evident if the pyloric orifice can be &#xA;observed distal to it.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  The rosette-like point of closure again corresponds to contraction &#xA;of the left pyloric loop, situated at the commencement of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;(Chap. 13).  Retrograde prolapse or movement of mucosal folds during contraction of the &#xA;cylinder is clearly visible radiographically (Chap. 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At endoscopy Kaye et al. (l976) found that the pylorus was frequently very narrow, but &#xA;that it was usually not completely closed except during the terminal phase of an &#34;antral&#34; &#xA;contraction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Maratka (l984) mentioned that a congenital septum or an acquired fibrous septum &#xA;(secondary to ulcer scarring) in the antral area might simulate the pylorus and could be &#xA;called a &#34;pseudopylorus&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  The permanent &#34;pseudopylorus&#34; formed by a septum is obviously &#xA;quite distinct from the normal intermittent, ring-like contractions of the left pyloric loop &#xA;with its central aperture.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Varis (l989) endoscopy may fail to demonstrate motor disorders of the &#xA;stomach, for instance in conditions such as diabetic gastroparesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  One of the few shortcomings of endoscopy in the examination of &#xA;the upper gastrointestinal tract is its inability to demonstrate the full range of gastric &#xA;motor movements under physiological conditions.  The very presence of an endoscope in &#xA;the stomach with mechanical distension of the gastro-oesophageal junction, renders the &#xA;examination unphysiological;  so does air distension of the gastric lumen.  Only &#xA;movements ahead of the light source are seen and these cannot be correlated with those &#xA;occurring more proximally.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the light of the anatomy as described by Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and &#xA;Torgersen (l942), and the radiological forms of movement as described by Torgersen &#xA;(l942) and Keet (1957), the sequence of events as seen at gastroscopy, can probably be &#xA;stated to be as follows:  once the tip of the gastroscope is beyond the angulus but some &#xA;distance proximally to the pylorus (with the gastric lumen distended by air), the pyloric &#xA;aperture is visualized and seen to be open most of the time.  At times ripples of &#xA;contraction are seen, and at times annular contraction waves with a frequency of 3 per &#xA;minute (peristaltic waves) move along the distal corpus and sinus to a well-defined ring, &#xA;formed by the left pyloric loop.  On the caudal side of the ring longitudinal mucosal folds &#xA;may be seen to recede into the distance and end at the pyloric aperture (Fig. 14.1). &#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/14-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 14.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Contraction ring formed by left pyloric loop.  On caudal side of ring &#xA;longitudinal mucosal folds recede into the distance, ending at pyloric aperture&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The region of the stomach between the ring (the left pyloric loop) and the pyloric aperture is &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  The ring may narrow (Fig.14.2) and contract to a narrow &#xA;bore, through which mucus or at times mucosal folds may be retropelled.  This indicates &#xA;the stage of maximal contraction of the sphincteric cylinder as seen radiologically (Chap. &#xA;13).  &#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/14-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 14.2.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Further narrowing of ring (left pyloric loop).  The region beyond the ring and &#xA;between it and the pyloric aperture (not visible) is the sphincteric cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As the contraction causes the lumen to &#34;disappear&#34;, the event itself (except for the &#xA;contraction of the left loop) is not visible gastroscopically.  In this sense maximal &#xA;contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder causes, gastroscopically speaking, an event &#xA;horizon in the distal stomach.  After a few seconds the sphincteric cylinder (including its &#xA;left loop) relaxes, revealing the pyloric aperture, which is seen to be open (Fig. 14.3).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/14-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 14.3.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Pyloric aperture distal to the ring&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Should the tip of the gastroscope be closer to the pylorus, the pyloric aperture itself may &#xA;be seen to close or open to a certain extent, in the absence of contraction of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder (marked air distension of the lumen may prevent contraction of the &#xA;cylinder).  In this case the variation in size of the aperture is thought to be due to iris-like &#xA;action of the mucosal folds (Chap.13).&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blackwood WD.  Pylorus identification.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l969, 57, &#xA;163-167.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Code CF, Carlson HC.  Motor activity of the stomach.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Handbook of &#xA;Physiology&lt;/em&gt;, Sect 6:  Alimentary Canal Vol 4:  Motility, edit Code CF.  &#xA;Amer Physiol Soc, Washington DC l968, pp 1903-1916.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edinb&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dagradi AE.  The gastric antrum and the pyloric orifice.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroint &#xA;Endosc&lt;/em&gt; l969, 16, 43-44.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Edwards DAW, Rowlands EN.  Physiology of the gastroduodenal junction.  In:  &#xA;Handbook of Physiology, Sect 6: Alimentary Canal Vol 4: Motility, edit Code &#xA;CF.  &lt;em&gt;Amer Physiol Soc&lt;/em&gt;, Washington DC l968, pp 1985-2000.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menslichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; 1913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Johnson HD.  The pylorus:  its function and some surgical considerations.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Proc Roy Soc Med&lt;/em&gt; l961, 54, 938-940.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kaye MD, Mehta SJ, Showalter JP.  Manometric studies of the human pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, 70, 477-480.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD.  The prepyloric contractions in the normal stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Acta &#xA;Rad&lt;/em&gt; l957, 48, 413-424.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Maratka Z.  Terminology, definitions and diagnostic criteria in digestive &#xA;endoscopy.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l984, l9, Suppl 103, 31-38.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rider JA, Moeller HC, Puletti EJ.  Gastroscopic observations of the dynamic &#xA;anatomy of the antrum and pylorus.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroint Endosc&lt;/em&gt; l967, 14, 100-&#xA;101.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schindler R.  Gastroscopic observation concerned with the gross anatomy of the &#xA;stomach:  the musculus sphincter antri, observation of the position of the stomach, &#xA;the mucosal folds.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l936, 3, 149-153.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Varis K.  Diabetic gastroparesis (a review).  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l989, 24, 897-903.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>15 - Manometry at the Gastroduodenal Junction</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_15/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_15/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;manometry-at-the-gastroduodenal-junction&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Manometry at the Gastroduodenal Junction&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#manometry-at-the-gastroduodenal-junction&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Atkinson et al. (l957) stated that although the pyloric sphincter was a well-defined &#xA;anatomical structure, there was doubt whether it functioned physiologically as a sphincter &#xA;in the sense that it closed the stomach off from the duodenum.  Using a system of small &#xA;air-filled balloons and air-filled, open-tipped tubes, these authors investigated &#xA;intraluminal pressure profiles in the pyloro-duodenal region in normal subjects as well as &#xA;in patients with active duodenal ulceration and with non-ulcer dyspepsia.  Measurements &#xA;were taken in the fasting stomach and in stomachs containing a mixture of food and &#xA;barium sulphate.  In no instance could a band of increased pressure be obtained anywhere &#xA;in the region of the duodenal cap, pyloric canal or pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;.  While phasic &#xA;pressure waves were recorded in the pyloric region on many occasions, and while it was &#xA;possible to correlate radiologically visible peristaltic waves inthe corpus and &#34;antrum&#34; &#xA;with the pressure records, no convincing evidence of independent contractions at the &#xA;gastroduodenal junction (i.e. the pyloric ring) was found.  It was concluded that the &#xA;diameter of the pyloric ring was more than 7.0 mm most of the time, whether the stomach &#xA;was empty or not.  These authors could not demonstrate a physiological sphincter in the &#xA;sense of a tonically contracted muscular ring which kept the lumen tightly closed and &#xA;which relaxed intermittently to allow gastric contents to pass into the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The phasic pressure waves recorded on the gastric side of the ring were deemed capable &#xA;of causing partial or complete obliteration of the lumen.  Each contraction was found to &#xA;be intermittent and brief, and involved a segment 3.0 to 4.0 cm in length.  It probably &#xA;reduced the bore of the pyloric canal and closed it momentarily.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  &#xA;&#34;Pyloric canal&#34; was equated with the pyloric aperture).  Atkinson et al. (l957) concluded &#xA;that the pylorus was normally relaxed;  there was no evidence that it acted &#xA;antagonistically to peristaltic or other phasic pressure waves.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Andersson and Grossman (l965), using a system of small (5.0 to 10 mm diameter) water-&#xA;filled balloons, recorded intraluminal pressures of the pyloro-duodenal region in normal, &#xA;fasting, supine human subjects.  As a balloon was withdrawn from the duodenum through &#xA;the pylorus, a change in pressure occurred only rarely.  During 7 of 130 withdrawals, i.e. &#xA;in approximately 5 percent of instances, a transient pressure peak of variable magnitude &#xA;occurred when the balloon passed the &#34;sphincter&#34;.  It was concluded that the pyloric &#xA;sphincter was usually not detectable by pressure measurements and that these &#xA;measurements could not be used as a means of identifying the pylorus.  The luminal &#xA;diameter of the resting pylorus in supine subjects appeared to be greater than 10.0 mm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Brink et al. (l965) measured intraluminal pressures of the gastroduodenal region in &#xA;canines.  Having performed a gastrostomy and duodenostomy in each animal, cannulae &#xA;were inserted into the stomach and duodenum through which water-filled, open-tipped &#xA;tubes and small balloons were introduced into the lumen.  As the pressure-detecting units &#xA;were withdrawn, an increase in resting pressure occurred when the gastroduodenal &#xA;junctional zone was reached.  The magnitude of the change in pressure varied with the &#xA;cross-sectional diameter of the detecting instrument.  With the open-tip tube, elevation of &#xA;pressure occurred in the junctional zone in 15 of 25 tests on 5 dogs.  The mean length of &#xA;the zone of increased pressure varied from 1.1cm to 1.6 cm.  With balloons an increase in &#xA;pressure was detected more often.  The frequency with which they were able to &#xA;demonstrate a high pressure zone rose as the size of the balloon sensor was increased.  &#xA;With a 7.0 mm diameter balloon, a rise in pressure was seen in 97 percent of 58 &#xA;observations.  Instillation of acid into the duodenum caused an increase in the pressure &#xA;peaks of the junctional zone, with a simultaneous increase in amplitude of duodenal &#xA;contractions (type I pressure waves) and a cessation of motor activity in the &#34;antrum&#34;.  It &#xA;was concluded that there was a narrow zone of raised pressure at the gastroduodenal &#xA;junction in fasting dogs, in which the diameter of the lumen was less than 7 mm most of &#xA;the time.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Carlson et al. (l966) investigated motor action of the canine gastroduodenal junction by &#xA;means of combined cineradiographic, manometric and electrical studies.  Small &#xA;intraluminal water-filled balloons were positioned in the first part of the duodenum and &#xA;within 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the pyloric ring on the gastric side, i.e. in the &#34;terminal antrum&#34;.  &#xA;The balloons were connected to external strain gauge transducers by means of cannulae.  &#xA;When a Type II contraction (Chap. 13) reached a point 3.0 to 4.0 cm from the pyloric &#xA;ring, the terminal antrum and pyloric canal distal to it contracted simultaneously, or &#xA;almost simultaneously, in a segmental way;  such vigorous terminal antral contractions &#xA;(TAC) caused sharp elevations in intraluminal pressures.  The pyloric canal almost &#xA;always contracted with the terminal antrum.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  &#34;Pyloric canal&#34; &#xA;was equated with the pyloric aperture).  The mean duration of TAC was 3.1 seconds, the &#xA;mean time interval between completion of cycles 12.7 seconds, and the mean rate 4.8 per &#xA;minute.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Isenberg and Csendes (l972), using open-tipped perfused tubes as pressure sensors, &#xA;measured intraluminal pressures in canines prepared with gastric and duodenal cannulas.  &#xA;The sensors were moved in 1.0 cm increments back and forth across the pylorus.  Mean &#xA;resting pyloric pressure when the sensors were moved from the stomach to duodenum &#xA;was 14.8 cm H&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;0;  when they were moved from duodenum to stomach, it was 8.9 cm &#xA;H&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;0.  Intravenous infusion of cholecystokinin octapeptide produced an increase in &#xA;pyloric pressure.  Mean sphincter length was 1.8 cm.  It was concluded that the dog &#xA;pylorus was tonically contracted and that the resting tone was increased by octapeptide of &#xA;cholecystokinin.&#xA;Fisher and Cohen (l973) used infused open-tipped catheters for their manometric studies &#xA;of the gastroduodenal junction in 28 normal, fasting human subjects.  All measurements &#xA;were made with the subject lying on the right side.  At the duodenogastric junction a high &#xA;pressure zone approximately 1.5 cm in length was recorded.  The pressure here varied &#xA;from 2.5 to 11.7 mm Hg above the intra-abdominal pressure, with a mean magnitude of &#xA;5.0 mm Hg.  During duodenal acidification with 0.1N HCl the pyloric pressure increased &#xA;from its basal level of 5.0mm Hg to 25.0 mm Hg, an increase occurring in all l7 subjects &#xA;tested.  Intraduodenal olive oil also significantly increased pyloric pressure.  An &#34;antral&#34; &#xA;peristaltic contraction was associated with a brief drop in pyloric pressure, followed by a &#xA;sequential contraction of the pylorus and the duodenum.  This motor behaviour did not &#xA;occur consistently and could be recorded in several subjects only.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fisher and Cohen (l973) concluded that the human pylorus had the physiological &#xA;characteristics of a true gastrointestinal sphincter, since (1) it was distinguised by a zone &#xA;of elevated pressure which relaxed with &#34;antral&#34; peristalsis;  (2) the high pressure zone &#xA;contracted in response to physiological duodenal stimuli, and (3) an increase in pyloric &#xA;pressure was associated with a diminution in reflux of duodenal contents into the &#xA;stomach.  Compared with other gastrointestinal sphincters, the high pressure zone was &#xA;narrow and had a low resting magnitude, which might explain the failure of previous &#xA;studies to recognize it.  They considered their perfused catheters to be more sensitive than &#xA;balloon sensors which had been used in some previous investigations.  Although the &#xA;presence of a high pressure zone at the gastroduodenal junction implied sphincteric &#xA;properties, these authors pointed out that an alternative explanation might be that the high &#xA;pressure zone was simply a manifestation of the anatomical configuration of the &#34;pyloric &#xA;channel&#34;.  In that case the findings would not be of any functional significance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kaye et al. (l976) did not agree with Fisher and Cohen (l973) that perfused catheters were &#xA;more sensitive than balloon sensors.  As each sensor in a perfused catheter assembly had &#xA;of necessity a restricted radial disposition, an important limitation was imposed on &#xA;sphincteric assessment.  In their opinion balloon sensors were less accurate, but not less &#xA;sensitive than perfused catheters.  For these reasons they used a circumferentially &#xA;sensitive pressure sensor, consisting of a silastic diaphragm around a fluid-filled chamber &#xA;containing a miniature transducer.  The overall circumference was 6.0mm, the device &#xA;being both accurate and sensitive to pressure around the whole circumference.  Pressures &#xA;were recorded in 8 healthy, fasting human subjects lying in the supine position.  Transient &#xA;phasic pressure rises were occasionally observed at the gastroduodenal junction (as &#xA;indicated by a change in electrical potential difference as described in Chap. 6), but in no &#xA;instance was a zone of tonically elevated pressure demonstrated convincingly.  The most &#xA;striking evidence for a pyloric high pressure zone in any of the 8 subjects was a sustained &#xA;rise of only 1.0 or 2.0 mm Hg, corresponding to a 26mV change in potential difference.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Because the miniature transducer assembly was not suitable for the introduction of &#xA;solutions into the duodenum, additional studies were done with a six-lumen, open-tipped, &#xA;continuously perfused catheter system similar to that of Fisher and Cohen (l973), its &#xA;overall diameter being 5.4 mm.  Ten healthy, fasting, supine human subjects were &#xA;studied, firstly in the basal state, subsequently during infusion of 0.1N HCl into the &#xA;duodenum and lastly after instillation of olive oil into the duodenum.  During the basal &#xA;withdrawal studies a pressure elevation was seen in 1 of 3 pressure-transmitting catheters &#xA;in 2 of the 10 subjects.  Such tonic elevations of pressure were seen more frequently &#xA;during intraduodenal infusion of HCl and installation of olive oil, but in only one subject &#xA;was a rise of pressure noted in all 3 leads;  this was quite small and occurred over a &#xA;distance of only 0.5 cm.  These elevations were felt to be due to mucosal apposition of &#xA;the catheter orifice as it traversed the narrowest part of the gastroduodenal region.  It was &#xA;also shown that the right lateral position, as used by Fisher and Cohen (l973), could cause &#xA;90 degree angulation at the gastroduodenal junction with increased resistance to flow and &#xA;therefore an increase in intraluminal pressure.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;With both types of assembly, Kaye et al. (l976) recorded phasic elevations in most &#xA;subjects from both duodenum and &#34;antrum&#34;.  The &#34;antral&#34; motor activity was usually &#xA;most prominent at, and immediately proximal to the gastroduodenal junction.  These &#xA;authors concluded that they were unable to demonstrate a zone of tonically elevated &#xA;pressure at the gastroduodenal junction in healthy subjects, despite the use of accurate &#xA;and sensitive manometric systems.  They inferred that the pylorus was open for most of &#xA;the time in fasting, healthy young individuals.  This conclusion was considered to be &#xA;consistent with endoscopic observations, which showed that the pylorus was usually not &#xA;completely closed except during the terminal phase of &#34;antral&#34; contractions (Chap. 14).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Valenzuela et al. (l976) assessed pyloric sphincter pressures in normal, fasting human &#xA;subjects as well as in patients with gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer.  All individuals were &#xA;examined in the right recumbent position by means of an open-tipped, water-perfused &#xA;catheter assembly.  Intra-duodenal pressure was used as a zero reference and pyloric &#xA;pressure was measured as a zone of sustained elevated pressure without considering peak &#xA;phasic contractions.  Basal pyloric sphincter pressure was found to be 10.2 &amp;#177; 1.2 &#xA;mm Hg.  During perfusion of acid into the duodenum the pressure was almost doubled, to &#xA;20.2 &amp;#177; 1.8mm Hg.  This was prevented by the prior administration of atropine.  &#xA;Metoclopramide increased pyloric sphincter pressure in normal subjects as well as in &#xA;patients with gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While comparing the findings of Fisher and Cohen (l973) with those of Kaye et al. &#xA;(l976), Winans (l976) was moved to conclude that the pylorus was &#34;fickle&#34;.  Whereas &#xA;Fisher and Cohen (l973) presented evidence to show that it was a true sphincter in the &#xA;anatomical and physiological sense, the findings of Kaye et al. (l976) cast doubt upon the &#xA;legitimacy of that claim.  Could the divergent experimental results be reconciled?  &#xA;Winans (l976) thought that an explanation might be found in differences in methodology.  &#xA;The right decubitus study position of Fisher and Cohen (l973), for instance, might have &#xA;narrowed the pyloric lumen mechanically, producing an artifactual high pressure zone.  &#xA;Other seemingly minor but potentially important methodological differences were &#xA;possible.&#xA;During combined radiographic and manometric studies Keet et al. (l978) recorded fasting &#xA;intraluminal pressures in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder by means of an air-filled system &#xA;and a miniature balloon in 5 normal adult subjects in the erect position (Chap. 13).  The &#xA;following two distinct waves of pressure increase in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder were &#xA;noted:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Irregularly occurring, nonrhythmic contractions, causing pressure increases &#xA;varying from 9 to 34 mm Hg (the majority being in the range of 12 to 25 mm Hg).  These &#xA;waves lasted from 5 to 21 seconds (the majority being in the 6 to 10 second range), and &#xA;occurred repeatedly in all subjects (Fig. 15.1).  Simultaneous radiographic TV monitoring &#xA;showed that each of these waves was associated with a typical maximal contraction of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13).  The waves also conformed to contractions of the &#xA;&#34;terminal antrum&#34; (TAC) described by Carlson, Code and Nelson (l966), Code and &#xA;Carlson (l968) and Shepard (l97l), called Type II waves.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/15-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 15.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Two Type II pressure waves of pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  Simultaneous &#xA;radiography showed typical contraction of cylinder during both waves.  Base line &#xA;indicates intraluminal pressure in absence of radiologically visible motor activity.  10-&#xA;second marker on zero line&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;In two of the subjects compound waves, consisting of a rise in base line pressure &#xA;of 3 to 5 mm Hg and lasting for 10 to 40 seconds, on which were superimposed waves of &#xA;shorter duration (3 to 5 seconds) and higher amplitude (up to 12 mm Hg) were seen.  &#xA;These conformed to Type III waves (Shepard l97l).  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  &#xA;Radiologically both types of waves were associated with typical contractions of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  Compound waves are usually ascribed to additional &#xA;increases in tone.  Contractions of the cylinder in the full stomach are usually quite &#xA;regular, tending to occur at a rate of 3 per minute.  The fact that pressure waves occurred &#xA;irregularly in this investigation, might have been due to the fact that a small volume of &#xA;liquid barium was used.  Houghton et al pointed out that emptying of solids was &#xA;associated with an increase in frequency of &#34;antral&#34; peristaltic waves;  vide infra).&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;No attempt was made by Keet et al. (l978) to record contractions of the pyloric &#xA;ring (right pyloric loop) and the sphincteric cylinder separately.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;McShane et al. (l980) studied pyloric sphincter pressures in 32 patients under basal &#xA;conditions, after stimulation with HCl and after posture changes.  A single fine perfused &#xA;catheter, 2.0mm in diameter, with 2 diametrically opposite side openings, was placed in &#xA;the duodenum at endoscopy; resting pyloric pressures were measured during catheter &#xA;withdrawal 3 to 5 hours later.  In 28 of the 32 patients no rise in pressure occurred in the &#xA;pyloric region.  One patient of the remaining 4 showed a temporary rise in pressure which &#xA;did not recur at repeat examinations, and in the other 3 there were pressure rises of 3.0, &#xA;3.0 and 6.0 mm Hg respectively.  It was concluded that it was not possible to demonstrate &#xA;any significant zone of pressure change at the pylorus in the basal state.  Posture changes &#xA;and instillation of 0.1N HCl into the duodenum did not affect the results.  It was thought &#xA;that the conflicting results previously obtained by Fisher and Cohen (l973) and by &#xA;Valenzuela et al. (l976) might have been due to the fact that in their investigations the &#xA;catheter was withdrawn too soon after intubation, at a time when the intubation itself &#xA;might have affected the sphincter tone.  Moreover, the catheters of Fisher and Cohen &#xA;(l973) had 3 times the diameter of those used by McShane et al. (l980), which could also &#xA;have affected their results;  Brink et al. (l965) had shown previously that the larger the &#xA;diameter of a pressure detecting unit, the greater were the pressures recorded.  They &#xA;implication was that the zones of elevated pressure recorded by Fisher and Cohen (l973) &#xA;and by Valenzuela et al (l976), might have been due to muscle excitation and resistance &#xA;to stretch, and might not have been a true indication of basal pyloric sphincter tone.  &#xA;McShane et al. (l980) concluded that the pyloric sphincter remained patent under fasting &#xA;conditions, with a luminal diameter greater than 2.0 mm.  They supported the concept of &#xA;the pylorus as a &#34;filter pump&#34;, having the ability to filter particles greater than 2.0 mm in &#xA;diameter, while allowing fluid and chyme to enter the duodenum continuously.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In discussing the uncertainties pertaining to the action of the human pylorus, White et al. &#xA;(l98l) thought that there had been a failure to obtain adequate pressure recordings from &#xA;within the lumen.  Pull-through techniques would not be applicable if the pylorus were &#xA;open most of the time.  It was necessary to determine the timing of closure of the pylorus &#xA;with respect to contractions of the &#34;antrum&#34; and duodenal bulb.  Consequently &#xA;continuous records of intraluminal pressures had to be obtained simultaneously from the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, pylorus and duodenal bulb.  In order to achieve this end an open-tipped, water-&#xA;perfused, six-channel catheter assembly with an external diameter of 6.0.mm was used.  &#xA;The middle opening was placed within the pylorus while other pressure channels &#xA;recorded from the &#34;mid-antrum&#34; and the distal duodenal bulb.  Measurements were taken &#xA;in 15 fasting, normal human subjects in the right recumbent position.  It was found that &#xA;basal pressures in the &#34;antrum&#34;, pylorus and duodenal bulb were the same relative to &#xA;atmospheric pressures;  there was no gradient of basal pressure across the pylorus.  &#xA;During withdrawal of the catheters through the pylorus a change in basal pressure did not &#xA;occur.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;White et al. (l98l) recorded a total of 264 &#34;antral&#34;, 213 pyloric and 834 duodenal pressure &#xA;waves.  The majority of pyloric contractions were related to an &#34;antral&#34; contraction, and &#xA;most of these were also associated with a duodenal contraction.  In this way a concerted &#xA;contraction of the whole gastroduodenal region occurred.  However, independent &#xA;contractions of all three areas were also encountered;  70 per cent of duodenal and 36 per &#xA;cent of pyloric contractions were independent.  Powerful contractions of the &#34;antrum&#34; were &#xA;usually associated with related contractions of the pylorus and duodenum.  Less powerful &#xA;contractions of the &#34;antrum&#34; were usually independent.  It was concluded that the human &#xA;pylorus did not cause a zone of elevated basal pressure;  apart from a brief closure during &#xA;contraction, the pylorus was always open.&#xA;Dooley et al. (l985), commenting on the contradictory results of previous investigators, &#xA;pointed out that the motility of the upper gastrointestinal tract during fasting was not a &#xA;static one and marked variations were seen during the various phases of the interdigestive &#xA;motility complex (IDMC).  It was conceivable that the pylorus could show cyclic &#xA;variation with the different phases of the complex.  Consequently pyloric pressure was &#xA;monitored continuously for 300 minutes at a time, in 6 healthy fasting adult subjects.  A &#xA;perfused catheter system was used with 2 &#34;antral&#34; and 2 duodenal side openings.  A Dent &#xA;(l976) sleeve, 4.5 cm in length and with an outer diameter of 6.0mm, was incorporated in &#xA;the multilumen tube assembly between the duodenal and antral ports, and placed in the &#xA;pylorus under fluroscopic control, with measurements obtained in the supine position.  &#xA;The pylorus was assessed for the possible presence of an elevated basal pressure zone, &#xA;using baseline duodenal pressure as a reference.  Pyloric pressure was also analyzed for &#xA;each separate phase of the IDMC, and the frequency and amplitude of its phasic &#xA;contractions were determined.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dooley et al. (l985) found that basal pyloric pressure in the fasting state showed no &#xA;elevation above baseline duodenal pressure during phase III of the IDMC.  In phases I &#xA;and II, basal pyloric pressures varied in different subjects, being elevated in some but not &#xA;in others.  Subjects studied on separate days often showed different patterns of activity, &#xA;and it appeared that duodenal acidification gradually increased basal pyloric pressure.  &#xA;The pylorus also showed phasic activity, which was maximal in phase III.  The exact &#xA;significance of this activity was not clear.  The sleeve device did not allow any firm &#xA;conclusions to be drawn on the phasic activity of the pylorus in relation to that of the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34; on the one hand, and that of the duodenum on the other.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using a system of perfused catheters and a pull-through technique, Gaffney et al. (l987) &#xA;found that the presence of a high pressure zone at the pylorus was very variable.  Of 170 &#xA;records made, a high pressure zone was present in 53 percent while no change in pressure &#xA;was found in 47 percent.  The subject&#39;s position had no effect on the presence of a high &#xA;pressure zone, which refuted the premise of Kaye et al. (l976) that the zone of elevated &#xA;pressure found by Fisher and Cohen (l973) might be artifactual.  In addition the pylorus &#xA;showed no response to duodenal acidification.  It was concluded that the evidence &#xA;weighed heavily against the presence of a tonic sphincter at the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Houghton et al. (l988) investigated the normal patterns of pressure activity in the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, pylorus and duodenum and their relationship to changes in &#34;antral&#34; and duodenal &#xA;pH, under fasting conditions and after ingestion of chocolate milk.  By this procedure the &#xA;relationship between motor events and transpyloric flow of acid gastric secretions could &#xA;be determined.  An eleven-channel intraluminal probe was used, incorporating a sleeve &#xA;sensor 4.5 cm in length positioned across the pylorus.  The maximum diameter of the &#xA;manometric assembly was 6.5 mm.  The &#34;short pyloric sphincter&#34; was identified by &#xA;continuous measurements of transmucosal electrical potential difference (Chap. 6).  The &#xA;sleeve sensor in the pylorus consistently registered a higher basal pressure from the &#xA;pylorus than from the adjacent &#34;antral&#34; and duodenal ports.  However, it was conceded &#xA;that the recording of pyloric tone might depend on the width of the manometric probe in &#xA;relation to the pyloric aperture;  the higher basal pressure might be an artifact.  The most &#xA;common fasting motor pattern consisted of regular co-ordinated contractions, most of &#xA;which involved the &#34;antrum&#34; and duodenum, and showed evidence of propagation with &#xA;transient reductions in duodenal pH.  Ingestion of milk changed the motor pattern to one &#xA;which was composed of pressure waves confined to the pylorus with few waves in the &#xA;&#34;terminal antrum&#34; or proximal duodenum.  These isolated pyloric pressure waves were &#xA;gradually replaced by propagated &#34;antroduodenal&#34; contractions occurring at a regular &#xA;frequency.  The liquid component of a mixed meal emptied rapidly in an exponential &#xA;manner, whereas the solid remained in the gastric fornix until 80 per cent of the liquid &#xA;had emptied, and then emptied in a linear manner;  the onset of solid emptying was &#xA;associated with an increase in the frequency of antral pressure waves.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gaffney (l987) pointed out that the results of pyloric manometric studies conflict, some &#xA;showing evidence of a sphincter at the pylorus, and others not.  As examples of the &#xA;former, the following may be mentioned:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Brink et al. (l965) demonstrated a narrow (1.1cm to 1.6cm) zone of raised intraluminal &#xA;pressure at the gastroduodenal junction in canines.  Isenberg and Csendes (l972) found &#xA;the dog pylorus to be tonically contracted, the sphincter length being 1.8 cm.  Fisher and &#xA;Cohen (l973) recorded a pyloric high pressure zone, 1.5 cm in length, in humans;  to &#xA;them it had the characteristics of a true sphincter, but it was acknowledged that it could &#xA;simply be a manifestation of the normal configuration of the pyloric channel.  Valenzuela &#xA;et al. (l976) found that the basal pyloric sphincter pressure was elevated in normal human &#xA;subjects lying on the right side;  they looked upon the pyloric ring as a &#xA;sphincter in the usually accepted sense.  Using a sleeve sensor, Houghton et al. (l988) consistently registered &#xA;a higher basal pressure from the pylorus than from the adjacent antral and duodenal ports.  &#xA;This was ascribed to the pyloric sphincter, but it was acknowledged that it might be &#xA;artefactual.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;These findings were not accepted universally.  Kaye et al. (l976) pointed out that the &#xA;results of Fisher and Cohen (l973) could have been influenced by the fact that subjects &#xA;were examined in the right lateral decubitus position;  in this position there could be &#xA;angulation of catheters with increased resistance to flow and consequent increase in &#xA;intraluminal pressure.  Valenzuela et al. (l976) similarly examined patients lying on their &#xA;right side.  However, Gaffney et al. (l987) found that the subject&#39;s position had no effect &#xA;on the presence of a high pressure zone, refuting the premise of Kaye et al. (l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is doubtful if the findings of Brink et al. (l965) and of Isenberg and Csendes (l972) can &#xA;be regarded as physiological, as each experimental animal had both a gastrostomy and a &#xA;duodenostomy, which might have influenced the results.&#xA;Many authors failed to find evidence of a tonically contracted ring structure at the &#xA;pylorus.  Atkinson et al. (l957) were unable to demonstrate independent contraction of &#xA;the pyloric ring;  they found that the pylorus was normally relaxed and did not act &#xA;antagonistically to phasic pressure waves.  Andersson and Grossman (l965), Kaye et al. &#xA;(l976), McShane et al. (l980), White et al. (l98l), Dooley et al. (l985) and Gaffney et al. &#xA;(l987) found no convincing manometric evidence of a zone of tonically elevated basal &#xA;pressure at the pylorus.  McShane et al. (l980) stated that the pyloric sphincter remained &#xA;patent under fasting conditions.  Apart from a brief closure during contraction, the &#xA;pylorus was always open, according to White et al. (l98l).  Kelly (l983) and Gaffney et al. &#xA;(l987) concluded that the evidence weighed heavily against the presence of a tonic &#xA;sphincter at the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Winans (l976) attributed the divergent results of manometric studies to differences in &#xA;methodology and differences in position of the subjects examined.  Whereas the human &#xA;pylorus was easily identifiable as a gross anatomic structure, it eluded identification as a &#xA;functioning sphincter.  Winans (l976) called this a &#34;sphincteric paradox&#34;, and referred to &#xA;the pylorus as being &#34;fickle&#34;.  Adding to the confusion is the lack of agreement on the &#xA;definition of a sphincter (Chap. 2) and its relation to a high pressure zone.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In determining the manometric features of the pylorus, none of the authors quoted, with &#xA;the exception of Keet et al. (l978), referred to or took note of the muscular anatomy of the &#xA;region as determined by Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen (l942) (Chap. &#xA;3).  According to this concept the pyloric ring consists of an aboral thickening of the &#xA;cylinder, and constitutes an inherent part of the cylinder both anatomically and &#xA;functionally.  The closest any of the authors came to the concept of a sphincteric cylinder &#xA;at the pylorus, was the recognition of the &#34;terminal antrum&#34; as a functional unit by &#xA;Carlson, Code and Nelson (l966), Code and Carlson (l968) and Shepard (l97l).  However, &#xA;the terminal antrum had not been defined in terms of muscular anatomy, whereas the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder had.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The sphincteric mechanism at the pylorus will probably prove to be less paradoxical once &#xA;the muscular component of the pyloric ring (the right pyloric loop) is no longer regarded &#xA;as a separate structure, but is acknowledged to be an inherent part (i.e. the aboral end) of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Andersson S, Grossman MI.  Profile of pH, pressure, and potential difference at &#xA;gastroduodenal junction in man.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l965, 49, 364-371.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Atkinson M, Edwards DAW, Honour AJ, et al.  Comparison of cardiac and &#xA;pyloric sphincters.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l957, 273, 918-922.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Brink BM, Schlegel JF, Code CF.  The pressure profile of the gastroduodenal &#xA;junctional zone in dogs.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l965, 6, 163-171.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Carlson HC, Code CF, Nelson RA.  Motor action of the canine gastroduodenal &#xA;junction:  a cineradiographic, pressure and electric study.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig &#xA;Dis&lt;/em&gt; l966, 11, 155-172.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Code CF, Carlson HC.  Motor activity of the stomach.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Handbook of &#xA;Physiology&lt;/em&gt;, Sect 6:  Alimentary Canal, Vol 4:  Motility.  American &#xA;Physiological Soc, Washington DC l968, pp 1903-1906.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dent JA.  A new technique for continuous sphincter pressure measurement.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, 7l, 263-267.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dooley CP, Reznick JB, Valenzuela JE.  A continuous manometric study of the &#xA;human pylorus.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l985, 89, 821-826.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fisher RS, Cohen S.  Physiological characteristics of the human pyloric sphincter.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l973, 64, 67-75.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; 1913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gaffney PR, Gleeson DJ, Hall JW, et al.  The manometric findings at the human &#xA;pylorus:  the evidence against the presence of a tonic sphincter.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l987, 22, 525-532.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Houghton LA, Read NW, Heddle R, et al.  Motor activity of the gastric antrum, &#xA;pylorus and duodenum under fasted conditions and after a liquid meal.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l988, 94, 1276-1284.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Houghton LA, Read NW, Heddle R, et al.  Relationship of the motor activity of &#xA;the antrum, pylorus and duodenum to gastric emptying of a solid-liquid mixed &#xA;meal.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l988, 94, 1285-1291.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Isenberg JI, Csendes A.  Effect of octapeptide of cholecystokinin on canine &#xA;pyloric pressure.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l972, 222, 428-431.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kaye MD, Mehta SJ, Showalter JP.  Manometric studies of the human pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, 70, 477-480.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD, Vermaak JC, Mouton J.  Intraluminal pressure profiles and mucosal &#xA;movements in the stomach and duodenum.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l978, 69, 144-148.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kelly KA.  Motility of the stomach and gastroduodenal junction.  In:  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract&lt;/em&gt;.  Vol 1, Edit Johnson LR.  &#xA;Raven Press, New York l98l, pp 393-410.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;McShane AJ, O&#39;Morain C, Lennon JR, et al.  Atraumatic non-distorting pyloric &#xA;sphincter pressure studies.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l980, 21, 826-828.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Shepard RS.  &lt;em&gt;Human Physiology&lt;/em&gt;.  JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia &#xA;l97l, p 417.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Valenzuela JE, Defilippi C, Csendes A.  Manometric studies on the human &#xA;pyloric sphincter:  effect of cigarette smoking, metoclopramide and atropine.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, 70, 481-483.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;White CM, Poxon V, Alexander-Williams J.  A study of motility of normal &#xA;human gastroduodenal region.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 26, 609-617.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Winans CS.  The fickle pylorus (editorial).  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, &#xA;70, 622-623.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>16 - Myoelectric Activity at the Gastroduodenal Junction</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_16/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_16/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;myoelectric-activity-at-the-gastroduodenal-junction&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Myoelectric Activity at the Gastroduodenal Junction&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#myoelectric-activity-at-the-gastroduodenal-junction&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The presence of rhythmic electrical activity in the musculature of the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; of &#xA;anaesthetized dogs was first reported by Alvarez and Mahoney (1922) and has since been &#xA;confirmed repeatedly.  Bozler (l945) recorded the electrical potentials of the dog, cat and &#xA;guinea pig stomachs by means of non-polarizable differential electrodes.  In the dog, the &#xA;differential potential associated with each peristaltic contraction showed three main &#xA;deflections, designated the R, S and T waves.  The shape of the recorded potential was &#xA;identical with that of cardiac muscle but differed from it in that it lasted from 5 to 8 &#xA;seconds, i.e. it had a slow phase.  Species differences were noted;  in the guinea pig &#xA;stomach a slow potential could be observed only in the region of the pylorus.  In the cat &#xA;the same action potentials as in the dog were obtained as long as the contractions in the &#xA;stomach were weak.  If movements were strong enough to be easily visible, brief spike &#xA;potentials were superimposed on the slow phases;  the number and frequency of the &#xA;spikes increased with the strength of the contraction.  At that time the significance of the &#xA;spikes was not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bass et al. (l96l) found that a rhythmic electric complex could be recorded regularly from &#xA;the &#34;antrum&#34; in dogs.  Called the basic electric rhythm (BER), its frequency was about &#xA;4.4 per minute.  Bursts of relatively rapid changes in potential, fast or spike activity, &#xA;occurred in association with approximately 40 percent of BER complexes.  (In the &#xA;duodenal bulb a similar basic electric rhythm and fast or spike activity was recorded.)  &#xA;Both types of activity became attenuated at the pylorus and usually disappeared in it.  &#xA;Although some of the fast activity of the antrum occasionally extended into the pylorus, it &#xA;was felt that in the dog the pylorus acted as an &#34;electric insulator&#34; between the stomach &#xA;and duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Daniel and Chapman (l963) pointed out that all investigators had recorded a more or less &#xA;constant electrical wave in vitro from the body and &#34;antrum&#34; of both the resting and the &#xA;contracting stomach.  Its frequency varied from 3 to 6 per minute, depending on the &#xA;species and the type of preparation.  In the contracting stomach an electrical wave, which &#xA;they called the primary wave, preceded each peristaltic contraction.  In the dog&#39;s stomach &#xA;these propagated electrical waves did not vary in shape with the presence or absence of &#xA;motor activity.  It was concluded that the electrical activity of the dog stomach preceded &#xA;and appeared to control the spread of peristaltic contractions, but went on relatively &#xA;unchanged in the absence of peristalsis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Daniel and Chapman (l963) also investigated the electrical activity of the dog stomach by &#xA;means of a monopolar technique.  When the electrodes were oriented transversely to the &#xA;longitudinal muscle fibres, the primary waves with a frequency of 3 to 6 per minute were &#xA;the most prominent and consistent feature.  In the upper third of the stomach the typical &#xA;electrical wave was small and disappeared near the fundus.  Activity progressed distally &#xA;along an array of electrodes parallel to the greater curvature, at a velocity increasing from &#xA;0.3 cm per second in the body of the stomach to 3.0 to 4.0 cm per second as the wave &#xA;neared the antrum, thus correlating electrical events with descriptions of a rapid spread of &#xA;peristalsis in the antral region.  Activity at the antral electrodes was often nearly &#xA;simultaneous.  In the antrum, but not in the body of the stomach, the primary wave was &#xA;often followed by secondary smaller deflections which were sometimes fused;  these &#xA;were present only when visible, active peristalsis was evident.  Visible antral peristaltic &#xA;contractions followed the primary waves by 6 to 9 seconds and the secondary waves by 1 &#xA;to 2 seconds.  Daniel and Chapman (l963) described the events as follows:  an electrical &#xA;wave, probably originating in the cardia, travelled slowly down the stomach at a velocity &#xA;of slightly more than 0.5 cm/sec until it reached the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;, where its velocity &#xA;increased to 4 cm/sec.  The wave recurred periodically at the same frequency of 3 to 6 per &#xA;minute as the contractions of the stomach, and appeared to precede and initiate gastric &#xA;motility.  However, there was a variable relationship between electrical and mechanical &#xA;events, as the primary electrical wave might continue unchanged after inhibition of &#xA;motility.  In the &#34;antrum&#34; of the dog secondary spikes accompanied motility and &#xA;disappeared with it.  Secondary spikes could only be recorded in the antral part of the &#xA;dog&#39;s stomach, while in the cat and guinea pig stomach they occurred in the cardia.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Daniel (l965) studied the drug responses of the &#34;antrum&#34; and duodenal bulb in the dog, &#xA;using intra-arterial infusions of drugs and combined recordings of electrical and &#xA;mechanical activity.  In the inactive antrum an electrical rhythm of 4 to 5 waves per &#xA;minute occurred, resembling the QRS complex in the heart, and called the initial &#xA;potential.  It was propagated distally over most of the antrum at a velocity of 0.3 to 1.0 &#xA;cm per second, but at a distance of 2.0 to 4.0cm from the pylorus the velocity increased, &#xA;reaching 2.0 to 4.0 cm per second in the terminal two centimeters of the antrum;  the &#xA;amplitude also increased near the pylorus.  In the active or contracting antrum, the above &#xA;repetitive initial potential was followed by a second potential, consisting of repetitive &#xA;negative going spikes in the terminal two centimeters;  they did not appear to be &#xA;propagated.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Daniel (l965) showed that infusion of adrenaline or noradrenaline caused inhibition of &#xA;antral second potentials and contractions.  Intra-arterial infusion of acetylcholine and &#xA;nicotine led to the production or enhancement of second potentials and contractions;  in &#xA;addition, premature initial potentials might be produced and these were often propagated &#xA;in an antiperistaltic direction.  In the duodenum, slow waves occurred at a rhythm of l7 to &#xA;l9 per minute, irrespective of mechanical activity;  when contractions occurred they were &#xA;preceded by a series of fast spike potentials.  Acetylcholine and other cholinergic &#xA;stimulants produced or increased fast spikes and contractions in the duodenum.  Atropine &#xA;prevented all the excitatory effects of acetylcholine and other cholinergic stimulants in &#xA;both the antrum and duodenum.&#xA;Bortoff and Weg (l965) studied the relationship between antral and duodenal slow waves &#xA;at the gastroduodenal junction.  Using feline anatomical preparations, they confirmed that &#xA;spontaneous electrical activity of the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34; consisted of periodic &#xA;depolarizations;  these antral slow waves could be associated with spike potentials which &#xA;were thought to initiate contractions.  There was an extension of antral slow waves across &#xA;the pylorus into the proximal duodenum;  consequently muscular contractions initiated in &#xA;the antrum could extend into the duodenum, thereby co-ordinating the activities of the &#xA;antrum, pylorus and duodenal bulb.  Although the results were not as definite in the dog &#xA;as in the cat, they differed from those of Bass et al. (l961), who had concluded that the &#xA;pylorus acted as an electric insulator, separating the electrical activity of the stomach &#xA;from that of the duodenum.  Bortoff and Weg (l965) found that extension of antral slow &#xA;waves into the proximal duodenum could be eliminated by a transverse incision through &#xA;the musculature at the gastroduodenal junction, the mucosa and submucosa being left &#xA;intact;  this indicated that continuity of the gastroduodenal musculature was a necessary &#xA;condition for transmission of antral slow waves into the proximal duodenum.  It was &#xA;surmized that electrical slow waves were generated by longitudinal muscle cells;  they &#xA;could be recorded in the stomach in the absence of any apparent mechanical activity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Carlson et al. (l966) simultaneously recorded intraluminal pressures, intramural electrical &#xA;activity and contractions as seen cineradiographically, in fasted dogs.  In the &#xA;gastroduodenal junctional zone the electrical activity consisted of cyclic changes in &#xA;potential, recognized as BER of the antrum, and occurring at a rate of 5.1 per minute.  &#xA;Between rhythmic antral BER complexes, elevations with superimposed rapid spike &#xA;activity, also described as &#34;fast activity&#34;, occurred.  The presence or absence of motor &#xA;activity did not affect the frequency of antral BER cycles, but did affect the contours.  &#xA;Motor action was associated with spike configurations;  in every instance of &#xA;cineradiographically identified contraction, the electric record showed associated spike &#xA;activity.  According to Carlson et al. (l966), a recognizable interval usually elapsed &#xA;between the appearances of BER complexes at separate electrodes in the upper part of the &#xA;stomach.  The mean velocity of the conduction of a BER complex increased as it &#xA;approached the pyloric &#34;canal&#34;.  In the body of the stomach there was a slow propagation &#xA;of 0.5 cm per second, increasing to about 2.0 cm per second in the antrum.  In the &#xA;terminal three centimeters of the antrum simultaneous or nearly simultaneous BER &#xA;complexes were recorded from different electrodes;  this was consistent with the &#xA;development of a simultaneous or nearly simultaneous contraction of the entire terminal &#xA;antrum as seen at cineradiography.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Motor activity in the pyloric &#34;canal&#34;, as in the antrum, was associated with fast activity in &#xA;the electrical record, and occurred with the same frequency and rhythm as the fast &#xA;activity in the adjacent antrum.  Contraction of the pyloric canal occurred simultaneously &#xA;with, or shortly after, the onset of a terminal antral contraction (TAC).  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  The pyloric canal was equated with the pyloric aperture).  The &#xA;electrical activity in the proximal duodenum was characterized by cyclic changes in &#xA;potential, with a mean rate of l7.2 per minute, designated BER of the duodenum.  &#xA;Duodenal contractions occurred synchronously with the BER, but their precise timing &#xA;with reference to contractions in the adjacent pyloric canal was irregular;  BER of the &#xA;stomach and duodenum did not appear to be in phase.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although the technique of obtaining electrical records from cutaneous electrodes, called &#xA;electrogastrography, had been known for a number of years, it was further developed by &#xA;Nelson and Kohatsu (l968).  These authors defined the slow wave in the stomach as a &#xA;controlled, rhythmic, regularly propagated, moving annulus of electrical depolarization &#xA;travelling from the cardia to the pylorus, and accelerating during its passage;  it could be &#xA;viewed as a conducted action potential.  When mechanical or contractile waves were &#xA;present, the electrical and mechanical waves were synchronous.  The relationship of &#xA;peristaltic to electric waves could be considered as locked in time but graded in amplitude &#xA;from no coupling (i.e. a mechanically quiescent stomach) to complete coupling (i.e. a &#xA;peristaltic wave of maximum amplitude synchronous with each electrical wave).  There &#xA;was a 1:1 time relationship of the peristaltic and electrical waves.  In human subjects &#xA;studied by means of surgical implantation of stainless steel electrodes directly into the &#xA;muscle, it was found that the rate in the fasting stomach was 3 &amp;#177; 0.4 cycles per &#xA;minute.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Daniel and Irwin (l968) pointed out that muscular contractile activity in the stomach was &#xA;rhythmic and propagated in a well co-ordinated way.  Rhythmic contractions in &#xA;unanaesthetized man recurred at a mean frequency of 3 per minute and in the dog at 5 per &#xA;minute.  Regular, propagated electrical activity was associated with this regular &#xA;contractile activity.  The rhythm of the elctrical activity was the same whether the &#xA;stomach was contracting or inactive;  during contractile activity, a second electrical &#xA;component appeared.  In the inactive stomach the rhythmically occurring electrical &#xA;complex, previously called the basic electric rhythm (BER) or pacesetter potential, was &#xA;termed the &#34;initial potential&#34; or &#34;initial polarization&#34; by Daniel and Irwin (l968).  It &#xA;seemed to commence some 15 to 20 cm above the pylorus in human subjects and was &#xA;normally propagated toward the pylorus; both the size and the rate of propagation of the &#xA;initial potential increased as it progressed.  In the anaesthetized dog it had a propagation &#xA;velocity of 0.1 to 0.2 cm per second near its origin, increasing to 1.5 to 4.0 cm per second &#xA;in the antrum.  The same general scheme had been noted previously by Carlson et al. &#xA;(l966).  According to Daniel and Irwin (l968) the more rapid spread of electrical activity &#xA;over the antrum presumably provided the mechanism responsible for its behaviour as a &#xA;motor unit.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the active or contracting stomach, a second electrical deflection occurred, &#xA;corresponding in time to the mechanically recorded contractile activity.  This had &#xA;previously been called &#34;spiking potentials&#34;, &#34;fast activity&#34; or &#34;action potential&#34;;  Daniel &#xA;and Irwin (l968) suggested the term &#34;second potential&#34;.  It was phased by the initial &#xA;potential and was typically recorded as a prolonged negative deflection, or as a series of &#xA;negative spikes.  Spikes were usually seen only in the terminal 2.0 or 3.0 cm of the dog &#xA;antrum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Abolishing contractile activity with moderate doses of catecholamines or atropine was &#xA;associated with disappearance of the second potential according to Daniel and Irwin &#xA;(l968).  Activation of contraction in a previously inactive stomach resulted in the &#xA;reappearance of second potentials.  Thus it appeared that second potentials were &#xA;associated with, or initiated, the contractile process.  The second potential, unlike the &#xA;initial potential, was not propagated;  it could be produced locally by the local intra-&#xA;arterial infusion of acetylcholine, without appearing at electrodes a few millimeters &#xA;distant in either direction.  It was surmized that the second potential as well as its &#xA;associated contractile activity might be produced or affected by local release of chemical &#xA;mediators or neurohormones, i.e. it appeared to be under local control.&#xA;Daniel and Irwin (l968) found that rhythmic duodenal electrical activity in dogs, &#xA;recurring at a rate of l7 per minute, existed within one millimeter of rhythmic gastric &#xA;electrical activity recurring at a rate of 4.3 to 5.1 per minute.  There was a possibility of &#xA;coupling between the gastric and duodenal electrical rhythms since the frequency of the &#xA;two rhythms could indicate a 3:1 or 4:1 coupling.  These authors did not agree with Bass &#xA;et al (l961) that the stomach and duodenum were electrically insulated by an interposed &#xA;electrically silent zone;  such insulation could only be achieved by a continuous lipid &#xA;membrane, and no such structure existed at the gastroduodenal junction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bortoff and Davis (l968) instituted in vivo animal studies to determine whether or not &#xA;transmission of slow waves across the gastroduodenal junction occurred, to study the &#xA;effect of myenteric denervation on slow wave transmission and to observe the effects of &#xA;vagal and splanchnic nerve stimulation.  Using suction electrodes applied to the serosal &#xA;surface in cats, dogs, rhesus monkeys and baboons, it was shown that &#34;antral&#34; slow &#xA;waves spread across the junction into the proximal duodenum, where they periodically &#xA;augmented depolarizations of duodenal slow waves, thereby increasing the probability of &#xA;duodenal spiking.  After functional myenteric denervation the duodenal spread of antral &#xA;slow waves continued, indicating that it was a myogenic process;  this probably occurred &#xA;via bundles of antral longitudinal muscle extending across the pylorus and interdigitating &#xA;with duodenal longitudinal musculature.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  Some longitudinal &#xA;muscle fibres normally extend across the pylorus from the stomach to the duodenum as &#xA;described in Chapter 3).  However, the spread could be modulated neurologically;  vagal &#xA;stimulation increased both amplitude and duration of antral slow waves, augmenting &#xA;depolarization on both sides of the junction and increasing spike activity.  Thus duodenal &#xA;spiking was temporally related to antral slow waves.  Splanchnic stimulation had mixed &#xA;effects, causing either excitation similar to that of vagal stimulation, or inhibition of &#xA;antral slow waves.  It appeared if the spread of antral slow waves into the proximal &#xA;duodenum constituted the primary mechanism for co-ordination of the mechanical &#xA;activity at the gastroduodenal junction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kwong et al (l970) studied the electrical activity of the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; up to 6.0 cm &#xA;from the pylorus in 56 patients with upper gastrointestinal pathology, and in 12 patients &#xA;with gall-stones acting as controls;  at operation electrodes were implanted through the &#xA;serosa and others attached to the mucosa by means of suction.  The same frequency was &#xA;recorded from the mucosal and serosal electrodes and the main components of the wave &#xA;forms were the same.  In the control patients the wave frequency was approximately 3 per &#xA;minute, which was significantly less than the frequency in patients with gastric &#xA;ulceration, duodenal ulceration and gastric carcinoma.  The general pattern of the wave &#xA;forms was the same in all groups, although areas replaced by tumor were electrically &#xA;silent.  It was concluded that while there were differences in frequency, no differences in &#xA;the pattern of electrical activity appeared which might be of diagnostic significance in &#xA;these conditions.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Duthie et al. (l97l) studied the pacesetter potential in the stomach and duodenum in &#xA;patients undergoing cholecystectomy.  Electrodes were implanted under the serosa in the &#xA;gastric &#34;antrum&#34; and in the duodenum as far as the duodenal papilla, the indifferent &#xA;electrode being placed on the skin of the abdomen.  The frequency and amplitude of the &#xA;electrical waves were measured, and where possible also the conduction times.  In the &#xA;antrum the frequency of the pacesetter potential was stable during recordings made at &#xA;rest.  The waveform was similar to that obtained from electrodes sucked on to the mucosa &#xA;as found by Kwong et al. (l970), and the mean frequency of about 3.12 cycles per minute &#xA;was also similar.  Action potentials were seen only occasionally in the unstimulated &#xA;stomach.  In the duodenum, from 10 to 12cm distal to the pylorus, the frequency of the &#xA;pacesetter potential was about 12 cycles per minute.  In the proximal 4.0 to 5.0 cm of the &#xA;duodenum, the predominant pattern consisted of 3 cycles/min as in the antrum, &#xA;occasionally superimposed on 12 cycles/min.  However, no direct relationship could be &#xA;established between the frequency of the gastric (3 cycles/min) and duodenal (12 &#xA;cycles/min) intrinsic activities.  The conduction velocity of the electrical waves in the &#xA;antrum between 4.0 and 1.5 cm from the pylorus was about 0.5 cm per second.  Across &#xA;the pyloric region it was approximately 2.0cm per second, i.e. about four times as fast.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Ingestion of water, citrate or oleate significantly slowed the frequency of the pacesetter &#xA;potential in the &#34;antrum&#34;;  the injection of morphine was followed by an increase in &#xA;action potentials both in the antrum and the duodenum.  Duthie et al (l97l) concluded that &#xA;the 3 cycles/min rhythm of the antrum passed into the proximal duodenum, but they were &#xA;not able to detect any relationship between this frequency and the intrinsic 12 cycles/min &#xA;frequency of the remainder of the duodenum.  The route of conduction from the stomach &#xA;to the duodenum was probably via the longitudinal muscle fibres continuing from the &#xA;antrum across the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Sarna (l975) suggested that the inherent rhythmic myoelectrical activity of the stomach &#xA;should be termed electrical control activity.  When motor activity was present, the &#xA;electrical control activity was accompanied by a second component with or without &#xA;superimposed fast oscillating potential changes, for which he suggested the appellation &#xA;electrical response activity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;El-Sharkawy et al. (l978) simultaneously recorded mechanical and intracellular electric &#xA;activity from canine and human gastric musculature, and found regional differences in &#xA;the electrical signal that caused contractions.  Phasic contractions in the &#34;terminal &#xA;antrum&#34; were initiated by spike potentials whereas phasic contractions in the corpus and &#xA;orad antrum were regulated by the plateau potential.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Smout et al. (l980) called the first kind of electrical activity, i.e. the omnipresent periodic &#xA;activity that is not indicative of contractile activity, the electrical control activity (ECA).  &#xA;Electrical response activity (ERA) only occurs in connection with phasic contractile &#xA;activity, but is time-locked to ECA;  it does not always consist of spikes.  ERA may be &#xA;absent, as in the motor quiescent phase of the interdigestive myoelectric complex.&#xA;According to Szurszewski (l98l) a phasic gastric contraction is usually a mechanical &#xA;manifestation of an electrical event occurring in smooth muscle cells.  A spontaneous &#xA;electrical signal originates in the musculature of the midcorpus, which can be identified &#xA;as a pacemaker region.  The signal complex is propagated circumferentially around the &#xA;stomach and longitudinally to the gastroduodenal junction.  In canines intracellularly &#xA;recorded action potentials from antral circular musculature, in the region extending from &#xA;the intermediate sphincter to the gastroduodenal junction, distinguishes it from more orad &#xA;regions of the stomach;  similar features were likely to exist in human musculature.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The intermediate sphincter is synonymous with the left pyloric &#xA;loop as described in Chap. 3).  The &#34;antrum&#34; can be divided into orad and terminal parts, &#xA;according to Szurszewski (l98l).  In the corpus and proximal antrum the electrical wave &#xA;forms are the same, and coincide closely with contraction of the circular muscle fibres;  &#xA;in the terminal 2.0 to 3.0 cm of the antrum, characteristic electrical activity is seen during &#xA;contraction.  The action potential in this region has an initial, rapid depolarization and a &#xA;plateau potential with oscillations in potential superimposed on the plateau potential.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Stoddard et al. (l98l) reiterated that gastric myoelectric activity is characterized by the &#xA;presence of regular slow waves in the distal two-thirds of the stomach, the orad third &#xA;being an electrically silent area.  The mean slow wave frequency is species dependent, &#xA;being approximately 3 cyles per minute in man and 5 cycles per minute in dogs, with &#xA;little day to day variation.  The rhythm is normally remarkably stable, with only &#xA;occasional irregularities of a few cycles&#39; duration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;You and Chey (l984) pointed out that it had not been clarified whether or not a slow &#xA;wave (pacesetter potential or PSP) per se was associated with a mechanical contraction.  &#xA;A prevailing view was that gastric contractions resulted from the occurrence of spike &#xA;activity (action potential), and not from the slow wave alone;  the function of the slow &#xA;wave was considered to consist of setting the pace and direction of gastric contractions.  &#xA;However, some authors had reported an intimate relationship between contractile activity &#xA;and PSP in the canine stomach, whether spike activity was present or not;  a similar &#xA;relationship had been found in human antral muscle segments (You et al. l980).  These &#xA;observations suggested that PSP in the stomach might also promote phasic contractions.  &#xA;In a study of the relationship between electrical and mechanical activities of the &#34;distal &#xA;antrum&#34; in humans and canines, it was found that phasic contractions were recorded by &#xA;sensitive ministrain gauges implanted on the serosal surface, although electrical activity &#xA;showed only PSP&#39;s without action potentials or second potentials.  (The distal antrum was &#xA;defined as the region 2.0 cm proximal to the pylorus).  Intraluminal manometry could not &#xA;always recognize these phasic contractions;  the number of contractions recorded by &#xA;manometry was less than 50 percent of the PSP&#39;s accompanied by action potentials or &#xA;second potentials.  No gastric contractions were recorded when pacesetter potentials &#xA;occurred without action potentials.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;You and Chey (l984) found that gastric dysrhythmia, including tachygastria, could be &#xA;induced by epinephrine.  During dysrhythmia phasic contractions disappeared and no &#xA;contractions occurred in association with action potentials.  Tachygastria was considered &#xA;to be present when PSP occurred regularly in a frequency of more than 7 cycles per &#xA;minute;  bradygastria indicated a frequency of less than 3 cycles per minute.  Because of &#xA;the insensitivity mentioned above, intraluminal manometry might not be able to detect &#xA;gastric dysrhythmia.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Geldof et al. (l986) reiterated that gastric myoelectric activity could be recorded by &#xA;peroral (suction) electrodes, by serosal electrodes placed at laparotomy, and by electrodes &#xA;attached to the abdominal skin (electrogastrography).  In a series of patients with &#xA;unexplained nausea and vomiting, these authors recorded abnormal myoelectric activity &#xA;by means of electrogastrography in almost 50 percent;  the abnormal recordings were &#xA;characterized by instability of the gastric pacemaker frequency, tachygastrias and absence &#xA;of the normal increase in amplitude in the postprandial recording.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Periodic, rhythmic electrical activity, propagated in an aboral direction, occurs in the &#xA;musculature of the stomach in man and other higher vertebrates.  These waves, consisting &#xA;of cyclical changes in potential, are variously known as primary waves, basic electrical &#xA;rhythm (BER), slow waves, initial potential, pacesetter potential (PP) and electrical &#xA;control activity (ECA).  The waves occur at a rate of approximately 3 per minute in man &#xA;and 6 per minute in dogs.  They are omnipresent, precede and control the spread of &#xA;peristalsis (Daniel and Chapman l963), but continue unchanged in the absence of &#xA;peristalsis and do not indicate contractile activity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bursts of relatively rapid changes in potential, variously known as secondary waves, fast &#xA;or spike potentials, second potential, fast activity, action potentials and electrical response &#xA;activity (ERA), occur in association with some BER complexes.  They are not &#xA;propagated, appear to initiate contractions, and are associated with motor action.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A number of authors demonstrated a velocity increase in BER from approximately 0.3 &#xA;cm per second in the corpus of the stomach to 3.0 or 4.0 cm per second in the terminal &#xA;two to three centimeters of the &#34;antrum&#34;, both in dogs (Daniel and Chapman l961, l963;  &#xA;Carlson et al. l966) and in man (Daniel and Irwin l968;  Duthie et al. l97l).  This &#xA;corresponded to a &#34;rapid spread of peristalsis&#34; in, or &#34;a nearly simultaneous contraction&#34; &#xA;of the terminal antrum.  According to Daniel and Irwin (l968) the more rapid spread of &#xA;electrical activity over the &#34;terminal antrum&#34; presumably provided the mechanism &#xA;responsible for its behaviour as a motor unit.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The rapid progression of BER in the &#34;terminal antrum&#34; probably also points to some &#xA;distinguishing feature or specialization of the musculature in this region.  It is surmized &#xA;that it is linked to the specialized musculature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;described by Cunningham (1906), Forssell (1913) and Torgersen (l942), with its typical &#xA;motor activity as discussed in Chapters 3, 13 and 15.&#xA;## References&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Alvarez WC, Mahoney LJ.  Action currents in stomach and intestine.  &lt;em&gt;Amer &#xA;J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l922, 58, 476-493.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bass P, Code CF, Lambert EH.  Electric activity of gastroduodenal junction.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l96l, 201, 587-592.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bortoff A, Weg N.  Transmission of electrical activity through the gastroduodenal &#xA;junction.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l965, 208, 531-536.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bortoff A, Davis RS.  Myogenic transmission of antral slow waves across the &#xA;gastroduodenal junction in situ.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l968, 215, 889-897.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bozler E.  The action potentials of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l945, &#xA;144, 693-700.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Carlson HC, Code CF, Nelson RA.  Motor action of the canine gastroduodenal &#xA;junction:  a cineradiographic, pressure and electric study.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig &#xA;Dis&lt;/em&gt; l966, 11, 155-172.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Daniel EE, Chapman KM.  Electrical activity of the gastrointestinal tract as an &#xA;indication of mechanical activity.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l963, 8, 54-102.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Daniel EE. The electrical and contractile activity of the pyloric region in dogs and &#xA;the effects of drugs.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l965, 49, 403-418.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Daniel EE, Irwin J.  Electrical activity of gastric musculature.  In:  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Handbook of Physiology&lt;/em&gt; Sect 6:  Alimentary Canal, Vol 4:  Motility.  &#xA;Edit Code CF.  American Physiological Society, Washington DC 1968, 1969-&#xA;1984.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Duthie HL, Kwong NK, Brown BH, et al.  Pacesetter potential of the human &#xA;gastroduodenal junction.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 12, 250-256.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;El-Sharkawy TY, Morgan KG, Szurszewski JH.  Intracellular electrical activity of &#xA;canine and human gastric smooth muscle.  &lt;em&gt;J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l978, 279, 291-&#xA;307.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G. &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen Magens zu &#xA;seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; 1913, &#xA;Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Geldof H, van der Schee EJ, van Blankenstein M, et al.  Electrogastrographic &#xA;study of gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with unexplained nausea and &#xA;vomiting.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l986, 27, 799-808.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hamilton JW, Bellahsene BE, Reichelderfer M, et al.  Human electrogastrograms:  &#xA;comparison of surface and mucosal recordings.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l986, 31, &#xA;33-39.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kwong NK, Brown BH, Whittaker GE, et al.  Electrical activity of the gastric &#xA;antrum in man.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 57, 913-916.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Nelson TS, Kohatsu S.  Clinical electrogastrography and its relationship to gastric &#xA;surgery.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l968, 116, 215-222.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Sarna SK.  Gastrointestinal electrical activity:  terminology.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l975, 68, 1631-1635.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Smout AJPM, van der Schee ET, Grashuis JL.  The electrogastrogram and what it &#xA;shows.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l980, 25, l79-l87.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stoddard CJ, Smallwood RH, Duthie HL.  Electrical arrhythmias in the human &#xA;stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 22, 705-712.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Szurszewski JH.  Electrical basis for gastrointestinal motility.  In:  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract.&lt;/em&gt;  Vol 2, edit Johnson LR.  &#xA;Raven Press, New York l98l, pp 1435-1466.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, l-191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;You CH, Lee KY, Chey WY, et al.  In vitro myoelectric study of antral muscle &#xA;from patients with tachygastria.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l980, 25, A17.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;You CH, Chey WY.  Study of electromechanical activity of the stomach in &#xA;humans and dogs with particular attention to tachygastria.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology &#xA;&lt;/em&gt;l984, 86, 1460-1468.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>17 - Ultrasonography of Pyloric Motility and Gastric Emptying</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_17/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_17/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;ultrasonography-of-pyloric-motility-and-gastric-emptying&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Ultrasonography of Pyloric Motility and Gastric Emptying&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#ultrasonography-of-pyloric-motility-and-gastric-emptying&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bateman et al (l977) measured the rate of gastric contractions by means of ultrasound &#xA;pulse-echo scanning.  As the procedure was non-invasive, non-ionizing and non-&#xA;traumatic, it had certain advantages over other modes of examination.  After an overnight &#xA;fast normal subjects seated in the upright position imbibed 500 ml orange cordial warmed &#xA;to 37&amp;#186;C.  Using a standard, commercially available B-scanner with a 1.5 MHz &#xA;probe, the fluid in the stomach presented as an echo-free, transonic region.  A &#xA;quantitative display of the movement of the anterior and posterior walls of the &#34;antrum&#34; &#xA;could be obtained in T-M (time motion) mode, and a permanent photographic record &#xA;could be made.  A continuous A-mode record of the wall movements was obtained &#xA;simultaneously on video-tape.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the normal stomach a biphasic response to the liquid meal was seen.  Initially the &#xA;&#34;antral&#34; contraction waves were slow and irregular, but after 7 to 15 min they appeared &#xA;more frequently at regular 20 second intervals.  The temperature of the fluid appeared to &#xA;be of importance as gastric contraction waves were found to be inhibited at temperatures &#xA;lower than 37&amp;#186;C.  Intravenous administration of 15 mg or 30 mg propantheline &#xA;caused cessation of the contractions for periods of up to 3 hours.  The method was found &#xA;to be particularly suited to the measurement of contraction rates.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Holt et al. (l980) used real-time ultrasonic imaging to study contractions in the pyloric &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34; and body of the stomach in 10 healthy subjects after a liquid test meal of 500 &#xA;ml warmed orange juice.  In 5 subjects scanning was also performed at intervals after a &#xA;variety of solid and liquid meals.  In all cases a real-time ultrasonic scanner containing 4 &#xA;rotating transducers of 2.5 MHz was used;  scans were done with the subject standing or &#xA;seated upright.  Real-time ultrasonic images were recorded on video-casettes and &#xA;permanent photographic records were obtained.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the resting state the distended, liquid-filled &#34;antrum&#34; was visualized as a rounded, &#xA;echo-free or transonic zone.  After the liquid meal contraction of the &#34;antrum&#34; was absent &#xA;or weak for up to 5 minutes, but this was followed by regular contractions occurring with &#xA;a frequency of 3 per minute, i.e. a contraction every 20 seconds;  these were taken to be &#xA;peristaltic waves.  Propantheline 30 mg intravenously abolished the &#34;antral&#34; movements, &#xA;while metoclopramide 10 mg intravenously enhanced the magnitude and frequency of the &#xA;contractions.  It was said that the images produced by real-time ultrasonic techniques &#xA;closely resembled those seen during barium screening studies.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;King et al. (l984) examined l7 normal subjects using a rotating transducer real-time &#xA;ultrasound scanner with a 5 MHz probe.  Subjects were examined seated in the upright &#xA;position after an overnight fast and after imbibing 500 ml warmed orange cordial to &#xA;which 0.5 g of chopped and sieved bran was added.  The bran particles suspended in the &#xA;fluid luminal contents acted as a sonic marker, thus allowing identification of movement &#xA;through the pylorus.  Forward flow indicated movement of particles from the stomach to &#xA;the duodenum and retrograde flow movement from the duodenum into the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Images of the bran particles, the &#34;distal or terminal antrum&#34;, pylorus and duodenum were &#xA;obtained.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment:&lt;/em&gt;  The &#34;terminal antrum&#34; was defined as the immediate &#xA;prepyloric area.  More detailed definitions of the terms &#34;antrum&#34; and &#34;terminal antrum&#34; &#xA;were not given.)  The timing and duration of the terminal antral contractions (TACs), &#xA;proximal duodenal contractions, and periods of forward and retrograde flow through the &#xA;pylorus in each individual were then compared in order to establish the relationships &#xA;between them.  The duration of a terminal antral contraction was about 4 seconds (mean &#xA;3.93 seconds &amp;#177; 0.8).  Pyloric closure invariably occurred as the gastric peristaltic &#xA;wave reached the pylorus at the midpoint of the terminal antral contraction.  Contractions &#xA;of the first part of the duodenum were seen to occur just after the midpoint of the &#xA;majority (86 percent) of terminal antral contractions.  The vast majority (92 percent) of &#xA;duodenal contractions occurred immediately after the terminal antral contraction, 5.5 &#xA;percent occurred simultaneously with it and 2.5 percent were ectopic.  Contraction of the &#xA;first part of the duodenum lasted about 5 seconds (mean 4.93 seconds SD &amp;#177; 1.75).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Transpyloric fluid movement was reflected by the movement of the bran particles.  It &#xA;occurred as brief episodes when the pylorus was open.  Forward flow occurred in 81 &#xA;percent of the cycles of contraction and lasted about 2 to 4 seconds.  The majority of &#xA;these episodes occurred after relaxation of the terminal antrum, pylorus and duodenum, &#xA;while 25 percent occurred just before the terminal antral contraction.  The discrete &#xA;episodes of forward flow thus occurred as the terminal antrum, pylorus and duodenum &#xA;were relaxed at the end or the start or each peristaltic cycle.  Occasionally there was no &#xA;forward flow in spite of terminal antral and duodenal contractions.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Retrograde flow, in episodes lasting up to 5 seconds, occurred in the vast majority of &#xA;observed cycles of contraction.  Most of these episodes were seen just before the terminal &#xA;antral contraction, with 39 percent following it.  A brief period of forward flow often &#xA;ended abruptly and was sometimes immediately followed by a period of retrograde flow.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bolondi et al. (l985) measured gastric emptying times in l8 normal subjects and 36 &#xA;patients with functional dyspepsia, using a high-resolution real-time scanner with a 3.5 &#xA;MHz linear array transducer.  Having measured the transverse diameter and length of the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34; before and after a mixed solid-liquid meal, the volume of the &#34;antropyloric&#34; &#xA;region was calculated and the time taken for its emptying determined.  The antrum was &#xA;taken to be the area extending from the &#34;angle region&#34; to the pylorus.  Significantly &#xA;longer emptying times were observed in patients with functional dyspepsia as compared &#xA;with normal subjects.  It was stated that various phases of antral peristalsis, such as &#xA;propulsion waves, grinding movements and retropulsion could be studied by means of &#xA;ultrasonic techniques, but no further particulars of these movements were given.&#xA;King et al. (l985) used real-time ultrasonic imaging to study the temporal relationships &#xA;between contractions of the terminal antrum, pylorus and proximal duodenum in 22 &#xA;normal subjects.  The methodology was similar to that of their previous study (King et al. &#xA;l984).  A total of 259 cyclical periods of motor activity were observed during 32 &#xA;recordings, a general pattern being seen in all.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Terminal antral contractions occurred in 98 percent of the cyclical periods of motor &#xA;activity.  The duration of the terminal antral contraction was relatively constant at about 4 &#xA;seconds (mean 3.6 &amp;#177; 0.6 sec) and pyloric closure occurred at the midpoint of these &#xA;contractions.  The pylorus then opened as the terminal antrum relaxed and remained open &#xA;until the next TAC started.  Pyloric closure occurred with each terminal antral contraction &#xA;and was not seen at any other time.  During the few (2 percent) cyclical periods of motor &#xA;activity in which terminal antral contractions did not occur, the pyloric &#34;channel&#34; &#xA;(presumably the pyloric aperture) remained widely patent.  The observations provided no &#xA;evidence of independent pyloric function, i.e. independent function of the pyloric ring, in &#xA;the post-prandial state in humans.  Sixty-seven percent of the TACs were associated with &#xA;contraction of the duodenal bulb.  Ninety-four percent of duodenal bulb contractions &#xA;occurred about 1 second after pyloric closure.  The remaining 6 percent were ectopic, i.e. &#xA;apparently unco-ordinated with TACs.  Duodenal bulb contractions lasted approximately &#xA;5 seconds.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Real-time ultrasonic scanning plays an important role in the investigation of pyloric &#xA;motility, pyloro-duodenal co-ordination and transpyloric fluid movement.  Contractions &#xA;of the pyloric region (designated pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;  or &#34;terminal antrum&#34;) closely &#xA;resemble motility seen during radiological studies.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;None of the authors quoted above related their findings to the specialized muscular &#xA;anatomy of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder as described by Cunningham, Forssell and &#xA;Torgersen (Chap. 3).  However, it appears if the &#34;terminal antrum&#34; corresponds to the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.  The finding that closure of the pyloric aperture occurs with each &#xA;terminal antral contraction tallies with radiological observations that muscular closure of &#xA;the aperture occurs during contraction of the sphincteric cylinder.  According to &#xA;ultrasonography the aperture closes as a gastric peristaltic wave reaches the midpoint of &#xA;the terminal antrum, i.e. during terminal antral contraction (TAC).  Radiologically it is &#xA;seen that the aperture closes progressively during ongoing contraction of the cylinder.  &#xA;However, there is also an interplay between the right and left loops of the cylinder.  If the &#xA;left loop closes first, propulsion of contents into the duodenum occurs;  if the right loop &#xA;(surrounding the aperture) closes first, retropulsion from the cylinder (and not from the &#xA;duodenum) into the more proximal part of the stomach occurs (Chap. 13).  During &#xA;maximal contraction of the cylinder both loops are tightly contracted and the aperture is &#xA;closed.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In ultrasonography &#34;forward flow&#34; from stomach to duodenum, and &#34;retrograde flow&#34; &#xA;from duodenum to stomach was described in association with TAC.  The question arises &#xA;whether true duodenogastric reflux was observed or whether retrograde movement of &#xA;contents from the contracting sphincteric cylinder occurred.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;With ultrasonography pyloro-duodenal co-ordination may be studied.  This is hardly &#xA;possible with conventional radiology;  although it has been attemped by others, it has not &#xA;been pursued in the present investigation.  Ultrasonography has an advantage over &#xA;radiology in that transpyloric flow of liquid contents may be quantified, using bran &#xA;particles as sonic markers.  Other advantages are that it is non-ionizing, non-invasive and &#xA;non-traumatic.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Ultrasonography failed to identify independent action of the pyloric ring in the post-&#xA;prandial state;  this seems to confirm the view that the ring as such does not function as a &#xA;sphincter.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bateman DN, Leeman S, Metreweli C, et al.  A non-invasive technique for gastric &#xA;motility measurement.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Rad&lt;/em&gt; l977, 50, 526-527.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bolondi L, Bortolotti M, Santi V, et al.  Measurement of gastric emptying time by &#xA;real-time ultrasonography.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l985, 89, 752-759.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Holt S, McDicken WN, Anderson T, et al.  Dynamic imaging of the stomach by &#xA;real-time ultrasound:  a method for the study of gastric motility.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l980, 21, 597-601.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;King PM, Adam RD, Pryde A, et al.  Relationships of human antroduodenal &#xA;motility and transpyloric fluid movement:  non-invasive observations with real-&#xA;time ultrasound.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l984, 25, 1384-1391.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;King PM, Heading RC, Pryde A.  Co-ordinated motor activity of the human &#xA;gastroduodenal region.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l985, 30, 219-224, 24.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>18 - Radionuclides in the Investigation of Gastric Emptying</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_18/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_18/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;radionuclides-in-the-investigation-of-gastric-emptying&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Radionuclides in the Investigation of Gastric Emptying&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#radionuclides-in-the-investigation-of-gastric-emptying&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Griffith et al. (l966, l968) enumerated some of the techniques which had been used up to &#xA;that time in the investigation of gastric emptying.  For example, a previously &#xA;administered meal could be aspirated at intervals, giving an indication of the rate of &#xA;emptying.  This showed that fluids left the stomach in an exponential manner;  however, &#xA;the technique was non-physiological and inaccurate, and required repeated naso-gastric &#xA;intubations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The time taken for a radio-opaque meal to leave the stomach could also be determined.  &#xA;This method could give rise to inaccuracies as it was possible that radio-opaque barium &#xA;could separate from the meal, or alternatively, could become adherent to the mucosa;  in &#xA;both instances it would leave the stomach at a rate different to that of the meal.  &#xA;Moreover, the rate of emptying could not be quantified, and little information was &#xA;obtained about the pattern of emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Griffith et al,. (l966, l968) first used radionuclides in the study of gastric emptying.  A &#xA;technique was described in which a standard meal of porridge and eggs was labelled with &#xA;radio-active chromium (&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;51&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cr), the rate at which it left the stomach being &#xA;determined by means of external gamma counting.  Subjects with and without gastro-&#xA;duodenal disease were examined in the supine position, care being taken to differentiate &#xA;the radio-activity emanating from the stomach from that of the small bowel.  It was found &#xA;that most of the meal left the stomach in an exponential manner.  It also appeared that the &#xA;rate of emptying of the stomach was constant for any one person whether there was &#xA;gastro-duodenal disease or not.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;emptying-of-liquids-and-solids&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Emptying of Liquids and Solids&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#emptying-of-liquids-and-solids&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Heading et al. (l974) used different radio-isotopes to label the liquid and solid &#xA;components of a standard meal;  by this method emptying of liquids and solids could be &#xA;assessed separately but simultaneously.  The liquid component, consisting of cornflakes &#xA;and milk, was labelled with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;113m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;In DTPA chelate.  The solid component &#xA;consisted of small pieces of filter paper impregnated with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc sulphur colloid &#xA;and coated with a thin film of perspex.  In 15 normal subjects emptying of the aqueous &#xA;phase approximated to a simple exponential process, but the solid phase marker appeared &#xA;to empty at a constant rate.  In almost all subjects this was substantially slower than &#xA;emptying of the liquid phase, and there was poor correlation between the two rates.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a review of gastric emptying tests up to that time, Sheiner (l975) pointed out that the &#xA;choice of isotope used for labelling meals varied widely between workers.  For the liquid &#xA;component &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;113&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;In-DTPA chelate was often used, while &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;51&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cr, &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;129&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cs and &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-human albumin microspheres (HAM) had all been &#xA;used to determine emptying of the more solid components.  The gamma emission was &#xA;measured by scintiscanning or by fixed detectors in a gamma camera.  The results of &#xA;gastric emptying studies could be expressed in diverse ways.  The rate and patterns of &#xA;emptying were influenced by a variety of factors such as the fluidity of the meal, the pH, &#xA;osmolarity and volume of the food eaten and the specific gravity and viscosity of the &#xA;more solid components.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Meyer et al. (l976) stated that previous measurements of gastric emptying of solid foods &#xA;had depended on external counting of surface adsorbed isotopes, without verification that &#xA;isotopic labels remained attached to the food in the stomach.  It was shown that up to 90 &#xA;percent of &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;51&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cr adsorbed to scrambled eggs could become detached in the stomach.  &#xA;Moreover, much of the egg was dissolved by HCl and pepsin, increasing the amount of &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;51&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cr which entered the liquid phase.  A method was developed in which &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc sulphur colloid was injected intravenously into chickens in vivo.  The &#xA;colloid was phagocytised by Kupfer cells, incorporated intracellularly and absorbed &#xA;uniformly throughout the liver substance.  Less than 10 percent of the tag administered in &#xA;this way separated from the fed liver in the stomach.  Chicken liver tagged with &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc in vivo was found to be an appropriate marker of the rate of emptying of &#xA;solid food.  Tests showed that &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-tagged liver left the stomach in a linear, &#xA;zero-order pattern.  The same amount of solid appeared to be transferred into the &#xA;duodenum per hour regardless of the size of the meal.  By contrast, the liquid component &#xA;of a meal left the stomach more rapidly, in an exponential or first-order pattern (i.e. linear &#xA;on a semilogarithmic plot).  Referring to the previous investigations of Griffith et al. &#xA;(l966, l968), who had found that solid food left the stomach in an exponential fashion, it &#xA;was stated that the discrepancy might have been due to liquefaction of the &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;51&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cr &#xA;marker used.  The observations of Meyer et al. (l976) that liquids emptied faster than &#xA;solids and that liquids emptied in a first-order fashion while solids emptied in a zero-&#xA;order pattern, supported the concept that the human stomach handled liquids and solids &#xA;by different processes.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Heading et al. (l976), using methods similar to those in their previous study (Heading et &#xA;al l974), found that the posture of a patient and the composition of a meal might modify &#xA;emptying patterns.  In normal control subjects and duodenal ulcer patients, liquid &#xA;emptying was faster than solid emptying and could be represented as a monoexponential &#xA;process.  Solid emptying followed a different pattern, better represented as a linear &#xA;emptying with time.  In patients who had undergone Billroth II partial gastrectomy there &#xA;was no evidence of differential emptying of liquids and solids.&#xA;Malagelada (l977) described the striking changes undergone by a solid liquid meal in the &#xA;stomach during the postprandial period.  Gastric and duodenal aspiration of a meal of &#xA;meat labelled with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;51&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Cr and containing water with polyethylene glycol, showed &#xA;that the volume of solids was decreased by solubilization and partial digestion in the &#xA;stomach.  At the same time, endogenous secretions expanded the liquid phase of the &#xA;gastric contents.  Because of these processes, the gap between the percentage of solids in &#xA;the stomach and that entering the duodenum gradually disappeared during the &#xA;postprandial period, and gastric secretions rapidly replaced the water imbibed as the main &#xA;intragastric liquid.  It was thought that the process of retaining solids in the stomach and &#xA;allowing liquids to empty into the duodenum, would expose the solid nutrients to &#xA;continuously renewed, fresh gastric juice.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Canine gastric emptying of a digestible solid, an indigestible solid and a liquid was &#xA;studied by Hinder and Kelly (l977), by quantitating the rate of appearance of gastric &#xA;markers in the duodenum.  Bovine liver tagged with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;57&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Co-cyanocobalamine, 7.0 &#xA;mm diameter radio-opaque plastic spheres and one percent or 10 percent dextrose tagged &#xA;with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;H polyethylene glycol (&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;3&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;HPEG) were used for the digestible solid, the &#xA;indigestible solid and liquid respectively.  The rate of gastric emptying of cubed liver was &#xA;found to be similar, whether the liver was given alone or with solutions of the rapidly &#xA;emptying one percent dextrose;  the rate of emptying was slowed by 10 percent dextrose.  &#xA;Homogenization of the liver speeded emptying.  The homogenized liver emptied even &#xA;faster when dispensed in one percent dextrose, and emptied more slowly when dispersed &#xA;in 10 percent dextrose, but in both instances the liver emptied at the same rate as the &#xA;solution with which it was mixed.  Indigestible spheres were nearly all retained, whereas &#xA;the liver and dextrose were emptied.  It was concluded that the stomach emptied liquids &#xA;while solids were retained for reduction to a smaller size, after which they were &#xA;discharged at the same rate as the liquid then present in the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Meyer (l979) pointed out that while external gamma counting of food markers to measure &#xA;gastric emptying should theoretically obviate the need for sampling gastric contents, the &#xA;method was not entirely free from difficulties.  The distribution of radiolabels was not &#xA;necessarily precise, as labels of the aqueous phase might adhere to the solids, and overlap &#xA;could contribute to inaccuracies in gamma counting.  Even when a radiolabel accurately &#xA;identified a portion of the solid phase, that portion might empty at rates dependent on the &#xA;size of its particles.  Meyer (l980) nevertheless pointed out that short half-life, low-&#xA;energy, gamma-emitting nuclide labels were safe for the investigation of gastric emptying &#xA;processes.  The phagocytosis of circulating colloidal nuclides such as &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc and &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;113m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;In by the Kupfer cells of the liver of living donor animals had reduced &#xA;labelling time.  Hepatocytes could be labelled with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;57&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Co or &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;59&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Fe in donor &#xA;animals to provide tagged liver.  The high chemical affinity of elemental &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;123&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;I for &#xA;starch in foods and the chemical conjugation of radioiodine to hemicellulose have also &#xA;provided methods for labelling food constituents.  Having identified some of the artifacts &#xA;in counting, methods have been instituted to correct them.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Horowitz et al. (l982) in an extensive review, pointed out that major advantages of &#xA;radionuclide studies of gastric emptying were that they were simple and noninvasive, did &#xA;not interfere with normal physiological mechanisms in the stomach, and allowed the &#xA;simultaneous labelling of solid and liquid components of a meal.  Methodological &#xA;problems limiting the specificity and sensitivity of radionuclide tests included factors &#xA;such as angulation of gamma rays originating within the stomach, causing them to be &#xA;counted outside the gastric region of interest.  Most of these minor problems were &#xA;capable of correction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Horowitz et al. (l982), emptying of labelled solids was usually linear after &#xA;an initial lag phase.  The lag phase reflected the movement of food from the fundus to the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;.  Emptying of liquids was generally nonlinear, with a minimal lag period, and &#xA;could be represented as a monoexponential, volume dependent process.  Consequently it &#xA;appeared that solid and liquid components of a meal were emptied in different ways.  The &#xA;pressure gradient across the gastroduodenal junction, largely controlled by the tone of the &#xA;fundus, was the major factor controlling the emptying of liquids.  The &#34;antropyloric &#xA;musculature&#34; was of major importance in controlling the emptying of solid food, the end &#xA;point being the passage of particles less than 1.0mm in size.  Both these processes were &#xA;also controlled from the duodenum by receptors responding to carbohydrate, fat and &#xA;protein, with resultant slowing of gastric emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Collins et al. (l983) assessed gastric emptying of a mixed solid and liquid meal in normal &#xA;subjects, using &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc sulphur colloid as the solid, and &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;113m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;In-DTPA &#xA;as the liquid marker.  It was shown that large errors in the measurements were possible, &#xA;due to the variation in tissue attenuation caused by the changing depth of the radionuclide &#xA;within the stomach.  A technique for the correction of attenuation was described, using &#xA;factors derived from a lateral image of the stomach.  Normal solid emptying was found to &#xA;be slower than liquid emptying and was characterised by a delay or lag period, which was &#xA;followed by linear emptying;  liquid emptying followed a single exponential pattern.  &#xA;Increasing the calorie content of the meal prolonged the lag period of solid and slowed &#xA;liquid emptying.  Whereas previous studies using other radionuclides in normal subjects &#xA;had shown day-to-day variation in gastric emptying rates within normal subjects, as well &#xA;as variations in rates between subjects (Heading et al. l976), this study showed that the &#xA;day-to-day variation in gastric emptying within individual subjects was not significant.  &#xA;On the other hand, statistically significant differences were present in solid and liquid &#xA;emptying between different subjects and groups.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Camilleri et al. (l985) studied the possible relation between &#34;antral&#34; phasic pressure &#xA;activity and the emptying of solids and liquids from the normal human stomach after a &#xA;mixed meal.  Simultaneous antral manometry and radioscintigraphy were performed in &#xA;14 normal individuals after ingestion of a meal labelled with &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc sulphur &#xA;colloid in cooked egg (solid component) and &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;111&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;In DTPA (liquid component).  &#xA;Phasic pressure activity was recorded in the &#34;distal antrum&#34;, i.e. 1.0 cm proximal to the &#xA;gastroduodenal junction.  During early precipitous emptying of liquids, occurring during &#xA;the lag phase for solids, there was no relation between liquid emptying and &#34;antral&#34; &#xA;motility.  During the solid-emptying period however, there was a positive correlation &#xA;between emptying of solids and &#34;antral&#34; motility.  In addition, during the solid-emptying &#xA;phase, a possible association was noted between antral phasic pressure activity and the &#xA;emptying of liquids.  The data are consistent with a role for antral pressure activity in &#xA;trituration of solid food and a role for the &#34;antrum&#34; in the subsequent propulsion of solids &#xA;and liquids from the stomach.&#xA;Read et al. (l986) determined gastric emptying time by labelling a solid test meal with &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Technetium sulphur colloid;  the meal included labelled mashed potato &#xA;mixed in water but was of homogeneous consistency.  In normal subjects the stomach &#xA;emptied exponentially with a half time of 1.2 &amp;#177; 0.3 hours.  A residue of up to 12 &#xA;percent of the food (mean 6 percent) was present in the stomach 4 hours ater eating the &#xA;meal.  Although the radionuclide was mixed with liquid which reconstituted the mashed &#xA;potato, they found no difference in the rate of emptying of the meal whether the marker &#xA;was in the water used for reconstitution or whether it was incorporated in chicken liver.  &#xA;This supported the results of Hinder and Kelley (l977), who had shown that the solid and &#xA;liquid components emptied at the same rate from meals of homogeneous consistency, but &#xA;at different rates from meals composed of well separated solid and liquid components &#xA;(such as the steak and water meal used by Meyer et al. in l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Camilleri et al. (l986) studied &#34;antral&#34; motility and gastric emptying in patients with &#xA;clinically suspected upper gastrointestinal dysmotility.  For the motility studies &#xA;manometry was performed with a multiple-lumen perfusion assembly, and for gastric &#xA;emptying a mixed solid and liquid meal was employed, &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;131&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;I-Fibre being &#xA;incorporated into the meal as a solid, nondigestible marker, and &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-DTPA as &#xA;the aqueous marker.  Solid emptying was found to be significantly prolonged in patients &#xA;with &#34;antral&#34; hypomotility (but not in those with intestinal dysmotility).  The &#xA;prolongation was characterised both by an increase in the duration of the lag phase and a &#xA;slower emptying rate in the postlag emptying phase (the lag phase being defined as the &#xA;interval between the ingestion of the meal and the first appearance of &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;131&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;I in the &#xA;proximal small intestine).  The half-times for liquid emptying were significantly &#xA;prolonged in antral hypomotility as well as in intestinal dysmotility, but it was more &#xA;marked in the former.  These authors came to the conclusion that radionuclide gastric &#xA;emptying and manometric studies provided closely interrelated physiologic information &#xA;and could be regarded as complementary diagnostic tools.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Velchik et al. (l989) pointed out that while gastric empyting was influenced by meal &#xA;weight and composition (the relative percentages of carbohydrate, protein and fat), the &#xA;effect of meal energy content had not been thoroughly investigated.  By means of &#xA;radioinuclide techniques these authors showed that gastric emptying was progressively &#xA;delayed by increasing the energy or caloric content of a standard meal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The rate and pattern of gastric emptying is influenced by multiple factors, e.g. the &#xA;composition, volume, osmolarity, pH and fluidity of a meal, the specific gravity, &#xA;viscosity, digestibility and size of the more solid components, the posture of the subject &#xA;(Heading et al. l974;  Sheiner l975), and emotional states (Velchik et al. l989).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The advantages of radionuclide studies of gastric emptying are that they are simple, &#xA;noninvasive, do not interfere with normal physiological processes and allow &#xA;simultaneous labelling of solid and liquid components of a meal (Horowitz et al. l982; &#xA;Velchik et al. l989).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The observations of Heading et al. (l974), Meyer et al. (l976) and Horowitz et al (l982) &#xA;indicate that the stomach handles liquids and solids by different processes.  The liquid &#xA;component of a meal leaves the stomach more rapidly than solids, and is emptied in an &#xA;exponential or first order pattern (Heading et al. l974;  Meyer et al. l976).  The pressure &#xA;gradient across the gastro-duodenal junction is a major factor influencing emptying of &#xA;liquids, and is largely controlled by the tone of the fundus (Horowitz et al. l982).  During &#xA;early emptying of liquids (occurring in the lag phase for solids), there is no relationship &#xA;between &#34;distal antral&#34; motility and liquid emptying, as shown by simultaneous &#xA;manometric and radioscintigraphic studies (the &#34;distal antrum&#34; was defined as the region &#xA;1.0 cm proximal to the gastro-duodenal junction) (Camilleri et al. l985).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although it is true that upper gastrointestinal radiography is not quantitative and not &#xA;suitable for analyzing the complex process of gastric emptying in its entirety, one agrees &#xA;with Velchik et al. (l989) that it exquisitely displays anatomic detail.  As contractions of &#xA;the walls are clearly visible (Chap. 13), much information can be gained about the early &#xA;stages of emptying of a liquid barium suspension (Chap 13).  The influence of gastric &#xA;tone (Chap. 19) and the posture of the subject (Chap. 20) is of major importance in the &#xA;emptying of liquid barium.  During the early stages emptying of the suspension usually &#xA;occurs in the absence of both gastric peristaltic waves and contractions of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder, although shallow ripples of contraction of the gastric walls may be &#xA;evident (Chap. 13).  During later stages regular, cyclical contractions of the sphincteric &#xA;cylinder occur at a rate of 3 per minute (Chaps. 13, 15).  In the barium studies it is not &#xA;possible to determine unequivocally whether individual contractions of the cylinder are &#xA;associated with propulsion of liquid contents into the duodenum, or with retropulsion into &#xA;the stomach, or with both (Chap. 13).  However, progressive filling of the duodenum &#xA;occurs in association with regular contractions of the cylinder, which suggests that one of &#xA;the functions is propulsion.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Solids are emptied at a slower rate than liquids and in a linear or zero-order pattern &#xA;(Heading et al l974;  Meyer et al. l976).  Hinder and Kelly (l977) showed that a &#xA;distinction had to be made between the emptying of digestible and indigestible solids, and &#xA;that larger solid particles were retained for reduction to a smaller size before emptying.  &#xA;The volume of solids may be decreased by solubilization and partial digestion in the &#xA;stomach (Malagelada l977).  Solids only empty after an initial delay or lag phase &#xA;(Horowitz et al. l982;  Collins et al. l983).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The &#34;antropyloric muscle&#34; is of major importance in controlling emptying of solid food &#xA;(Horowitz et al. l982);  a positive correlation exists between &#34;antral&#34; motility and &#xA;emptying of solids (Camilleri et al. l986).  This was confirmed by Velchik et al. (l989), &#xA;who stated that the emptying of solids was largely determined by the &#34;antrum and &#xA;duodenopyloric mechanism&#34;.&#xA;None of the authors quoted above correlated their findings with the muscular anatomy of &#xA;the distal stomach as described by Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen &#xA;(l942).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Radiographically the emptying of a mixed meal consisting of liquids, solids and barium &#xA;sulphate suspension, is seen to be associated with vigorous cyclical contractions of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13).  Solids present as defects in the barium;  softish &#xA;solids may be observed to change in shape during contraction of the cylinder.  It is our &#xA;submission that cyclical contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder will explain the &#xA;&#34;antropyloric muscular function&#34; mentioned by Horowitz et al (l982), the &#34;antral phasic &#xA;pressure activity&#34; of Camilleri et al (l986) and the &#34;antral and duodenopyloric &#xA;mechanism&#34; of Velchik et al (l989).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Camilleri et al. (l986) found that antral phasic pressure activity played a role not only in &#xA;propulsion of liquids and solids from the stomach, but also in trituration of solid food.  &#xA;Contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder may at times be associated with &#xA;retropulsion of barium suspension into the stomach (Chap. 13), retropulsion of its &#xA;mucosal folds (Chap. 13), and retropulsion of sessile mucosal polyps (Chap. 36).  &#xA;Whether propulsion or retropulsion occurs, depends on the interplay between the right &#xA;and left pyloric muscular loops (Chap. 13).  It is probable that contraction of the cylinder, &#xA;especially in the absence of propulsion or retropulsion, may be associated with trituration &#xA;of solid particles.  In diabetic gastroparesis failure of contraction of the cylinder was seen &#xA;to be associated with failure of trituration (and propulsion) of solid tablets (Chap. 37).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Camilleri et al. (l986) radionuclide and manometric emptying studies &#xA;provide closely interrelated physiological studies and may be regarded as complementary &#xA;diagnostic tools.  It seems that upper gastrointestinal radiographic studies may likewise &#xA;assist in the clarification of problems of gastric emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Camilleri M, Malagelada JR, Brown ML, et al.  Relation between antral motility &#xA;and gastric emptying of solids and liquids in humans.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l985, 249 (Gastrointest Liver Physiol 12) : G580-G585.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Camilleri M, Brown ML, Malagelada JR.  Relationship between impaired gastric &#xA;emptying and abnormal gastrointestinal motility.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l986, 9l, 94-99.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Collins PJ, Horowitz M, Cook DJ, et al.  Gastric emptying in normal subjects:  a &#xA;reproducible technique using a single scintillation camera and computer system.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l983, 24, 1117-1125.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;age.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Forschr Geb R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Griffith GH, Owen GM, Kirkman S, et al.  Measurement of rate of gastric &#xA;emptying using Chromium - 51.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l966, 1, 1244-1245.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Griffith GH, Owen GM, Campbell H, et al.  Gastric emptying in health and in &#xA;gastroduodenal disease.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l968, 54, 1-7.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Heading RC, Tothill P, McLoughlin GP, et al.  Gastric emptying rate &#xA;measurement in man:  a method for simultaneous study of solid and liquid phases.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l974, 15, 841.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Heading RC, Tothill P, McLoughlin GP, et al.  Gastric emptying rate &#xA;measurement in man:  a double isotope scanning technique for simultaneous study &#xA;of solid and liquid phases.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l976, 71, 45-50.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hinder RA, Kelly KA.  Canine gastric emptying of solids and liquids.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l977, 233 (Endocrinol Metab Gastro-intest Physiol &#xA;2): E335-E340.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horowitz M, Cook DJ, Collins PJ, et al.  The application of techniques using &#xA;radionuclides to the study of gastric emptying.  &lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l982, 155, 737-744.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Malagelada JR.  Quantification of gastric solid-liquid descrimination during &#xA;digestion of ordinary meals.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l977, 72, 1264-1267.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meyer JH, MacGregor IL, Gueller R, et al.  &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-tagged chicken liver &#xA;as a marker of solid food in the human stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l976, 21, 296-304.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meyer JH.  New dimensions in gastric physiology.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l979, &#xA;24, 97-100.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meyer JH.  Gastric emptying of ordinary food:  effect of antrum on particle size.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l980, 239 (Gastroint Liver Physiol 2);  G133-G135.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Read NW, Al-Janabi MN, Holgate AM, et al.  Simultaneous measurement of &#xA;gastric emptying, small bowel residence and colonic filling of a solid meal by the &#xA;use of the gamma camera.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l986, 27, 300-308.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Sheiner HJ.  Gastric emptying tests in man.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l975, 16, 235-247.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, l-l91.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Velchik MG, Reynolds JC, Alavi A.  The effect of meal energy content on gastric &#xA;emptying.  &lt;em&gt;J Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l989, 30, 1106-1110.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>19 - Gastric Tone and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_19/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_19/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;gastric-tone-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastric Tone and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastric-tone-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schulze-Delrieu (l986) pointed out that there was much uncertainty about  the concept &#xA;&#34;gastric tone&#34;.  It was a term that had been widely used at the beginning of this century &#xA;and it was thought that tone determined the mechanical responsiveness of the stomach.  &#xA;Radiologists elaborated on this concept by assuming that a long, angulated &#34;fish-hook&#34; &#xA;stomach reflected a low gastric tone;  such a hypotonic stomach was associated with &#xA;delayed gastric emptying and gastric stasis.  On the other hand a short, globular, &#xA;&#34;steerhorn&#34; stomach indicated a high gastric tone, i.e. it was hypertonic, and was &#xA;associated with rapid gastric emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;determination-of-tone&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Determination of Tone&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#determination-of-tone&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In order to determine gastric tone, Stadaas and Aune (l970) recorded intragastric &#xA;pressure-volume relationships in 27 patients with dyspepsia, the tension generated by the &#xA;gastric walls being measured over a range of balloon volumes.  A thin-walled intragastric &#xA;plastic balloon was filled stepwise with known volumes of water;  after each step the &#xA;intragastric pressure was recorded.  If balloon pressures for all volumes were low, &#xA;muscular tension of the gastric wall was low, i.e. the stomach was considered to be &#xA;hypotonic.  If balloon pressures were high, muscular tension of the wall was high and the &#xA;stomach was hypertonic.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a study of gastric tone Schulze-Delrieu (l983) examined the changes in gastric &#xA;dimensions that accompanied the accommodation of volume by the stomach.  He pointed &#xA;out that while distension of the stomach was seen during routine radiographic studies, it &#xA;had not been determined whether all the walls distended to the same degree, whether &#xA;distension occurred mostly in the transverse axis or in the longitudinal axis, and which &#xA;muscular structures were primarily concerned with volume accommodation.  Excised &#xA;stomachs of herbivores (rabbits) and carnivores (cats) were immersed in carboxygenated &#xA;physiological solution and the shape and dimensions of the stomach, the response to &#xA;filling, the intragastric pressures and the effects of drugs were determined.  It was found &#xA;that in both herbivores and carnivores the length and angulation of the lesser curvature &#xA;were little affected by filling of the stomach.  During volume accommodation gastric &#xA;distension occurred mostly in the proximal stomach and along the greater curvature.  &#xA;Filling the stomach increased the length of the gastric circumference.  These features &#xA;could be explained on the muscular build of the stomach as a whole as determined by &#xA;Pernkopf (l929) and Torgersen (l945).  Another reason for the sizeable expansion of the &#xA;greater curvature was that this curvature was concave while the lesser curvature was &#xA;convex with respect to the lumen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Normally, according to Schulze-Delrieu (l983), intraluminal pressures rose sharply on &#xA;filling the stomach and declined thereafter.  Carbachol, a known stimulant of gastric &#xA;smooth muscle, caused contraction with a shortening of the longitudinal axis, as well as &#xA;tubular contraction of the &#34;antrum&#34; and an increase in intragastric pressure.  &#xA;Isoproterenol, a known inhibitor of gastric smooth muscle, caused a more elongated &#xA;shape, a flaccid appearance and a decrease in intragastric pressure.  The findings &#xA;provided experimental proof that the degree of gastric muscle tension was reflected in the &#xA;overall configuration of the stomach.  The existence of correlations between the &#xA;configuration and the state of activity or tone of the musculature was demonstrated, &#xA;thereby confirming the assumptions of early radiologists, according to Schulze-Delrieu &#xA;(l983).  Consequently measurements of gastric size and configuration provide one &#xA;method of assessing gastric tone.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Another method is to measure tone by its effects on gastric volume rather than on gastric &#xA;pressure.  This was done by Azpiroz and Malagelada (l985, G229) who had developed an &#xA;electronic barostat allowing the measurement of tone by recording changes in the &#xA;intragastric volume of air.  The barostat consisted of an intragastric air-filled bag, the &#xA;pressure in the bag being kept constant electronically.  When the stomach relaxed, air was &#xA;injected into the bag;  when it contracted, air was withdrawn.  Gastric tone could be &#xA;monitored from the barostat as variations in intrabag volume.  Simultaneously &#xA;intraluminal pressure activity was recorded by implanted manometric catheters.  Tonic &#xA;changes undetected by manometry were clearly registered by the barostat.  In dogs it was &#xA;found that marked changes in gastric tone were induced by meals.  Receptive relaxation &#xA;during feeding was followed by a low-tone accommodation period;  this in turn was &#xA;followed by a period of sustained high tonicity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Azpiroz and Malagelada (l985, G501) demonstrated that nutrients in the small bowel &#xA;could affect gastric tone.  Fat infused into the proximal small bowel induced gastric &#xA;relaxation in canines, whereas protein had only a modest effect and carbohydrate had no &#xA;effect.  In contrast, protein and carbohydrate infused into the distal small bowel markedly &#xA;reduced gastric tone, whereas fat had no effect.  These authors defined gastric tone as &#xA;sustained muscular contraction of the gastric wall;  variations in gastric tone probably &#xA;mediated important physiological functions such as accommodation to a meal and &#xA;emptying of liquids.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schulze-Delrieu (l986) stated that physiologists working with isolated strips of gastric &#xA;musculature abhorred the term gastric tone, as it was imprecise and reflected a judgment &#xA;on gastric muscle tension as gained from purely visual or radiographic inspection.  &#xA;However, more precise measurements of gastric tone had been made with the use of &#xA;gastric balloons.  In his view gastric tone referred to the tension generated by the gastric &#xA;walls.  It affected the ability of the stomach to accommodate volume and to generate the &#xA;driving force for gastric emptying.  Experimental studies (Schulze-Delrieu l983) provided &#xA;proof that the degree of gastric muscle tension development was reflected in the overall &#xA;configuration of the stomach.  If it was stimulated, the stomach was short and globular;  if &#xA;it was inhibited, the stomach was long and flaccid.  The longitudinal musculature of the &#xA;proximal greater curvature had a pivotal role in the overall control of gastric tone.&#xA;According to Azpiroz and Malagelada (l990) tonic muscular contraction of the stomach &#xA;(i.e. gastric tone), determines the balance between gastric accommodation and emptying.  &#xA;Tone is finely regulated by multiple interacting mechanisms;  reflexes arising from &#xA;different regions of the upper gastrointestinal tract may modulate the gastric emptying &#xA;process (and hence presumably gastric tone).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;An unusual but well-documented case of gastric atony was described by Telander et al &#xA;(l978).  This concerned a 5 months old child who presented with massive gastric &#xA;distension and intractable gastric stasis.  No evidence of organic narrowing or occlusion &#xA;was found at the pylorus during 3 separate exploratory operations.  Biopsy of the gastric &#xA;wall revealed no abnormality of the ganglion cells in the myenteric plexuses and the &#xA;smooth muscle cells of the tunica muscularis were normal.  A gastric pressure-volume &#xA;response obtained through a gastrostomy revealed no concomitant increase of intragastric &#xA;pressure during stepwise increments of volume, indicating a complete lack of gastric &#xA;tone, i.e. gastric atony.  The cause was considered to be absence of electrical potential &#xA;normally coupling electrical and mechanical activity, diminished sensitivity of the gastric &#xA;smooth muscle to excitatory stimuli and probably an ectopic antral pacemaker.  &#xA;(Chap.16).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;hypotonicity&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Hypotonicity&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#hypotonicity&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Mainly as a result of the investigations of Stadaas and Aune (l97O), Schulze-Delrieu &#xA;(l983, l986) and Azpiroz and Malagelada (l985) it may now be accepted that the &#xA;radiographic image of a long, angulated, &#34;fish-hook&#34; stomach with a sagging greater &#xA;curvature is due to hypotonicity of the gastric musculature.  The hypotonic stomach is &#xA;associated with decreased or absent peristalsis, absent cyclical contractions of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder and delayed emptying of liquid barium in the erect position (Chap. &#xA;13, 20).  Changing the position of the subject to the left anterior oblique recumbent &#xA;position, causes immediate, gravitational emptying of liquid barium, showing that &#xA;pylorospasm is not a factor in these cases (Chap. 20).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In most instances gastric hypotonicity is of idiopathic origin and presumably of little &#xA;clinical significance.  More severe degrees, sometimes progressing to acute gastric &#xA;dilatation, may occur in a variety of conditions e.g. post-operatively, after severe trauma &#xA;and in electrolyte disturbances.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;hypertonicity&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Hypertonicity&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#hypertonicity&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A short, transversely situated, &#34;steerhorn&#34; stomach on the other hand, is now known to be &#xA;the result of gastric hypertonicity.  In these cases immediate emptying of liquid barium &#xA;usually commences in the erect position, before the onset of peristalsis or cyclical &#xA;contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR.  Physiologic variations in canine gastric tone &#xA;measured by an electronic barostat.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l985, 248, G229 &#xA;- G237.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR.  Intestinal control of gastric tone.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Physiol&lt;/em&gt; l985, 249, G501 - G509.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Azpiroz F, Malagelada JR.  Perception and reflex relaxation of the stomach in &#xA;response to gut distension.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l990, 98, ll93 - ll98.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Pernkopf E.  Beitr&amp;#228;ge zur vergleichenden Anatomie des &#xA;Vertebratenmagens.  &lt;em&gt;Zeitschr gesamte Anat&lt;/em&gt; l929, 91, 329 - 362.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schulze-Delrieu K.  Volume accommodation by distension of gastric fundus &#xA;(rabbit) and gastric corpus (cat).  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l983, 28, 625 - 632.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schulze-Delrieu K.  Selected Summaries:  Gastric Tone.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l986, 90, 1298 - 1299.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stadaas J, Aune S.  Intragastric pressure-volume relationship before and after &#xA;vagotomy.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Chir Scand&lt;/em&gt; l970, 136, 611 - 615.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Telander RL, Morgan KG, Kreulen DL, et al.  Human gastric atony with &#xA;tachygastria and gastric retention.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l978, 75, 497 - &#xA;501.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l945, Suppl 45, 1 - 191.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>20 - Pylorospasm</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_20/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_20/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;pylorospasm&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pylorospasm&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pylorospasm&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;There has been much uncertainty about the concept &#34;pylorospasm&#34;.  For many years &#xA;radiologists considered pylorospasm to be due to spasm of the pyloric ring, where the &#xA;ring was equated with the pyloric sphincter.  It was thought that spasm of the ring (or &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34;) closed the pyloric aperture, thereby delaying gastric emptying and causing &#xA;retention.  In other words, whenever the barium-filled stomach showed delayed &#xA;emptying, or failed to empty within a certain prescribed time (in the absence of an &#xA;organic lesion), older radiologists were inclined to label the condition &#34;pylorospasm&#34;.  &#xA;This diagnosis was made commonly, was usually accepted by clinicians, and probably &#xA;had an erroneous bearing on the perception of many intra-abdominal conditions.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;radiological-features&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Radiological Features&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#radiological-features&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hughson (1925) for example, stated that spasm of the pylorus (as manifested by delayed &#xA;gastric emptying) formed the basis of the radiological diagnosis in many pathologic &#xA;conditions of the gastrointestinal tract.  The great majority of cases of radiologically &#xA;diagnosed pylorospasm were directly attributable to pathological conditions either of the &#xA;stomach itself or of other abdominal viscera.  He quoted previous studies in which &#xA;radiological examinations had revealed delayed gastric emptying, considered to be due to &#xA;pylorospasm, in 27 percent of duodenal ulcer and 89 percent of gastric ulcer cases.  This &#xA;led him to believe that radiologists had thrown much light on the relation of pylorospasm &#xA;to intra-abdominal disease.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bastianelli (1925) had reservations about the above radiological interpretation of &#xA;pylorospasm.  He agreed that in certain patients, especially neurotic individuals, a type of &#xA;pylorospasm of nervous origin could occur;  this was defined as a more or less permanent &#xA;closure of the pylorus, not relieved by contractions of the &#34;antrum&#34; as seen at radiological &#xA;examinations.  It is clear that in this instance spasm of the pyloric ring was inferred.  A &#xA;similar type of pylorospasm was reflex spasm, occurring as a result of lesions of other &#xA;abdominal organs, e.g. pathology of the gall bladder or appendix.  In these cases there &#xA;was increased tonicity of the pyloric canal and pyloric ring (the term &#34;canal&#34; indicated the &#xA;pyloric aperture).  Reflex spasm, causing a delay in gastric emptying, could also occur as &#xA;a result of gastric hyperacidity.  However, referring to the work of Cole (1913), &#xA;Bastianelli (1925) stated that in many instances the radiological observations could not be &#xA;accepted without question.  Pylorospasm was much more likely to consist of a tonic &#xA;contraction of the entire &#34;antrum&#34; rather than an isolated contraction of the &#34;sphincter&#34;, as &#xA;physiological observations favoured a simultaneous contraction of the whole region.  It &#xA;appeared to him that the question of pylorospasm needed revision.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Deaver and Burden (1929) were also impressed by the frequent radiological diagnosis of &#xA;pylorospasm in intra-abdominal conditions (where pylorospasm was equated with spasm &#xA;of the pyloric ring, which was considered to be the sphincter).  It led these surgeons to &#xA;believe that disease of the gall bladder or appendix caused symptoms which were &#xA;attributable to reflex pylorospasm.  It was assumed, moreover, that reflex pylorospasm &#xA;prevented regurgitation of alkaline duodenal contents into the stomach, causing gastric &#xA;hyperacidity and ulceration.  In order to alleviate the symptoms in gastric ulceration, &#xA;duodenal ulceration and chronic cholecystitis, the now obsolete operation of hemi-&#xA;sphincterectomy was devised.  During this procedure the anterior half of the pyloric &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34; (i.e. the pyloric ring) was excised;  in their view this prevented further &#xA;pylorospasm and relieved the symptoms in most cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;problems-of-definition&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Problems of Definition&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#problems-of-definition&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;What exactly is meant by pylorospasm?  During conventional radiological examinations, &#xA;with the patient in the erect position, and in the absence of an organic lesion in the upper &#xA;gastrointestinal tract, it is not unusual to observe a delay in gastric emptying of liquid &#xA;barium suspension.  This, in many instances, is still considered to be caused by &#xA;pylorospasm, by which is implied spasm of the pyloric ring, which is equated with the &#xA;sphincter.  The question may well be asked whether the ring is spastic in these cases.  If it &#xA;were, it could be expected to remain spastic irrespective of the position of the patient.  In &#xA;order to determine whether this is the case, the following investigations were done.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fifty adult, ambulatory out-patients, each showing a long, &#34;hanging&#34;, atonic stomach &#xA;with a marked delay in gastric emptying of liquid barium in the erect position (an &#xA;appearance usually ascribed to pylorospasm), were selected for examination.  These &#xA;patients were encountered during the ordinary course of events, having been referred for &#xA;routine radiographic study because of vague upper abdominal symptoms.  None had any &#xA;objective signs of upper gastrointestinal disease at a prior clinical examination.  The &#xA;following is a representative case:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;cr&#34;&gt;Case Report&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 20.1.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt;J.B., 47 year old male.  After swallowing the first 3 mouthfuls of &#xA;Micropaque in the erect position, the stomach was seen to be of the long, hanging, atonic &#xA;type, the sagging greater curvature forming the most dependent part (Fig. &#xA;20.1&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  The distal part of the stomach curved upwards and was filled up to &#xA;the presumed position of the pyloric ring.  Peristalsis and cyclical contractions of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder were absent, with total absence of gastric emptying for the &#xA;first 5 minutes.  This would have been interpreted as &#34;pylorospasm&#34; by many &#xA;investigators.  The head of the examining table was then lowered to an angle of 45 &#xA;degrees, while the patient was rotated 45 degrees onto the right side (i.e. the tilted left &#xA;anterior oblique radiological position).  Immediate emptying of liquid barium occurred in &#xA;the continued absence of both peristalsis and contractions of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder, revealing a normal pyloric ring surrounding a patent aperture (Fig &#xA;21.1&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  On re-assuming the erect position, gastric emptying ceased once &#xA;again.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/20-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/20-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 20.1. A&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case J.B.  Erect position.  Long, atonic stomach, the sagging &#xA;greater curvature forming most dependent part.  Absence of peristalsis, cyclical activity &#xA;of sphincteric cylinder and emptying of fluid barium.&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Case J.B.  Oblique tilted position.  Normal pyloric ring and &#xA;patent aperture.  Immediate emptying of fluid barium in continued absence of peristalsis &#xA;and cyclical activity of sphincteric cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 49 of the patients the features were identical to the case quoted.  The findings show &#xA;that the delay in gastric emptying was not due to pylorospasm, in the sense that the &#xA;pyloric ring was spastic, as neither spasm nor delayed emptying was present in the tilted &#xA;oblique position;  it would be highly improbable for spasm to manifest itself in the erect &#xA;position only.  It was much more likely that the delay in gastric emptying was due to one &#xA;or both of the following factors:  (1) primarily aperistaltic, hypotonic stomach;  (2) the &#xA;erect position of the subject.  In these cases, in the erect position, the pyloric aperture is at &#xA;a higher level than the lowermost part of the greater curvature, which bulges downward.  &#xA;While the aperture is patent, the lack of tone (Chap. 19) and/or cyclical contractions of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 18) causes failure of emptying.  In the tilted &#xA;oblique position the aperture is manipulated so as to become the lowermost part of the &#xA;stomach.  While contractions of the cylinder remain absent, passive, gravitational &#xA;emptying of liquid content occurs, showing the aperture to be patent, without evidence of &#xA;spasm of the ring.  (In one of the 50 cases a delay in gastric emptying occurred in both &#xA;the erect and the tilted oblique positions;  the cause of this remained unclear.)&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It appears possible that Hughson (l925), Deaver and Burden (l929) and others were led to &#xA;believe that absent or delayed emptying of fluid barium in hypotonic stomachs in the &#xA;erect position, was due to pylorospasm, which was equated with spasm of the pyloric &#xA;ring.  It was claimed, moreover, that such &#34;pylorospasm&#34; was a frequent accompaniment &#xA;of intra-abdominal pathology.  In the historical context it is of interest to note that &#xA;Bastianelli (l925) questioned their radiological interpretation of &#34;pylorospasm&#34;.  Even &#xA;today an inactive, hypotonic, barium containing stomach showing delayed or absent &#xA;emptying in the erect position is often, and we believe mistakenly, ascribed to &#xA;pylorospasm.  According to Torgersen&#39;s views (l942) it would be highly unlikely for the &#xA;pyloric ring (the right pyloric loop) as such, to become spastic;  as no dividing line exists &#xA;between the musculature  of the ring and that of the remainder of the sphincteric cylinder, &#xA;any possible spasm would involve the entire cylinder.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;pathogenesis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pathogenesis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pathogenesis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Torgersen (1942) showed an illustration in which the canine canalis egestorius (i.e. &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder), in its entirety, was spastic.  He postulated that the &#xA;appearance of pylorospasm was identical to that seen in a maximal or near maximal &#xA;normal contraction of the sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13) during certain stages of &#xA;vomiting (Chap. 26) and in cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) (Chap. &#xA;23).  All these conditions had the same anatomical &#34;substratum&#34;, namely contraction of &#xA;the musculature of the entire sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Astley (1952) described 10 well-documented cases of infantile pylorospasm in which the &#xA;spasm involved the canalis egestorius as defined anatomically by Forssell (1913) (Chap. &#xA;3).  In all these infants, who presented with vomiting, a prepyloric narrowing simulating &#xA;infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis was seen at the radiological examination.  The &#xA;narrowing persisted for periods ranging from 10 minutes to over an hour;  it differed from &#xA;IHPS in degree but not in the extent or shape of the area affected.  Continued observation &#xA;showed that it was neither constantly narrowed nor completely devoid of peristalsis as in &#xA;IHPS;  after a variable interval the narrowed segment relaxed to a certain extent and in &#xA;some cases it eventually attained a normal calibre.  In a few instances the relaxation &#xA;occurred suddenly while in others intermittent contraction and relaxation was seen.  &#xA;There can be little doubt that these cases of infantile pylorospasm were due to spasm of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  Astley (1952) mentioned the fact that the radiological &#xA;appearance simulated a stage in the normal cycle of contraction of what he called the &#xA;&#34;prepylorus&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wood and Astley (1952), during an investigation of the causes of vomiting in young &#xA;infants, described the clinical findings in a group of 12 cases in which the symptoms &#xA;closely resembled those of IHPS.  Some of the cases previously mentioned by Astley &#xA;(1952) appear to be included in this group.  A palpable pyloric tumor was found in 8 of &#xA;the cases (the term &#34;tumor&#34; indicated a clinically detectable swelling).  It resembled the &#xA;tumor of IHPS, although it differed in consistency, being softer, and it was less well &#xA;defined.  It was usually palpable immediately before or just after a vomit, relaxed quickly &#xA;and could not be felt repeatedly;  as the clinical findings resembled IHPS the condition &#xA;was called &#34;pseudo-pyloric stenosis&#34;.  Radiological examination in 4 of the 12 babies &#xA;showed infantile pylorospasm, i.e. a cylindrical prepyloric narrowing simulating IHPS.  &#xA;However, it lacked the constancy and aperistalsis of IHPS, and continued observation &#xA;showed that it widened eventually.  In 5 of the 12 babies who were operated upon, neither &#xA;pyloric hypertrophy nor tumor was found, showing that the features were due to spasm of &#xA;the sphincteric cylinder.  In their investigations into the causes of vomiting in more than &#xA;100 infants, Astley (1952) and Wood and Astley (1952) did not describe any cases of &#xA;pylorospasm in which spasm was limited to the pyloric ring.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Craig (l955) pointed out that a palpable, contractile tumor was present in 98 percent of &#xA;infants with IHPS over the age of 2 weeks.  The same significance could not always be &#xA;attached to the palpation of a contractile pyloric tumor in babies under 2 weeks of age.  &#xA;Initially 2 cases were encountered, both babies under 2 weeks, in whom recurrent &#xA;regurgitation was associated with a contractile pyloric tumor.  Over a period of weeks the &#xA;symptoms as well as the pyloric tumor disappeared, the only treatment having been daily &#xA;gastric lavages.  Because of the clinical features IHPS was excluded as a cause of the &#xA;condition.  Craig (l955) instituted a prospective study in which 21 infants less than 2 &#xA;weeks of age, presenting with repeated vomiting but otherwise normal, were examined.  &#xA;Contractile pyloric tumors were palpated in l7.  With repeated gastric lavages symptoms &#xA;subsided within 7 to 14 days, while the tumors disappeared after a period of time varying &#xA;from 4 weeks to 3 months.  In a control group of 115 healthy newborn infants with &#xA;uninterrupted progress and no feeding difficulties, a palpable pyloric tumor was felt in &#xA;25.  Of the 21 who were followed up, the tumor disappeared within 6 weeks to 3 months.  &#xA;The pyloric tumors had a fusiform or spheroidal shape and a firm or distinctly hard &#xA;consistency.  They were felt to contract and relax repeatedly, became firmer as feeding &#xA;continued, and were palpated at successive examinations.  A feature of all cases was the &#xA;large amount of mucus in the gastric lavages.  Some of the cases were examined &#xA;radiologically but this appeared to be incomplete and yielded little relevant information.  &#xA;One of the symptomatic babies, who had a large pyloric tumor resembling IHPS in all &#xA;respects, was referred for operation, at which no tumor was found.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Craig (1955) these cases indicated that a hard, contractile pyloric tumor &#xA;could be felt in the absence of organic change of the musculature.  It was considered to be &#xA;due to spasm of the fan-shaped pyloric musculature described by Cole (l928).  It was &#xA;evidence not of muscular hypertrophy but of muscular spasm, and resembled the cases of &#xA;pseudo-pyloric stenosis previously described by Astley (l952).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Atkinson et al. (l957) stated that the concept of spasm of the pylorus presumably derived &#xA;from the belief that a physiological sphincter existed at the pylorus.  It was widely &#xA;believed that the pyloric ring acted as a sphincter.  However, during manometric studies &#xA;they were unable to find any evidence of a physiological sphincter at the pylorus, and in &#xA;no instance could a band of increased pressure be demonstrated anywhere at the &#xA;pyloroduodenal junction (Chap. 15).  Although phasic pressure waves were recorded &#xA;repeatedly in a 4.0 to 5.0 cm long segment of the prepyloric region, no evidence of &#xA;independent contraction was found at the gastroduodenal junction, i.e. at the pyloric ring.  &#xA;For most of the time the lumen surrounded by the pyloric ring or &#34;sphincter&#34; was more &#xA;than 7.0 mm in diameter.  The closure of the ring was intermittent and brief, occurring as &#xA;part of the phasic contraction which periodically involved the whole pyloric region.  &#xA;Atkinson et al. (l957) concluded that the concept of spasm of the pyloric ring had been &#xA;grossly overworked as an explanation for a variety of symptoms.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Levin (l971) pylorospasm could at times mimick the &#34;elongated&#34;, narrowed &#xA;pylorus of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Swischuk (l978, l980) considered pylorospasm to be a spasm of the &#34;antropyloric&#34; &#xA;region, by which was meant a tubelike, segmental area extending orally from the ring.  It &#xA;could be difficult to distinguish pylorospasm from some cases of IHPS;  in pylorospasm, &#xA;however, the narrowing was not as intense and there were slight changes in the &#xA;configuration.  A similar deformity of the antropyloric region could also occur in &#xA;association with gastric ulceration in neonates.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Franken (l982) found infantile pylorospasm a difficult entity to define;  the appearances &#xA;could be very similar to those of IHPS on radiographic study.  However, the narrowing &#xA;seen in infantile pylorospasm was not as constant as in IHPS, and in infantile &#xA;pylorospasm some peristaltic movement did occur in the affected area.  It could be &#xA;difficult to convince the surgeon that the patient had infantile pylorospasm and not IHPS.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;ultrasonic-features&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Ultrasonic Features&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#ultrasonic-features&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Direct viewing of the pyloric musculature is achieved by means of ultrasonic examination &#xA;(Chap. 10).  Blumhagen and Coombs (l98l) showed that a persistent contraction of the &#xA;circular musculature of the &#34;distal antrum and pylorus&#34;, creating a cylindrical muscle &#xA;mass resembling IHPS, might be seen during ultrasonic examinations in infants.  &#xA;According to these authors, contraction of the &#34;distal antrum&#34; and pylorus (and not of the &#xA;pyloric ring) constituted pylorospasm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Blumhagen and Noble (l983) found that spasm of the &#34;distal antrum and pylorus&#34; could &#xA;be differentiated ultrasonically from IHPS by measuring the single wall muscle thickness.  &#xA;Normally the muscle thickness in infants varies between 1.5 and 3.0 mm; in IHPS it &#xA;varies between 3.0 and 6.0 mm.  Whenever the single wall muscle thickness is 4.0 mm or &#xA;more, it can be regarded as IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wilson and Vanhoutte (l984) determined the true length of the pyloric muscle by means &#xA;of ultrasonography in l7 normal infants;  the range varied from 12.0 to 15.0 mm.  Similar &#xA;results were obtained by Graif et al. (l984), who found the mean length of the pylorus &#xA;(pyloric musculature) to be 12.0 mm with a standard deviation of 3.7 mm.  It is clear that &#xA;this is the anatomical region which may contract during pylorospasm, i.e. a relatively &#xA;long area which includes the pyloric ring, as opposed to an isolated contraction of the &#xA;ring only.  This was confirmed by Stunden et al. (l986), who measured the length of the &#xA;pyloric canal in normal infants &#34;with the pylorus in its most contracted state&#34;.  The mean &#xA;length of the canal was 8.3 &amp;#177; 2.5mm, and on occasion it was up to 14.0 mm in &#xA;length.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;With longitudinal ultrasonic views of the pylorus Haller and Cohen (l986) found the &#xA;length of the pyloric musculature in normal infants to be up to l8.0 mm.  Ultrasonically &#xA;the contraction of this muscular cylinder in pylorospasm could simulate IHPS.  However, &#xA;with spasm the contracted region was not quite as rigid as in IHPS, and the appearance &#xA;changed on subsequent examinations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;operative-and-experimental-features&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Operative and Experimental Features&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#operative-and-experimental-features&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Larson et al (l967) described 10 adult cases in whom radiographs showed clear evidence &#xA;of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (AHPS), i.e. a cylindrical pyloric narrowing (Chap. &#xA;24).  At operation the stomach was found to be normal in 5, showing that the narrowing &#xA;was of a temporary, spastic nature, in other words due to pylorospasm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During operations on 5 suspected cases of AHPS, Bateson et al. (l969) noted that on &#xA;touching the pylorus with a gloved finger, the pyloric and adjacent &#34;antral&#34; muscle &#xA;contracted, becoming hard and pale;  the affected region was approximately 2.5 cm in &#xA;length and resembled AHPS, but the contraction was temporary and of a spastic nature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Keet and Heydenrych (l97l) found that electrical and mechanical stimulation of the vagus &#xA;trunks in the oesophageal hiatus of the diaphragm in canines, caused a 3.0 cm long &#xA;cylindrical area of contraction in the pyloric region.  It corresponded exactly to the &#xA;anatomical pyloric sphincteric cylinder as described by Cunningham (l906), Forssell &#xA;(l913) and Torgersen (l942), lasted as long as the stimulus was applied, and was clearly &#xA;of a spastic nature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;cr&#34;&gt;Case Reports&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The following are some of the cases of pylorospasm which we have encountered:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>21 - Congenital Anomalies</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_21/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_21/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;congenital-anomalies&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Congenital Anomalies&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#congenital-anomalies&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Congenital anomalies of the pyloric region of the stomach are rare (Thompson et al. l968;  &#xA;Lamesch and Schneider l973;  Korber and Glasson l977).  The cause is usually thought to &#xA;be localized vascular impairment occurring during foetal life (Bremer l944;  Louw l959).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;pyloric-atresia&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pyloric Atresia&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pyloric-atresia&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Almost all cases of gastric atresia occur in the pyloric region (Franken l982).  The &#xA;condition may present as a membrane occluding the lumen, as a gap in continuity, or a &#xA;fibrous cord intervening between patent portions at the gastroduodenal junction.  Some &#xA;cases have been associated with epidermolysis  bullosa (Korber and Glasson l977;  &#xA;Franken l982).  Clinically the condition presents as upper abdominal distension in a &#xA;newborn infant, with bile-free vomiting from birth (Davis and Douglas l961;  Thompson &#xA;et al. l968;  Bronsther et al. l97l).  Maternal hydramnios occurs in approximately 50 &#xA;percent of cases (Thompson et al. l968;  Bronsther et al. l97l).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Radiographic examination shows the stomach to be distended, with complete absence of &#xA;gas in the remainder of the gastrointestinal tract.  In the erect abdominal film this gives &#xA;rise to a single air-fluid level in the stomach,  topped by a gas bubble (the &#34;single bubble&#34; &#xA;sign) (Davis &amp; Douglas l961;  Becker et al. l963;  Bronsther et al. l97l).  According to &#xA;Franken (l982) neonatal gastric hypotonia, which is a much more frequent condition, may &#xA;give a similar appearance.  (In hypotonia gastric inactivity with lack of peristalsis and &#xA;cyclical contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder may delay gastric emptying as &#xA;described in Chapter l9).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gastric atresia usually affects the region of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder;  whether it is &#xA;limited to the cylinder is not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Becker JM, Schneider KM, Fischer AE.  Pyloric atresia.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l963, 87, 413-416.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bremer JL.  Diverticula and duplications of the intestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Arch &#xA;Path&lt;/em&gt; l944, 38, 132-140.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bronsther B, Nadeau MR, Abrams MW.  Congenital pyloric atresia:  a report of &#xA;three cases and a review of the literature.  &lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 69, 130-136.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Davis DA, Douglas KR.  Congenital pyloric atresia, a rare anomaly.  &lt;em&gt;Ann &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; l96l, 153, 418-422.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Franken EA.  &lt;em&gt;Gastrointestinal Imaging in Pediatrics.&lt;/em&gt;  Harper and &#xA;Row, Philadelphia l982, 2nd ed, p 138.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Korber JS, Glasson MJ.  Pyloric atresia associated with epidermolysis bullosa.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;J Pediatr&lt;/em&gt; l977, 90, 600-601.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lamesch A, Schneider H.  Atr�sie et st�nose congenitales du pylore.  &lt;em&gt;Acta &#xA;Paed Belgica&lt;/em&gt; l973, 27, 169-183.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Louw JH.  Congenital intestinal atresia and stenosis in the newborn;  observations &#xA;on its pathogenesis and treatment.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Roy Coll Surg&lt;/em&gt; l959, 25, 209-&#xA;234.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Thompson NW, Parker W, Schwartz S, et al.  Congenital pyloric atresia.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; l968, 97, 792-796.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;duplications&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Duplications&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#duplications&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;True or complete duplication of the stomach or any other entire region of the &#xA;gastrointestinal tract is exceedingly rare.  More common (but also rare) incomplete &#xA;duplications may be defined as spherical or tubular enteric formations which lie in &#xA;contiguity with the normal alimentary tract and which share with it a common blood &#xA;supply, and usually a common muscle coat (Abrami and Dennison l961).  These cyst-like &#xA;structures, or duplication cysts, usually do not communicate with the normal lumen.   &#xA;They may have a mucosal lining and may be pedunculated (Kammerer l969).  They may &#xA;occur along the entire alimentary tract, the most common site being the ileum and the &#xA;least common the stomach (Abrami and Dennison l961;  Kremer et al. l970).  Over a 21 &#xA;year period Sieber (l956) encountered 25 cases of gastrointestinal tract duplications, only &#xA;4 of which involved the stomach.  Duplications of the pyloric region are particularly rare &#xA;(Grosfeld et al. l970).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Duplication cyst of the stomach is a communicating or non-communicating cyst lined by &#xA;gastric, intestinal or pancreatic epithelium, and usually located along the greater &#xA;curvature (Kremer et al. l970).  Occasionally it may be situated in the wall of the pyloric &#xA;region;  in such cases encroachment on the lumen may produce gastric outlet obstruction &#xA;(Grosfeld et al. l970), or an appearance resembling infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis &#xA;(Abrami and Dennison l96l;  Kammerer l969).  In non-communicating duplication cysts &#xA;accumulation of acid and pepsin may produce a local inflammatory reaction, perforation, &#xA;abscess formation and peritonitis;  this was seen in 6 of 9 patients described by Kremer et &#xA;al. (l970).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gastric duplication does not appear to be related anatomically to the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Abrami G, Dennison WM.  Duplication of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; l96l, &#xA;49, 794-801.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Grosfeld JL, Boles ET, Reiner C.  Duplication of pylorus in the newborn:  a rare &#xA;cause of gastric outlet obstruction.  &lt;em&gt;J Ped Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 5, 365-369.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Grosfeld JL, O&#39;Neill JA, Clatworthy HW.  Enteric duplications in infancy and &#xA;childhood:  an l8 year review.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 172, 83-90.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kammerer GT.  Duplication of stomach resembling hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/em&gt; l969, 207, 2101-2102.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kremer RM, Lepoff RB, Izant RJ.  Duplication of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;J Pediat &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 5, 360-364.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Sieber WK.  Alimentary tract duplications.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; l956, 73, 383-&#xA;392.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;congenital-double-pylorus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Congenital Double Pylorus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#congenital-double-pylorus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Congenital double pylorus is an extremely rare condition.  In reviewing their cases of &#xA;gastro-intestinal duplications encountered over an l8 year period, Grosfeld et al. (l970) &#xA;did not mention a single example of this anomaly.  A case was reported by Christien et al &#xA;(l97l), but subsequently doubt was expressed as to the congenital nature of the lesion &#xA;(Hansen et al. l972).  Acquired double pylorus, due to pyloroduodenal fistula, is not &#xA;nearly as rare and is a well documented condition (Chap. 31).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Sufian et al. (l977) described a case which appears to be of true congenital origin.  It &#xA;concerned a 30 year old female with a long history of epigastric pain and aspirin and &#xA;ethanol abuse.  The radiological examination revealed two pyloric apertures;  gastroscopy &#xA;failed to show any abnormality.  Although no evidence of active or previous ulceration &#xA;was found at operation, a partial gastrectomy was performed.  The resection specimen &#xA;revealed a second pyloric opening 2.0 cm in length and 1.0cm in diameter, adjacent to the &#xA;normal pylorus.  The mucosa and muscularis mucosae of both apertures were normal, but &#xA;a nodule of ectopic pancreatic tissue was situated in the wall of the second opening.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gupta and Hollander (l977) described a case of achalasia of the oesophagus occurring in &#xA;a 56 year old female.  During endoscopic examination a double pyloric aperture was an &#xA;unexpected finding.  There was no evidence of peptic ulcer disease and it was considered &#xA;to be a case of double pylorus of congenital origin.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Williams et al. (l98l) mentioned the case of a 35 year old male who had had duodenal &#xA;ulcer symptoms for 5 years.  Endoscopy showed a duodenal ulcer and a double pylorus &#xA;proximal to the ulcer.  At operation a septum between the 2 apertures was excised.  It was &#xA;composed of normal mucosa with a complete ring of muscularis mucosae, and the case &#xA;was considered to be a double pylorus of congenital origin.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion-2&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion-2&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Congenital double pylorus is extremely rare and cases have not been encountered by us.  &#xA;Acquired double pylorus due to pyloroduodenal fistula is much less rare and is well &#xA;documented.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references-2&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references-2&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Christien G, Branthomme J, Volny L, et al.  Pylore double:  malformation &#xA;cong&amp;#233;nitale.  &lt;em&gt;Sem H&amp;#244;p Paris&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 47, 1485-1488.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Grosfeld JL, O&#39;Neill JA, Clatworthy HW.  Enteric duplications in infancy and &#xA;childhood:  an l8 year review.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, l72, 83-90.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gupta A, Hollander D.  Duplication of the pylorus found concomitantly with &#xA;achalasia:  congenital or peptic etiology?  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig&lt;/em&gt; Dis l977, 22, &#xA;829-830.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hansen HO, Kronborg O, Pedersen T.  The double pylorus.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l972, 7, 695-696.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Sufian S, Ominsky S, Matsumoto T.  Congenital double pylorus:  a case report &#xA;and review of the literature.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l977, 73, 154-157.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Williams RS, Gilmore IT, Johnson AG.  Congenital double pylorus:  a case &#xA;report.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 68, 65.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;pyloric-membrane-web-or-diaphragm&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pyloric Membrane, Web or Diaphragm&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pyloric-membrane-web-or-diaphragm&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Pyloric membrane, web or diaphragm has been defined as a thin, circumferential mucosal &#xA;septum in the pyloric region, projecting intraluminally perpendicular to the long axis of &#xA;the &#34;antrum&#34;.  It is composed of two layers of gastric mucosa, with a central core of &#xA;submucosa and muscularis mucosae;  the external muscular and serous coats do not take &#xA;part in its formation.  In the majority of cases a central or eccentric aperture is present, &#xA;varying from a pinhole to several millimeters in diameter;  in a few cases the membrane &#xA;was unperforated or complete (Rowling l959;  Melamed et al. l960;  Gerber l965;  Parrish &#xA;et al. l968;  Felson et al. l969;  Bell et al. l977;  Mitchell et al. l979;  Jinkins et al. l980).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Pyloric membrane is generally regarded as a congenital anomaly.  It is usually associated &#xA;with symptoms and signs of gastric outlet obstruction.  In incomplete membranes &#xA;symptoms may only occur in adult life, the aperture preventing obstruction for many &#xA;years (Cremin l969;  Jinkins et al. l980).  The condition has been described in premature &#xA;and newborn infants, in older infants and children (Touroff and Sussman l940;  Gerber &#xA;l965;  Farman et al. l968;  Cremin l969;  Bell et al. l977;  Fujioka et al. l980;  Jinkins et &#xA;al. l980), and in adults (Farman et al l968;  Felson et al l969;  Melamed et al l960; Ghent &#xA;and Denton l974;  Ghahremani l974), the ages in adults ranging from 32 to 85 years.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A typical radiographic sign is a radiolucent line 2.0 to 3.0 mm in width, perpendicular to &#xA;the long axis of the &#34;antrum&#34;, representing the membrane (Felson et al. l969).  The region &#xA;between the membrane and the pyloric aperture may be filled with barium, resembling &#xA;the duodenal bulb;  the &#34;double-bulb&#34; appearance is another chracteristic sign (Parrish et &#xA;al. l968;  Felson et al. l969;  Bell et al. l977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the great majority of cases described in the literature, the membrane was located 1.0 to &#xA;4.0 cm proximal to the pyloric aperture;  it could perhaps best be designated a &#xA;&#34;prepyloric&#34; membrane in these cases (vide infra).  In a few instances it was very close &#xA;to, or at the pylorus (&#34;true pyloric membrane&#34;);  one case of Rowling (l959), one of &#xA;Dineen and Redo (l963), one of Gerber (l965), two of Felson et al. (l969) and one of &#xA;Mitchell (l979) fall into this category.  In isolated instances (one case of Felson et al., and &#xA;one of Ghahremani), a membrane was seen 7.0cm proximal to the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the prepyloric category, the distance of the membrane from the pyloric aperture varied &#xA;from 1.0 to 2.0 cm in children (Bell et al. l978), and from 1.5 to 4.5 cm in adults &#xA;(Ghahremani l974).  The majority of membranes in adults were located at a distance of &#xA;1.5 to 4.0 cm from the pylorus (Rowling l959;  Melamed et al. l960;  Parrish l968;  &#xA;Cremin l969;  Felson et al. l969;  Ghahremani l974;  Bell et al. l977;  Mitchell et al. l979;  &#xA;Jinkins et al. l980).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion-3&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion-3&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We have not encountered reports in which the prepyloric membrane was described in &#xA;relation to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  However, in many descriptions and their &#xA;accompanying illustrations, it was noted that the prepyloric membrane occurred in the &#xA;location of the left pyloric loop.  This is especially well demonstrated in illustrations &#xA;accompanying the case report of Rowling (l959), that of Melamed et al (l960), the 3 cases &#xA;of Parrish et al. (l968), the 2 of Cremin (l969), the one of Ghent and Denton (l974), most &#xA;of the 10 cases of Bell et al. (l977), the 2 cases of Fujioka et al (l980) and the 4 of Jinkins &#xA;et al. (l980).  It appears to us (but it has not been proved) that, in the majority of cases, &#xA;the prepyloric mucosal membrane occurs on the luminal aspect of the left pyloric loop of &#xA;the muscularis externa, in the same way as the mucosal and submucosal parts of the &#xA;pyloric ring are located on the luminal aspect of the right pyloric loop (to form the pyloric &#xA;ring).  It is interesting to note that Parrish et al. (l968) found a definite thickening in the &#xA;muscularis externa underlying the membrane in one of their cases;  this could &#xA;conceivably be due to the left loop.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fujioka et al. (l980) also reported 2 cases of pseudowebs, in whom radiographic &#xA;examination had shown typical signs of prepyloric membranes;  at operation and &#xA;endoscopy no abnormality was found.  In these cases the &#34;webs&#34; were probably caused &#xA;by prominent, circular mucosal folds.  It should be possible to differentiate permanent &#xA;webs from circular mucosal folds by the characteristic movements and change in position &#xA;of the folds during contraction of the sphincteric cylinder, as discussed in Chapters 2 and &#xA;13.  However, a circular mucosal fold may occasionally be permanent, simulating a web &#xA;(Chap. 28).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references-3&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references-3&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, McAlister W, et al.  Antral diaphragm:  cause of gastric &#xA;outlet obstruction in infants and children.  &lt;em&gt;J Pediatr&lt;/em&gt; l977, 90, 196-&#xA;202.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Keating JP, et al.  Prepyloric gastric antral web:  a puzzling &#xA;epidemic.  &lt;em&gt;J Pediat Surg&lt;/em&gt; l978, 13, 307-313.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cremin BJ.  Congenital pyloric antral membranes in infancy.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l969, 92, 509-512.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dineen JP, Redo SF.  Pyloric obstruction due to mucosal diaphragm.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; l963, 53, 674-676.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Farman J, Cywes S, Werbeloff L.  Pyloric mucosal diaphragms.  &lt;em&gt;Clin &#xA;Rad&lt;/em&gt; l968, l9, 95-99.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Felson B, Berkmen YM, Hoyumpa M.  Gastric mucosal diaphragm.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l969, 92, 513-517.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fujioka M, Fisher S, Young LW.  Pseudoweb of the gastric antrum in infants.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Ped Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l980, 9, 73-75.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gerber BC.  Prepyloric diaphragm, an unusual abnormality:  a case report.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; l965, 90, 472-480.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ghent CN, Denton D.  Mucosal diaphragm of the gastric antrum:  case report and &#xA;review of the literature.  Canad J Surg l974, 17, 274-278.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ghahremani GG.  Nonobstructive mucosal diaphragms or rings of the gastric &#xA;antrum in adults.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l974, 121, 236-&#xA;247.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Jinkins JR, Ball TI, Clements JL, et al.  Antral mucosal diaphragms in infants and &#xA;children.  &lt;em&gt;Ped Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l980, 9, 69-72.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Melamed A, Haukohl RS, Callan E.  Pyloric antral mucosal diaphragm with &#xA;transpyloric mucosal prolapse.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l960, 74, 452-457.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Mitchell KG, McGowan A, Smith DC, et al.  Pyloric diaphragm, antral web, &#xA;congenital antral membrane:  a surgical rarity?  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l979, 66, &#xA;572-574.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Parrish RA, Kanavage CB, Wells JA, et al.  &lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; l968, &#xA;127, 999-1004.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rowling JT.  The prepyloric septum:  a rare anomaly.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l959, 47, 162-166.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Touroff ASW, Sussman RM.  Congenital prepyloric membranous obstruction in &#xA;premature infant.  &lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; l940, 8, 739-755.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;ectopic-pancreatic-tissue&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Ectopic Pancreatic Tissue&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#ectopic-pancreatic-tissue&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Samuel (l955) pointed out that barium-filled ducts in ectopic pancreatic tissue, embedded &#xA;in the wall of the stomach, may simulate an intramural diverticulum.  Moore and Kaplan &#xA;(l956) found that a small mass of aberrant pancreatic tissue may be loosely attached to &#xA;the serosal surface of the upper intestine, or it may occur in the subserosal, submuscular &#xA;or submucosal regions of the gastric walls.  Radiographically it usually presents as an &#xA;elevated mound with a central dimpling and an opening formed by ducts.  When the &#xA;dimpling is filled with barium, it may resemble a polyp with an ulcer at its tip;  when the &#xA;ducts are filled, it resembles a diverticulum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Besemann et al. (l97l) confirmed that most aberrant pancreatic nodules occurred in the &#xA;upper gastrointestinal tract, usually in the duodenum, but occasionally in the stomach &#xA;near the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;case-report&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Report&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-report&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 21.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; D.J., 22 year old male, had a long history of dyspepsia not responding to &#xA;anti-ulcer treatment.  Two days before admission there had been an episode of &#xA;haematemesis.  Gastroscopy showed a small orifice  on the posterior gastric wall close to &#xA;the pyloric aperture.  It was thought to be either an intramural diverticulum or a double &#xA;pylorus;  radiographic examination was requested for further elucidation.  This showed a &#xA;small, branching, diverticular structure approximately 1.0 cm in length, on the greater &#xA;curvature side of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder within 1.0 cm of the pylorus (Fig. 21.1).  &#xA;It remained constant in appearance irrespective of the degree of contraction of the &#xA;cylinder, the contractions being normal.  At laparotomy no evidence of ulceration was &#xA;seen.  A nodule of abnormal tissue measuring approximately 2.0 cm in diameter was &#xA;palpated in the gastric wall at the site indicated by endoscopy and radiology.  &#xA;Gastrostomy revealed a small orifice extending into the nodule, which was removed by &#xA;local excision.  Histology showed it to consist of endo- and exocrine pancreatic tissue &#xA;located in the muscular coat of the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/21-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 21.1.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case D.J. Small, branching, diverticulum-like structure (arrow) on greater &#xA;curvature side of pyloric sphincteric cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion-4&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion-4&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In this case a small nodule of ectopic pancreatic tissue in the wall of the greater curvature &#xA;of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder did not affect the movements of the cylinder to any &#xA;appreciable extent.  Radiographically the lesion mimicked an intramural diverticulum &#xA;(Chap. 22).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references-4&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references-4&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Besemann EF, Auerbach SH, Wolfe WW.  Importance of roentgenologic &#xA;diagnosis of aberrant pancreatic tissue in the gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l969, 107, 71-76.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Moore MB, Kaplan IW.  Heterotopic pancreatic tissue in the stomach.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l956, 26, 699-705.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Samuel E.  Gastric diverticula.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l955, 28, 574-578.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>22 - Partial or Intramural Gastric Diverticulum</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_22/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_22/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;partial-or-intramural-gastric-diverticulum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Partial or Intramural Gastric Diverticulum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#partial-or-intramural-gastric-diverticulum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The term partial gastric diverticulum was first used by Samuel (l955) to indicate a &#xA;projection of the mucosa into, but not through the muscular coats of the stomach.  As it &#xA;does not extend as far as the serosa, external inspection of the stomach at operation will &#xA;not reveal any abnormality.  He described a case, diagnosed by radiography and &#xA;subsequently confirmed at operation, in whom a partial diverticulum was located on the &#xA;greater curvature of the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34; approximately 1.0mm orally to the pyloric ring.  &#xA;It was surrounded by a shallow, smooth-walled defect which was considered to be due to &#xA;oedema.  Radiographically it had to be differentiated from a gastric ulcer, a small &#xA;ulcerated tumor and ectopic pancreatic tissue (in which barium-filled ducts might &#xA;resemble small diverticula) (Chap. 21).  However, these conditions could be excluded &#xA;because of the smooth outline and narrow neck of the diverticulum, the normal mucosal &#xA;pattern in its vicinity and the absence of associated spasm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Flachs et al. (l965) described 2 similar cases.  In both the partial diverticulum was &#xA;situated on the greater curvature close to the pyloric ring.  In one of the cases it was &#xA;mistaken for a gastric ulcer, resulting in partial gastrectomy.  The resection specimen &#xA;showed a mucosal pouch protruding into the submucosa, with the muscular layer intact &#xA;and the serosa smooth and glistening.  It was pointed out that a mucosal pouch could &#xA;show variable filling with barium during the radiographic examination;  the surrounding &#xA;musculature might contract to such an extent that it could disappear almost completely.  &#xA;In contrast, a gastric ulcer showed little change in appearance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rabushka et al. (l968) described the radiographic appearances of a case (confirmed at &#xA;operation) in which a partial diverticulum, entirely contained within the wall of the &#xA;stomach, was situated on the greater curvature 4.0 to 5.0 cm proximal to the pylorus.  (In &#xA;another case a diverticulum on the greater curvature of the pars media was also &#xA;considered to be of the intramural variety, but this was not proved and it could possibly &#xA;have been a &#34;conventional&#34; diverticulum).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The condition is rare.  Treichel et al. (l976) encountered 4 patients (one of whom had 2 &#xA;intramural diverticula) during the course of 10,000 routine upper gastrointestinal barium &#xA;investigations.  All cases were confirmed by endoscopy and 2 also by operation.  The &#xA;diverticula typically occurred on the greater curvature of the &#34;antrum&#34; within 1.0 to 4.0 &#xA;cm of the pylorus, measured 4.0 to 10.0 mm in diameter, presented as round or oval &#xA;pouches with narrow necks, and changed to some extent in size and shape during &#xA;contraction of the walls.  Complete filling of a diverticulum could be achieved by &#xA;administering a spasmolytic during a double contrast examination.  In the case where &#xA;radiography showed 2 diverticula, endoscopy initially failed to reveal the lesions;  &#xA;however, they were visualized at a second attempt.  It was stated that the lesions were &#xA;easier to detect by radiography than by endoscopy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Treugut and Olsson (l980) described another case in which the lesion typically presented &#xA;at radiography as a smooth-walled, lenticular, intramural outpouching on the greater &#xA;curvature of the &#34;antrum&#34; approximately 3.0 cm proximal to the pylorus.  It varied &#xA;somewhat in size but never exceeded 10.0 mm in diameter.  The ostium was surrounded &#xA;by a circular fold;  in other respects the mucosal folds were normal, which differentiated &#xA;it from a gastric ulcer and an ulcerated tumor.  Confirmation was obtained by endoscopy &#xA;and operation.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cockrell et al. (l984) encountered reports of 13 cases in the literature and added 3 of their &#xA;own.  To them the striking feature was the unique location of the lesion on the greater &#xA;curvature of the &#34;distal antrum&#34;.  There was no explanation for its occurrence in this &#xA;particular situation and the etiology remained unknown.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dickinson and Freeman (l986) reviewed the radiographic and endoscopic features of the &#xA;condition and described 6 cases of their own.  All were diagnosed at radiography, 4 being &#xA;confirmed by endoscopy.  It was pointed out that while a partial gastric diverticulum was &#xA;a rare and clinically insignificant lesion, it was liable to cause diagnostic confusion and &#xA;might lead to inappropriate treatment (e.g. partial gastrectomy) if not recognized.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We have encountered the following 3 cases of intramural gastric diverticula during the &#xA;last 13,600 upper gastrointestinal barium investigations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;cr&#34;&gt;Case Reports&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 22.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; M.W., 55 year old female, complained of cramp-like epigastric pains &#xA;diurnally and occasionally nocturnally after a late evening meal.  At times she felt &#xA;nauseous.  Physical examination revealed signs of chronic bronchitis and iron deficiency &#xA;anaemia.  Gastroscopy showed a sliding hiatus hernia without oesophagitis.  No evidence &#xA;of ulceration or other lesion was seen in the stomach and duodenum.  A second &#xA;gastroscopy six years later showed no abnormality in the oesophagus, stomach and &#xA;duodenum.  Repeat gastroscopy the following month was difficult due to lack of patient &#xA;co-operation.  The oesophagus was normal.  The pyloric region appeared somewhat &#xA;hyperaemic and oedematous, the remainder of the stomach being normal.  The duodenum &#xA;could not be visualized.&#xA;Barium radiographic examination at that time showed a small diverticulum on the greater &#xA;curvature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder approximately 2.5 cm proximal to the &#xA;pyloric ring (Fig. 22.1A).  Its neck, which was surrounded by a shallow, smooth-walled &#xA;indentation of the barium in the lumen, was 0.7 mm in diameter.  During contraction of &#xA;the cylinder it was seen to be situated midway between the right and left pyloric loops &#xA;(Fig. 22.1B) in the situation where the pyloric pseudo-diverticulum occurs normally &#xA;(Chap. 13).  At times, during near maximal contraction of the cylinder, it disappeared, &#xA;only to reappear during the next cycle of filling.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/b&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/22-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/22-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 22.1. A &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case M.W. Small intramural diverticulum (arrow) on greater &#xA;curvature of pyloric sphincteric cylinder 2.5 cm proximal to pyloric ring.&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Case M.W.  Partial contraction of sphincteric cylinder.  &#xA;Intramural diverticulum (arrow) situated on rim of physiological pseudodiverticulum &#xA;(PD), midway between right and left pyloric loops&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Because of the features enumerated in the discussion it was diagnosed as an intramural or &#xA;partial gastric diverticulum.  It was certainly not an ulcer as witnessed by repeated &#xA;gastroscopies.  The fact that it was not seen at gastroscopy does not come as a surprise as &#xA;Treichel et al. (l976) had found that the lesion was easier to detect by radiography than by &#xA;endoscopy.  Cockrell et al. (l984) stated that an intramural diverticulum may be difficult &#xA;to detect endoscopically if its ostium is hidden by a fold or if it occurs in an area which is &#xA;contracting.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 22.2.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; G.V., 32 year old female, complained of a vague feeling of fullness and &#xA;occasional pain in the epigastrium.  Physical examination revealed some epigastric &#xA;tenderness.  After a month&#39;s treatment with antacids the symptoms disappeared.  &#xA;Radiographic examination at that time showed a small diverticular-like structure on the &#xA;greater curvature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder approximately 3.0 cm proximal to the &#xA;pyloric ring, i.e. midway between the right and left pyloric loops, in the position where &#xA;the pyloric pseudo-diverticulum usually occurs  (Fig. 22.2&lt;rm&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  It was &#xA;surrounded by a shallow, smooth-walled, lenticular indentation of the barium in the &#xA;lumen.  During contraction of the cylinder it changed in shape and became smaller (Fig. &#xA;22.2&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;);  it was diagnosed as an intramural or partial diverticulum.  Absence &#xA;of associated spasm, normal mucosal folds in the vicinity and change in size during &#xA;contraction ruled out an ulcer.  The patient was lost to follow-up and did not return for &#xA;gastroscopy.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/22-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/22-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 22.2. A &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case G.V.  Intramural diverticulum (arrow) on greater curvature &#xA;of sphincteric cylinder 3.0 cm proximal to pyloric ring.&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Case G.V.  Contraction of sphincteric cylinder.  Intramural &#xA;diverticulum (arrow) between right and left pyloric loops now smaller&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 22.3.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; J.V., l9 year old female, complained of &#34;acidity&#34;, of several months&#39; &#xA;duration.  Gastroscopy showed mucosal erosions in the lower oesophagus, probably due &#xA;to reflux oesophagitis.  The gastric fornix and corpus were normal;  on the greater &#xA;curvature of the &#34;antrum&#34; a &#34;pseudodiverticulum&#34; was seen.  Radiographic examination &#xA;14 months later, for the same complaint, showed an intramural diverticulum on the &#xA;greater curvature within 2.0 cm of the pylorus.  Cyclical contractions of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder were normal;  during contraction of the right and left pyloric loops, a &#xA;normal, physiological pseudodiverticulum was seen with an intramural diverticulum on &#xA;its greater curvature aspect (Fig. 22.3).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/22-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 22.3. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case J.V.  Normal contraction of pyloric muscle torus (MT) and right (RPL) &#xA;and left (LPL) pyloric loops.  Intramural diverticulum (arrow) on rim of physiological &#xA;pseudodiverticulum (PD)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Cockrell et al. (l984) the striking feature of the lesion was its unique &#xA;location on the greater curvature of the &#34;distal antrum&#34;.  No ready explanation could be &#xA;found for its occurrence in this particular situation and the etiology remained unknown.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We believe the explanation probably lies in the anatomical build of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder as described previously (Chap. 3).  In all 3 our cases the intramural &#xA;diverticulum occurred on the greater curvature between the right and left pyloric loops, a &#xA;fact which became clear during contraction of the loops.  In this region the musculature &#xA;of the cylinder is at its thinnest;  it is surmized that the intramural diverticulum consists of &#xA;a projection of mucosa and submucosa into the relatively sparse muscle fibres.  It is best &#xA;visible when the region is distended, becoming compressed or smaller during contraction &#xA;of the muscular rings and intervening musculature.  According to the descriptions of &#xA;Samuel (l955), Flachs et al. (l965), Treugut and Olsson (l980) and Cockrell et al. (l984) &#xA;their cases will also fall into this category, and so will some of the cases described by &#xA;Rabushka et al. (l968), Treichel et al. (l976) and Dickinson and Freeman (l986).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;An intramural gastric diverticulum should not be confused with the pseudo-diverticulum &#xA;of the pylorus, which is a fleeting, physiological outpouching of all layers of the wall &#xA;occurring normally during contraction of the sphincteric cylinder (Chap.13).  An &#xA;intramural gastric diverticulum may be seen on the greater curvature aspect of the &#xA;physiological pseudodiverticulum during a stage of contraction of the sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Whether it is a congenital or acquired lesion, is not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cockrell CH, Cho SR, Messmer JM, et al.  Intramural gastric diverticula:  a report &#xA;of three cases.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l984, 57, 285-288.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dickinson RJ, Freeman AH.  Partial gastric diverticula:  radiological and &#xA;endoscopic features in six patients.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l986, 27, 954-957.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Flachs K, Stelman HH, Matsumoto PJH.  Partial gastric diverticula.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l965, 94, 339-342.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rabushka SE, Melamed M, Melamed JL.  Unusual gastric diverticula:  report of &#xA;two cases.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l968, 90, 1006-1008.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Samuel E.  Gastric diverticula.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l955, 28, 574-578.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Treichel J, Gerstenberg E, Palme G, et al.  Diagnosis of partial gastric diverticula.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l976, ll9, 13-18.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Treugut H, Olsson SA.  Intramurales Magendivertikel.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr Nuklearmed&lt;/em&gt; l980, 133, 327-328.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>23 - Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_23/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_23/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;infantile-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Infantile Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#infantile-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although a few isolated cases of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) had been &#xA;reported previously, Hirschsprung (l888) is generally regarded as the first author to have &#xA;recognized it as a separate clinical entity.  At that time the tendency was to designate the &#xA;condition congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  At present, the clinical features and &#xA;management are well understood, and will not be recapitulated.  It may be useful to &#xA;discuss the images seen during radiographic and ultrasonic examinations, especially in &#xA;relation to anatomical factors, and to consider some of the theories regarding the etiology &#xA;and pathogenesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;anatomical-localization-and-radiographic-features&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Anatomical Localization and Radiographic Features&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#anatomical-localization-and-radiographic-features&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cunningham (1906) studied the morbid anatomical appearances in &#34;a considerable &#xA;number&#34; of cases of IHPS, and found the muscular hypertrophy to be limited to the &#xA;anatomical pyloric sphincteric cylinder, which includes the pyloric ring (Chap. 3).  The &#xA;affected area was almost 2.54 cm in length and had the look and feel of a hard, solid &#xA;cylinder.  It was sharply demarcated from the duodenum on its aboral, and from the &#xA;pyloric vestibule on its oral side.  In more severe cases the narrowing was greatest at the &#xA;two ends, the cylinder in those cases assuming an oval or fusiform shape, somewhat like &#xA;an olive.  In all cases the musculature of the remainder of the stomach was normal.  The &#xA;relative extent to which each of the two muscular layers was involved in the hypertrophy &#xA;was not the same in every case.  While some observers believed that the circular &#xA;musculature had undergone the greater degree of hypertrophy, Cunningham (1906) found &#xA;that both layers were involved.  Nevertheless the circular layer of the cylinder remained 3 &#xA;to 4 times as thick as the longitudinal in his cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Forssell (l913) emphasized that muscular hypertrophy in cases of IHPS was localized to &#xA;the canalis egestorius, i.e. the pyloric sphincteric cylinder of Cunningham (1906) (Chap. &#xA;3).  The radiographic appearances of the contracted canalis in IHPS corresponded exactly &#xA;to those of a maximal normal contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13);  &#xA;while the contraction was cyclical and of a fleeting nature in normal subjects, it was &#xA;constant in IHPS.  The muscular hypertrophy was associated with functional &#xA;abnormalities of the closing mechanism of the canalis egestorius.  The autoplastic &#xA;movements of the mucous membrane were also involved (Chaps. 2, 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Meuwissen and Sloof (l932, l934) were the first to state that the purpose of the &#xA;radiological examination was not to demonstrate the indirect features of the condition, &#xA;such as gastric hyperperistalsis and retention, but to visualize the lesion itself, i.e. the &#xA;contracted pyloric canal, in its longest dimension.  The average length of the canal in &#xA;normal infants was only 1.0 to 2.0 mm, while in the majority of cases of IHPS it was very &#xA;long and narrow, ranging from 12.0 to 24.0 mm in length.  In a minority of cases the &#xA;range was from 3.0 to 11.0 mm.  (Owing to magnification factors the actual length was &#xA;about nine-tenths of that measured on the films).  Radiologically the thin, permanently &#xA;contracted canal, containing a single, central streak of barium in the lumen, resembled a &#xA;string.  These authors were the first to describe the &#34;string sign&#34; of IHPS, and also &#xA;mentioned concave indentations of the distal stomach on either side of the string, caused &#xA;by the bulging pyloric musculature, which became known as the &#34;shoulder sign&#34; (Fig. &#xA;23.1).  There was complete absence of peristalsis in the contracted region.  According to &#xA;Meuwissen and Sloof (l932, l934) the contraction was largely due to spasm, with or &#xA;without associated muscular hypertrophy.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/23-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 23.1 A-F. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;More common radiographic signs of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis &#xA;(after Astley, 1952).  &lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Central &#34;beak&#34;. &lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Beak with adjacent &#xA;concave indentations (shoulder sign). &lt;b&gt;C&lt;/B&gt; Beak, gap and cap. &lt;b&gt;D&lt;/b&gt; String &#xA;sign. &lt;b&gt;E&lt;/b&gt; Longitudinal mucosal folds. &lt;b&gt;F&lt;/b&gt; Concave indentation &#xA;base of cap.  Pyloric &#34;tit&#34; (arrow)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Frimann-Dahl (l935) reported 3 cases and showed that muscular hypertrophy was not &#xA;limited to the pyloric ring, as was commonly thought, but that it was up to 20.0 mm in &#xA;length and involved the entire canalis egestorius.  In his cases the musculature of the &#xA;canalis was hypertrophied and strongly contracted, whereas the ring itself showed little &#xA;thickening.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Runstr&amp;#246;m (l939), in a study of 107 cases of IHPS, described the main patho-&#xA;anatomical finding as a tumor as hard as cartilage, 2.0 to 3.0 cm in length and 1.5 cm &#xA;thick, involving the muscular part of the stomach which had been designated the canalis &#xA;egestorius by Forssell (l913);  the muscular hypertrophy was not localized to the pyloric &#xA;sphincter (i.e. the pyloric ring), but involved the entire canalis.  Radiologically the &#xA;contracted canalis presented as a tube with a narrow lumen 2.0 to 3.0 cm in length, &#xA;completely lacking in &#34;peristaltic motility&#34;.  In contrast, the remainder of the stomach &#xA;showed increased peristalsis, which invariably stopped at the oral end of the constriction.  &#xA;In addition a change occurred in the autoplastic movements of the mucosa, with mucosal &#xA;folds filling the narrow passage in the contracted canalis;  these factors resulted in a delay &#xA;in gastric emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Torgersen&#39;s (l942) microscopic sections showed that muscular hypertrophy in IHPS &#xA;involved the two sphincteric loops together with the intervening fibres, i.e. the entire &#xA;canalis egestorius.  As the musculature of the remainder of the stomach was normal, he &#xA;concluded that it was a pathological process limited to the canalis.  Hypertrophy of the &#xA;muscular wall with resultant narrowing of the lumen gave rise to the radiological picture &#xA;of a permanently contracted pyloric canal.  Torgersen (l942) agreed with Forssell (l913) &#xA;that the radiological appearance of IHPS conformed to that seen in a maximal or near &#xA;maximal contraction of the normal canalis.  Contraction of the circular fibres of the &#xA;muscularis externa produced narrowing of the lumen, and contraction of the longitudinal &#xA;fibres produced shortening;  the exact picture seen would depend on which of the two &#xA;forms of contraction had gained supremacy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Astley (l952) reiterated that in IHPS the prepyloric portion of the stomach was constantly &#xA;narrowed and devoid of peristalsis.  Radiologically this might present in a number of &#xA;ways (Fig. 23.1).  In some infants in whom no gastric emptying occurred for a &#xA;considerable time, the distended stomach was seen to end in a small triangular projection &#xA;or &#34;antral beak&#34;.  On either side of the beak a concave indentation occurred in the distal &#xA;stomach due to the bulging pyloric musculature.  Whem emptying did take place, the &#xA;narrowed channel might present as a hair-line of barium, or as 2 or 3 parallel lines &#xA;(crowded mucosal folds), or as a canal with a width of up to 3.0 mm.  The canal was &#xA;often slightly curved (concave upwards) and its length could vary between 8.0 and 30.0 &#xA;mm.  A concave indentation of the base of the duodenal bulb, again caused by the &#xA;bulging pyloric muscle mass, might be present, resulting in a mushroom or umbrella-like &#xA;appearance of the bulb.  Incomplete filling of the stenotic area appeared as a gap between &#xA;the &#34;beak&#34; and the cap.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Astley (l952) the following conditions could mimic the radiographic &#xA;appearances of IHPS, and should be considered in the differential diagnosis:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;A stage in the normal, cyclical contraction of the region.  Referring to Forssell (l913), &#xA;he mentioned that a maximal normal contraction of the canalis egestorius (Chap. 13) &#xA;might simulate the contraction of IHPS.  While the former is of a fleeting nature, the &#xA;latter is permanent.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Infantile pylorospasm.  In a series of 10 vomiting babies Astley (l952) noted that the &#xA;normal process of widening of the prepyloric channel to its full calibre was considerably &#xA;delayed in these cases.  The narrowing persisted for 10 minutes to over an hour and &#xA;simulated IHPS.  However, continued observation showed that the segment was neither &#xA;constantly narrowed nor devoid of peristalsis as it was in IHPS.  After an interval &#xA;gradual, or at times a more sudden relaxation occurred.  The features were due to &#xA;pylorospasm (Chap. 20) and were sometimes erroneously diagnosed as IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gastric inactivity, i.e. failure of barium to leave the stomach due to absence of &#xA;peristalsis.  The retention could simulate that occurring in IHPS.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;In a minority of cases of IHPS, the radiological findings were less easy to interpret;  &#xA;according to Astley (l952) these were cases in which filling of the stenotic area and &#xA;duodenal bulb was of a fleeting nature, or in which free gastric emptying occurred.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Shopfner (l964) described an additional radiological sign of IHPS, namely the &#xA;pyloric tit. This consisted of a sharp projection from the lesser curvature of &#xA;the filled part of the stomach at the oral end of the constriction (Fig. 23.1).&#xA;The tit was also seen in 2 cases of pylorospasm, and had exactly the same &#xA;appearance as in IHPS, but disappeared when the spasm relaxed.&#xA;The narrowing of pylorospasm resembled IHPS but disappeared within 5 to 10 &#xA;minutes, enabling a differentiation to be made between the two conditions.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Not all the radiological signs occur in every case.  In 14 proved cases of IHPS Haran et al &#xA;(l966) noted the string sign in 11, the beak sign in 11, the tit sign in 6 and the shoulder &#xA;sign in 5.  These authors also described the doubletrack sign, consisting of 2 parallel &#xA;linear streaks of barium with an interposed radiolucent band in the constricted channel.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The sign seems to be similar to one previously described by &#xA;Astley in l952).  While infantile pylorospasm might resemble IHPS radiologically, the &#xA;&#34;double-track&#34; was not evident in their cases of spasm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The radiographic features have been reviewed by Shuman et al. (l967), Haller and Cohen &#xA;(l986) and others.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Swischuk et al. (l980, l989) pointed out that pylorospasm produced an &#34;antral&#34; deformity &#xA;which was virtually indistinguishable from some forms of true IHPS.  However, in spasm &#xA;the configuration was less permanent, showing slight variations from time to time.  The &#xA;same authors described a number of cases of unusual, atypical or incomplete hypertrophy &#xA;of the pyloric musculature, in which barium studies led to puzzling &#34;antral&#34; &#xA;configurations, including funnel antrum, spiculated antrum, pyloric niche, and the lesser &#xA;curve mass.  The spiculated antrum was thought to be due to hypertrophied rings of &#xA;circular muscularis externa, and the lesser curve mass to selective hypertrophy of the &#xA;muscle torus (Chap. 25).  With ultrasound and its ability to visualize the pyloric &#xA;musculature directly, the diagnosis of IHPS in these cases left no room for doubt.&#xA;The following cases illustrate some of the radiological features of IHPS:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;cr&#34;&gt;Case Reports&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 23.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; B.G., 21 day old male, was admitted for projectile vomiting.  &#xA;Radiographic examination showed almost total obstruction in the pyloric region with &#xA;gastric distension.  The obstruction presented as a sharp cut-off transverse to the long axis &#xA;of the stomach, with a tiny central &#34;beak&#34; (Fig 23.2).  These appearances are generally &#xA;accepted to be indicative of IHPS, and in our view can be explained as follows:  &#xA;hypertrophy of the musculature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder causes a mass which &#xA;occludes the lumen, preventing its filling with barium (this has sometimes been referred &#xA;to as &#34;amputation of the antrum&#34;).  The tiny &#34;beak&#34; indicates filling of the &#xA;commencement of the occluded pyloric canal.  At operation the diagnosis of IHPS was &#xA;confirmed.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/23-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 23.2. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case B.G.  Sharp cut-off pyloric region causing obstruction.  Presumed extent &#xA;of pyloric muscular hypertrophy (straight arrows).  Central &#34;beak&#34; (curved arrow)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 23.2.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; B.B., 28 day old male, had a history of post-feeds vomiting for the &#xA;previous 2 weeks.  Radiographic examination showed a severe, constant narrowing 2.0cm &#xA;in length in the pyloric region of the stomach, causing obstruction.  The narrowing was &#xA;string-like in appearance and at its proximal end associated with concave indentations &#xA;into the stomach (Fig. 23.3).  The appearance is compatible with IHPS and can be &#xA;explained as follows:  hypertrophy of the musculature of the entire length of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder causes a pronounced narrowing of the lumen, which is permanent.  &#xA;Muscular hypertrophy surrounding the narrowed lumen indents the stomach, causing &#xA;concave defects.  The diagnosis of IHPS was confirmed at operation.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/23-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 23.3.&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case B.B. String-like narrowing 2.0cm in length (arrows) due to pyloric muscular hypertrophy&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 23.3.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; M.M., male aged 10 days, was admitted with a history of vomiting since &#xA;birth.  Radiographic examination initially showed total obstruction of the pyloric region &#xA;(&#34;amputation of the antrum&#34;) (Fig. 23.4&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  After 15 minutes, barium filled &#xA;the pyloric canal, which was permanently contracted and approximately 2.0 cm in length &#xA;(Fig. 23.4&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;);  two longitudinal mucosal folds were seen in the contracted &#xA;canal.  There was a concave indentation of the base of the duodenal bulb.  The &#xA;appearance is that of IHPS and can be explained as follows:  muscular hypertrophy of the &#xA;entire length of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder initially obstructs the lumen;  somewhat &#xA;later filling of the permanently formed pyloric canal occurs.  Muscular hypertrophy &#xA;surrounding the latter indents the base of the duodenal bulb.  Ramstedt operation two &#xA;days later confirmed IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/23-4a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/23-4b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 23.4. A &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case M.M. Initial total obstruction pyloric region (&#34;amputation of antrum&#34;).  &#xA;Presumed extent of pyloric muscular hypertrophy (arrows).&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Case M.M.  Permanently formed pyloric canal, containing longitudinal mucosal folds, &#xA;due to IHPS (arrows).  Concave indentation base of duodenal bulb&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 23.4.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; C.V., male aged 15 days, was admitted for projectile vomiting and &#xA;dehydration.  Radiographic examination showed a constant narrowing, 1.5 cm in length, &#xA;in the pyloric region, with a concave indentation of the base of the duodenal bulb (Fig. &#xA;23.5).  At times a small dilatation was seen in the centre of the narrowed canal.  The &#xA;appearance is indicative of IHPS and can be explained as follows:  the entire length of the &#xA;musculature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder is hypertrophied, causing narrowing of the &#xA;lumen and a permanently contracted pyloric canal, as well as a concave indentation of the &#xA;base of the duodenal bulb.  The dilatation in the centre of the narrowed canal is probably &#xA;an outward bulge between the right and left pyloric loops.  The diagnosis was confirmed &#xA;at a Ramstedt operation a few days later.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/23-5.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 23.5. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case C.V. Permanently formed pyloric canal due to IHPS.  Concave indentation base of bulb. &#xA;Small central dilatation in canal&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;anatomical-localization-and-ultrasonic-features&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Anatomical Localization and Ultrasonic Features&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#anatomical-localization-and-ultrasonic-features&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using a grey-scale unit with a 5MHz nonfocused transducer, Teele and Smith (l977) first &#xA;described the sonographic appearances in 5 babies with IHPS.  By passing the transducer &#xA;transversely over the right lateral abdominal wall at the level of the costal margin, the &#xA;region of the pylorus was scanned through the liver;  the hypertrophied pyloric &#xA;musculature presented as a round or oval echolucent mass with a central stellate &#xA;collection of echoes.  The average antero-posterior diameter of each mass was 2.3 cm, &#xA;with a range of 1.8 to 2.8 cm.  They were unable to identify a similar soft tissue mass in &#xA;normal babies.  An echolucent mass could also be produced by the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; or &#xA;duodenal bulb filled with fluid, and by the hepatic flexure of the colon filled with stool, &#xA;but in those instances the appearance was evanescent and did not have the typical central &#xA;collection of echoes seen in IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Subsequently, various authors determined the measurements of the pyloric mass in IHPS &#xA;by direct viewing during ultrasonic examinations.  Strauss et al. (l98l) examined 20 &#xA;infants aged from 14 to 49 days with IHPS, initially using a static gray-scale B-scan and &#xA;later a real-time unit with a 5 MHz focused transducer.  The pylorus was considered to be &#xA;abnormally thickened if it measured 1.5 cm or more in its ventral-dorsal diameter.  (In &#xA;surgically controlled cases the pyloric mass of IHPS measured approximately 1.5 cm in &#xA;diameter).  In 16 of the cases the mass measured from 1.5 cm to 3.0 cm.  It presented as a &#xA;round anechoic mass with a central collection of echoes.  In addition the pyloric &#34;canal&#34; &#xA;was seen to be elongated to 20 mm.  Real-time scanning showed an absence of movement &#xA;of gastric contents across the pyloric canal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Blumhagen and Coombs (l98l) examined 23 proven cases of IHPS between the ages of 2 &#xA;and 10 weeks, using a B-scanner with a 6.0 mm focused 7.5 MHz transducer.  In all cases &#xA;the hypoechoic single muscle layer was 4.0 mm thick or thicker.  The thick hypoechoic &#xA;ring in the pyloric region was the sole criterion by which IHPS was diagnosed.  The &#xA;fundamental advantage of ultrasonography over other methods of diagnosis was that it &#xA;visualized the hypertrophied muscle directly.  Occasionally a hypoechoic ring might be &#xA;formed by the muscle layers of the normal &#34;distal antrum&#34; as seen on parasagittal sections &#xA;near the midline, but in those cases the layer was less than 4.0 mm in thickness.  A false &#xA;positive sonograph might be obtained in pylorospasm, in which there was persistent &#xA;contraction of the circular musculature of the &#34;distal antrum&#34; and pylorus, creating a &#xA;cylindrical muscle mass.  In those cases the muscle was also less than 4.0 mm in &#xA;thickness.  The length of the hypertrophied muscle in IHPS was found to be variable, &#xA;with some patients having only a short segment of hypertrophy and others a more &#xA;elliptical mass.&#xA;In a larger series of cases Blumhagen and Noble (l983) followed the normal hypoechoic &#xA;muscle layer of the proximal stomach distally to the gastric outlet.  Where the thickness &#xA;of the muscle layer of the distal antrum and pylorus was 4.0 mm or more, a confident &#xA;diagnosis of IHPS could be made.  (The thickness varied from 3.0 mm to 6.0 mm in &#xA;IHPS, being approximately 4.5 mm in the majority of cases).  It was stated that at &#xA;sonography the hypertrophied antral and pyloric circular musculature formed a thick, &#xA;rounded cylinder having the appearance of a hypoechoic ring in cross section, and an &#xA;ellipse with an echogenic core in sections parallel to the long axis.  The best safeguard &#xA;against making a false positive sonographic diagnosis is to identify the continuity of the &#xA;thickened pyloric muscular layer with that of the remainder of the stomach, and to &#xA;measure its thickness, rather than to measure the diameter of the mass, as advocated by &#xA;previous authors.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Khamapirad and Athey (l983) obtained transverse and longitudinal sonographic images &#xA;in l8 babies between the ages of one and 6 weeks with IHPS.  A constant finding was a &#xA;hypoechoic mass greater than 1.0 cm in diameter and containing a round or stellate &#xA;central echogenic area.  (The diameter of the mass ranged from 1.2 cm to 2.2 cm, with an &#xA;average of l.7 cm).  This was considered to be one of the main criteria for the diagnosis, &#xA;the other being the ability to demonstrate a continuation of the hypoechoic mass with the &#xA;gastric &#34;antrum&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Graif et al. (l984) considered previous sonographic measurements in IHPS to have been &#xA;inconclusive, especially in borderline cases.  In order to increase the diagnostic accuracy &#xA;of the modality other parameters and features of the hypertrophied muscle were &#xA;evaluated, using a high resolution real-time unit with a 10 MHz transducer.  In 22 infants &#xA;with IHPS between the ages of 2 and 10 weeks the following measurements were &#xA;obtained (mean and standard deviations were given respectively):  the transverse &#xA;diameter of the pylorus was 13.4 &amp;#177; 1.6mm, the single wall thickness 4.5 &amp;#177; &#xA;0.9 mm, and the mean pyloric length was 84 percent longer than that of normals.  It was &#xA;noted that high resolution, high frequency real-time scanning also showed the pressure &#xA;effects of the hypertrophied muscle on the adjacent &#34;antrum&#34; by direct vision, confirming &#xA;the fact that the concave indentations were caused by the muscle mass.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  In radiology hypertrophy of the muscular wall is inferred from &#xA;the configuration of intraluminal barium).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wilson and Vanhoutte (l984) held that the true pyloric muscle length was the most &#xA;important criterion for the diagnosis of IHPS.  This was obtained by rotating the &#xA;transducer from a short axis image of the pylorus until a maximum long axis was &#xA;produced.  In 16 proven cases of IHPS the true pyloric muscle length ranged from 2.0 to &#xA;2.6 cm.  In 17 normal controls the range varied from 12.0 mm to 15.0 mm.  It was felt &#xA;that measurements of the true pyloric muscle length approached more closely the &#xA;established radiological criterion of an elongated pyloric muscle and that it defined the &#xA;anatomic abnormality seen at surgery more clearly.  It was concluded that a true pyloric &#xA;muscle length of 2.0 cm or more was a reliable sonographic sign of IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Stunden et al. (l986) achieved 100 percent accuracy in the ultrasound diagnosis of IHPS &#xA;in 112 cases.  Criteria used included measurements of the pyloric diameter, muscle &#xA;thickness, canal length, real-time observation of the function of the pylorus and gastric &#xA;peristalsis.  Statistics showed that canal length was the only factor which could &#xA;discriminate precisely between a normal and an hypertrophied pylorus.  The overall &#xA;diameter of the ring in IHPS was usually more than 11.0 mm (normal 11.0 mm or less) &#xA;and the thickness of the muscle layer in the wall more than 2.5 mm (normal less than 2.5 &#xA;mm).  The canal length in IHPS was more than 16mm (normal less than 15 mm).  When &#xA;viewing the hypertrophied pylorus in real-time, relaxation of the canal did not occur, little &#xA;fluid passed through it and gastric peristalsis was increased.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Carver et al. (l988) pointed out that in most of the previous publications where normal &#xA;and abnormal ranges for length, breadth and muscle thickness were determined, there was &#xA;often an overlap between the normal and abnormal ranges for all three measurements.  &#xA;By using a 7.5 MHz real-time sector scanner they estimated pyloric muscle volume and &#xA;correlated this with body weight.  In 21 babies with surgically confirmed IHPS, the &#xA;pyloric muscle index was obtained by dividing the pyloric muscle volume in cubic &#xA;centimeters by the body weight in kilograms.  If this index was less than 0.4 the pylorus &#xA;was normal, and if more than 0.4 the diagnosis of IHPS could be made with confidence.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In many instances Bowen (l988) was unable to identify the normal pyloric muscles with 5 &#xA;MHz mechanical sector transducers;  the normal pyloric muscle was much easier to &#xA;demonstrate with computed sonography using a 5 MHz linear transducer.  Normally &#xA;pyloric dimensions might vary during real-time ultrasonic scanning, probably related to &#xA;peristaltic contractions involving the pyloric muscle itself;  the contracted gastric antrum &#xA;might simulate an elongated pyloric channel of IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;pathogenesis-and-etiology&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pathogenesis and Etiology&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pathogenesis-and-etiology&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Meuwissen and Sloof (l932, l934) were of the opinion that the condition was entirely due &#xA;to spasm of the pyloric muscle, causing a permanent contraction.  This might or might &#xA;not be associated with muscular hypertrophy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Torgersen (l942) thought the simplest explanation would be that the circular musculature &#xA;of the canalis egestorius had developed disproportionately strongly in comparison with &#xA;the longitudinal musculature.  During foetal life the circular musculature was laid down &#xA;earlier and reached considerable thickness before the longitudinal layer was differentiated &#xA;(Chap. 3).  It seemed possible that regressive changes in the powerful circular &#xA;musculature, which normally occurred at or near birth, had not taken place.  Torgersen &#xA;(l949) later also pointed out that the pyloric sulcus had an asymmetrical position in &#xA;relation to the axis of the transverse part of the stomach, being closer to the angulus on &#xA;the lesser curvature side.  In IHPS genetic causes might lead to excessive asymmetry with &#xA;consequent hypertrophy of the musculature of the canalis (i.e. the sphincteric cylinder).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Meeker and De Nicola (l948) described IHPS in a newborn infant;  it had caused gastric &#xA;outlet obstruction on the 2nd day of life and required operation on the 4th day.  The &#xA;etiology was unclear, and the question was whether muscular hypertrophy had preceded &#xA;or followed pylorospasm.  As the condition appeared to be congenital in their case, it was &#xA;thought that it had occurred too early in life for spasm to have caused hypertrophy.&#xA;By means of light microscopy Belding and Kernohan (l953) studied the myenteric &#xA;plexuses and thickness of the muscle layers in normal controls, in 9 cases of IHPS and in &#xA;5 cases of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (AHPS).  In both IHPS and AHPS the &#xA;number of myenteric ganglion cells and myenteric nerve fibre tracts per unit area of &#xA;muscle tissue showed a real decrease in the pyloric region, while it remained &#xA;quantitatively normal in the remainder of the stomach and in the duodenum.  A constant &#xA;finding was that the majority of myenteric ganglion cells in the pyloric region also &#xA;showed degenerative changes, consisting of indistinct nuclear membranes, fragmentation &#xA;or disintegration of the nucleolus, and disintegration of the cytoplasm with loss of cell &#xA;membranes.  Such changes were not present in the myenteric ganglion cells in the &#xA;remainder of the stomach and in the duodenum, nor were they evident in normal controls.  &#xA;These pathological changes could be due to exhaustion caused by excessive vagal &#xA;stimulation.  According to these authors thickening of the muscularis externa in the &#xA;normal stomach commences at a point just below the gastric incisura, extends to the &#xA;pyloro-duodenal junction, and consists mainly of an increase  in thickness of the circular &#xA;musculature.  In IHPS and AHPS the circular muscle of the pylorus was 2 to 4 times as &#xA;thick as in normal controls, while it remained normal, or showed only a slight increase in &#xA;thickness, in the remainder of the stomach and the duodenum.  Microscopically the &#xA;hypertrophied circular muscle of IHPS and AHPS had an irregular pattern with muscle &#xA;fibres running in all directions, resembling a leiomyoma.  The disorganization of muscle &#xA;fibres was not evident in the stomach above the stenosed area and in the duodenum, &#xA;neither was it seen in the normal stomach.  It was unlikely that the ganglionic changes &#xA;were secondary to the muscle hypertrophy and there appeared to be primary changes in &#xA;both the myenteric ganglia and the musculature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Carter and Powell (l954) recorded 12 examples of pyloric stenosis in parent and child, &#xA;and drew attention to the increased risk of the disease in offspring of parents who were &#xA;themselves affected.  It was thought that genetic predisposition was a strong probability &#xA;in the pathogenesis.  However, environmental factors also had to be considered.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;McKeown and MacMahon (l955) traced 112 adults who had been operated upon for &#xA;IHPS in infancy.  They had 29 children, none of whom exhibited pyloric stenosis.  This &#xA;and several other series examined by these authors, led them to conclude that a simple &#xA;genetic hypothesis was unlikely.  The condition could more plausibly be attributed to &#xA;early postnatal environmental factors.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Friesen et al (l956) also using light microscopy, studied the myenteric nerve plexuses in &#xA;normal controls and in l9 infants with IHPS.  In the normal foetus at 12 weeks&#39; gestation, &#xA;the myenteric nerve layer of the pylorus appeared as an almost continuous layer of &#xA;immature, completely undifferentiated nerve cells with little, if any segmentation into &#xA;nests or plexuses.  At 14 to 16 weeks there was a tendency towards elongated plexuses of &#xA;cells which were still undifferentiated.  At 26 weeks the myenteric layer showed &#xA;organization into definite plexuses which contained, in addition to the undifferentiated &#xA;cells, some cells with vesicular nuclei.  Shortly after birth more mature cells appeared in &#xA;the plexuses.  Mature ganglion cells with abundant cytoplasm, prominent cell and nuclear &#xA;membranes with nucleoli first appeared between the second and the fourth week after &#xA;full-term gestation.  The shift was toward differentiation so that recognizable mature &#xA;ganglion cells were present in the normal pylorus from one to 5 months, with only a few &#xA;undifferentiated cells being visible.  In IHPS, at 4 to 8 weeks after birth, the plexuses &#xA;contained no mature ganglion cells, having a cellular development similar to that of a &#xA;normal pylorus several weeks earlier in age.  It was concluded that failure of &#xA;development or maturation of the ganglion cells was present, rather than degeneration of &#xA;the cells as had been postulated by previous authors.  The &#34;degenerated&#34; or &#xA;&#34;disintegrated&#34; appearances previously described were probably cells which had never &#xA;developed completely.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Roberts (l959) studied normal controls and biopsy specimens obtained at pyloromyotomy &#xA;in 25 cases of IHPS.  True hypertrophy of both longitudinal and circular muscle layers &#xA;was evident, which he ascribed to overwork.  The myenteric plexuses were examined for &#xA;the quality and quantity of neural elements, i.e. nerve cells, supporting cells of Schwann &#xA;and nerve fibrils.  In IHPS the constituent cells had less cytoplasm and were more tightly &#xA;packed than in normal controls, with fewer well-differentiated nerve cells in evidence.  &#xA;The size of ganglia tended to be smaller and the intervals between them greater than in &#xA;normal specimens.  The large continuous sheets of ganglia seen in the normal pylorus &#xA;were absent, and it was concluded that there were quantitative as well as qualitative &#xA;changes in the myenteric ganglia in IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rintoul and Kirkman (l961) studied the morphological appearance of the myenteric &#xA;ganglion cells and the structure of the nerve fibre tracts in biopsy specimens in 38 infants &#xA;with IHPS.  With silver staining two distinct ganglion cell types were recognized:  (1)  &#xA;Type I Dogiel cells, showing a marked affinity for silver.  While they were present in the &#xA;control specimens, they were absent or virtually absent from the pyloric ganglia in cases &#xA;of IHPS;  this suggested that these cells were either congenitally absent, or that they had &#xA;degenerated.  (2)  Type II Dogiel cells, which were less argentophylic.  These were &#xA;present and uniformly distributed throughout the myenteric ganglia in both the control &#xA;and biopsy material.  No clear evidence of degeneration of ganglion cells, such as had &#xA;been described earlier, was found.  However, it was admitted that early degenerative &#xA;changes might not have been revealed by the silver staining process.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Friesen and Pearse (l963) studied the histological and histochemical features of the &#xA;pyloric ganglion cells in biopsy material in 15 cases of IHPS;  post-mortem studies were &#xA;done in 2 additional cases.  In IHPS the ganglion cells in the pylorus were not arranged in &#xA;an evenly dispersed layer between the longitudinal and circular musculature.  Cells were &#xA;present in clumps within the thin longitudinal musculature, with infrequent extensions &#xA;into the underlying circular layer.  While numerous cells were present, few were large, &#xA;mature cells, the majority being small and immature;  these cells were enzymatically &#xA;active and the histological appearances were not those of degenerated or dead cells.  &#xA;However, there was lack of mitochondrial and other oxidative enzymes characteristic of &#xA;the mature cell.  The features suggested arrest of the normal development of ganglion &#xA;cells in the pyloric area.  Mature ganglion cells containing numerous mitochondria were &#xA;present in large numbers in the gastric wall above the pylorus in cases of IHPS, as well as &#xA;in the pylorus in normal stomachs.  The results supported the theory that motor acitivity &#xA;such as pylorospasm preceded the development of hypertrophy of the pyloric circular &#xA;musculature.&#xA;According to Heinisch (l967) the etiology and pathogenesis of IHPS and AHPS remained &#xA;obscure.  Macroscopically and microscopically these conditions could not be &#xA;differentiated from each other.  As the pathological process was not limited to the pyloric &#xA;ring, but also encompassed the immediate prepyloric area, Heinisch suggested that it &#xA;should be termed &#34;antrumhypertrophy&#34; instead of pyloric hypertrophy.  In his &#xA;experimental work on rabbits, Heinisch attached glass spheres to the interior of the &#xA;gastric fundus through a gastrostomy.  This caused an &#34;impairment of the functional &#xA;unity&#34; of the stomach;  after 4 weeks a definite pyloric muscular thickening, which could &#xA;not be distinguished from pyloric hypertrophy, occurred.  Heinisch (l967) thought that the &#xA;muscular hypertrophy was a compensatory mechanism due to the functional impairment &#xA;of the proximal part of the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Smith (1970) noted that hypertrophic pyloric stenosis could occur in Chagas disease, in &#xA;which myenteric plexus damage occurs.  The general effect of this is loss of co-ordinated &#xA;muscle contractions which propel the bolus analwards, leading to local hypertrophy and &#xA;hyperplasia of smooth muscle.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dodge (l970) found that pentagastrin injections of 3 pregnant bitches produced pyloric &#xA;muscle hypertrophy and duodenal ulceration in some of the offspring.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Keet and Heydenrych (l97l) showed that electrical and mechanical stimulation of the &#xA;vagal nerve trunks in the oesophageal hiatus of the diaphragm in canines, produced a &#xA;temporary, tubular contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, approximately 3.0cm &#xA;in length and exactly resembling hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  Increasing the stimulus &#xA;caused the contraction to become firmer, until it became a rubbery hard cylinder &#xA;simulating the &#34;olive&#34; of IHPS.  It lasted as long as the stimulus was applied, while the &#xA;remainder of the stomach remained flaccid.  A similar result was obtained with &#xA;mechanical stimulation (Chap. 32).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dodge (l973), in a wide ranging review of the genetics of the condition, concluded that &#xA;IHPS had a familial distribution but that this did not obey simple Mendelian laws.  A &#xA;single X-linked gene whose effects were greatly modified by other genetic and/or &#xA;environmental factors would explain the increased risk to male relatives of female &#xA;probands, but the excess of males with IHPS could not be accounted for by X-linkage, as &#xA;male to male transmission occurred with greater frequency than expected.  The most &#xA;likely explanation for the distribution pattern was that multiple genetic and environmental &#xA;factors, including a modifying effect of sex, operated together to produce IHPS.  Female &#xA;patients carried a heavier genetic load and were more likely to have affected male &#xA;relatives.  Suggested environmental factors were the maternal blood group, &#xA;primogeniture, and the occurrence of stress shortly before birth.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Karim, Morrison and Parks (l974) administered daily pentagastrin injections to 12 bitches &#xA;during the second half of pregnancy.  Among 59 offspring 14 developed pyloric muscle &#xA;hypertrophy, and 8 others pyloroduodenal ulcers.  No muscle hypertrophy was seen in the &#xA;controls.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rogers et al. (l975) found no difference in circulating plasma gastrin levels in babies with &#xA;and without IHPS, and concluded that gastrin stimulation was an unlikely cause of the &#xA;muscle hypertrophy.  An alternative hypothesis could be an abnormal response to &#xA;intermittent milk feeding.  This would release cholecystokinin and secretin from the &#xA;duodenal mucosa, causing contraction, and ultimately hypertrophy, of the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dodge and Karim (l976) again found that pentagastrin administered to pregnant bitches &#xA;produced typical pyloric muscular hypertrophy in some of their offspring.  This occurred &#xA;in 16 out of 56 puppies;  some had duodenal ulceration.  The findings indicated a &#xA;variation in the response, with some pups showing no pathological changes while others &#xA;were markedly affected.  It suggested that individual inherent susceptibilities, such as &#xA;genetic and environmental factors, were important determinants of the response.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In electron microscopic studies of the pyloric parasympathetic ganglia in IHPS, Jona &#xA;(l978) found no abnormalities in the neurons and interstitial cells of the nerve plexuses;  &#xA;the maturation process of the ganglia proceeded normally.  A small number of large &#xA;axons, the significance of which was unclear, was present.  While there was a marked &#xA;increase in the overall thickness of the circular musculature, the individual muscle cells &#xA;appeared normal.  In view of the essentially normal morphology, Jona suggested that a &#xA;&#34;functional&#34; etiology should be considered.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Swischuk (l980) evidence was accumulating to suggest that prolonged &#xA;spasm or overactivity of the &#34;antropyloric muscle&#34; was the primary problem in infants &#xA;with IHPS.  It was probable that multiple causes of the muscular spasm could be &#xA;operating.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While numerous factors had been proposed as the cause of IHPS, Haller and Cohen &#xA;(l986) reiterated that the precise etiology remained uncertain.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the radiological examination, here as elsewhere, only the barium suspension in the &#xA;lumen is visible, and from the luminal appearances the alterations in the walls are &#xA;inferred (Chap. 13).  With ultrasonography the actual muscle mass causing narrowing of &#xA;the lumen can usually be demonstrated.  Consequently ultrasound has become the &#xA;investigation of choice for suspected IHPS in many centers.  Pilling (l983) discussed the &#xA;relative sensitivity of radiology and ultrasound in the diagnosis.  Of 26 cases with &#xA;palpable pyloric tumors the mass was not detected by ultrasound in 2;  in these cases, as &#xA;well as in cases without palpable masses, an upper gastrointestinal radiological series was &#xA;deemed necessary.&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;pathogenesis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pathogenesis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pathogenesis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In considering the pathogenesis, it should be noted that many authors held the view that &#xA;the pyloric canal was elongated in IHPS (Shopfner l964;  Shuman et al. l967;  Teele and &#xA;Smith l977;  Strauss et al. l98l;  Graif et al. l984;  Stunden et al. l986;  Bowen l988).  The &#xA;same was implied by Meuwissen and Sloof (l932, l934) and by Jenkinson (l955).  While &#xA;terminological uncertainties have to be taken into account, it is clear that in all these &#xA;instances the &#34;pyloric canal&#34; was equated with the pyloric ring, which was considered to &#xA;be the sphincter.  Meuwissen and Sloof, for instance, stated that the average length of the &#xA;pyloric canal was 1.0 to 2.0 mm in normal infants, which tallies with the width of the &#xA;ring.  According to these authors the essential factor in the pathogenesis was hypertrophy &#xA;and elongation of the pyloric ring or &#34;sphincter&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;However, in dissections of morbid anatomical specimens of IHPS, Cunningham (l906) &#xA;had shown previously that muscular hypertrophy involved the entire length of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder;  it included, but was not limited to, the ring.  Forssell (1913) and &#xA;Torgersen (l942) showed convincingly that the musculature of the entire canalis &#xA;egestorius (the sphincteric cylinder) was involved in the hypertrophy;  the findings were &#xA;subsequently confirmed by Frimann-Dahl (l935), Runstr&#34;m (l939) and Astley (l952).  &#xA;Although he did not refer to the anatomical findings of Cunningham (l906), Forssell &#xA;(l913) and Torgersen (l942), Heinisch (l967) noted that muscular hypertrophy was not &#xA;confined to the pyloric ring but also involved the prepyloric region, which led him to &#xA;suggest the term &#34;antrumhypertrophy&#34; for the condition.  Analysis of our own cases also &#xA;shows that the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in its entirety, is involved.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The premise that the pyloric canal is hypertrophied and elongated in IHPS (where &#34;canal&#34; &#xA;is equated with the pyloric ring or sphincter), is difficult to accept.  In view of the &#xA;evidence quoted it appears much more likely that the entire pyloric sphincteric cylinder is &#xA;involved in the hypertrophy, causing a permanently formed pyloric canal with &#xA;concomitant motility disturbances.  Normally the canal is a fleeting, physiological &#xA;structure, being fully formed at the end of a maximal, cyclical contraction of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13);  in IHPS it is permanent, due to muscular hypertrophy of &#xA;the entire cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In their investigations of IHPS many authors (Teele and Smith l977;  Strauss et al. l98l;  &#xA;Blumhagen and Coombs l98l;  Blumhagen and Noble l983;  Khamapirad and Athey l983;  &#xA;Graif et al. l984) failed to consider the fundamental anatomical findings of Cunningham &#xA;(l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen (l942);  this may account for much of the &#xA;uncertainty surrounding the pathogenesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;etiology&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Etiology&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#etiology&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In considering the etiology, it has to be pointed out that numerous theories have been &#xA;formulated (some of which will be mentioned or recapitulated briefly).  Most authors &#xA;agree that the cause remains obscure.  Freeman (l929) pointed out that the gizzard in &#xA;graminivorous birds was situated in exactly the same location as the pyloric mass in &#xA;IHPS.  Normally in birds, food is mixed with gastric juice in the proventriculus or &#xA;glandular stomach, and ground in the gizzard or muscular stomach.  Similarly, in some &#xA;higher mammals such as the coloured anteater, the gastric outlet is occupied by a heavy &#xA;muscular mass in the same situation as the &#34;tumor&#34; in IHPS.  It was thought that the &#xA;condition could be of an atavistic nature, a reversion to a more primitive form.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Torgersen (l942, 1949) the most likely explanation was a genetic &#xA;disturbance associated with excessive asymmetry;  this could delay or impede regressive &#xA;changes in the circular musculature of the sphincteric cylinder, normally occurring at or &#xA;near birth.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Prolonged pylorospasm was suggested as a possible cause by Meeker and De Nicola &#xA;(l948).  A genetic defect was also postulated by Carter and Powell (l954) and by Rintoul &#xA;and Kirkman (l96l).  McKeown and MacMahon (l955) mentioned the possibility of &#xA;environmental factors.  Belding and Kernohan (l953) demonstrated degeneration of &#xA;neurons in the myenteric ganglia of the affected region;  Rintoul and Kirkman (l96l) were &#xA;unable to substantiate these findings, but postulated an absence of argyrophilic Type I &#xA;Dogiel cells from pyloric myenteric ganglia in IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Friesen et al. (l956) suggested delay in maturation of myenteric ganglion cells;  this &#xA;statement was questioned by Roberts (l959), as premature infants did not have an &#xA;increased incidence of IHPS.  Skoryna et al (l959) thought a congenital neuro-muscular &#xA;dysfunction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder could be responsible for both the infantile &#xA;and adult forms.  Friesen and Pearse (l963) found the ganglion cells in the affected region &#xA;to be present in clumps and not arranged in evenly dispersed layers;  many cells were &#xA;small and immature, suggesting failure or arrest of normal development.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Heinisch (l967) produced hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in rabbits by suturing glass &#xA;spheres to the interior of the fornix.  Keet and Heydenrych (l97l) found that electrical and &#xA;mechanical stimulation of the vagal trunks in the oesophageal hiatus of the diaphragm (in &#xA;canines), produced temporary muscular contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, &#xA;indistinguishable from IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dodge (l970, l973, l976) as well as Karim et al. (l974) produced IHPS in some newborn &#xA;pups by administration of pentagastrin to the mothers (other probands developed &#xA;pyloroduodenal ulcers).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rogers et al. (l975) and Moazam et al (l978) found no difference in plasma gastrin levels &#xA;in infants with and without IHPS, concluding that gastrin stimulation was an unlikely &#xA;cause of the muscular hypertrophy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In view of the fact that the pyloric parasympathetic ganglia and individual muscle cells &#xA;appeared normal at electron microscopy, Jona (l978) suggested a &#34;functional&#34; etiology.  &#xA;Swischuk (l980) thought that prolonged spasm of the &#34;antropyloric muscle&#34; (which could &#xA;be due to a variety of causes) was the primary event.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;conclusion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Conclusion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#conclusion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It has been shown that the pyloric sphincteric cylinder is a specialized muscular region of &#xA;the stomach (Chap. 3), normally lined by pyloric mucosa (Chap. 5).  In the vast majority &#xA;of subjects its vagal supply occurs exclusively via the hepatic branch or branches (Chap. &#xA;8).  Its motility is unique (as far as the stomach is concerned) in that it contracts cyclically &#xA;in a &#34;segmental&#34; or &#34;systolic&#34;, rather than a peristaltic way (Chap. 13).  The contractions &#xA;depend on and are triggered by underlying myoelectric activity (Chap. 16).  In our view &#xA;any one, or a combination of these factors, may have a bearing on the pathogenesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The contraction of the hypertrophied musculature in IHPS closely resembles a normal &#xA;maximal or near-maximal contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13).  In &#xA;the former the contraction is permanent, in the latter of a fleeting nature, occurring in &#xA;cycles with a frequency of approximately 3 per minute during active gastric emptying of &#xA;solids.  Normally when the cylinder is fully contracted, its lumen is obliterated by closely &#xA;packed longitudinal mucosal folds;  barium-filling of furrows between the folds may &#xA;resemble lines or strings (Chap.13).  A similar appearance of the mucosa is seen in IHPS, &#xA;where barium-filling of longitudinal mucosal furrows in the hypertrophied and contracted &#xA;cylinder gives rise to the &#34;string sign&#34; (Fig. 23.0).  In a sense IHPS can be looked upon as &#xA;the pathological counterpart of a maximal normal, physiological contraction of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Radiologically and ultrasonically the narrowing of pylorospasm resembles that of IHPS &#xA;in many respects (Meuwissen and Sloof l932;  Torgersen l942;  Astley l952;  Shopfner &#xA;l964;  Haran et al. l966;  Swischuk l980;  Blumhagen and Coombs l98l;  Bowen l988), &#xA;showing that pylorospasm is not limited to the pyloric ring, but involves the entire pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Astley R.  The radiology of infantile pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Rad&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l952, 25, 342-350.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Belding HH, Kernohan JW.  A morphologic study of the myenteric plexus and &#xA;musculature of the pylorus with special reference to the changes in hypertrophic &#xA;pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; l953, 97, 322-334.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blumhagen JD, Coombs JB.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;J Clin Ultrasound&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 9, 289-292.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Blumhagen JD, Noble HGS.  Muscle thickness in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis:  &#xA;sonographic determination.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg&lt;/em&gt; l983, 140, 221-223.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bowen A.  The vomiting infant:  recent advances and unsettled issues in imaging.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiol Clin North Amer&lt;/em&gt; l988, 26, 377-392.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Carter CO, Powell BW.  Two-generation pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l954, 1, 746-748.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Carver RA, Okorie M, Steiner GM, et al.  Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis:  &#xA;diagnosis from the pyloric muscle index.  &lt;em&gt;Clin Rad&lt;/em&gt; l988, 38, 625-&#xA;627.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dodge JA.  Production of duodenal ulcers and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis by &#xA;administration of pentagastrin to pregnant and newborn dogs.  &lt;em&gt;Nature&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l970, 225, 284-285.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dodge JA.  Genetics of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Clin Gastroent&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l973, 2, 523-538.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dodge JA, Karim AA.  Induction of pyloric hypertrophy by pentagastrin.  An &#xA;animal model for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l976, &#xA;17, 280-284.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt;. &#xA;1913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Freeman L.  Discussion:  The management of recurrent ulcer following partial &#xA;gastrectomy, by Balfour DC.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l929, 90, 535-545.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Friesen SR, Boley JO, Miller DR.  The myenteric plexus of the pylorus:  its early &#xA;normal development and its changes in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; l956, 39, 21-29.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Friesen SR, Pearse AGE.  Pathogenesis of congenital pyloric stenosis:  &#xA;histochemical analysis of pyloric ganglion cells.  &lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; l963, 53, &#xA;604-608.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Frimann-Dahl J.  &amp;#220;ber den Nachweis der sogenannten kongenitalen &#xA;Pylorus-hypertrophie durch R&amp;#246;ntgenuntersuchung.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l935, 16, 331-334.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Graif M.  Itzchak Y, Avigad I, et al.  The pylorus in infancy: overall sonographic &#xA;assessment.  &lt;em&gt;Pediatr Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l984, 14, 14-17.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Haller JO, Cohen HL.  Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: diagnosis using ultrasound.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l986, 161, 335-339.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Haran PJ, Darling DB, Sciammas F.  The value of the double-track sign as a &#xA;differentiating factor between pylorospasm and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in &#xA;infants.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l966, 86, 723-725.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Heinisch HM.  Die sogenannte Pylorushypertrophie im Tierversuch.  &lt;em&gt;Klin &#xA;Wochenschr&lt;/em&gt; l967, 45, 1251-1252.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hirschsprung H.  F&#34;lle von angeborener Pylorusstenose, beobachtet bei &#xA;S&amp;#228;uglingen.  Jahrb Kinderheil, l888, 28, 61-68.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Jenkinson EL.  The pyloric antrum of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad &#xA;Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l955, 73, 905-937.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Jona JZ.  Electron microscopic observations in infantile hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;J Pediatr Surg&lt;/em&gt; l978, 13, 17-20.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Karim AA, Morrison JE, Parks TG.  The role of pentagastrin in the production of &#xA;canine hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and pyloroduodenal ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Brit &#xA;Journ Surg&lt;/em&gt; l974, 61, 327.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD, Heydenrych JJ.  Hiatus hernia, pyloric muscle hypertrophy and &#xA;contracted pyloric segment in adults.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl &#xA;Med&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 113, 217-228.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Khamapirad T, Athey PA.  Ultrasound diagnosis of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;J Pediatr&lt;/em&gt; l983, 102, 23-26.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;McKeown T, MacMahon B.  Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in parent and &#xA;child.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Dis Child&lt;/em&gt; l955, 30, 497-500.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meeker CS, De Nicola RR.  Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a newborn infant.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;J Pediatr&lt;/em&gt; l948, 33, 94-97.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meuwissen T, Sloof JP.  Die roentgenologische Diagnose der kongenitalen, &#xA;hypertrophischen Pylorusstenose.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Paediatr Scand&lt;/em&gt; l932, 14, l9-&#xA;48.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meuwissen T, Slooff J.  Roentgen examination of pyloric canal of infants with &#xA;congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dis Child&lt;/em&gt; l934, 48, &#xA;1304-1315.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Moazam F, Rodgers BM, Talbert JL, et al.  Fasting and postprandial serum &#xA;gastrin levels in infants with congenital hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Ann &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; l978, 188, 623-625.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Pilling DW.  Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis:  a fresh approach to the &#xA;diagnosis.  &lt;em&gt;Clin Rad&lt;/em&gt; l983, 34, 51-53.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rintoul JR, Kirkman NF.  The myenteric plexus in infantile hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Dis Child&lt;/em&gt; l96l, 36, 474-480.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Roberts PAL.  Pathology of infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Proc &#xA;Roy Soc Med&lt;/em&gt; l959, 52, 1022-1023.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rogers IM, Drainer IK, Moore MR, et al.  Plasma gastrin in hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis:  a hypothesis disproved?  &lt;em&gt;Arch Dis Childh&lt;/em&gt; l975, 50, 467-&#xA;471.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Runstr&amp;#246;m G.  On the roentgen-anatomical appearance of congenital pyloric &#xA;stenosis during and after the manifest stage of the disease.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Paediatr &#xA;Scand&lt;/em&gt; l939, 26, 383-433.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Shopfner CE.  The &#34;pyloric tit&#34; in hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l964, 91, 674-679.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Shuman FI, Darling DB, Fisher JH.  The radiographic diagnosis of congenital &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;J Pediatr&lt;/em&gt; l967, 71, 70-74.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skoryna SC, Dolan HS, Gley A.  Development of primary pyloric hypertrophy in &#xA;adults in relation to the structure and function of the pyloric canal.  &lt;em&gt;Surg &#xA;Gynec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; l959, 108, 83-92.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Smith B.  Disorders of the myenteric plexus (progress report).  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;1970, 11, 271-274.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Strauss S, Itzchak Y, Manor A, et al.  Sonography of hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 136, 1057-1058.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stunden RJ, Le Quesne GW, Little KET.  The improved ultrasound diagnosis of &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Pediatr Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l986, 16, 200-205.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Swischuk LE, Heyden CK, Tyson KR.  Atypical muscle hypertrophy in pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg&lt;/em&gt; l980, 134, 481-484.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Swischuk LE.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology of the Newborn and Young Infant&lt;/em&gt;.  &#xA;Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 2nd ed l980, pp 364-381.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Swischuk LE.  &lt;Imaging of the Newborn, Infant, and Young Child&lt;/em&gt;.  &#xA;Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 3rd ed l989, pp 394-413.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Teele RL, Smith EH.  Ultrasound in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypertrophic &#xA;pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;New Eng J Med&lt;/em&gt; l977, 296, 1149-1150.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The developmental anatomy of the pyloric canal and the etiology of &#xA;infantile pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l949, 32, 435-438.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wilson DA, Vanhoutte JJ.  The reliable sonographic diagnosis of hypertrophic &#xA;pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;J Clin Ultrasound&lt;/em&gt; l984, 12, 201-204.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>24 - Adult Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_24/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_24/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;adult-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Adult Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#adult-hypertrophic-pyloric-stenosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although cases of hypertrophy of the pyloric musculature in adults (AHPS) had been &#xA;reported previously, Morton (l930) first concluded that the condition seemed to constitute &#xA;a definite clinical entity.  He described 3 cases, aged 63, 42 and 39 years, in each of in &#xA;each of whom radiographic examination had shown a constant, tubelike narrowing of the &#xA;pyloric ring and immediate prepyloric area, 2.5 to 3.0 cm in length in one of the cases.  &#xA;(Measurements were not given in the other two).  At operation the lesion was found to be &#xA;due to hypertrophy of the pyloric muscularis externa in all instances;  there were no &#xA;associated lesions such as gastric or duodenal ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kirklin and Harris (l933) described the radiographic signs of AHPS as elongation and &#xA;narrowing of the pyloric canal together with evidence of gastric outlet obstruction.  While &#xA;these signs were not pathognomonic, a distinctive sign was a concave indentation of the &#xA;base of the duodenal bulb, produced by partial invagination of the hypertrophied pyloric &#xA;muscle into the duodenum.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  It has subsequently been shown that &#xA;various other conditions, ranging from normal contraction of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder to pyloric carcinoma, may produce similar duodenal indentation, as described in &#xA;Chapters 13 and 33).  In 50 cases of pyloric muscular hypertrophy in adults associated &#xA;lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract, such as gastric and duodenal ulceration, were &#xA;present in 35.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;North and Johnson (l950) stated that many cases of secondary pyloric hypertrophy, i.e. &#xA;cases in whom the hypertrophy was associated with either benign or malignant gastric &#xA;ulceration, had been reported prior to that time.  The associated lesion was often situated &#xA;away from the pyloric region in the more proximal part of the stomach.  In primary &#xA;AHPS, on the other hand, there were no associated gastric lesions.  They were able to &#xA;collect 59 case reports of verified primary AHPS, and described 5 cases of their own.  It &#xA;was stated that the lesion was not always easily recognizable at operation, a firm mass, or &#xA;at least a thickening, being usually but not invariably palpable.  When the condition was &#xA;suspected, and when the exterior of the stomach appeared normal, a gastrostomy with &#xA;examination of the lumen and palpation of the wall was necessary.  Although the normal &#xA;variations in the thickness of the pyloric musculature had not been clearly defined at that &#xA;time, Truesdale (1915) had previously determined that the normal thickness of the &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34; (presumably referring to the pyloric ring) was 5.0 mm on an average, while &#xA;Horwitz et al. (l929) found the range in thickness to vary from 3.8 to 8.5 mm with an &#xA;average of 5.8 mm;  both made their measurements upon fixed specimens in which the &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34; had been sectioned.  North and Johnson (l950) found that in most of the &#xA;recorded cases of primary AHPS in which data were available, the pyloric muscle &#xA;measurements were considerably above this normal range and the same applied in their &#xA;cases.  The outstanding pathological feature of the lesion was hypertrophy and &#xA;hyperplasia of the circular muscle layer, which was thickest at the pyloric ring, &#xA;diminishing gradually over the &#34;antrum&#34; for a distance of 3.0 to 4.0 cm.  The longitudinal &#xA;muscle coat might also show a moderate grade of hypertrophy and the submucosa and &#xA;mucosa might contain foci of cellular infiltration, consisting of plasma cells, lymphocytes &#xA;and some neutrophils.  Macroscopically the condition caused an unyielding tumor &#xA;occupying the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the stomach.  The macroscopic appearances of &#xA;infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS) and primary adult hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis (AHPS) were almost identical.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;McNaught (l957) described 5 cases of AHPS, in 3 of whom there was no associated &#xA;lesion, while in 2 an associated gastric ulcer was found at operation.  It appears from the &#xA;description that the ulcer was away from (i.e. proximal to) the area of muscular &#xA;hypertrophy in both cases.  This author found the lesion in AHPS to be comparable to &#xA;simple hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infants, and to him it was clear that the lesion was &#xA;limited to the canalis egestorius or pyloric sphincteric cyclinder, as postulated by &#xA;Torgersen (1942).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Craver (l957) reported 11 cases of AHPS encountered during a 24 year period.  In 5 of &#xA;these there was no concomitant upper gastrointestinal lesion, in 3 there was associated &#xA;gastric ulceration, in 2 associated duodenal ulceration and in one associated haemorrhagic &#xA;gastritis.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  It is not stated clearly what the location of the gastric &#xA;ulcers was, but it appears if they were proximal to the area of muscular hypertrophy).  &#xA;The gross appearance at operation resembled that found in IHPS, with a firm, unyielding, &#xA;fusiform or circular tumor mass occupying the distal 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the stomach.  The &#xA;consistency varied from that of soft rubber to cartilage and it was thickest at the pyloro-&#xA;duodenal junction, thinning out gradually over the &#34;antrum&#34;;  distally it stopped abruptly &#xA;at the pyloric ring.  In 8 of the cases measurements showed that the muscular thickness &#xA;ranged from 12 to 20 mm, with an average of 15.4 mm.  This was 2 to 3 times the &#xA;average thickness (7.1 mm) found in a series of normal controls.  Microscopically there &#xA;was both hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the circular layer, the muscular fibres being &#xA;increased in size as well as in number.  There were no inflammatory changes or oedema.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a series of 25 cases coming to laparotomy, Desmond and Swynnerton (l957) found &#xA;associated gastric ulceration in 12, duodenal ulceration in 6, pyloric ulceration in one and &#xA;mucosal prolapse in 2, while 6 cases had no associated lesion (some cases had more than &#xA;one associated condition).  At operation the lesion presented as a white, regular, &#xA;glistening muscular mass with a normal serosa and a loose, lax submucosa.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The finding is similar to the appearance seen during &#xA;experimental truncal vagal stimulation in canines as described in Chap. 32).  It could &#xA;readily be differentiated from a grey, irregular, infiltrative type of carcinoma.&#xA;Lumsden and Truelove (l958) described cases which showed that AHPS might be a &#xA;sequel to IHPS, or it might arise de novo in adults.  In the first category 5 patients who &#xA;had received medical treatment for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in infancy, showed &#xA;radiological abnormalities campatible with AHPS in later life.  Similar cases were &#xA;described by other authors (Chap. 23);  most of these adult cases were symptom-free.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Skoryna et al. (l959) described 6 cases with the morphology based on Torgersen&#39;s &#xA;anatominal concepts.  In 2 cases there was hypertrophy of the circular musculature of the &#xA;pyloric canal (i.e. presumably the pyloric sphincteric cylinder) without other macroscopic &#xA;lesions in the stomach and duodenum (one of the cases showed microscopic evidence of &#xA;chronic gastritis);  these were labelled cases of diffuse primary pyloric hypertrophy &#xA;without associated proximal gastric lesions.  In one case hypertrophy of the circular &#xA;musculature of the &#34;pyloric canal&#34; was associated with a gastric ulcer on the lesser &#xA;curvature 6.0 cm orally to the pylorus (i.e. approximately 3.0 cm orally to the &#xA;commencement of the sphincteric cylinder) together with associated chronic gastritis;  &#xA;this was called a case of diffuse primary pyloric hypertrophy associated with a proximal &#xA;gastric lesion.  In another case there was moderate hypertrophy of the musculature of the &#xA;entire pyloric canal, with a relatively greater degree of hypertrophy of the circular muscle &#xA;on the lesser curvature at the muscle knot;  there was no associated gastric or duodenal &#xA;lesion, and Skoryna et al. (1959) considered it to be an example of primary pyloric &#xA;hypertrophy of the focal type.  (This case is also quoted in Chap. 25).  One case exhibited &#xA;benign ulceration within the confines of the &#34;pyloric canal&#34; (with muscular hypertrophy &#xA;of its walls), and another had pyloric muscle hypertrophy with extensive surrounding &#xA;adhesions and fibrosis, suggesting a previous inflammatory process (probably a duodenal &#xA;ulcer).  These 2 cases were considered to be pyloric muscular hypertrophy secondary to a &#xA;distal obstructive lesion, e.g. obstructive complications of pyloric or duodenal ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Knight (l961) described 7 cases of AHPS;  four of these were of a focal nature and are &#xA;considered elsewhere (Chap. 25).  Two of the remaining cases had diffuse enlargement of &#xA;the pyloric musculature similar to IHPS, without evidence of gastric or duodenal &#xA;ulceration.  Gallstones were present in one of these, for which a cholecystectomy was &#xA;performed.  Both cases needed pyloroplasty.  In the last case there was diffuse pyloric &#xA;muscular hypertrophy involving a segment 2.5 cm in length, with a benign gastric ulcer &#xA;6.0 cm proximal to the pylorus.  According to Knight (1961), hypertrophy in IHPS &#xA;involves the entire circumference, while in the adult it may involve only a localized &#xA;segment of the pyloric musculature.  In IHPS hypertrophy always seems to occur as a &#xA;primary condition, without associated upper gastro-intestinal pathology, while in the &#xA;adult associated peptic ulceration or gastritis is common.  This author found the thickness &#xA;of the &#34;pylorus&#34; in 10 fresh post-mortem adult stomachs to range from 4.0 to 7.0 mm, &#xA;with an average of 5.1 mm, while the thickness ranged from 10 to 15 mm in AHPS.  The &#xA;gross appearance of the pylorus in AHPS was similar to that of IHPS.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Edwards (1961) recognized two types of AHPS, viz. an idiopathic form, in which no &#xA;other gastric lesion was present, and a secondary form in which there was some &#xA;associated lesion such as gastric or duodenal ulceration or gastric carcinoma.  It was &#xA;stated that the etiology remained doubtful and among the possibilities to be considered &#xA;were persistence of the infantile form, degeneration of the myenteric plexus and long &#xA;continued pylorospasm.  Pathologically the circular musculature was increased in &#xA;thickness from the usual 3.0 to 8.0 mm to a maximum of 30 mm with an average of 15 &#xA;mm.  Radiologically elongation and narrowing of the pyloric canal was present.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Christiansen and Grantham (l962) collected 56 case reports published subsequent to the &#xA;review by North and Johnson (l950), and added 2 of their own.  In both their cases the &#xA;gross and histological appearances were indistinguishable from those of IHPS.  Of the 58 &#xA;cases reviewed, 34 had no associated lesion in the upper gastrointestinal tract, but the &#xA;remaining 24 had associated pathology, the most common lesions being gastritis (9), &#xA;cholecysititis (7) and hiatus hernia (4).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Seaman (l963) reported 27 cases of AHPS, of which l8 had an associated gastric ulcer &#xA;and 2 more had evidence of previous gastric ulceration.  It is not clear from the &#xA;description what the position of the gastric ulcer was in each case.  Most of the other &#xA;cases had microscopic evidence of gastritis, while 2 had duodenal ulceration (one of these &#xA;also had a gastric ulcer.)  There was no evidence of obstruction in the duodenal ulcer &#xA;cases.  While accepting the normal measurements of Horwitz (l929), Craver (l957) and &#xA;Knight (l961), Seaman (l963) found that the thickness of the pyloric musculature in his &#xA;cases varied from 9.0 to 15 mm, with an average of 11.2 mm.  He found the gross &#xA;appearance of AHPS to be similar to that of IHPS, the thickest portion of the musculature &#xA;being at the pyloroduodenal junction, ending abruptly at the duodenum, but decreasing &#xA;gradually as it faded into the &#34;antrum&#34; on the gastric side.  Seaman based the morphology &#xA;of the lesion in AHPS on the muscular anatomy as determined by Forssell (l913), Cole &#xA;(l928) and Torgersen (l942).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wieser et al. (l963) reviewed 44 operatively confirmed cases of AHPS.  The condition &#xA;was defined as any non-carcinomatous wall-thickening in the canalis egestorius, &#xA;irrespective of its etiology.  Two types were recognized, viz. a purely muscular form and &#xA;a mixed form in which additional evidence of gastritis was present in the mucosa and &#xA;submucosa.  Twenty percent of the cases were associated with hiatus hernia, and gastric &#xA;ulceration was present in 50 percent;  this was probably not coincidental, the ulceration &#xA;being deemed to be secondary to the pyloric stenosis.  Radiologically there was &#xA;elongation and narrowing of the pyloric canal with a prepyloric outpouching, altered &#xA;peristalsis and a concave indentation of the base of the duodenal bulb.  The condition had &#xA;to be differentiated from early pyloric carcinoma.&#xA;Keynes (l965) found that 132 cases of simple, primary or idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis in adults, i.e. muscular hypertrophy without associated lesions, had been &#xA;described in the English literature up to that time.  These included 64 case reports &#xA;collected from, or added to the literature by North and Johnson (l950), as well as 56 cases &#xA;reviewed by Christiansen and Grantham (l962) and 2 new cases added by them.  Keynes &#xA;(l965) described the clinical, radiological and pathological findings in 12 new cases of &#xA;AHPS, 6 of whom had associated peptic ulceration (3 duodenal, 2 gastric and one &#xA;pyloric), and were designated &#34;complicated&#34; AHPS.  The remaining 6 had no associated &#xA;upper gastro-intestinal lesion and were of the &#34;simple&#34; variety.  The gross appearance of &#xA;the pylorus in diffuse AHPS, both in the simple and the complicated types, was similar to &#xA;that in IHPS:  a smooth, firm or rubbery hard tumor occupied the region of the pylorus, &#xA;ending abruptly at the duodenum, where it was at its thickest.  From here the muscular &#xA;thickening gradually decreased towards the proximal end of the pyloric canal.  &#xA;Histologically there was hypertrophy of the circular fibres with occasional moderate &#xA;longitudinal muscular hypertrophy.  Keynes (l965) noted no abnormality in the ganglion &#xA;cells of the myenteric plexuses.  The affected region was limited to the pyloric &#34;canal&#34; &#xA;(pyloric sphincteric cylinder) as described by Cunningham (1906), Horton (1928) and &#xA;Torgersen (l942).  In infants the hypertrophy was always of the simple variety, since it &#xA;occurred in the absence of other gastro-intestinal pathology, but in adults it could be &#xA;complicated.  Although simple AHPS was uncommon, Keynes (l965) did not believe it &#xA;was as rare as the literature seemed to suggest.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Du Plessis (l966) described 6 cases of what he termed primary hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis commencing in adult life without apparent cause.  Gastric resection was &#xA;performed in 2, both of which showed atrophic gastritis and gastric ulceration.  These &#xA;cases would have been classified secondary AHPS by North and Johnson (1950), and &#xA;primary AHPS associated with a proximal gastric lesion by Skoryna (l959), Knight (l961) &#xA;and Christiansen and Grantham (l962).  Keynes (l965) would have designated them &#xA;&#34;complicated&#34; AHPS.   Du Plessis (l966) looked upon them as &#34;primary&#34; as he &#xA;considered the gastric ulceration to be the effect of stasis secondary to the pyloric &#xA;stenosis.  In both resection specimens the circular muscle along the greater curvature &#xA;showed a marked increase in thickness at the pylorus and for a distance of 2.5 cm &#xA;proximally.  Along the lesser curvature the circular muscle was increased in thickness at &#xA;the pylorus and up to 1.5 cm proximally.  In contrast the longitudinal musculature &#xA;showed a decrease in thickness over the pylorus and for some distance proximally.  The &#xA;ganglion cells in the myenteric plexuses of the 2 cases appeared normal.  In 4 cases there &#xA;was no associated pathology in the stomach and duodenum.  Biopsies taken at the time of &#xA;operation in all 6 cases showed atrophic gastritis and confirmed the deficiency in the &#xA;longitudinal musculature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Interpreting his findings on the anatomical concepts of Torgersen (l942), Du Plessis &#xA;(l966) suggested that the cause of AHPS was a deficiency of the longitudinal musculature &#xA;of the pyloric canal (i.e. pyloric sphincteric cylinder), which would result in a failure of &#xA;the canal to shorten during contraction.  This would cause an imbalance of longitudinal &#xA;and circular muscle contractions resulting in functional obstruction.  The circular fibres &#xA;of the fan-shaped muscle would gradually become hypertrophied as a result of repeated &#xA;ineffective contractions, adding a mechanical element to the obstruction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Larson et al. (l967) enumerated the generally accepted radiographic signs as lengthening &#xA;and narrowing of the pyloric canal with an intact mucosal relief, a contrast filled cleft in &#xA;the centre of the canal and a crescentic indentation of the duodenal bulb.  In 10 cases in &#xA;whom radiographs showed clear evidence of AHPS, surgical exploration revealed a &#xA;normal stomach in 5, pyloric carcinoma in 2, AHPS in 1, AHPS and a gastric ulcer in 1, &#xA;while one case showed evidence of prior surgical treatment for IHPS.  It was concluded &#xA;that there was little direct correlation between the radiographic appearance of pyloric &#xA;elongation and narrowing on the one hand, and pyloric muscle thickness on the other.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bodon and Haake (l968) called attention to the frequent association of AHPS with hiatus &#xA;hernia and reported 11 cases of their own.  In these cases the surgical solution was to &#xA;correct the pyloric hypertrophy by means of pyloroplasty or antrectomy, necessitating an &#xA;abdominal (as opposed to a transthoracic) approach.  At operation the diagnosis of &#xA;pyloric hypertrophy was not difficult, the hypertrophied muscle presenting as a mass 4.0 &#xA;to 10 mm thick and 1.0 to 5.0 cm long.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At gastroscopy the hypertrophied muscle resembles the uterine cervix, according to &#xA;Schuster and Smith (l969).  The pyloric opening presents as a hole of fixed diameter in &#xA;the centre of the mound, thus contrasting with the actively mobile pyloric region of &#xA;normal subjects.  The affected region, unlike the normal &#34;antrum&#34;, does not respond to &#xA;anticholinergics.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bateson et al. (l969) described l7 cases of AHPS, in 4 of whom there was an associated &#xA;lesser curvature gastric ulcer, and in one a prepyloric ulcer.  None of these cases had &#xA;associated duodenal ulceration.  Macroscopically every case showed hypertrophy of the &#xA;&#34;pyloric and prepyloric muscle&#34;, stopping abruptly at the &#34;pyloric canal&#34; (i.e. pyloric &#xA;aperture) and thinning out gradually over the adjacent part of the &#34;antrum&#34;.  Although the &#xA;hypertrophy was most marked at the pyloroduodenal junction, it also involved the wall of &#xA;the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;, and a more accurate title according to Bateson et al. (l969) would &#xA;have been hypertrophic pyloric channel disease, the pyloric channel being defined as the &#xA;area between the duodenum and a point 2.5 cm proximal to the duodenum.  In 5 of the &#xA;cases it was noted that on touching the pylorus with a gloved finger during operation, the &#xA;pyloric and adjacent antral muscle contracted, becoming hard and pale.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  a similar appearance was seen during experimental truncal vagal &#xA;stimulation as described in Chapter 32).  This spasm probably accounted as much for the &#xA;radiological appearances as did the degree and extent of muscle hypertrophy and, in their &#xA;opinion, made careful measurement of the muscle thickness an academic exercise of &#xA;doubtful value.  Microscopically hypertrophy and hyperplasia of the circular muscle &#xA;fibres was seen with fibrous tissue between the hypertrophied bundles in every case.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In his review Levin (l97l) came to the conclusion that the radiographic diagnosis of &#xA;AHPS could not be made with a high degree of confidence.  While the signs of &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis were diagnostic in infants, this was not always the case in &#xA;adults.  Nevertheless several reports had indicated that AHPS represented persistence of a &#xA;mild form of IHPS.  In his view the poor correlation between the radiographic and &#xA;pathologic findings led to the conclusion that the elongated, narrowed pylorus was at &#xA;times due to spasm.  In those patients proved to have AHPS, gastric or duodenal &#xA;ulceration or gastritis had been present in the majority.  Indirect evidence suggested that &#xA;these conditions were the sequelae and not the cause of pyloric muscle hypertrophy.  It &#xA;was important to exclude pyloric carcinoma as a cause of the narrowing in every case.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Most authors agree that adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (AHPS) is a rare condition.  &#xA;In approximately 17,000 upper gastrointestinal barium examinations over a 5 year period &#xA;we diagnosed the condition not more than 3 or 4 times;  these patients were lost to &#xA;follow-up and the diagnosis could not be verified.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;types-of-ahps&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Types of AHPS&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#types-of-ahps&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;primary-idiopathic-or-simple&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Primary, Idiopathic or Simple&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#primary-idiopathic-or-simple&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;AHPS may occur in the absence of other pathology in the upper gastrointestinal tract.  An &#xA;analysis of 129 verified cases encountered in the literature, showed that 51 had no &#xA;associated lesions (Table 24.1).  In addition to the above Morton (1930) described 3, &#xA;North and Johnson (1950) 5, Lumsden and Truelove (1958) 5, Christiansen and &#xA;Grantham (l962) 2, and Larsen et al. (l967) one case of verified AHPS without &#xA;concomitant lesions.  (These were individual cases, not forming part of larger groups).  &#xA;These cases have been termed primary (North and Johnson l950), idiopathic (Edwards &#xA;l96l) or simple (Keynes l965) AHPS.  In order to differentiate the condition from focal &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis Skoryna et al. (l959) designated them cases of diffuse &#xA;primary pyloric hypertrophy without associated proximal gastric lesions.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA; &lt;tt&gt;&#xA; &lt;b&gt;Table 24.1.&lt;/b&gt; Analysis of 129 verified cases of AHPS encountered in the literature&#xA; &lt;/tt&gt;&#xA;  &lt;table border=0 width=100%&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Authors&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;No. of verified AHPS cases&lt;/td&gt;&#xA; &lt;td&gt;No. of AHPS cases without associated lesions&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Kirklin &amp;amp; Harris (1933)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;50&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;15&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Desmond &amp;amp; Swynnerton (1957)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;25&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Craver (1957)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;11&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;McNaught (1957)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;5&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Skoryna et al. (1959)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Knight (1961)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Keynes (1965)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;12&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;6&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Bateson et al. (1969)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;17&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;12&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;TOTAL&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;129&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;51&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;tt&gt;AHPS: adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>25 - Focal Hypertrophy and Focal Spasm of the Pyloric Musculature in Adults</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_25/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_25/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;focal-hypertrophy-and-focal-spasm-of-the-pyloric-musculature-in-adults&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Focal Hypertrophy and Focal Spasm of the Pyloric Musculature in Adults&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#focal-hypertrophy-and-focal-spasm-of-the-pyloric-musculature-in-adults&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In l952 Bachmann reported 12 cases with localized areas of hypertrophy of the pyloric &#xA;musculature in adults.  In each instance the hypertrophied area was situated on the lesser &#xA;curvature;  it was found as incidental pathology in a series of 600 autopsies and none of &#xA;the cases had any other abnormalities of the stomach and duodenum.  The cases were &#xA;divided into three groups according to their relationship to the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34;.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;: the &#34;sphincter&#34; was equated with the pyloric ring).  In the first &#xA;group (5 cases) the thickening was situated directly in the &#34;sphincter&#34;;  it resembled an &#xA;enlarged version of the normal sphincter, consisting mainly of circular but also &#xA;containing some irregular and longitudinal muscle fibres.  In the second group (4 cases) &#xA;the thickening was located a very short distance orally to the &#34;sphincter&#34;, being separated &#xA;from it by a narrow zone of normal tissues.  In the third group (3 cases) it was situated in &#xA;the &#34;sphincter&#34; as well as in the immediate prepyloric part.  In the first two groups it &#xA;appeared to be of a rounded or nodular character (while differing distinctly from a &#xA;myoma), and in the third group it was rather longer than wide.  In considering the &#xA;pathogenesis, Bachmann asked himself whether these cases indicated that a certain part &#xA;of the pyloric musculature was liable to undergo hypertrophy by virtue of its having a &#xA;specialized function or structure.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Keet (l956) reported 2 adult operative cases in which the gastric resection specimens &#xA;showed, as incidental pathology, a localized area of thickening of the pyloric musculature &#xA;on the lesser curvature of the stomach.  In the first case a true muscular hypertrophy was &#xA;present;  in the second the thickening appeared to be in the nature of a spasm, as it &#xA;disappeared during the course of a few hours.  We believe that the localized or focal &#xA;pyloric muscular thickening in these two cases lends itself to a rational explanation on &#xA;anatomical grounds, as indicated below.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 25.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; G.V.L., 50 year old male, was admitted for partial gastrectomy because of &#xA;a non-healing gastric ulcer, having had ulcer symptoms for the previous 12 years.  &#xA;Radiographic examination 6 years prior to admission had shown a tiny excrescence on &#xA;the lesser curvature of the stomach 1.5 cm proximal to the pylorus, which was interpreted &#xA;as a gastric ulcer.  Three years prior to admission a second radiographic examination &#xA;reported an ulcer niche on the lesser curvature, but failed to state its exact situation.  Four &#xA;months before admission a third radiographic examination showed a large gastric ulcer &#xA;niche halfway up the lesser curvature in the region of the incisura angularis;  there was no &#xA;sign of the ulcer previously mentioned proximal to the pylorus.  At operation the gall &#xA;bladder was distended and contained calculi;  there were no adhesions to the duodenum &#xA;or pylorus.  Palpation of the stomach in situ revealed a thickening of softish consistency &#xA;in the pylorus on the lesser curvature side, diagnosed provisionally as a gastric polyp.  A &#xA;large gastric ulcer of the middle of the lesser curvature was seen and felt.  Partial &#xA;gastrectomy was done, the duodenum being divided 3.0 cm distal to the pyloric ring, well &#xA;beyond the palpable thickening.  A retrocolic gastrojejunal anastomosis was made and a &#xA;cholecystectomy performed.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The macroscopic pathological examination of the resection specimen showed a large &#xA;gastric ulcer on the lesser curvature 7.0 cm proximal to the pylorus.  A mucosal fold, &#xA;approximately l.0 cm high, separated the lumen of the stomach from that of the &#xA;duodenum.  In the pylorus, on the lesser curvature side and jutting into this mucosal fold, &#xA;a rounded, pea-sized, rubbery hard mass was situated in the gastric wall.  The mucosa, &#xA;which was freely mobile on the underlying layers, was less mobile over the mass.  There &#xA;was no naked-eye evidence of ulceration locally.  Microscopic examination showed the &#xA;mass to consist of hyperplasia of the circular muscle (Fig. 25.1);  it was not a myoma as it &#xA;was not well defined and merged gradually into the surrounding circular muscle.  The &#xA;submucosa overlying the thickening was rather thin and contained numerous blood &#xA;vessels.  The pyloric mucosa and submucosa showed infiltration with inflammatory cells &#xA;and changes of chronic gastritis.  The ulcer on the middle of the lesser curvature proved &#xA;to be a chronic, benign ulcer penetrating into the muscle layers.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/25-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 25.1.&lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case G.V.L.  Microscopic section of pyloric nodule on lesser curvature side of &#xA;pyloroduodenal junction, showing great hypertrophy of circular muscle fibres.  Thin &#xA;overlying submucosa&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 25.2&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; M.B., 58 year old female, was admitted because of achylia gastrica.  &#xA;Radiographic examination showed an irregularity on the lesser curvature at the incusura &#xA;angularis, which was regarded as a probable early gastric carcinoma.  Partial gastrectomy &#xA;was performed.  The macroscopic examination of the fresh resection specimen showed a &#xA;few hemorragic spots in its proximal part.  At the pylorus, on the lesser curvature side, a &#xA;hard pea-sized nodule was felt in the gastric wall.  It was not particualrly well defined &#xA;and was presumed to be a local thickening of the pyloric musculature.  Microscopic &#xA;examination showed well marked chronic gastritis with a few erosive defects in the &#xA;mucosa and fibrotic tissue in the submucosa.  When the specimen was handled again a &#xA;few hours after it had been received, it was noted that the nodule previously felt at the &#xA;pylorus on the lesser curvature side had disappeared.  Except for the chronic gastritis no &#xA;microscopical abnormalities were seen in the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;em&gt;Comments&lt;/em&gt;:  Care should be taken with the interpretation of localized &#xA;thickenings in gastric resection specimens, as these may be artifacts due to the application &#xA;of clamps.  This can be ruled out in the first case, since the thickening was felt with the &#xA;stomach in situ and before clamps were applied.  In the second case there was no obvious &#xA;damage to the gastric wall at the site, such as one would expect after a clamp.  The &#xA;question may also arise whether the muscular thickening in the first case was not caused &#xA;by healing of the old ulcer.  Several points mitigate against this.  The tiny excrescence &#xA;originally interpreted as an ulcer niche was situated some distance orally to the pyloric &#xA;aperture and not at the orifice, where the muscular thickening was subsequently felt.  &#xA;Second, the microscopic appearances were quite different from those of a healed gastric &#xA;ulcer.  Third, reference to the original radiographs raised serious doubt as to whether the &#xA;excrescence was in fact an ulcer and not due to barium filling a furrow between mucosal &#xA;folds.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The cases show, therefore, that there was focal thickening of the pyloric musculature, &#xA;located in both cases on the lesser curvature at the pyloric aperture.  In the first case the &#xA;thickening was due to muscle hypertrophy, in the second to a temporary spasm.  In both &#xA;cases it was an incidental finding, and in both there was evidence of chronic gastritis, &#xA;with an active gastric ulcer halfway up the lesser curvature in the first case.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;From the above it will be clear that the focal muscular thickening in our 2 cases occurred &#xA;in the exact situation of the pyloric muscle torus or muscle knot as described by &#xA;Torgersen (l942).  To the best of our knowledge these were the first cases to be reported &#xA;in which it was shown that the anatomic basis for this entity derived from Torgersen&#39;s &#xA;interpretation of the anatomy.  Subsequently a number of authors based their findings in &#xA;focal pyloric hypertrophy as well as in adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis on the anatomy &#xA;as determined by Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen (l942) (Chap. 3).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;While Bachmann (1952) did not refer to Torgersen&#39;s findings, it is interesting to note that &#xA;the hypertrophy in his first first group of cases occurred in exactly the same situation, and &#xA;he in fact stated that the appearance resembled an enlarged version of a normal section of &#xA;that region.  Morphologically the cases described in Bachmann&#39;s second and third groups &#xA;appear to be related to the first.  Referring to the normal prepyloric contractions as &#xA;described earlier (Chap. 13), it seems that the muscular hypertrophy in his second group &#xA;occurred in the area where the peristaltic wave stops, i.e. a short distance orally to the &#xA;pyloric aperture.  The site and extent of muscular hypertrophy in his third group &#xA;corresponds to the area of contraction on the lesser curvature normally occurring during a &#xA;near maximal contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Skoryna et al. (l959), in their description of 6 cases of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, &#xA;included one case with moderate thickening of the entire pyloric &#34;canal&#34;, with an &#xA;additional small nodular mass on the lesser curvature side of the &#34;canal&#34; (i.e. at the &#xA;muscle knot).  Pathologically this proved to be a muscular nodule composed of circular &#xA;fibres, diagnosed as focal hyperplasia of the muscle knot.  There was no associated &#xA;ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Mack (l959) described another case of focal hypertrophy of the muscle torus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 4 of the 7 cases of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis described by Knight (l96l), the &#xA;hypertrophy was of a focal nature.  In two of these it was localized to the muscle knot on &#xA;the superior aspect (i.e. lesser curvature side) of the pyloric ring.  In both the nodule was &#xA;l.0 cm in diameter and consisted of circular muscle fibres.  In the third case the &#xA;hypertrophy was more extensive, involving the greater curvature and posterior wall, but &#xA;not encircling the lumen, and extending proximally from the pyloric ring for a distance of &#xA;3.0 to 4.0 cm (i.e. the length of the sphincteric cylinder).  In the fourth case a l.0 cm &#xA;nodule of circular muscle fibres was found in the pylorus on the greater curvature side.  &#xA;None of these cases had associated gastric or duodenal ulceration, but chronic gastritis &#xA;was present in two.  Knight concluded that focal hypertrophy was not necessarily limited &#xA;to the muscle knot, but that it could occur anywhere in the pyloric musculature.  Whether &#xA;it represented an early stage of diffuse hypertrophy was not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Heidenblut (l96l) described a case in whom a benign gastric ulcer was situated in the &#xA;anterior gastric wall l.5 cm proximal to the pyloric ring.  Directly opposite the ulcer in the &#xA;posterior gastric wall a localized area of muscular thickening was found. It was thickest &#xA;at the pylorus and extended for a short distance proximally into the &#34;antrum&#34;, gradually &#xA;thinning out.  Microscopically it consisted of hypertrophied circular fibres.  Changes of &#xA;chronic gastritis were present in the mucosa and submucosa.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wellman et al. (l964) described the autopsy findings in an elderly patient in whom an &#xA;area of focal muscular hypertrophy occurred on the lesser curvature of the pyloric and &#xA;immediate prepyloric region.  The hypertrophy was confined to the circular musculature &#xA;and was diagnosed as torus hyperplasia.  A superficial erosion was seen in the overlying &#xA;mucosa but no ulceration or ulcer scar was evident.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Seaman (l963, l966) described 4 adult cases of focal hypertrophy of the pyloric muscle in &#xA;which the hypertrophy was limited to the muscle torus or knot.  In all cases a firm, &#xA;rounded, intramural mass was palpated at the lesser curvature aspect of the pyloric ring in &#xA;the situation of the muscle knot.  It varied in diameter in the different cases from 1.0 to &#xA;2.0 cm.  In one case there was associated cholelithiasis and an hiatus hernia, in another a &#xA;duodenal ulcer, and in a third associated atrophic gastritis;  none was associated with a &#xA;gastric ulcer.  In all cases microscopic examination showed focal hypertrophy of the &#xA;pyloric musculature.  Of the 4 cases, one showed no definite radiographic abnormality.  &#xA;Two cases exhibited a widening of the space between the base of the duodenal bulb and &#xA;the distal &#34;antrum&#34; on the lesser curvature side, i.e. a widening of the lesser curvature &#xA;side of the pyloric ring.  The fourth case showed a flattening of the distal lesser curvature &#xA;of the &#34;antrum&#34; with a small protrusion which was not constant and not caused by an &#xA;ulcer.&#xA;Aron et al. (l973) described the case of an elderly female in whom radiographic &#xA;examination showed an hiatus hernia and a large filling defect on the lesser curvature side &#xA;of the &#34;distal antrum&#34; with narrowing of the antral outlet.  Endoscopy revealed &#xA;oesophagitis while an irregular submucosal lesion measuring 2.5 cm x 0.5 cm was seen &#xA;approximately l.0 to 2.0 cm proximal to the pylorus on the lesser curvature side;  biopsy &#xA;showed a normal mucosa.  At operation a localized, firm, nodular mass measuring 3.0 cm &#xA;in length and extending from the pylorus to the &#34;distal antrum&#34; on the lesser curvature, &#xA;was found.  Histology revealed marked hypertrophy of the circular musculature, &#xA;diagnosed as torus hyperplasia which had presented as a gastric pseudotumor.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l977) investigated the morphology of the &#xA;pylorus and &#34;antrum&#34; in gastric ulcer disease.  In a series of 77 cases the ulcer was &#xA;adjacent to the pylorus in 10, and in other parts of the stomach in 67.  Focal areas of &#xA;muscle hypertrophy which distorted either the &#34;antrum&#34;, the pyloric ring or both were &#xA;commonly found.  The hypertrophy was not uniform but irregular, involving different &#xA;parts of the pylorus and &#34;antrum&#34; to a variable degree.  The findings were not described &#xA;in detail nor interpreted in the light of the anatomy as determined by Cunningham (1906), &#xA;Forssell (1913) and Torgersen (1942).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;/b&gt; &#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At least 27 cases of focal hypertrophy (including one of focal spasm) of the pyloric &#xA;musculature in adults have been described in detail in the literature.  Seventeen were not &#xA;associated with other lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract and apparently occurred de &#xA;novo.  Four cases were associated with chronic or atrophic gastritis (one also had achylia &#xA;gastrica), one with an acute erosion, 2 with hiatus hernia, 2 with gastric and one with &#xA;duodenal ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 17 cases the hypertrophy (or spasm in one case) was limited to the pyloric muscle &#xA;torus or knot.  (The l7 cases in this group do not tally with the l7 mentioned above).  &#xA;Normally contraction of the pyloric muscle knot is a fleeting occurrence, being part of &#xA;cyclical contraction of the sphincteric cylinder;  it causes an evanescent widening of the &#xA;lesser curvature part of the pyloric ring (Chap. 13).  In focal hypertrophy of the muscle &#xA;knot the mass occurs in the same situation and is permanent.  The condition may be &#xA;considered to be the pathological counterpart of a physiological stage of contraction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Radiographically Seaman (l966) noted a permanent widening of the lesser curvature side &#xA;of the pyloric ring in 2 of his 4 cases of torus hyperplasia.  In retrospect this was also &#xA;present in our Case 25.1.  A similar but very advanced case was described by Aron et al. &#xA;(l973).  Torus hyperplasia should be considered in the radiological differential diagnosis &#xA;of permanent widening of the lesser curvature side of the pyloric ring.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 7 of the remaining l0 cases (described by Bachmann) the focal hypertrophy, while not &#xA;strictly limited to the &#xA;muscle torus, occurred in the same region and can probably be explained on the same &#xA;basis.  In 3 the hypertrophy occurred elsewhere in the pyloric musculature;  this also &#xA;applied to the cases of Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l977), which were not &#xA;described individually.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that focal hypertrophy is limited to the pyloric muscle torus in many &#xA;instances, but this is not invariably the case and it may also occur elsewhere in the pyloric &#xA;musculature.  It may occur de novo or be associated with gastric ulceration (located more &#xA;proximally in the stomach), chronic or erosive gastritis, hiatus hernia and duodenal &#xA;ulceration.  Whether it represents an early stage of diffuse adult hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis is not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Aron JM, Newman A, Heaton JW.  Torus hyperplasia of the pyloric antrum &#xA;presenting as a gastric pseudotumor.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l973, 64, 634 &#xA;- 636.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bachmann KD.  &amp;#220;ber umschriebene, plattenf&amp;#246;rmige &#xA;Muskelhyperplasien im Antrum und Pylorus (&#34;Muskelplatten&#34;), &lt;em&gt;Beitr path &#xA;Anat&lt;/em&gt; l952, 112, 97 - 103.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9 - 47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G. &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb R&amp;#246ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;1913, Suppl 30, 1 - 265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Heidenblut A.  Herdf&amp;#246;rmige gutartige Pylorushypertrophie des &#xA;Erwachsenen.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb R&amp;#246;ntgenstr Nuklearmed&lt;/em&gt; 1961, 94, &#xA;l75 - 181.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD.  Focal hypertrophy of the pyloric musculature in adults.  &lt;em&gt;Arch &#xA;Path&lt;/em&gt; l956, 61, 20 - 23.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Knight CD.  Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the adult.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l96l, 153, 899 - 910.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Liebermann-Meffert D, Allg&amp;#246;wer M.  The morphology of the antrum and &#xA;pylorus in gastric ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Prog Surg&lt;/em&gt; 1977, 15, 109 - 139.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Mack HC.  Adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Int Med&lt;/em&gt; 1959, &#xA;104, 574 - 579.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Seaman WB.  Hypertrophy of the pyloric muscle in adults.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l963, 80, 753 - 764.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Seaman WB.  Focal hypertrophy of the pyloric muscle:  torus hyperplasia.   &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l966, 96, 388 - 392.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skoryna SC, Dolan HS, Gley A.  Development of primary pyloric hypertrophy in &#xA;adults in relation to the structure and function of the pyloric canal.  &lt;em&gt;Surg &#xA;Gynaec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; l959, 108, 83 - 92.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1 - 191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wellman KF, Kagan A, Fang H.  Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in adults:  survey &#xA;of the literature and report of a case of the localized form (torus hyperplasia).  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l964, 46, 601 - 608.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>26 - Nausea, Retching and Vomiting</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_26/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_26/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;nausea-retching-and-vomiting&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Nausea, Retching and Vomiting&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#nausea-retching-and-vomiting&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The mechanism of vomiting in mammals is complex and in spite of experimental studies &#xA;some aspects are still not fully understood.  It is usually accepted that the vomiting &#xA;sequence consists of 3 successive phases:  nausea initially, followed by retching, often &#xA;leading to forcible expulsion of gastric contents through the mouth, i.e. ejection or &#xA;vomiting.  During these stages a co-ordinated sequence of movements occurs, involving, &#xA;amongst others, the upper small bowel, stomach, oesophagus, diaphragm, voluntary &#xA;abdominal muscles and glottis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The complex movements of the ejection phase occur with extreme rapidity.  Some &#xA;features visible during radiographic investigation of this phase have been described by &#xA;Lumsden and Holden (l969);  as these involve the proximal stomach, the gastro-&#xA;oesophageal junction, oesophagus and laryngo-pharynx, the details fall outside the scope &#xA;of the present investigation.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;nausea&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Nausea&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#nausea&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During radiological examinations Barclay (l936) noted absence of gastric peristalsis in &#xA;cases of nausea, as well as sagging of the lowermost part of the greater curvature which &#xA;he attributed to loss of gastric tone.  Lumsden and Holden (l969) described a similar, &#xA;sudden descent of the greater curvature in a number of patients with nausea;  they had no &#xA;radiographic record of the occurrence.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During routine barium studies in the erect position, one of our patients would &#xA;occasionally complain of nausea after having swallowed the first few mouthfuls of the &#xA;suspension.  Under these circumstances the following was seen:  the lower part of the &#xA;greater curvature sagged, causing an increase in the diameter of the distal part of the &#xA;stomach, indicating loss of tone (Chap. 19).  Simultaneously peristaltic contractions in &#xA;the body of the stomach, cyclical contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and &#xA;gastric emptying ceased.  The appearance of the stomach was similar to that seen after &#xA;administration of anticholinergic agents.  The following is an example of what is usually &#xA;observed in cases of nausea:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-report&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Report&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-report&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 26.1.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; G.C., male aged 24 years, was referred for barium study because of vague &#xA;upper gastrointestinal symptoms.  Having swallowed the first 3 mouthfuls of barium, the &#xA;patient complained of feeling nauseous;  there was no retching but he was unable to &#xA;continue drinking.  Initially the stomach appeared to have a normal tone, but the greater &#xA;curvature sagged, moderate gastric dilatation occurred and peristaltic activity and cyclical &#xA;contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder ceased.  A trickle of barium had entered &#xA;the duodenal bulb but no further gastric emptying occurred (Fig. 26.1).  He was advised &#xA;to sit down.  After 15 minutes the nausea disappeared and the examination could be &#xA;resumed.  Gastric tone, peristalsis, sphincteric cylinder activity and emptying became &#xA;normal; no organic lesion was detected.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/26-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 26.1. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case G.C. Moderate dilatation of stomach, sagging of greater curvature, and &#xA;absence of peristalsis and cyclical activity of pyloric sphincteric cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Monges et al. (l974) the first electromyographic phenomena of nausea are &#xA;the disappearance of spiking activity in the stomach and small intestine, and the slowing, &#xA;decrease in amplitude and disturbance in propagation of the basal electrical rhythm &#xA;(BER).  These events may occur before the patient experiences nausea.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;You et al. (l980) recorded gastric myoelectric activity in control subjects and in a group &#xA;of patients with unexplained nausea, epigastric bloating and vomiting;  the technique &#xA;entailed the use of a peroral suction electrode.  As no mention was made of actual &#xA;retching or vomiting during the investigations, it would appear that recordings were &#xA;obtained during the phase of nausea.  One of the electrodes was attached to the gastric &#xA;mucosa 1.0 cm orally to the pyloric ring, and another 3.0 cm orally to the ring, i.e. within &#xA;the confines of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (others were attached further orally, and 2 &#xA;were located in the duodenum).  In contrast to the normal, regular pacesetter potential &#xA;(PP) with a frequency of 3 to 4 cycles per minute, all 9 patients showed abnormal &#34;antral&#34; &#xA;myoelectric activity, characterized by tachygastria or tachyarrhythmia and propagation of &#xA;the PP in either the orad or aborad direction.&#xA;Although all 9 patients with nausea, bloating and vomiting studied by You et al. (l980) &#xA;had antral arrhythmias, Stoddard et al. (l98l) described 5 patients with antral arrhythmia &#xA;without any gastrointestinal symptoms at all.  In their view the association between antral &#xA;arrhythmia and disturbed gastric motility remained unclear, although it was possible that &#xA;such arrhythmia might be associated with delay in gastric emptying.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hamilton et al. (l986) studied the BER in 20 normal control subjects and in 5 patients &#xA;with nausea and vomiting of longer than 6 months&#39; duration.  All patients had delayed &#xA;gastric emptying as diagnosed by radionuclide scanning techniques, and 4 had previously &#xA;been diagnosed as diabetic gastroparesis.  The BER was recorded from the abdominal &#xA;surface by means of a cutaneous electrode, and was shown to be similar in form and &#xA;frequency to recordings obtained by mucosal suction electrodes.  In one normal subject &#xA;and in 4 of the 5 patients, periods occurred in which BER rates exceeded 5 per minute.  In &#xA;a normal subject the period of tachygastria lasted only 2.5 minutes and the subject &#xA;remained asymptomatic.  In patients, tachygastria lasted for periods of 4 minutes and was &#xA;associated with nausea;  the nausea resolved when the fast rate abated.  The fifth patient &#xA;was asymptomatic during the recording and had no tachygastria.  Again it appeared if the &#xA;recordings were done during periods of nausea and not while retching or vomiting &#xA;occurred.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using cutaneous electrodes, Geldof et al. (l986) recorded gastric myoelectrical behaviour &#xA;by electrogastrography in 48 patients with prolonged, unexplained nausea and vomiting, &#xA;and in 52 normal control subjects, in the fasting and post-prandial states.  In 30 of the 48 &#xA;patients gastric emptying studies were done, using a radiolabelled solid meal.  No &#xA;mention was made of actual retching or vomiting during the investigations, and it seems &#xA;if the recordings were done during the phase of nausea.  The patient group could be &#xA;divided into 2 subgroups:  in 25 patients all electrogastrographic parameters were &#xA;identical to the control group, while in 23 abnormal myoelectrical activity was found, &#xA;characterised by instability of the gastric pacemaker frequency, tachygastrias in both the &#xA;fasting and postprandial states, and absence of the normal increase in amplitude in the &#xA;postprandial tracing.  This last characteristic was correlated with delayed gastric &#xA;emptying of solids.  Not all patients displayed all three abnormal features;  tachygastria &#xA;lasting between 3 and 14 minutes for instance, was seen in 8 of the patients.  It is &#xA;generally assumed that no motor activity is present during a tachygastria (Telander et al &#xA;l978;  You et al. l980;  You and Chey l984; Geldof et al. l986), which is generated in an &#xA;&#34;antral&#34; ectopic focus and which overrides the normal gastric pacemaker (Telander et al. &#xA;l978).  It was concluded that in a heterogeneous group of patients with unexplained &#xA;nausea and vomiting, a subgroup could be discerned with abnormal myoelectrical activity &#xA;which was related to the symptoms.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kerlin (l989) studied the contractile activity of the stomach and small intestine in 20 &#xA;patients with longstanding, idiopathic nausea and vomiting, in the fasting and &#xA;postprandial states.  Records were obtained by a low compliance infusion system from &#xA;the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; (four sites), the duodenum and the jejunum;  it appears if the studies &#xA;were done during the stage of nausea.  Only two patients had contractile abnormalities &#xA;during fasting.  After a solid-liquid test meal, the contractility of the gastric &#34;antrum&#34; was &#xA;significantly impaired in patients as compared with normal controls.  It was concluded &#xA;that postprandial &#34;antral&#34; hypomotility was a major abnormality in patients with &#xA;unexplained nausea and vomiting.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;retching&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Retching&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#retching&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The retching phase is characterized by a series of violent spasmodic abdomino-thoracic &#xA;contractions with the glottis closed.  During this time the inspiratory movements of the &#xA;chest wall and diaphragm are opposed by the expiratory contractions of the abdominal &#xA;musculature.  At the same time movements of the stomach and its contents take place.  &#xA;Whereas a patient will complain of disagreeable sensations during nausea, speech is not &#xA;possible during retching.  The characteristic movements furnish a ready diagnostic sign &#xA;of the retching phase.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During gastroscopic observations retching usually interferes to such an extent with the &#xA;examination that it is difficult to observe the motor behaviour of the stomach.  Schindler &#xA;(l937) studied retching on two occasions during gastroscopy and noted that longitudinal &#xA;folds appeared in the previously smooth &#34;antrum&#34;, thickened quickly, came together and &#xA;completely closed the &#34;antrum&#34;.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The description tallies with &#xA;contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder during which the folds become &#xA;longitudinal, so that only longitudinal folds are seen in the fully contracted cylinder) &#xA;(Chap. 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Torgersen (l942) stated that the canalis egestorius (pyloric sphincteric cylinder) &#xA;contracted during vomiting, and referred to previous work by Groedel who had illustrated &#xA;the contraction of the two loops and the intervening musculature during vomiting.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lumsden and Holden (l969) gave a detailed description of the movements of the stomach &#xA;and duodenum in vomiting as seen in 3 cases during diagnostic radiological &#xA;investigations.  They did not refer to, and did not base their findings on, the concept of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  In their first case, during retching, a constriction was &#xA;described and illustrated in the proximal part of the &#34;antrum&#34;.  The greater curvature in &#xA;this region showed a deep notch and was closely approximated to the lesser curvature.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  From the description and illustration it is clear that the &#xA;constriction and deep notch correspond to contraction of the left pyloric loop, with a &#xA;collection of barium in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder on its aboral side).  On an &#xA;exposure taken immediately afterwards, the prepyloric region had hardly changed.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  In the illustration a collection of barium is seen in the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder between the right and left pyloric loops).  At this stage the body of &#xA;the stomach had also contracted and barium was being expelled through the cardia.&#xA;In their second case, during retching, there was some barium in the &#34;antrum&#34;, separated &#xA;from the main mass of barium in the stomach by an annular constriction involving both &#xA;curvatures of the stomach and superficially resembling the pylorus.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The appearance in the illustration is identical to contraction of &#xA;the left pyloric loop) (Chap. 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In their third case vomiting occurred suddenly, a radiograph being taken at that exact &#xA;moment.  Some barium was trapped between the contracted &#34;proximal part of the &#xA;antrum&#34; and the closed pylorus.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The trapped barium as &#xA;illustrated appears to be in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder between the right and left &#xA;pyloric loops).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following are examples of cases we observed during retching:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 26.2.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; M.J., female aged 29 years.  Having swallowed 2 mouthfuls of barium, the &#xA;patient suddenly started to retch.  A film exposed at that moment showed a tightly &#xA;contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder containing longitudinal mucosal folds, with folds &#xA;on its oral side bulging into the gas-distended gastric lumen (Fig. 26.2).  The appearance &#xA;is identical to that seen during a stage of the normal contraction of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder (Chap. 13).  Afterwards retching stopped, more barium was swallowed and &#xA;cyclical contractions of the cylinder became normal.  No lesion was detected in the upper &#xA;gastrointestinal tract.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/26-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 26.2. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case M.J. Tightly contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder, containing &#xA;longitudinal mucosal folds (straight arrow). Retropelled folds bulging into gastric lumen &#xA;(curved arrows)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 26.3.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; E.W., female aged 34 years.  Having swallowed 4 mouthfuls of barium in &#xA;the erect position, the patient suddenly started to retch;  barium had reached the pyloric &#xA;aperture but had not traversed it, while some was still in the oesophagus.  As soon as &#xA;retching started a film was exposed.  This showed contraction of the left pyloric loop with &#xA;a &#34;round&#34; collection of barium on its aboral side, i.e. in the sphincteric cylinder (Fig. &#xA;26.3&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  A segmental or systolic contraction of this collection followed, &#xA;terminating in a tightly contracted cylinder containing a longitudinal mucosal fold (Fig. &#xA;26.3&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;);  this corresponded to maximal contraction of the sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.  During contraction barium contained in the cylinder was propagated not into &#xA;the duodenum, but in a retrograde way into the more proximal part of the stomach.  When &#xA;retching ceased, normal cyclical contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and &#xA;gastric emptying commenced.  No organic lesion was found.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/b&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/26-3a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/26-3b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 26.3. A &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case E.W. Contraction of left pyloric loop (curved arrow).  &#xA;Round collection of barium in partially contracted sphincteric cylinder (straight arrow).&#xA;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt; Case E.W. Maximally contracted sphincteric cylinder containing a longitudinal &#xA;mucosal fold (arrow).&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;vomiting&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Vomiting&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#vomiting&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lang et al. (l986) examined the gastrointestinal motor correlates of vomiting in canines &#xA;by means of implanted extramural strain gauge transducers.  One of the motor responses &#xA;was a retrograde peristaltic contraction commencing in the middle of the small intestine &#xA;and moving in an orad direction through the small intestine to the gastric &#34;antrum&#34;.  &#xA;Ejection did not occur after a consistent delay following the &#34;antral retrograde peristaltic &#xA;contraction&#34;, i.e. there was no evidence that the antral contraction correlated with vomitus &#xA;ejection.  This was consistent with previous findings that the stomach did not provide the &#xA;propulsive force for vomitus ejection;  it was more likely that the propulsive force was &#xA;provided by contractions of the abdominal or respiratory muscles.  The small intestinal &#xA;retrograde peristaltic contraction, leading to gastric &#34;antral&#34; contractions, was probably &#xA;mediated peripherally by muscarinic cholinergic receptors as it was selectively blocked &#xA;by atropine (which does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During routine barium studies we observed the act of ejection in 5 or 6 patients.  Because &#xA;of violent movements it was usually not possible to obtain satisfactory radiographs.  The &#xA;following is a representative case:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-report-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Report&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-report-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 26.4.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; S.S., female aged 42 years.  After swallowing two mouthfuls of barium, it &#xA;accummulated in the pyloric region.  Incomplete contractions of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder, not propagating the barium into the duodenum, soon started.  Almost &#xA;immediately the patient felt nauseous and retching commenced.  At this stage the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder contracted maximally, giving rise to an appearance sometimes called &#xA;&#34;amputation of the antrum&#34;.  Immediately afterwards a long spastic contraction occurred &#xA;in the body of the stomach, associated with ejection.  Two contracted areas were then &#xA;present in the stomach, namely the contracted sphincteric cylinder, and a larger region of &#xA;contraction of the body of the stomach.  At that stage most of the remaining barium was &#xA;in the upper part of the stomach, above the contracted regions.  Subsequent clinical &#xA;examination revealed no obvious cause for the vomiting.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;With the exception of Torgersen (l942), none of the authors quoted above based their &#xA;descriptions of nausea, retching and vomiting on the muscular anatomy of the stomach as &#xA;previously determined by Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen himself.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Our radiographic observations show that nausea is characterized by loss of gastric tone, &#xA;absence of peristalsis and cyclical contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, and &#xA;lack of emptying of fluid barium in the erect position.  A number of authors described the &#xA;electromyographic phenomena recorded during nausea (Monges et al. l974;  You et al. &#xA;l980, l984;  Hamilton et al. l986;  Geldof et al. l986).  It is probable that some of the &#xA;electrical arrhythmias may be associated with the appearances seen at radiography.  &#xA;Pressure studies of Kerlin (l989) confirmed that postprandial &#34;antral&#34; hypomotility was a &#xA;major factor in unexplained nausea.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The representative cases described here show that retching is associated with contraction &#xA;of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder;  this is well seen during radiographic studies.  &#xA;Although Lumsden and Holden (l969) did not base the morphology in their cases on the &#xA;anatomy as described by Torgersen (l942), accompanying illustrations leave little doubt &#xA;that the pyloric sphincteric cylinder was contracted in all.  Wood and Astley (l952) and &#xA;others (Chap. 20) described a temporary narrowing in the pyloric region closely &#xA;resembling infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, in vomiting infants.  Judging by the &#xA;descriptions it involved the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  The endoscopic appearances &#xA;described by Schindler (l937) also tally with contraction of the sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Radiography shows that the cylinder is contracted during ejection.  By means of strain &#xA;gauge transducers in canines Lang et al. (l986) demonstrated an &#34;antral retrograde &#xA;peristaltic contraction&#34;, which appears to tally with contraction of the cylinder;  this &#xA;contraction, however, did not provide the propulsive force for ejection.  Radiographically &#xA;a second, longer area of contraction was seen in the upper part of the stomach during &#xA;ejection, in addition to the contraction of the cylinder in one of our cases (Case 26.4).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Barclay AE.  &lt;em&gt;The Digestive Tract&lt;/em&gt;.  Cambridge University Press, &#xA;London l936, p 268.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G, &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; l913, Suppl 30, l-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Geldof H, Van der Schee EJ, Van Blankenstein M, et al.  Electrogastrographic &#xA;study of gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with unexplained nausea and &#xA;vomiting.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; 1986, 27, 799-808.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hamilton JW, Ballahsene BE, Reichelderfer M, et al.  Human electrogastrograms:  &#xA;comparison of surface and mucosal recordings.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l986, 31, &#xA;33-39.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kerlin P.  Postprandial antral hypomotility in patients with idopathic nausea and &#xA;vomiting.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l989, 30, 54-58.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lang IM, Sarna SK, Condon RE.  Gastrointestinal motor correlates of vomiting in &#xA;the dog:  quantification and characterization as an independent phenomenon.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l986, 90, 40-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lumsden K, Holden WS.  The act of vomiting in man.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l969, l0, &#xA;173-179.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Monges H, Salducci J, Naudy B.  Electrical activity of the gastrointestinal tract in &#xA;dog during vomiting.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Gastrointestinal Motility&lt;/em&gt;, edit Daniel EE.  &#xA;Mitchell Press, Vancouver l974, pp 479-488.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schindler R.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroscopy&lt;/em&gt;.  University of Chicago Press, Chicago &#xA;l937, p 145.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stoddard CJ, Smallwood RH, Duthie HL.  Electrical arrhythmias in the human &#xA;stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; 1981, 22, 705-712.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Telander RL, Morgan KG, Kreulen DL, et al.  Human gastric atony with &#xA;tachygastria and gastric retention.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l978, 75, 497-&#xA;501.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, pp 38, 39.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wood BSB, Astley R.  Vomiting of uncertain origin in young infants.  &lt;em&gt;Arch &#xA;Dis Child&lt;/em&gt; l952, 27, 562-568.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;You CH, Lee KY, Chey WY, et al.  Electrogastrographic study of patients with &#xA;unexplained nausea, bloating and vomiting.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l980, &#xA;79, 311-314.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;You CH, Chey WY.  Study of electromechanical activity of the stomach in &#xA;humans and dogs with particular attention to tachygastria.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l984, 86, 1460-1468.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>27 - Duodenogastric Reflux</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_27/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_27/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;duodenogastric-reflux&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Duodenogastric Reflux&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#duodenogastric-reflux&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Regurgitation of alkaline duodenal juice into the stomach has long been of interest.  &#xA;Previously it was assumed to be a normal, protective reaction in cases of gastric &#xA;hyperacidity (Olch l928).  The studies by Du Plessis (1960, 1962, 1965) and Lawson &#xA;(l964) tended to show the converse, namely that it might be damaging to the gastric &#xA;mucosa.  It was found that transpyloric duodenogastric reflux constituted one of the &#xA;causes of chronic and atrophic gastritis, with an attendant decrease in gastric mucosal &#xA;resistance to ulceration (Du Plessis l960, l965).  Transstomal reflux after gastro-&#xA;enterostomies caused a severe atrophic gastritis (Du Plessis l962).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Under experimental conditions in canines, duodenogastric reflux caused superficial &#xA;gastritis, atrophic gastritis and epithelial proliferation with an increase in mitotic acitivity &#xA;(Lawson l964).  Excessive reflux of duodenal contents into the stomach appeared to be a &#xA;factor in the pathogenesis of gastric ulceration (Capper l967;  Delaney et al. l970).  The &#xA;canine gastric mucosal barrier was destroyed by lysolecithin and phospholipase A, and if &#xA;the human gastric mucosa behaved similarly, regurgitation of duodenal contents could be &#xA;damaging (Davenport l970).  In guinea-pigs, lysolecithin produced gastric mucosal &#xA;damage with macroscopic erosions, showing that reflux from the duodenum was an &#xA;important factor in causing gastritis and gastric erosions (Orchard et al. l977).  Bile salts &#xA;caused a degradation of gastric mucus in pigs, thus damaging the protective layer on the &#xA;luminal surface of the epithelium (Marriott et al. l977;  Schrager and Oates l978).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;previous-tests&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Previous Tests&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#previous-tests&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Various tests have been devised to determine the ability of the pylorus to prevent &#xA;duodenogastric reflux.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The concentration of bile acid conjugates in fasting gastric aspirates has long been used &#xA;as a quantitative measure of duodenogastric reflux (Du Plessis l965;  Kaye and Showalter &#xA;l974;  Valenzuela and Defilippi l976;  Hoare et al. l978).  Although it is a useful guide it &#xA;has obvious limitations and may not always be reliable since duodenogastric &#xA;regurgitation may result simply from the presence of an indwelling gastric tube itself &#xA;(Capper et al. l966).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A radiographic test was devised by Capper et al. (l966).  By threading a thin-bore soft &#xA;rubber tube through the pylorus, gastrografin was injected directly into the lumen of the &#xA;duodenum.  (Rigid plastic tubes were found to be unsuitable as their stiffness interfered &#xA;with the normal sphincteric action and rendered the pylorus incompetent).  With the tube &#xA;in situ, and with no contrast medium in the stomach, reflux could be observed on the &#xA;radiological TV monitor, being categorized as minimal, moderate or gross.  Special &#xA;attention was paid to the relationship of reflux to duodenal contraction waves.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In his investigations Grech (l970) used Capper&#39;s test with minor modifications.  Keighley &#xA;et al. (l975) employed a further modification;  after injection of 20 ml dilute barium &#xA;suspension into the duodenum through the transpyloric tube, the tube was withdrawn, &#xA;followed by 3 minutes of radiographic screening to observe whether reflux was present.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using a radioactive test, Rhodes et al (l969) injected a dose of &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;14&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;C-tagged bile salts &#xA;intravenously.  The concentration of secreted radio-active bile salts in aspirated gastric &#xA;juice was measured, the value serving as an index of duodenal regurgitation.  In &#xA;Wormsley&#39;s (l972) test an indicator substance (polyethylene glycol) was injected into the &#xA;duodenum, followed by aspiration of gastric juice;  this entailed the use of both an &#xA;intragastric and an intraduodenal tube.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kim et al. (l972) and Keighley et al. (l975) pointed out that the diagnosis of reflux &#xA;alkaline gastritis could be made by a combination of gastric analysis, gastroscopy and &#xA;biopsy.  Reflux was present endoscopically, according to Hoare et al. (l978), if there was &#xA;a pool of bile in the stomach or if reflux occurred throughout the examination.  It was &#xA;acknowledged that the presence of a duodenal tube or gastroscope might lead to reflux.  &#xA;Previously Flint and Grech (l970) had stated that gastroscopy was not a satisfactory &#xA;method of assessing pyloric reflux when vagal blocking drugs were used.  Connell (l978) &#xA;stated that endoscopy in itself had marked effects on gastro-intestinal motility, and &#xA;implied that it was not satisfactory for assessing pyloric reflux.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Sophisticated electrical pacing techniques have been used experimentally.  Kelly and &#xA;Code (l977) examined duodenogastric reflux in canines, in which pacing from a site in &#xA;the distal duodenum reversed the direction of the pacesetter potential from aborad to &#xA;orad, reversing the direction of propagation of duodenal contents, and resulting in &#xA;duodenogastric reflux.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Valenzuela and Defilippi (l976) used manometric techniques for direct measurement of &#xA;pyloric sphincter pressures;  this entailed the presence of polyvinyl catheters through the &#xA;pylorus.  By the combined use of duodenal marker perfusion and miniature intraluminal &#xA;strain gauge transducers, Rees et al (l979) determined the relationship between &#xA;antroduodenal motor activity, duodenogastric reflux and gastric emptying.  Although &#xA;these refined techniques have yielded valuable data, there remains the lingering suspicion &#xA;that the presence of gastric or transpyloric tubes might have influenced the results.  Cole &#xA;(l969) had stated previously that even the nausea felt by most intubated patients might &#xA;account for bile entering the stomach.  Rovelstad (l976) reiterated that tube studies could &#xA;impair the normal closing mechanism of the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A radioactive test, based on the differential excretion of iminodiacetic acid (IDA) by the &#xA;liver, was described by Muhammad et al. (l980).  Following the intravenous &#xA;administration of &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-labelled &lt;EM&gt;p&lt;/EM&gt;-butyl-IDA,  which is completely secreted &#xA;into the bile, radioactivity was measured in the stomach (in post-gastrectomy patients) by &#xA;means of a gamma camera.  Reflux was expressed as a percentage of the total excreted &#xA;radioactivity.  Nicolai et al. (l980) injected &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-labelled diethyl-IDA &#xA;intravenously, followed by aspiration of the tracer from the stomach through a double-&#xA;lumen nasogastric tube, allowing quantification of reflux.  The test also involved the &#xA;intravenous injection of cholecystokinin to produce gallbladder contraction, with &#xA;constriction of the pylorus as a side effect.&#xA;Ehrlein (l98l) pointed out that the function of the pyloric sphincter in preventing &#xA;duodenogastric reflux had not been clarified.  (It was explained that the term &#34;pyloric &#xA;sphincter&#34; in this context referred to the pyloric ring).  It was difficult to record &#xA;contractions over a long period of time in humans.  In animals it was possible to measure &#xA;the external diameter of the pylorus with induction coils, and to determine pressure &#xA;changes simultaneously by means of implanted strain gauge transducers (Ehrlein l980).  &#xA;The method was used in canines to investigate possible co-ordination of gastric and &#xA;duodenal motility, gastroduodenal reflux at the same time being observed &#xA;fluoroscopically.  In the digestive state the pylorus opened when a peristaltic wave &#xA;involved the commencement of the &#34;antrum&#34;, closing when the wave reached the pyloric &#xA;sphincter.  Contraction maxima of the duodenal bulb most often occurred a fraction of a &#xA;second before, or after, contraction maxima of the pyloric sphincter.  Consequently there &#xA;was incomplete closure of the pylorus during duodenal contraction, allowing &#xA;duodenogastric reflux to occur;  it was produced by atypical segmental contractions of &#xA;the bulb.  In the interdigestive state different phases were encountered.  In the first phase, &#xA;in the absence of contractile activity in the stomach and duodenum, no reflux occurred.  &#xA;In the second and third phases imperfect timing of pyloric and duodenal contractions, as &#xA;in the digestive state, sometimes resulted in duodenogastric reflux.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Various derivatives of &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-IDA have now been used extensively in the study &#xA;of duodenogastric reflux, notably &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-BIDA (butyl iminodiacetic acid) and &#xA;&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-HIDA.  These tests have certain minor limitations in common (Thomas et &#xA;al, l984).  For instance, anatomical definition of the stomach was often complicated by &#xA;overlap of the left lobe of the liver and the duodeno-jejunal flexure;  delineation of the &#xA;gastric &#34;antrum&#34; was poor, and as it was close to the duodenal bulb, minor degrees of &#xA;reflux might not be detectable;  and computer analysis of small volumes of reflux might &#xA;be difficult to interpret.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Two further limitations of the cholescintigraphic tests, in our view, are the following:&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;As only bile constituents are labelled, the tests apply to reflux of bile into the &#xA;stomach;  they are not a measure of reflux of the other constituents of duodenal &#xA;juice, of which pancreatic exocrine secretion is the most important.  It may be &#xA;useful to have a test able to demonstrate reflux of duodenal contents (as opposed &#xA;to bile only), into the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;At present the tests do not visualize the pylorus clearly, i.e. it is not possible to &#xA;determine the extent of contraction or relaxation of the pyloric region in relation &#xA;to reflux.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;a-double-contrast-radiographic-test-for-duodenogastric-reflux&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  A Double-Contrast Radiographic Test for Duodenogastric Reflux&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#a-double-contrast-radiographic-test-for-duodenogastric-reflux&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As a modification of the double-contrast upper gastrointestinal radiographic examination, &#xA;we have described the following radiographic test for duodenogastric reflux (Keet l982).  &#xA;In this test the pylorus is clearly visualized and its diameter can be determined during &#xA;reflux;  in addition, the relationship of reflux to pyloric and duodenal contractions may be &#xA;studied.  The test is non-invasive and does not entail the use of catheters, intubation or the &#xA;administration of pharmacological agents (which may alter motility).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The patient, standing behind the radiological TV monitor after a 12-hour overnight fast, &#xA;is instructed to swallow 4 to 5 mouthfuls of a micropulverized barium suspension, e.g. &#xA;Micropaque (Adcock-Ingram, Johannesburg) ordinarily used for upper gastrointestinal &#xA;radiographic examinations.  Immediately afterwards a gas-producing agent is swallowed, &#xA;e.g. 2 x 50 Gastrast tablets (Toho Kagaku Kenyusho, Tokyo), followed by 2 mouthfuls of &#xA;water containing a few drops of Telament liquid (Adcock Ingram, Johannesburg).  The &#xA;barium accumulates in the lower part of the stomach while the gas distends the fornix.  &#xA;While the patient is instructed not to eructate, the table is immediately tilted into the &#xA;horizontal position.  With the arms abducted throughout the examination, the supine &#xA;subject is now rotated into the left anterior oblique position (right side down) till barium &#xA;enters the duodenal bulb.  As soon as duodenal filling is achieved, the subject is rotated &#xA;rapidly through 90 degrees into the right anterior oblique position.  This causes the &#xA;remaining barium in the stomach to descend into the fornix, while the gas is displaced &#xA;and ascends into the pyloric region, which now constitutes the uppermost part of the &#xA;stomach.  Consequently the first part of the duodenum is filled with barium, while the &#xA;pyloric region up to the ring is filled with gas (Fig. 27.1).  The competence of the pylorus &#xA;can now be studied, radiographs being taken at appropriate times.  Duodenogastric reflux &#xA;through the pylorus into the gas-containing part of the gastric lumen is clearly visible &#xA;(Fig. 27.2).  (This should not be confused with the normal orad movement of barium &#xA;often seen during contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder as described in Chap. &#xA;13).  Should no reflux be observed, or should the duodenum empty its contents &#xA;prematurely, positioning of the patient is repeated.  Generally speaking, the manoeuvre is &#xA;repeated 4 to 5 times during each test.  The effects of compression of the second or third &#xA;parts of the duodenum may also be studied.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/27-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 27.1. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Duodenal bulb filled with barium.  Pyloric sphincteric cylinder filled with gas &#xA;and distended&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/27-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 27.2. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Reflux of barium (arrow) from the duodenum into the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder, which is relaxed&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;advantages&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Advantages&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#advantages&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The main advantages of this method appear to be the following:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Because of the clear images produced by radiography, the diameter and &#xA;competence of the pylorus may be studied in relation to both duodenal contraction &#xA;waves and the motility of the pyloric part of the stomach, i.e. the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.  Little attention has been paid to duodenogastric reflux in &#xA;relation to pyloric motility in previous investigations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;If it is assumed that the barium suspension in the duodenal lumen represents &#xA;duodenal contents, the procedure will determine the presence or absence of reflux &#xA;of duodenal contents, i.e. of duodenal juice (in contrast to bile only).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;No medication (e.g. anticholinergics or cholecystokinin) is administered, thus &#xA;allowing the study of pyloric competence in the absence of pharmacological &#xA;modification.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;There is no gastric intubation (thus eliminating nausea) and the pylorus is not &#xA;traversed by a tube (or has been traversed immediately before observation, as in &#xA;the test of Keighley et al. l975).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The test is quick and simple to perform, and may be followed by a &#34;conventional&#34; &#xA;upper gastrointestinal radiographic examination.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;disadvantages&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Disadvantages&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#disadvantages&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Radiation to the patient should be considered, but measurements showed that this &#xA;was minimal and could be discounted since a small (11.0 x 8.0 cm), localized &#xA;aperture was used, not more than two 11.0 x 8.0 cm film exposures were needed &#xA;for record purposes, and screening time generally did not exceed 90 to 120 &#xA;seconds.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;In a minority of patients, depending on the direction of the pyloroduodenal axis, it &#xA;may not be possible to obtain a side view of the duodenum and pylorus, the &#xA;barium-filled bulb being projected over the pyloric aperture.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;The examination is performed in the interdigestive phase and in the supine &#xA;position only.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;While there is no doubt about the ability of the procedure to illustrate the presence &#xA;or absence of reflux, quantification cannot be accurate as only a rough impression &#xA;of the quantity of reflux is gained.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;results-in-normal-subjects&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Results in Normal Subjects&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#results-in-normal-subjects&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Having received approval of the Ethical Committee, the test was performed in 14 &#xA;informed, volunteer, asymptomatic male medical students between the ages of 23 and 27 &#xA;years.  In 9 of the subjects no duodenogastric reflux occurred.  In 2 subjects there was &#xA;minimal reflux on one occasion only (three further &#34;rotating manoeuvres&#34; failed to &#xA;produce reflux).  In 3 subjects moderate reflux occurred.  In each it was seen two or three &#xA;times during four &#34;rotating manoeuvres&#34;.  One of these subjects was re-tested a week &#xA;later, with similar results.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Duodenal Motility&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In all 14 normal subjects duodenal peristalsis appeared normal on the TV monitor and the &#xA;duodenum emptied normally.  In all there also occurred retrograde movement of barium &#xA;in the duodenal lumen, which appeared to result from &#34;segmental&#34; contraction waves in &#xA;the third part of the duodenum.  While these contractions did not proceed along the &#xA;duodenal walls, but remained localized to the third part, they forced barium in an orad &#xA;direction, at times as far as the bulb;  barium in the lumen distal to these contractions was &#xA;forced in an aborad direction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In all normal subjects the second part of the duodenum was also compressed as far as &#xA;possible by means of the gloved hand on the anterior abdominal surface.  This did not &#xA;occlude the lumen completely, did not prevent aborad movement, and did not initiate &#xA;retrograde movement.  The results were the same with and without partial compression of &#xA;the second part of the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Pyloric Motility&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As indicated previously (Chap. 3), the muscular part of the pyloric ring is considered to &#xA;be the terminal annular thickening of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, as described by &#xA;Cunningham (1906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen (l942).  The cylinder, which is 3.0 to &#xA;4.0 cm in length, normally contracts in a segmental (as opposed to &#34;peristaltic&#34;) way &#xA;(Chap. 13).  As the ring forms an inherent part of the cylinder, it closes and opens with &#xA;contraction and relaxation of the cylinder respectively.  In all subjects these contractions &#xA;were normal.  Reflux in the 5 subjects occurred either during maximal relaxation of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder, (Fig. 27.2), or when it was in a state of partial contraction (Fig. &#xA;27.3).  It never occurred during maximal contraction of the cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/27-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 27.3. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Barium filling to show partial contraction of sphincteric cylinder.  At this stage &#xA;the pyloric aperture (arrow) is widely patent&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;results-in-patients&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Results in Patients&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#results-in-patients&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Having received approval of the Ethical Committee, the test was performed in 100 &#xA;patients between the ages of l8 and 79 years who, during the ordinary course of events, &#xA;had been referred for radiographic examinations because of upper gastro-intestinal &#xA;symptoms, e.g. dyspepsia and epigastric pain.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;No Lesion Detected&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 48 patients no macroscopic organic lesion could be demonstrated in the upper gastro-&#xA;intestinal tract;  these were considered to be patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.  Eighteen &#xA;(&amp;#177; 37 percent) had minimal to moderate duodenogastric reflux.  In all cases reflux &#xA;occurred during those stages of the pyloric cycle in which the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;was relaxed (Fig. 27.2), or partially contracted (Fig. 27.3).  Reflux never occurred during &#xA;maximal contraction of the cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Duodenal Ulceration&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In our series there were 25 cases of active duodenal ulceration or duodenal deformity &#xA;typical of ulceration, l8 (approximately 72 percent) showing moderate duodenogastric &#xA;reflux.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Gastric Ulceration&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We encountered 9 cases of chronic benign ulcer on the lesser curvature of the stomach at &#xA;varying distances proximal to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, i.e. not within the cylinder &#xA;itself.  Seven of these showed moderate reflux.  In the present series no cases of benign &#xA;gastric ulceration within the pyloric sphincteric cylinder were seen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Malignant Gastric Ulceration&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In our series 2 cases of malignant gastric ulceration (proved by biopsy) were diagnosed.  &#xA;In one case, with the ulcer on the lesser curvature close to the pylorus (i.e. within the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder), there was moderate to marked reflux.  In the second case, with the &#xA;ulcer at the incisura angularis, no reflux was seen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Sliding Hiatus Hernia with Free Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;There were 9 cases in the present series, 4 showing reflux of duodenal contents into the &#xA;stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Combined Lesions&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the present series 7 cases had combined lesions, e.g. duodenal ulceration and hiatus &#xA;hernia.  Most of these showed reflux.  One of these cases had constant spasticity of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder with irregular and transverse mucosal folds (Fig. 27.4).  It &#xA;was diagnosed radiologically and endoscopically as spasm and chronic gastritis affecting &#xA;the cylinder.  In addition the duodenal bulb was deformed due to ulceration.  In this case &#xA;moderate to marked duodenogastric reflux occurred.  Owing to the tube-like spasm of the &#xA;cylinder, the pyloric aperture was neither fully open nor fully closed, but fixed in a state &#xA;of partial patency.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/27-4.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 27.4. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Barium filling of spastic pyloric sphincteric cylinder in a case of chronic &#xA;gastritis.  Duodenal bulb deformed&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Duodenal Motility&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the last 40 patients of the series, special attention was paid to duodenal motility.  In 32 &#xA;of these the aborad and orad movements of intraluminal barium were identical to those in &#xA;normal controls.  In 8 no orad movement of contrast was seen in the second and third &#xA;parts of the duodenum, yet in half of these cases duodenogastric reflux occurred.  One&#39;s &#xA;impression was that physiological duodenal movements were probably of little &#xA;consequence in the mechanism of reflux.  (By experimentally reversing the pacesetter &#xA;potential in the duodenum in canines by electrical stimulation, Kelly and Code l977 did &#xA;produce reflux.)&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Pyloric Motility&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As in normal control subjects, reflux in patients only occurred while the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder was relaxed or in a state of partial contraction;  it never occurred &#xA;during maximal contraction of the cylinder.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;subsequent-tests&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Subsequent Tests&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#subsequent-tests&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Shortly after the above radiographic test for duodenogastric reflux was described (Keet &#xA;l982), a similar procedure was mentioned by Hughes et al. (l982).  Minimal reflux was &#xA;considered to be a slight trickle through the pylorus, moderate reflux that which extended &#xA;to the &#34;antral&#34; region of the stomach, and gross reflux that which extended to the body of &#xA;the stomach.  Duodenogastric reflux was found to be present in 6 (27 percent) of 22 &#xA;normal subjects and in 128 (32 percent) of 396 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.  &#xA;Statistically there was no significant difference in incidence between the normal controls &#xA;and dyspeptic patients.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using a &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-EHIDA test, Niemela et al (l984) found reflux in 14 of 33 &#xA;normal controls.  With a similar test Wolverson et al (l984) noted duodenogastric reflux &#xA;in 6 of 13 normal controls.  With a nasogastric aspiration technique Wolverson et al &#xA;(l984) found that 8 of 15 normal controls had reflux.  By measuring the intragastric bile &#xA;acid concentration by means of a nasogastric suction technique, Gotthard et al. (l985) &#xA;showed that large fluctuations in reflux might occur during a 24 hour measuring period.  &#xA;Of 12 normal control subjects 10 showed reflux, with low daytime values and frequent &#xA;high peaks in bile acid concentration during the night.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Normal subjects&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Du Plessis (l965) stated that slight duodenogastric reflux was a normal occurrence.  &#xA;Capper et al. (l966) found no reflux in 15 normal controls, while it occurred in one out of &#xA;12 normal subjects in Flint and Grech&#39;s (l970) series.  Nevertheless Flint and Grech were &#xA;of the opinion that the pylorus was normally competent, i.e. it did not allow reflux.  &#xA;Rovelstad (l976) stated that it was debatable whether duodenogastric reflux was a normal &#xA;phenomenon, while Donovan et al (l977) found no reflux in normal controls.  Nicolai et &#xA;al. (l980) on the other hand, demonstrated a median reflux of 4.3 percent of an &#xA;intravenously injected dose of radioactive technetium-labelled IDA.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 5 of 14 normal subjects, and in l8 of 48 non-ulcer dyspeptic patients, Keet (l982) found &#xA;minimal to moderate duodenogastric reflux.  Hughes et al. (l982) found reflux in 6 of 22 &#xA;normal subjects and in 128 of 396 patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia, the incidence in the &#xA;two groups being more or less the same.  Similar results were obtained by Niemela et al. &#xA;(l984), who noted reflux in 14 of 33 normal control subjects, and by Wolverson et al. &#xA;(l984) who found reflux in 6 of 13 controls.  The findings of Gotthard et al. (l985) &#xA;pointed to large fluctuations in reflux, with higher peaks occurring nocturnally.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that mild to moderate duodenogastric reflux occurs in approximately one &#xA;third of normal subjects, and in one third of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia, as shown &#xA;(inter alia) by the radiological tests of Keet (l982) and Hughes et al. (l982).  In other &#xA;words, the pylorus is normally not competent in a significant percentage of normal &#xA;subjects and approximately the same percentage of patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Duodenal Ulceration&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Du Plessis (l965) stated that in some cases of duodenal ulceration, reflux was excessive.  &#xA;Capper et al. (l966) found moderate or gross reflux in 33 percent or duodenal ulcer cases, &#xA;Donovan et al (l977) in 24 percent, while Valenzuela and Defilippi (l976) stated that the &#xA;incidence of reflux in patients with duodenal ulceration was not significantly different &#xA;from that in controls.  Of 7 cases Nicolai et al. (l980) found increased reflux in 2 only;  in &#xA;both, pyloric deformity was also present.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In our series there were 25 cases of active duodenal ulceration or duodenal deformity &#xA;typical of ulceration, l8 (approximately 72 percent) showing moderate duodenogastric &#xA;reflux.  Hughes et al. (l982) found reflux in 53 percent of one group of patients with &#xA;duodenal ulcer, and in 32 percent of patients in another group.  Of 60 patients with &#xA;duodenal ulceration Wolverson et al. (l984) found 32 (53 percent) to be reflux positive.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that duodenogastric reflux occurs in a significant percentage of cases with &#xA;duodenal ulceration;  the incidence, as reported by different authors, varies from &#xA;approximately 24 percent to approximately 72 percent.  As cyclical activity of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder is normal in the vast majority of cases of duodenal ulceration (Chap. &#xA;30), the reflux is difficult to explain on the basis of pyloric dysfunction.&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Gastric Ulceration&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Du Plessis (l965) found the concentration of bile acid conjugates in fasting gastric &#xA;aspirates to be abnormally high in cases of gastric ulceration.  Capper et al. (l966) found &#xA;moderate or gross reflux in 66 percent of gastric ulceration patients, while Rhodes et al &#xA;(l969) and Delaney et al. (l970) mentioned an increased incidence of bile reflux in &#xA;patients with gastric ulceration.  Flint and Grech (l970) stated that the pylorus was &#xA;incompetent in gastric ulceration and chronic alcoholic gastritis, while the results of &#xA;Valenzuela and Defilippi (l976) suggested pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; incompetence in gastric &#xA;ulceration.  Nicolai et al. (l980) found increased reflux in l8 gastric ulcer cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In our series (Keet l982) there were 9 cases of benign ulcer on the lesser curvature of the &#xA;stomach at varying distances proximal to the sphincteric cylinder, i.e. not within the &#xA;cylinder.  Seven of these showed moderate reflux.  In the series of Hughes et al. (l982) &#xA;reflux was present in 21 of 46 patients with gastric ulcer.  Although there appeared to be &#xA;a higher proportion of gastric ulcer patients with reflux, the results did not reach &#xA;statistical significance when compared with the other dyspeptic patients examined.  The &#xA;impression was that there was no direct association between the degree of reflux and the &#xA;presence of peptic ulceration, according to Hughes et al. (l982).  Niemela et al. (l984) &#xA;found that of l9 patients with gastric ulcer in the body of the stomach, l7 had reflux.  Two &#xA;patients had both gastric and duodenal ulceration, both showing reflux.  Twelve patients &#xA;had prepyloric and antral gastric ulcers, 8 showing reflux.  Of 30 patients with gastric &#xA;ulceration Wolverson et al. (l984) found l7 (53 percent) to be reflux positive.  Gotthard et &#xA;al. (l985) examined 11 patients with prepyloric ulcer disease (i.e. with the ulcer situated &#xA;within 2.0 cm of the pyloric ring);  in all the intragastric concentrations of bile acid were &#xA;measured over a 12 hour period.  The mean bile acid concentrations in prepyloric ulcer &#xA;patients were found to be significantly higher than in both controls and duodenal ulcer &#xA;patients, diurnally as well as nocturnally.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gastric ulceration is often associated with spasm of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;(Chap. 29).  Spasm of the cylinder resembles a normal, partial contraction;  at this stage &#xA;the pyloric aperture is normally open (Chap. 13).  In spasm the aperture is &#34;fixed&#34; in the &#xA;open position.  It is surmized that for this reason a high incidence of duodenogastric &#xA;reflux is to be expected in gastric ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Malignant Gastric Ulceration&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In our series (Keet l982) 2 malignant gastric ulcers were found.  In one case, with the &#xA;ulcer on the gastric lesser curvature close to the pylorus (i.e. within the sphincteric &#xA;cylinder), there was moderate to marked reflux.  In the second case, with the ulcer at the &#xA;incisura angularis, no reflux was seen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Sliding Hiatus Hernia with Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Donovan et al. (l977) noted duodenogastric reflux in 3 of 8 patients with hiatus hernia.  In &#xA;10 cases of hiatus hernia Nicolai et al. (l980) found no evidence of increased reflux.  In &#xA;our series (Keet l982) there were 9 cases of hiatus hernia, 4 showing reflux of duodenal &#xA;contents.  There seems to be an association between hiatus hernia and spasm of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder;  this may allow increased duodenogastric reflux and may &#xA;ultimately lead to biliary oesophagitis (Chap. 32).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Combined Lesions&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the present series 7 cases had combined lesions, e.g. duodenal ulceration and hiatus &#xA;hernia;  most of these showed reflux.  One of these cases showed a constant spasm of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder with irregular and transverse mucosal folds (Fig. 27.4).  It &#xA;was diagnosed radiologically and endoscopically as spasm and gastritis affecting the &#xA;cylinder;  in addition the duodenal bulb was deformed due to ulceration.  In this case &#xA;moderate to marked duodenogastric reflux occurred.  Owing to the tube-like spasm of the &#xA;cylinder, the pyloric aperture was neither fully open nor fully closed, but fixed in the &#xA;patent position.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Pyloric Motility&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Both in normal controls and in patients, duodenogastric reflux only occurred while the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder was relaxed or in a state of partial contraction;  it never &#xA;occurred during maximal contraction of the cylinder.  During relaxation of the cylinder &#xA;there is absence of muscular closure of the aperture;  mucosal closure may be present &#xA;(Chap. 13).  During partial contraction of the cylinder, occurring as a phase of cyclical &#xA;contractile activity, the pyloric aperture is open (Chap. 13).  Spasm of the cylinder &#xA;resembles partial, physiological contraction, and is associated with patency of the &#xA;aperture;  it differs from a physiological contraction in that its contraction is permanent.  &#xA;Consequently increased duodenogastric reflux is to be expected in spasticity of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The above does not imply that the phase of contraction of the sphincteric cylinder is the &#xA;only factor in the pathogenesis of duodenogastric reflux.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H4&gt;Duodenal Motility&lt;/H4&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Both in normal subjects and in patients, duodenal peristaltic waves and &#34;segmental&#34; &#xA;contraction waves in the third part of the duodenum appeared to be of little consequence &#xA;in duodenogastric reflux (vide supra).  However, in experimental studies in canines &#xA;Ehrlein (l981) found that the timing between contractions of the duodenal bulb and the &#xA;pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; (right pyloric loop) was not perfect.  Contraction maxima of the &#xA;duodenal bulb often occurred slightly before or after contraction maxima of the &#34;sphincter&#34;.  &#xA;Consequently the pyloric aperture was often inadequately closed during contraction of &#xA;the duodenal bulb, resulting in reflux.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Capper WM, Airth GR, Kilby JO.  A test for pyloric regurgitation.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l966, 2, 621-623.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Capper WM.  Factors in the pathogenesis of gastric ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Roy Coll &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; l967, 40, 21-35.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cole GJ.  The implications of bile in the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l969, 10, 864-&#xA;867.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Connell AM.  Direct measurement of pyloric diameter and tone in man and their &#xA;response to cholecystokinin (discussion).  In:  &lt;em&gt;Gastrointestinal Motility in &#xA;Health and Disease&lt;/em&gt;.  Edit Duthie HL.  Baltimore, University Park Press &#xA;l978, p 357.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunnigham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid ape.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Davenport HW.  Effect of lysolecithin, digitonin and phospholipase A upon the &#xA;dog&#39;s gastric mucosal barrier.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l970, 59, 505-509.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Delaney JP, Cheng JWB, Butler BA, et al.  Gastric ulcer and regurgitation &#xA;gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l970, 11, 715-719.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Donovan IA, Harding LK, Keighley MRB, et al.  Abnormalities of gastric &#xA;emptying and pyloric reflux in uncomplicated hiatus hernia.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; l977, 64, 847-849.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Du Plessis DJ.  Some aspects of the pathogenesis and surgical management of &#xA;peptic ulcers.  &lt;em&gt;South Afr Med J&lt;/em&gt; l960, 34, 101-108.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Du Plessis DJ.  Gastric mucosal changes after operations on the stomach.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;South Afr Med J&lt;/em&gt; l962, 36, 471-478.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Du Plessis DJ.  Pathogenesis of gastric ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l965, l, &#xA;974-978.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ehrlein HJ.  Strain gauge transducer for recording gastrointestinal motility in &#xA;unanaesthetized animals.  &lt;em&gt;Zeitschr Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l980, l8, l9l-l97.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Ehrlein HJ.  Gastric and duodenal motility in relation to duodenogastric reflux in &#xA;healthy dogs.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 16 (Suppl 67), 23-27.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Flint FJ, Grech P.  Pyloric regurgitation and gastric ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l970, &#xA;11, 735-737.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; l9l3, Suppl 30, l-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gotthard R, Bodemar G, Tj&amp;#228;dermo M, et al.  High gastric bile acid &#xA;concentration in prepyloric ulcer patients.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l985, 20, 439-446.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Grech P.  A technique for assessing pyloric reflux.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l970, ll, 794-&#xA;795.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hoare AM, Keighley MRB, Starkey B, et al.  Measurement of bile acids in fasting &#xA;gastric aspirates:  an objective test for bile reflux after gastric surgery.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l978, l9, 166-169.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hughes K, Robertson DAR, James WB.  Duodeno-gastric reflux in normal and &#xA;dyspeptic subjects.  &lt;em&gt;Clin Rad&lt;/em&gt; l982, 33, 461-466.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kaye MD, Showalter JP.  Pyloric incompetence in patients with symptomatic &#xA;gastro-oesophageal reflux.  &lt;em&gt;J Lab Clin Med&lt;/em&gt; l974, 83, 198-206.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD.  Diameter of the pyloric aperture in relation to the contraction of the &#xA;canalis egestorius.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l962, 57, 31-44.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD.  A new, tubeless radiological test for duodenogastric reflux.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;South Afr Med J&lt;/em&gt; l982, 61, 78-81.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keighley MRB, Asquith P, Alexander-Williams J.  Duodenogastric reflux:  a &#xA;cause of gastric mucosal hyperaemia and symptoms after operations for peptic &#xA;ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l975, 16, 28-32.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kelly KA, Code CF.  Duodenal-gastric reflux and slowed gastric emptying by &#xA;electrical pacing of the canine duodenal pacesetter potential.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l977, 72, 429-433.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kim SK, Rogers LS, Heitzman RE.  Reflux alkaline gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l972, 115, 271-274.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lawson HH.  Effect of duodenal contents on the gastric mucosa under &#xA;experimental conditions.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l964, 1, 469-472.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Marriott C, Kellaway IW, Martin GP.  The effect of bile salts on the physical &#xA;properties of mucus (abstract).  In:  &lt;em&gt;Mucus in Health and Disease&lt;/em&gt;.  &#xA;Edit Elstein M, Parke DV.  Plenum Press, London l977, p 509.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Muhammed I, McLoughlin GP, Holt S, et al.  Non-invasive estimation of &#xA;duodenogastric reflux using technetium-&lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;butyliminodiacetic acid.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l980, 2, 1162-1165.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Nicolai JJ, Silberbusch J, Van Roon F, et al.  A simple method for the &#xA;quantification of biliary reflux.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l980, 15, 775-&#xA;780.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Niemela S, Heikkila J, Lehtola J.  Duodenogastric reflux in patients with gastric &#xA;ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l984, 19, 896-898.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Olch IY.  Duodenal regurgitation as a factor in neutralisation of gastric acidity.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; l928, 16, 125-138.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Orchard R, Reynolds K, Fox B, et al.  Effect of lysolecithin on gastric mucosal &#xA;structure and potential difference.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l977, l8, 457-461.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rees WDW, Go VLW, Malagelada JR.  Simultaneous measurement of &#xA;antroduodenal motility, gastric emptying and duodenogastric reflux in man.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l979, 20, 963-970.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rhodes J, Bernardo DE, Phillips SF, et al.  Increased reflux of bile into the &#xA;stomach in patients with gastric ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l969, 57, &#xA;241-252.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rovelstad RA.  The incompetent pyloric sphincter;  bile and mucosal ulceration.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l976, 21, 165-173.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schrager J, Oates MDG.  Relation of human gastro-intestinal mucus to disease &#xA;states.  &lt;em&gt;Brit Med Bull&lt;/em&gt; l978, 34, 79-82.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Thomas WEG, Jackson PC, Cooper MJ, et al.  The problems associated with &#xA;scintigraphic assessment of duodenogastric reflux.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l984, l9 (Suppl 92), 36-40.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Valenzuela JE, Defilippi C.  Pyloric sphincter studies in peptic ulcer patients.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l976, 21, 229-232.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wolverson RL, Sorgi M, Mosimann F, et al.  The incidence of duodenogastric &#xA;reflux in peptic ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l984, l9 (Suppl &#xA;92), 149-150.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wormsley KG.  Aspects of duodenogastric reflux in man.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l972, &#xA;13, 243-250.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>28 - Gastritis and Erosions in the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_28/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_28/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;gastritis-and-erosions-in-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastritis and Erosions in the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastritis-and-erosions-in-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Holsti (l931) stated that inflammatory alterations of gastritis usually affected the mucosa, &#xA;but that changes also occurred in the deeper layers of the wall in 66 percent of cases, and &#xA;even the serous layer might be involved.  He performed detailed histological studies of &#xA;the intramural ganglia in gastric resection specimens affected by chronic gastritis (in the &#xA;absence of peptic ulceration).  Compared with normal controls, the ganglia of gastritis &#xA;showed marked changes affecting the periganglionar, capsular and intraganglionar &#xA;structures.  The outstanding feature was an increase in connective tissue both in the &#xA;periganglionar and intraganglionar regions, coupled with intraganglionar infiltration of &#xA;inflammatory cells and degeneration of ganglion cells;  in some ganglia hardly a single &#xA;normal cell was seen.  The changes were more marked in Auerbach&#39;s than in Meissner&#39;s &#xA;plexus and more advanced in the pyloric than in the fundic zone.  The intensity of the &#xA;condition varied from case to case, from ganglion to ganglion, and even from one part of &#xA;a ganglion to another.  The spatial spread of the process was uneven, but two components &#xA;of the wall, namely the mucosa and Auerbach&#39;s plexuses, were always involved.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schindler et al. (l937) pointed out that at that time the normal histological picture of the &#xA;gastric mucosa was still being debated.  Specimens for examination were rarely obtained &#xA;from healthy stomachs as postmortem changes altered the picture and healthy stomachs &#xA;were not resected.  Minor histological changes did not indicate active disease but were &#xA;the normal reaction to external irritants, such as hot or cold food;  those changes were not &#xA;due to chronic gastritis.  Gastroscopy could be carried out in normal persons, and on the &#xA;basis of systematic gastroscopic investigations it was suggested that chronic gastritis &#xA;could be divided into 3 types:  superficial, atrophic and hypertrophic.  Demonstrating the &#xA;mucosal folds by means of radiological relief techniques was of little value in the &#xA;diagnosis of chronic gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Golden (l937) defined gastritis as inflammation of the gastric wall of unknown etiology, &#xA;which began in and might be limited to the mucosa, but which frequently extended to the &#xA;deeper layers and even to the serosa.  It could be generalized, but was often patchy and &#xA;not infrequently it was limited to, or had its maximum effect in, the antrum.  The term &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34; was used synonymously with the canalis egestorius as described by Forssell &#xA;(l913), while antral systole and diastole indicated contraction and relaxation of the canalis &#xA;respectively.  As the canalis egestorius was the most important part of the stomach as far &#xA;as motility was concerned, inflammatory change here could be expected to produce &#xA;serious disturbances in gastric motive function.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Golden (l937) agreed with Schindler et al. (l937) and other previous authors that in many &#xA;cases of gastritis the change in the mucous membrane could not be demonstrated by &#xA;radiology, and the condition could only be diagnosed by gastroscopy.  In other cases, &#xA;however, the canalis exhibited motility disorders which were readily apparent during the &#xA;radiological examination;  in some there was absence of contraction (absence of &#34;antral &#xA;systole&#34;), while in others a greater or lesser degree of &#34;antral&#34; spasm was seen.  The &#xA;spasm could vary from marked contraction to failure of full relaxation of the canalis.  &#xA;Involvement of the deeper layers of the wall by inflammatory infiltration and fibrosis &#xA;could hamper or prevent normal movements of the muscularis mucosae and consequently &#xA;of the mucosal folds (Chaps. 2, 13);  as a result the folds failed to change in direction as &#xA;they normally did during antral systole, causing them to appear exaggerated.  These &#xA;features enabled Golden (l937) to make a radiological diagnosis of &#34;antral gastritis and &#xA;spasm&#34; in appropriate cases.  The prepyloric narrowing was sometimes associated with &#xA;mucosal erosions which at that time were only demonstrable by gastroscopy or &#xA;histological examination.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In histological studies of 100 partial gastrectomy specimens, Magnus (l946) found that &#xA;inflammatory gastritis affecting the pyloric region consisted of two types.  The first type, &#xA;acute erosive pyloric gastritis, was characterized by polymorphonuclear infiltration of the &#xA;mucosa, with lesser numbers of lymphocytes, plasma cells and eosinophils.  The &#xA;glandular epithelium showed degenerative changes, there was capillary hyperaemia with &#xA;mucosal oedema, and erosions were visible on the surface.  The typical erosion had the &#xA;size of a pin&#39;s head and involved only the superficial part of the mucosa, i.e. it did not &#xA;extend through the mucosa and muscularis mucosae into the submucosa;  erosions varied &#xA;in number from a few to over a hundred in individual cases.  The second type, chronic &#xA;atrophic gastritis, was characterized by atrophy of the glandular parenchyma, fibrosis in &#xA;the mucosa and submucosa, intense infiltration of the interstitial tissue by plasma cells &#xA;and lymphocytes, and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric epithelium.  There was a &#xA;transition from acute erosive to chronic atrophic pyloric gastritis, and the two types were &#xA;sometimes found together.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;MacDonald and Rubin (l967) found that gastric suction biopsy studies of gastritis had &#xA;been disappointing;  blind suction biopsy often missed the pyloric mucosal zone and &#xA;specimens of pyloric mucosa were seldom obtained.  Examination of the entire length of &#xA;gastrectomy specimens by means of the Swiss roll technique afforded better results.  For &#xA;a variety of reasons the definition and classification of chronic gastritis remained &#xA;unsatisfactory.  Correlation between the radiological mucosal fold pattern and &#xA;histological findings was poor.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Studies by Gear et al. (l97l), (Chap. 29), showed that ulcers of the body of the stomach &#xA;were associated with more extensive and more severe gastritis than ulcers of the &#xA;prepyloric region.  In the latter gastritis was usually localized to the distal stomach, it was &#xA;often superficial and showed little evidence of atrophic change or metaplasia.  The fact &#xA;that gastritis persisted in spite of healing of the gastric ulceration, indicated that it was the &#xA;basic disease process and not simply a zonal change secondary to the ulcer.&#xA;By means of fibreoptic gastroscopy Whitehead et al. (l972) obtained fresh, multiple full-&#xA;thickness biopsy specimens from all parts of the gastric mucosa in a large number of &#xA;patients.  They proposed a classification of chronic gastritis applicable to all zones of the &#xA;mucosa, based on the following features:  First, the mucosal type had to be established, &#xA;e.g. pyloric mucosa had to be differentiated from pseudopyloric metaplasia of body &#xA;mucosa.  Second, the grade had to be determined;  chronic atrophic gastritis (in which &#xA;there was atrophy of tubules) could be subdivided into mild, moderate and severe grades.  &#xA;Third, the stage of activity had to be established;  both superficial and atrophic gastritis &#xA;could be either active or quiescent.  Fourth, the presence and type of metaplasia had to be &#xA;determined;  it was acknowledged that difficulties could arise in recognizing mucosal &#xA;type when severe gastritis was associated with metaplasia or atrophy.  In their &#xA;classification the degree of atrophy, rather than the degree of chronic cellular infiltration, &#xA;was graded.  It was also established that intestinal metaplasia nearly always occurred in &#xA;mucosa which was the site of atrophic gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Strickland and Mackay (l973) reviewed the nature of chronic atrophic gastritis in relation &#xA;to the structure and function of the pyloric antrum, where &#34;antrum&#34; was equated with the &#xA;pyloric mucosal zone.  Two distinct types of atrophic gastritis were recognized.  In Type &#xA;A, tests for parietal cell autoantibody and intrinsic factor antibody were positive;  there &#xA;was sparing of antral mucosa, with diffuse changes in the corpus, and severe impairment &#xA;of gastric secretion.  In Type B, parietal cell autoantibody and intrinsic factor antibody &#xA;reactions were negative;  there was definite antral involvement with focal changes in the &#xA;corpus, and moderate impairment of gastric secretion.  Benign gastric ulceration of the &#xA;corpus was found to be associated with Type B atrophic gastritis;  the more proximally &#xA;the ulcer was located in the stomach, the more extensive the gastritis and the more severe &#xA;the impairment of acid secretion proved to be.  Chronic atrophic gastritis persisted after &#xA;ulcer healing, supporting the view that gastric ulcer originated from chronic gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rao et al. (l975) stated that the term chronic gastritis carried different connotations for &#xA;the clinician, the pathologist and the radiologist.  Previously little attention had been &#xA;given to determining the degree of chronic cellular infiltration involving the full thickness &#xA;of the gastric mucosa.  They supported the use of terms which described the &#xA;morphological abnormalities found in mucosal biopsies, namely the degree of cellular &#xA;infiltration of the whole mucosa and the presence or absence of atrophy.  A simple &#xA;descriptive classification of chronic gastritis into mild, moderately severe and severe &#xA;grades, with or without atrophy or metaplasia, was recommended.  Mucosal biopsies in &#xA;241 patients with a variety of upper abdominal conditions showed chronic gastritis in &#xA;184.  Only 3 of the patients were diagnosed as true superficial gastritis, where the cellular &#xA;infiltration was limited to the lamina propria between the pits.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Op den Orth and Dekker (l976) described erosions as superfical mucosal defects which &#xA;did not penetrate the muscularis mucosae.  A flat erosion was a mucosal defect without &#xA;reaction in the adjacent parts, while a varioliform or complete erosion indicated a &#xA;mucosal defect surrounded by an elevated zone;  the elevated zone had been variously &#xA;interpreted as a circular contraction of the muscularis mucosae, oedema, leucocytic &#xA;infiltration, or fibrosis.  It was pointed out that erosions could occur as solitary lesions or &#xA;in combination with other upper gastro-intestinal pathology, e.g. gastric or duodenal &#xA;ulceration;  whether a gastric erosion itself ever developed into a gastric ulcer was &#xA;controversial.  Because of the raised zone surrounding it, an erosion could be visualized &#xA;fairly easily with double-contrast radiography as a tiny, constant fleck of barium &#xA;surrounded by a radiolucent halo;  some erosions tended to be linear rather than circular.  &#xA;In some cases erosions in the prepyloric area were associated with prominent or irregular &#xA;mucosal folds;  the radiographic diagnosis of erosions was found to be reliable, and &#xA;correlated well with their endoscopic demonstration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Roesch (l978) pointed out that gastric erosions occurred very commonly and were often &#xA;multiple.  In the acute type the epithelial defect was not surrounded by inflammatory &#xA;reaction, while the chronic type had an elevated, bulging border.  Only the chronic type &#xA;was detectable radiologically, presenting as a small fleck with a surrounding halo.  &#xA;Endoscopy showed that almost 60 percent of chronic erosions occurred in the antral &#xA;region, and that they were often associated with prominent mucosal folds.  Radiological &#xA;demonstration of these bead-like prepyloric folds was highly suspicious of chronic &#xA;erosions, even in the absence of a central punctate barium-filled depression.  Where &#xA;erosions were followed-up for 5 years or longer, the transformation of multiple antral &#xA;erosions into hyperplastic folds could often be seen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Morson and Dawson (l979) reiterated that the most accurate diagnosis of gastritis was &#xA;made on biopsies taken under direct vision through a fibrescope.  Their classification, &#xA;which was made on histological grounds, entailed 3 types, namely chronic superfical &#xA;gastritis, atrophic gastritis (both of which might be either active or quiescent), and gastric &#xA;atrophy.  Active superficial gastritis might be accompanied by small erosions.  In &#xA;atrophic gastritis the essential feature was not the increase in inflammatory cells in the &#xA;lamina propria, but the reduction or atrophy of the deep glands, accompanied by &#xA;intestinal metaplasia in the &#34;antrum&#34;.  Attention was drawn to the fact that in both &#xA;superficial and atrophic gastritis, submucous fibrosis and thickening of the muscularis &#xA;externa had been reported, giving rise to &#34;antral&#34; deformity which was recognizable &#xA;radiologically.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Freise et al. (l979) did four year follow-up studies in 64 patients with gastric erosions.  &#xA;The most common site of multiple erosions was the &#34;antral&#34; region.  Erosions were &#xA;frequently seen in combination with other upper gastrointestinal conditions such as &#xA;gastric or duodenal ulceration or hiatus hernia.  In 10 percent of cases chain-like multiple &#xA;erosions developed into a persistent, prominent gastric mucosal fold, usually in the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;.  When such a fold was seen, it could be taken to be the result of a chain of &#xA;erosions.  There was no evidence that erosions led to chronic gastric ulceration, polyps or &#xA;malignancy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Karvonen et al. (l983) classified erosions according to their endoscopic morphology.  In &#xA;the complete type there was a surrounding elevated border;  incomplete or flat erosions &#xA;were surrounded by a red halo, and haemorrhagic erosions were punctate bleeding spots.  &#xA;In 86 percent of 117 patients with gastric erosions (but without other upper &#xA;gastrointestinal pathology), the lesions occurred only in the antral or prepyloric part of &#xA;the stomach, and in the majority of patients presented as multiple erosions.  Some showed &#xA;features of both the complete and incomplete types, and were characterized by their &#xA;location on prominent prepyloric mucosal folds.&#xA;Nesland and Berstad (l985) noted a specific endoscopic appearance, consisting of &#xA;standing prepyloric mucosal folds, redness and erosions, in a considerable number of &#xA;patients presenting with dyspepsia;  they called the condition erosive prepyloric changes &#xA;(EPC) and divided it into three grades on the basis of the endoscopic features.  In grade 1 &#xA;there were standing mucosal folds, independent of peristalsis, running either transversely &#xA;or longitudinally in the &#34;antral&#34; lumen.  In grade 2 the same appearance was seen with red &#xA;spots or streaks situated on top of the folds.  In grade 3 the previous 2 appearances were &#xA;associated with macroscopic erosions, described as white, fibrin-covered spots with red &#xA;halos.  EPC grades 2 and 3 were found in 26 percent of 1001 consecutive patients &#xA;examined endoscopically.  After excluding all patients with ulcer, carcinoma, post-&#xA;operative conditions and upper gastro-intestinal bleeding, a group of 651 patients with &#xA;non-ulcer dyspepsia remained;  EPC grades 2 or 3 were seen in 210.  In a group of 34 &#xA;asymptomatic volunteers, grade 2 was found in 5 cases and grade 3 in one case.  The &#xA;frequency of grades 2 and 3 of erosive prepyloric changes appeared to be higher in non-&#xA;ulcer dyspepsia than in patients with peptic ulceration and also varied with age.  The &#xA;highest frequency encountered was 52 percent, in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia in the &#xA;40 to 49 year age group.  The entity prepyloric erosive changes probably represented a &#xA;form of antral gastritis.  It might have a bearing on the radiological diagnosis of antral &#xA;gastritis.  Although the redness and often also the erosions were not visible &#xA;radiologically, the permanent and coarse mucosal folds should be evident.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Berstad and Nesland (l985) stated that the three grades of EPC were merely different &#xA;expressions of the same process.  While the superficial mucosal state might regress or &#xA;progress to another grade, the prominent, standing prepyloric mucosal folds were of a &#xA;permanent nature.  Histological verification was obtained in 88 percent of cases of &#xA;endoscopically visible grade 3 erosions;  they were always accompanied by an element of &#xA;acute inflammation with infiltration of neutrophil polymorphs.  In the vast majority there &#xA;was an additional chronic inflammatory infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells.  &#xA;Intramucosal fibrosis was present in all biopsy specimens.  Clinically, EPC appeared to &#xA;be related to non-ulcer dyspepsia.  The symptoms could be suggestive of gastric ulcer, &#xA;while endoscopy proved the absence of ulceration.  The findings supported the theory &#xA;that EPC was a disease entity of its own, to be differentiated from ulcer disease.  The &#xA;permanent feature of the condition, namely standing mucosal folds, was independent of &#xA;the ongoing inflammatory activity in the surface layer;  whether contractions in the &#xA;deeper muscular layers contributed to the fold formation was not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Berstad and Nesland (l987) reiterated that EPC was an endoscopic diagnosis based on the &#xA;presence of standing prepyloric folds, with or without different types of erosions.  &#xA;Standing folds were defined as transverse or parallel folds in the prepyloric region, which &#xA;might run into the pylorus itself and which were independent of peristaltic movements.  &#xA;They did not believe that EPC and peptic ulceration were aspects of the same disease &#xA;process;  EPC could not be considered to be merely a form of antral gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hojgaard et al. (l987) pointed out that clinicians, endoscopists and pathologists defined &#xA;gastritis in different ways.  Pathoanatomical gastritis occurred very commonly and the &#xA;prevalence increased with age.  These authors found no correlation between dyspepsia (in &#xA;patients without peptic ulceration) and endoscopic signs suggesting gastritis, or &#xA;histological gastritis.  It was concluded that gastritis did not seem to constitute a clinical &#xA;entity in non-ulcer dyspepsia.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Karvonen et al. (l987) studied 130 patients with gastric mucosal erosions, occurring in &#xA;the absence of peptic ulceration, by endoscopic biopsy;  most were located in the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;.  In their view erosions were inconsistent phenomena, probably with different &#xA;pathogeneses and etiologies.  Some incomplete erosions were associated with abuse of &#xA;analgesics, but those located on prepyloric mucosal folds appeared to be associated with &#xA;duodenal ulceration or duodenitis.  The study suggested that prepyloric erosions &#xA;constituted an entity of their own;  in most instances the mucosa of the corpus was well &#xA;preserved despite ageing, the appearance being similar to that of duodenal ulcer disease.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;present-investigations&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Present Investigations&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#present-investigations&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During routine upper gastrointestinal barium examinations, a presumptive radiological &#xA;diagnosis of &#34;antral gastritis&#34; was made from time to time.  Most of these patients &#xA;subsequently had endoscopic investigations (unfortunately biopsies were not taken in all).  &#xA;After a suitable interval the patients&#39; clinical notes were perused and a final diagnosis &#xA;obtained.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A total of 50 cases who were diagnosed radiologically, and confirmed endoscopically, as &#xA;chronic &#34;antral&#34; gastritis were studied.  The following are examples of the more &#xA;pronounced cases:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 28.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; G.G., 52 year old male.  Radiographic examination showed a moderate &#xA;degree of constant contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, with absence of normal, &#xA;cyclical contraction and relaxation;  the contraction fixed the pyloric aperture in the open &#xA;position (Fig. 28.1).  The stomach appeared to be hypertonic;  rapid emptying of fluid &#xA;barium occurred.  Endoscopic biopsy of the &#34;antral&#34; region revealed acute on chronic &#xA;gastritis;  no evidence of malignancy was seen.  Repeat endoscopic biopsy two months &#xA;later showed acute on chronic inflammatory reaction in the lamina propria, with &#xA;eosinophylic infiltration and without evidence of intestinal metaplasia.  Stainings for &#xA;Helicobacter pylori were positive.  A third endoscopic biopsy two months after the &#xA;second, showed chronic gastritis with intestinal metaplasia.  Stainings for Helicobacter &#xA;pylori were negative.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 28.1. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case G.G.  Moderate degree of constant contraction of pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder (arrows).  Cyclical activity absent.  Pyloric aperture patent&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 28.2&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; J.C., 63 year old male, was a know case of ethanol abuse and liver &#xA;cirrhosis.  Radiographic examination showed a marked degree of constant contraction of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder,  which contained prominent, irregular, immobile &#xA;mucosal folds  (Fig. 28.2 &lt;em&gt;A-D&lt;/em&gt;).&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-2c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-2d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 28.2 A-D. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case J.C.  Constant contraction of sphincteric cylinder with absent cyclical activity. &#xA;Irregular, immobile folds in cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Peristaltic waves were normal in the remainder of the stomach, but stopped abruptly at &#xA;the commencement of the cylinder, which showed total absence of cyclical contraction &#xA;and relaxation.  Endoscopy revealed chronic &#34;antral&#34; gastritis;  a few small erosions were &#xA;noted in the first part of the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 28.3&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; L.M., 50 year old female.  Radiographic examination showed pronounced, &#xA;constant contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder;  occasionally a minor degree of &#xA;relaxation occurred, but cyclical contraction and relaxation was absent and most of the &#xA;time the appearance remained as illustrated (Fig. 28.3).  Prominent circular and irregular &#xA;mucosal folds which appreared to be immobile, were present in the contracted cylinder.  &#xA;A concave indentation was seen in the base of the duodenal bulb.  Endoscopy revealed a &#xA;number of mucosal erosions as well as an appearance of severe &#34;antral&#34; gastritis.  This &#xA;was still present at a second endoscopy 8 months later, indicating chronicity.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 28.3. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case L.M. Constant contraction of sphincteric cylinder (arrows), with prominent irregular, &#xA;static mucosal folds&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 28.4&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; C.C., 36 year old female.  Radiographic examination showed the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder to be markedly contracted most of the time;  at such times it &#xA;contained longitudinal mucosal folds (Fig. 28.4&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  Occasionally it relaxed to &#xA;a certain extent, when a fold changed in direction to become circular (Fig. &#xA;28.4&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;);  relaxation was never complete and cyclical activity was absent.  &#xA;Endoscopy revealed an erosion on the lesser curvature side of the pyloric region;  &#xA;touching the mucosa caused haemorrhage.  The endoscopic diagnosis was erosive antral &#xA;gastritis. &#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-4a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 28.4. A &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case C.C. Marked contraction of sphincteric cylinder, with longitudinal mucosal folds&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B &lt;/b&gt;Case C.C. Some relaxation of cylinder.  A mucosal fold has changed in direction to &#xA;become circular.  Cyclical activity absent&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-4b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 28.5&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; J.M., 45 year old male.  The pyloric sphincteric cylinder remained &#xA;partially contracted throughout the radiographic examination, with complete absence of &#xA;normal, cyclical contraction and relaxation.  At least one prominent, circumferential &#xA;mucosal fold, which did not change in position, was present in the partially contracted &#xA;cylinder (Fig. 28.5).  Initially it was difficult to distinguish between a permanent, &#xA;circumferential mucosal fold and a prepyloric septum.  Endoscopy revealed prominent, &#xA;thickened prepyloric mucosal folds with an abnormal, whitish, granular surface.  &#xA;Endoscopic biopsy showed lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration of the lamina &#xA;propria;  in some areas atypical epithelium, presumably due to inflmmatory change, was &#xA;seen.  The endoscopic diagnosis was chronic &#34;antral&#34; gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/28-5.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 28.5. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case J.M. Partial contraction of sphincteric cylinder, with absent cyclical activity. &#xA;Prominent static, circular mucosal fold in cylinder (arrow)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A brief review of the literature shows that many aspects of gastritis are still controversial;  &#xA;even its definition is contentious.  It has been stated that clinicians, pathologists and &#xA;endoscopists defined &#34;gastritis&#34; in different ways (Hojgaard et al. l987).  Others held that &#xA;the term &#34;chronic gastritis&#34; had different connotations for the clinician, the pathologist &#xA;and radiologist (Rao et al. l975).  Authors differ on the subdivision of gastritis into &#xA;various types and grades.  It is agreed, however, that the diagnosis in the intact stomach &#xA;can only be made by means of endoscopy, biopsy and microscopy.  As the deeper layers &#xA;of the wall are also involved in many instances, a full investigation would entail &#xA;histologic examination of resection specimens.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The cases quoted here show that certain radiologically recognizable alterations may be &#xA;associated with chronic &#34;antral&#34; gastritis, perhaps more correctly termed chronic gastritis &#xA;affecting the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  (One of the cases was diagnosed as erosive &#xA;haemorrhagic gastritis).  The radiologically recognizable alterations are:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Partial but constant contraction of the sphincteric cylinder;  the degree of &#xA;contraction was usually described as &#34;moderate&#34; or &#34;marked&#34;.  In these cases &#xA;radiologically visible peristaltic waves in the corpus and sinus of the stomach &#xA;appeared normal, but each wave stopped at the commencement of the partially &#xA;contracted cylinder.  In some cases the cylinder showed minor degrees of &#xA;contraction and relaxation, but maximal cyclical contraction and relaxation at a &#xA;rate of 3 cycles per minute was absent in all.  The appearance closely resembles &#xA;that of pylorospasm (Chap. 20).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In some cases the pyloric aperture was seen to be fixed in the open position as a &#xA;consequence of partial contraction of the cylinder;  this appearance may be &#xA;associated with duodenogastric reflux (Chap. 27).  It is presumed that the lack of &#xA;cyclical activity of the cylinder may have a bearing on trituration and the &#xA;emptying of solids (Chap. 18).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Prominent irregular and/or circular mucosal folds showing restricted movements &#xA;or no movement at all.  In view of the restricted movements of the walls of the &#xA;cylinder it is not surprising that &#34;independent but co-ordinated&#34; movements of the &#xA;inner mucosal layer should also be curtailed or absent (Chaps. 2, 13).  It is &#xA;surmized that cellular infiltration in the mucosa, submucosa, muscular layers and &#xA;neuronal elements occurring in chronic gastritis, partially accounts for the &#xA;restricted movements. &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Theoretically the static, irregular mucosal folds projecting into the lumen should &#xA;hamper duodenogastric reflux occurring as a result of patency of the pyloric &#xA;aperture in some cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;A presumptive radiological diagnosis of chronic gastritis affecting the sphincteric &#xA;cylinder, was only made if the above features occurred in the absence of other &#xA;pathology in the upper gastrointestinal tract (e.g. gastric ulceration or hiatus &#xA;hernia).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Nesland and Berstad (l985) and Karvonen et al. (l987), erosive &#xA;prepyloric change (EPC) was a condition characterized by standing mucosal folds &#xA;and erosions;  it was diagnosed endoscopically and appeared to be an entity of its &#xA;own.  Radiographically a standing mucosal fold may also be recognized, as seen &#xA;in Fig. 28.5.  In this case it concerned a circular fold which failed to change in &#xA;position.  It was associated with lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration, no &#xA;mention being made of erosions.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Berstad A, Nesland AA.  Prepyloric erosions and related changes:  review.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l985, 20, 779-782.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Berstad A, Nesland AA.  Erosive prepyloric changes:  a new entity.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l987, 22, Suppl 128, 94-100.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G.  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; l913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Freise J, Hofmann R, Gebel M, et al.  Follow-up study of chronic gastric erosions.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Endoscopy&lt;/em&gt; l979, 11, 13-17.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gear MWL, Truelove SC, Whitehead R.  Gastric ulcer and gastritis.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 12, 639-645.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Golden R.  Antral gastritis and spasm.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/em&gt; l937, 109, &#xA;1497-1500.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Holsti O.  On the condition of the intramural ganglia in the stomach in cases of &#xA;gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Med Scand&lt;/em&gt; l93l, 76, 316-342.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Holsti O.  On the nature of the pylorus affections which simulate ulcus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Acta Med Scand&lt;/em&gt; l93l, 76, 343-393.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hojgaard L, Matzen P, Christoffersen P.  Gastritis:  a clinical entity?  &lt;em&gt;Scand &#xA;J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l987, 22, Suppl 128, 90-93.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Karvonen AL, Sipponen P, Lehtola J, et al.  Gastric mucosal erosions:  an &#xA;endoscopic, histological and functional study.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l983, l8, 1051-1056.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Karvonen AL, Kekki M, Lehtola J, et al.  Prepyloric erosions:  an entity of its own &#xA;among erosive gastric lesions.  A morphologic and dynamic study of gastric &#xA;mucosa in patients with gastric erosions.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l987, &#xA;22, 1095-1101.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;MacDonald WC, Rubin CE.  Gastric biopsy:  a critical evaluation.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l967, 53, 143-170.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Magnus HA.  The pathology of simple gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;J Path Bact&lt;/em&gt; l946, 58, &#xA;431-439.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Morson BC, Dawson IMP.  &lt;em&gt;Gastrointestinal Pathology&lt;/em&gt;.  Blackwell &#xA;Scientific Publications, London 2nd ed, l979, p 91.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Nesland AA, Berstad A.  Erosive prepyloric changes in persons with and without &#xA;dyspepsia.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l985, 20, 222-228.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Op den Orth JO, Dekker W.  Gastric erosions:  radiological and endoscopic &#xA;aspects.  &lt;em&gt;Radiol Clin&lt;/em&gt; l976, 45, 88-99.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rao SS, Krasner N, Thomson TJ.  Chronic gastritis:  a simple classification.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;J Path&lt;/em&gt; l975, 117, 93-96.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Roesch W.  Erosions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Clin &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l978, 7, 623-634.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schindler R, Ortmayer M, Renshaw JF.  Chronic gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med &#xA;Assoc&lt;/em&gt; l937, l08, 465-468.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Strickland RG, Mackay IR.  A reappraisal of the nature and significance of &#xA;chronic atrophic gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l973, 18, 426-440.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Whitehead R, Truelove SC, Gear WML.  The histological diagnosis of chronic &#xA;gastritis in fibreoptic gastroscope biopsy specimens.  &lt;em&gt;J Clin Path&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l972, 25, 1-11.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>29 - Gastric Ulceration and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_29/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_29/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;gastric-ulceration-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastric Ulceration and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastric-ulceration-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Johnson (l957, 1965) and Johnson et al. (l964) held that gastric ulcers should not only be &#xA;classified anatomically according to their distance from the pylorus, but also in &#xA;accordance with their associated acid-secretory or patho-physiological characteristics.  &#xA;While most gastric ulcer patients were acid hyposecretors, some were moderate and &#xA;others hypersecretors of acid.  On this basis the following 3 types of gastric ulcers were &#xA;recognized:  Type I consisted of those cases in whom the ulcer was situated to the left of &#xA;and above the gastric angulus (the angulus being defined as the lowest point of the lesser &#xA;curvature), without macroscopic abnormalities of the prepyloric region, the pylorus or &#xA;duodenum;  these cases were associated with a low level of acid secretion and possibly &#xA;hyposecretion of mucus.  Type II consisted of those cases in which a gastric ulcer to the &#xA;left of the angulus was associated with, and probably secondary to, an ulcer or its scar in &#xA;the pylorus or duodenum;  these patients were moderate and sometimes hypersecretors of &#xA;acid.  Type III included all gastric ulcers on or near the pylorus, and might be combined &#xA;with a duodenal ulcer or a Type II gastric ulcer proximally;  these patients usually had &#xA;hypersecretion of acid.  Type III was subdivided as follows:  (1)  ulcers within one inch &#xA;(2.54 cm) of the pylorus, called true prepyloric ulcers;  (2) ulcers to the right of the &#xA;angulus but further than 2.54 cm from the pylorus, called &#34;other antral&#34; ulcers.  It was &#xA;concluded that gastric ulcers near the pylorus and those occurring with a duodenal ulcer &#xA;should be looked upon as a disease of acid hypersecretion;  in these cases there was a &#xA;marked blood group O predominance, the ulcers nearest the pylorus carrying the highest &#xA;proportion of blood group O.  Gastric ulcers in the body of the stomach, occurring in &#xA;patients in whom the duodenum was normal, were usually characterized by acid &#xA;hyposecretion;  in these patients there was no evidence of group O preponderance, but in &#xA;fact an excess of blood group A.  The findings showed that the pathogenesis differed in &#xA;different types of gastric ulcers.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In their endoscopic studies of the mucosal morphology in 200 patients with chronic &#xA;gastric ulceration, Stadelmann et al. (l97l) classified the ulcers according to their &#xA;anatomical location, i.e. whether they were situated in the &#34;prepyloric antrum&#34;, at the &#xA;angulus, in the middle of the body or in the subcardial region.  A close relationship &#xA;existed between the location of the ulcer and the maximal acid secretion.  Ulcers of the &#xA;&#34;prepyloric antrum&#34; were similar to duodenal ulcers, having hyperchlorhydria, while &#xA;those at the angulus had normochlorhydria and subcardial ulcers had hypochlorhydria.  It &#xA;was concluded that the maximal acid output decreased the farther the ulcer was away &#xA;from the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In an extensive review Brooks (l985) divided chronic, benign, recurrent gastric ulcers &#xA;into the following subgroups:  (1) corpus or fundus ulcers;  (2) antral or prepyloric ulcers;  &#xA;(3) pyloric channel ulcers;  (4) a combination of any of the above with duodenal &#xA;ulceration;  (5) ulcers resistant to healing under treatment.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In view of the fact that the present investigation is primarily concerned with the muscular &#xA;anatomy of the stomach and motility, we divided gastric ulcers into 2 types, viz. those &#xA;situated proximally to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and those occurring within the &#xA;cylinder, i.e. within 3.0 cm to 4.0 cm of the pyloric aperture.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;gastric-ulceration-proximal-to-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastric Ulceration Proximal to the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastric-ulceration-proximal-to-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a radiological investigation of 200 patients with large, chronic benign gastric ulcers on &#xA;the lesser curvature of the pars media, Steigman (l943) found associated &#34;antral spasm&#34; &#xA;(which he equated with pylorospasm) in a small percentage of cases.  At times the spasm &#xA;was persistent and quite marked, the whole &#34;antrum&#34; distal to the ulcer being contracted &#xA;throughout the examination.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  On accompanying illustrations it &#xA;appears if the &#34;antral spasm&#34; is limited to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lilja (l953, l954) pointed out that in cases of ulceration at the incisura angularis, &#xA;associated changes in the pyloric part of the stomach were not unknown but had not been &#xA;subjected to a systematic analysis.  In his radiological investigations Lilja found that &#xA;gross ulceration at the incisura was usually associated with an impairment of gastric &#xA;motility in the distal stomach, consisting of altered peristalsis with dilatation of the sinus.  &#xA;Of 21 cases with a large ulcer at the incisura, radiological examination showed dilatation &#xA;of the sinus in 18;  in 4 cases in which the ulcer was smaller, the sinus was not dilated.  In &#xA;some of these cases the appearance of the canalis egestorius (i.e. the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder) also deviated from the normal, showing a cylindrical contraction in several.  In &#xA;others it contained irregular and oblique mucosal folds, while its contractions were &#xA;atypical and occurred at infrequent intervals.  At times there was a non-characteristic &#xA;functional impairment of the canalis with the pylorus remaining widely patent.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Histological examination in one of these cases showed chronic inflammatory changes in &#xA;the mucosa of the canalis with infiltration of plasma cells and hyperplasia of lymph &#xA;follicles.  Another case showed follicular and antral gastritis.  In all cases destruction of &#xA;the muscularis externa, with fibrous replacement, was seen at the site of the ulcer (at the &#xA;incisura).  Lilja (l953, l954) concluded that in cases of ulceration at the incisura angularis, &#xA;associated changes were frequently seen in the canalis egestorius.  The most common &#xA;appearance was a more or less permanent contraction of the canalis of varying severity, &#xA;resembling adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (AHPS) in the most pronounced cases.  &#xA;Lilja (l959) subsequently stated that the changes in the canalis were so common that they &#xA;had to be regarded as an inherent part of the radiological appearance in cases of deep &#xA;ulceration at the incisura.  In some cases it was found that the contraction of the canalis &#xA;persisted for periods of 2 to 4 years after healing of the ulcer.&#xA;In their description of 6 cases of AHPS, Skoryna et al. (l959) included one case in which &#xA;pyloric muscular hypertrophy was associated with a lesser curvature gastric ulcer situated &#xA;6.0 cm orally to the pylorus (Chap. 24).  The muscular hypertrophy involved the canalis &#xA;egestorius as described by Torgersen (l942).  It was surmized that the pyloric hypertrophy &#xA;was probably the primary lesion.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Knight (l961) described a case of a 37 year old male in which a benign gastric ulcer, 6.0 &#xA;cm proximal to the pylorus, was associated with AHPS (Chap. 24).  The area of muscular &#xA;hypertrophy was 2.5 cm in length and the walls measured 1.5 cm in thickness, i.e. it &#xA;appeared to be a typical case of AHPS limited to the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  &#xA;Whether there was a causal relationship between the gastric ulcer and the pyloric &#xA;hypertrophy was not clear.  (Two other cases of AHPS described by Knight were not &#xA;associated with gastric ulceration).  According to him it was likely that the gastric ulcer &#xA;was the result rather than the cause of the AHPS.  This was consistent with the &#xA;experimental findings of Dragstedt et al. (l954), who had previously produced gastric &#xA;ulceration in dogs by occluding the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Burge et al. (l963) described 2 adult cases in each of which a benign gastric ulcer situated &#xA;high on the lesser curvature was associated with what they called the &#34;pyloric channel &#xA;syndrome&#34;.  In one case radiography showed a narrowed pyloric �antrum� suggesting &#xA;malignancy, while operation revealed severe benign organic stenosis of the pyloric area &#xA;with a tiny eccentric aperture.  In the second case, in which radiography showed tapering &#xA;of the prepyloric stomach and deformity of the duodenal cap (in addition to the high &#xA;gastric ulcer), microscopic examination of the resection specimen revealed unilateral &#xA;pyloric muscle hypertrophy with small round-cell infiltration and fibrosis.  It was thought &#xA;that the pyloric channel syndrome, with associated gastric stasis, was the probable cause &#xA;of the gastric ulceration in these cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During histological examination of resection specimens in 37 cases of chronic gastric &#xA;ulceration, Du Plessis (l963) found associated atrophic gastritis of the whole of the &#xA;pyloric gland area in 62 percent of cases, and of half the pyloric gland area in 92 percent.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  In cases of gastric ulceration the pyloric glandular zone may be &#xA;more extensive than in normal controls as described in Chapter 5).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Garret et al. (l966) studied antral contraction waves by means of small water-filled &#xA;balloons placed in the &#34;distal antrum&#34; in normal controls and 13 patients with benign &#xA;gastric ulceration.  In 10 of the patients the ulcer was situated at or below the incisura &#xA;angularis but orally to the pyloric region.  The amplitude and duration of Type II waves &#xA;were similar in health and gastric ulcer patients, but there was a significant reduction in &#xA;the number of these waves in the ulcer group.  Normal motility patterns were obtained &#xA;after the ulcer had healed.  It was concluded that the gastric ulcer had a secondary effect &#xA;on motility;  there could be an interruption between action potentials and the contractile &#xA;mechanism of antral smooth muscle.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schrager et al. (l967) performed histological studies of the &#34;antrum&#34; in 40 resection &#xA;specimens obtained from cases of gastric ulceration.  In 31 cases the ulcer was situated at &#xA;a distance of 5.0 cm to 10.0 cm proximal to the pylorus;  in 5 cases it was at a distance of &#xA;2.5 cm to 5.0 cm, and in 4 cases at a distance of 0 cm to 2.5 cm from the pylorus.  While &#xA;a zone of gastritis surrounded the ulcer in all instances, the main inflammatory changes &#xA;were found in the &#34;antrum&#34;.  These consisted of widespread destruction of pyloric glands, &#xA;intestinalization, and in a few cases complete mucosal atrophy, usually associated with &#xA;marked fibrosis in the submucosa.  In 7 stomachs (it is not clear what the exact situation &#xA;of the ulcer was in these cases) the changes had been severe enough to produce stenosis &#xA;of the &#34;antrum&#34;.  Schrager et al. (l967) quoted a number of previous authors who had &#xA;found that the inflammatory changes of gastritis in cases of gastric ulceration were &#xA;confined to the &#34;antrum&#34;.  These changes were much more intense in cases of gastric &#xA;ulceration than in duodenal ulceration;  while intestinal metaplasia was uncommon in &#xA;duodenal ulceration, it was frequently encountered in cases of gastric ulcer.  Most &#xA;previous authors held the view that the inflammatory changes preceded the ulceration, &#xA;and that the inflammation of the antrum was the more fundamental change.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kwong et al. (l970) studied the electrical activity in the distal 6.0 cm of the &#34;antrum&#34; in &#xA;patients with gastric ulceration by means of serosal electrodes implanted at operation and &#xA;mucosal electrodes introduced via nasogastric tubes.  Recordings in 12 control subjects &#xA;showed a wave frequency of 3 cycles per minute;  there was a significantly higher &#xA;frequency in 8 patients with gastric ulceration.  The amplitude of the waves, the shape of &#xA;the wave forms and the conduction time of the electrical impulses were the same in the &#xA;two groups.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gear et al. (l97l) pointed out that gastric ulcer was frequently associated with chronic &#xA;gastritis, but that the relationship between the two was controversial.  Some previous &#xA;studies had suggested that gastritis was the primary change, with the gastric ulcer &#xA;supervening;  other studies had indicated that the ulcer was the primary lesion with &#xA;gastritis an accompanying zonal change.  Features of the gastritis associated with chronic &#xA;benign gastric ulcer in 35 untreated cases were studied by means of fibreoptic &#xA;gastroscopy and biopsy;  there were 14 prepyloric ulcers and 21 in the body of the &#xA;stomach.  Biopsies were taken in the prepyloric area, from the middle of the lesser &#xA;curvature, from the high lesser curvature and the middle of the greater curvature.  A &#xA;marked difference in the distribution and severity of the gastritis in the two subgroups &#xA;was found, the changes being more severe and more extensive in ulcers of the body of the &#xA;stomach.  In general, there was a tendency for the more severe atrophic changes to be &#xA;found distally in the &#34;antrum&#34; and on the lesser curvature, while the greater curvature was &#xA;least affected.  Another group of 28 patients with gastric ulceration had a gastroscopy &#xA;before and after medical treatment.  In most cases biopsy specimens from the second &#xA;examination showed a similar, or worse, grade of gastritis than those from the first.  In a &#xA;third group of patients, in whom the gastric ulceration had been treated by vagotomy and &#xA;pyloroplasty, the atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia commonly became worse &#xA;after surgery.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gear et al. (l97l) concluded that the gastritis associated with chronic gastric ulcer was &#xA;regional, with the distal part of the stomach and midpart of the lesser curvature the most &#xA;severely affected.  Ulcers of the body of the stomach were associated with more &#xA;extensive and more severe gastritis than ulcers of the prepyloric region.  It was felt that &#xA;gastritis was the basic disease process with gastric ulceration a secondary phenomenon.&#xA;Lawson (l972) studied the antral mucosa by means of gastroscopy and biopsy in 25 &#xA;patients with gastric ulceration &#34;in the usual position&#34; along the lesser curvature.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  It appears if the ulcers were situated a considerable distance &#xA;proximally to the pyloric aperture).  The biopsies were taken at a point half-way between &#xA;the ulcer and the pyloric aperture, in an area in which the antral mucosa appeared normal &#xA;macroscopically.  In 10 cases the surface epithelium, pyloric glands and mitotic activity &#xA;were normal.  In the remaining 15 cases marked histological changes were seen, with &#xA;chronic atrophic gastritis in 7 and increased mitotic activity in 8.  The findings supported &#xA;the view that a diffuse mucosal lesion of the &#34;antrum&#34; was associated with gastric &#xA;ulceration situated proximally to the antrum.   It was not clear whether the gastritis or the &#xA;gastric ulcer was the primary event.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fisher and Cohen (l973) studied pyloric sphincter pressures in 10 patients with gastric &#xA;ulceration, both before and after healing, and in 10 normal control subjects.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  The pyloric ring was equated with the sphincter).  The ulcer was &#xA;situated high on the lesser curvature in 1 case, on the middle of the lesser curvature in 4, &#xA;in the prepyloric region in 3 and in the &#34;pyloric channel&#34; in 2.  Intraluminal pressures &#xA;were determined by means of an open-tipped, 5-lumen catheter assembly, with all &#xA;patients in the right lateral decubitus position.  It was found that the gastroduodenal &#xA;junction of patients with an active gastric ulcer was characterized by a zone of high &#xA;pressure similar to that in normal subjects.  The pyloric pressure in patients with gastric &#xA;ulcer was 4.2 &amp;#177; 0.9 mm Hg as compared to 6.2 &amp;#177: 1.3 mm Hg in normal &#xA;subjects.  Duodenal acidification in normal subjects increased the pyloric pressure to 25 &#xA;mm Hg, but had no effect in patients with active gastric ulceration.  Intravenous &#xA;administration of secretin and cholecystokinin gave similar results.  The studies &#xA;suggested pyloric sphincter dysfunction in patients with gastric ulceration, probably &#xA;leading to increased duodenogastric reflux.  As similar findings were obtained after &#xA;healing, it appeared unlikely that gastric ulceration was the cause of the pyloric &#xA;incompetence.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/EM&gt;:  The results of manometric studies in normal &#xA;subjects by Fisher and Cohen are discussed in Chap. 15).  Fisher and Boden (l975) &#xA;subsequently reported that pyloric sphincter dysfunction could be reversed by gastric &#xA;acidification, but that the mechanism of the dysfunction remained unclear.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l977) pointed out that while the factors leading &#xA;to gastric ulceration were not fully understood, some abnormality of the pylorus, e.g. &#xA;antral stasis or duodenogastric reflux, had been implicated.  In an attempt to elucidate the &#xA;problem, detailed studies of anatomical changes in the pyloric region were performed in &#xA;77 surgical resection specimens of patients with gastric ulceration.  In 10 the ulcer was &#xA;immediately adjacent to the pylorus (&#34;pyloric ulcers&#34;) while in 67 it was situated in other &#xA;parts of the stomach (&#34;non-pyloric ulcers&#34;);  the findings were compared with those of 50 &#xA;control subjects.  While all controls had a soft antropyloric wall, considerable patchy &#xA;induration of the wall was felt in 41 of 54 gastric ulcer specimens.  The pyloric diameter &#xA;in controls had a range of 15 mm to 22 mm;  in the ulcer specimens the range was 10mm &#xA;to 22 mm.  In 22 of 45 ulcer specimens the pyloric ring was smaller than the lower limit &#xA;of normal, and bouginage was found to be difficult as the ring was more rigid than in &#xA;controls, although it had not caused obstruction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l977) the pyloric and prepyloric &#xA;musculature was of uniform thickness in control subjects, while nodular or fusiform &#xA;muscular thickening, often involving only part of the circumference, was frequently &#xA;found in ulcer specimens (Chap. 25).  In 9 of these cases the muscular hypertrophy was &#xA;circular, involving the whole pyloric ring uniformly.  In all cases considerable fibrosis &#xA;was seen in the thickened musculature.  Diffuse submucosal thickening, probably due to &#xA;a combination of oedema and connective tissue hypertrophy, was found in the ulcer &#xA;cases, and the mucosa often appeared coarse and roughened.  The number of Auerbach&#39;s &#xA;plexuses and the corresponding number of nerve cells was significantly reduced in cases &#xA;of gastric ulcer, being only half that seen in controls.  All the changes occurred in the &#xA;antropyloric wall irrespective of the site of the ulcer.  It was concluded that the thickness &#xA;of the gastric wall at the pylorus and in the distal 5.0 cm of the &#34;antrum&#34;, was increased &#xA;in patients with gastric ulcer.  Although the mucosa, submucosa and muscular layers &#xA;were affected, the changes were most marked in the latter.  Muscle hypertrophy was not &#xA;necessarily uniform, was usually associated with fibrosis, and histological abnormalities &#xA;of the muscle cells were common.  The intramural ganglia were markedly reduced in &#xA;number and those which were present commonly showed abnormal nuclei.  Since the &#xA;muscle and ganglia were involved in normal motility, it was reasoned that the above &#xA;features were consistent with a disturbance of normal physiological mechanisms at this &#xA;site.  Whether this was a cause or the consequence of duodenogastric reflux, or whether it &#xA;formed a link in the chain of events leading to gastric ulceration, remained uncertain.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 8 cases in whom a gastric ulcer was situated on the lesser curvature or anterior gastric &#xA;wall, Meister et al. (l979) found histologically verified chronic atrophic gastritis and &#xA;intestinal metaplasia with mild or moderate dysplasia in all.  These mucosal changes were &#xA;especially prominent in the proximal regions of the resection specimens.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Liebermann-Meffert et al. (l98l) found that intraoperative electrical stimulation of the &#xA;vagal trunks caused a distinct intragastric pressure rise in patients with gastric ulcer, &#xA;duodenal ulcer, combined gastric and duodenal ulcer, and in non-ulcer controls.  &#xA;However, the amplitude, duration and integrated motor response in the stomach was &#xA;significantly greater in the patients with gastric ulcer than in the other groups.  It was &#xA;concluded that gastric ulceration did not cuase hypomotility of the gastric reservoir (i.e. &#xA;the corpus and fundus), but that it was probably associated with a disturbance of the &#xA;antral pump mechanism.  The intrinsic morphological alterations of the antropyloric wall &#xA;could render antral contractions less effective, leading to impaired gastric drainage and &#xA;stasis.&#xA;In a further study of the pathomorphology of the antropyloric wall in peptic ulcer disease, &#xA;Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l98l) found that abnormalities of the muscle &#xA;fibres and Auerbach&#39;s plexuses, and the replacement of contractile muscular tissue by &#xA;fibrous tissue, might impair antropyloric motor function, having a bearing on gastric &#xA;emptying and duodenogastric reflux.  The changes were always more severe in gastric &#xA;than in duodenal ulceration, and did not occur in controls.  While the pyloric aperture was &#xA;somewhat rigid to distension in all peptic ulcer patients, its mean diameter was not &#xA;significantly smaller than in controls and there was no stenosis of the pyloric ring which &#xA;could account for gastric stasis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Miller et al. (l980) pointed out that while patients with Type I gastric ulcers had less acid &#xA;in their stomachs than normal controls, it was debatable whether this indicated actual &#xA;hyposecretion, or whether it was due to increased back-diffusion of hydrogen ions across &#xA;the mucosal barrier, or to neutralization by refluxed duodenal contents.  In a study of 7 &#xA;patients with chronic benign gastric ulceration above the incisura, it was found that &#xA;gastric acid output in response to an ordinary solid-liquid meal was significantly less than &#xA;in normal controls.  In the patient group the emptying rate of solids was consistently &#xA;lower than in controls while emptying of liquids remained normal.  The gastric ulcer &#xA;patients also had increased intragastric bile acid concentrations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In his review Brooks (l985) found that a gastric ulcer in the corpus was usually associated &#xA;with hyposecretion of acid and pepsin, decrease in the &#34;antral&#34; gastrin content, reduced &#xA;amplitude of &#34;antral&#34; contractions, an incompetent pylorus, increased bile reflux, and &#xA;delayed emptying of solids.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We have noted that gastric ulcers in the more proximal parts of the stomach were &#xA;sometimes associated with contraction or motility disturbances of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.  The following are representative cases:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.1&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; C.W., 60 year old male, presented with intermittent epigastric pain and &#xA;malaena.  Radiographic examination showed a gastric ulcer, 2.5 cm in diameter, in the &#xA;posterior wall of the upper corpus, approximately 10 cm proximal to the pylorus;  the &#xA;features were those of a benign ulcer.  There was constant contraction (or spasticity) of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, the contracted region being 3.0 to 4.0 cm in length (Fig. &#xA;29.1).  Cyclical contraction and relaxation of the cylinder, normally occurring at a rate of &#xA;3 cylces per minute, was absent;  the contraction of the cylinder &#34;fixed&#34; the pyloric &#xA;aperture in the open or patent position.  Mucosal folds in the contracted cylinder appeared &#xA;normal, but their movements were restricted.  A shallow, concave identation of the base &#xA;of the duodenal bulb, caused by the pyloric ring, was evident.  Peristaltic waves in the &#xA;remainder of the stomach were normal;  emptying of liquid barium appeared normal.  &#xA;Two weeks later a Billroth I partial gastrectomy confirmed the large, chronic gastric &#xA;ulcer.  No macroscopic abnormality was seen or felt in the pyloric region.  Histology of &#xA;the ulcer proved it to be benign;  microscopic examination of the pyloric region was not &#xA;carried out.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-1c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-1d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.1 A-D. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case C.W.  Constant contraction or spasticity of pyloric sphincteric cylinder. Cyclical &#xA;activity absent.  Pyloric aperture &#34;fixed&#34; in patent position (&lt;b&gt;B-D&lt;/b&gt;)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.2&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; I.H., 59 year old male, presented with longstanding epigastric pain and &#xA;malaena.  Radiographic examination showed a large ulcer in the posterior wall of the &#xA;midcorpus.  Endoscopic biopsy confirmed the ulcer;  the gastric mucosa showed &#xA;intestinal metaplasia with prominent acute and chronic inflammatory cells, diagnosed as &#xA;subacute gastritis.  No evidence of malignancy was found.  After anti-ulcer therapy the &#xA;patient was temporarily lost to follow-up, but reappeared three years later.  Radiographic &#xA;examination showed the following:  after the first two mouthfuls of barium a large ulcer &#xA;on the posterior wall of the corpus was evident as before (Fig. 29.2&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  &#xA;Before barium entered the duodenum a constant, deep spastic incisura was seen in the &#xA;pyloric region of the distal greater curvature;  swallowing more barium showed it to be &#xA;due to contraction of the left pyloric loop (Fig. 29.2&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  The pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder between the left loop and the pyloric aperture remained partially &#xA;contracted, normal cyclical contraction and relaxation being absent.  The pyloric aperture &#xA;remained patent and emptying of fluid barium appeared normal;  the appearances were &#xA;unchanged throughout the examination.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Further treatment followed.  Radiographic examination 18 months later showed the ulcer, &#xA;the prominent contraction of the left pyloric loop and contraction of the remainder of the &#xA;cylinder to be unchanged (Fig. 29.2&lt;em&gt;C&lt;/em&gt;).  Endoscopic biopsy confirmed the &#xA;previous findings.  Radiographic examination and endoscopic biopsy after another 5 &#xA;years showed no change.  Billroth II partial gastrectomy confirmed the presence of a &#xA;large, chronic, benign gastric ulcer on the posterior wall of the corpus;  it had penetrated &#xA;into the pancreas.  No organic lesion was seen or felt in the pyloric region.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.2 A,B. A &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case I.H. Large gastric ulcer posterior wall of corpus (open arrow). Deep spastic incisura &#xA;distal greater curvature (curved arrow). &lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Case I.H. The spastic incisura is caused by &#xA;constant contraction of the left pyloric loop (curved arrow).&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-2c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td alicn=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-2d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-2e.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td alicn=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-2f.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.2 C-F &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case I.H.  Eighteen months later the gastric ulcer (open arrow), contraction of the left &#xA;pyloric loop (curved arrow) and contraction of the sphincteric cylinder are unchanged&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.3&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; V.D., 30 year old male, complained of epigastric pain not responding to &#xA;antacids.  Radiographic examination showed a gastric ulcer 1.5cm in diameter, on the &#xA;lesser curvature at the angulus (Fig. 29.3&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;);  no signs of malignancy were &#xA;seen.  Intially there was marked contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, which &#xA;contained a few prominent mucosal folds;  this was associated with delay in emptying of &#xA;liquid barium.  After barium had filled the cylinder, it was seen to remain contracted &#xA;throughout the examination;  although a minor degree of relaxation occurred &#xA;occasionally, the apperances remained as illustrated most of the time, with absence of &#xA;cyclical activity (Fig. 29.3&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  Longitudinal mucosal folds were evident in &#xA;the contracted cylinder.  Endoscopic biopsy showed a benign looking gastric ulcer in the &#xA;corpus.  Microscopically there was mixed inflammatory cell infiltration, diagnosed as &#xA;acute on chronic gastritis.  No evidence of malignancy was seen.  Repeat endoscopy 2 &#xA;months later showed that the ulcer had healed.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-3a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.3. A &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case V.D. Gastric ulcer on lesser curvature at angulus (open arrow). Marked contraction of &#xA;sphincteric cylinder (filled arrow). &lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Case V.D. Gastric ulcer at angulus (open arrow). &#xA;Constant contraction of sphincteric cylinder (filled arrows) with absent cyclical activity.&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-3b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;chronic-benign-gastric-ulceration&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Chronic Benign Gastric Ulceration&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#chronic-benign-gastric-ulceration&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Many authors found evidence of chronic or atrophic gastritis in the pyloric region in &#xA;cases where gastric ulceration was located more proximally in the stomach (Lilja l959;  &#xA;Burge et al. l963;  du Plessis l963;  Schrager et al. l967;  Gear et al. l97l;  Lawson l972;  &#xA;Meister et al. l979).  Some investigators looked upon &#34;antral&#34; gastritis as the primary &#xA;event (Schrager et al. l967;  Gear et al. l97l), while others pointed out that the relationship &#xA;between gastritis and gastric ulceration remained controversial (Lawson l972;  &#xA;Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer 1977).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Narrowing of the pyloric region in cases of chronic, benign gastric ulceration in the &#xA;region of the angulus has been described by several authors.  Steigman (l943) for &#xA;instance, noted &#34;antral spasm&#34; in a small percentage of cases where the ulcer was located &#xA;at the incisura angularis.  Lilja (l953, l954) found the canalis egestorius (i.e. the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder) to be contracted in some of these cases of gastric ulceration.  The &#xA;cylindrical contraction might resemble AHPS, or it might be less severe and be more in &#xA;the nature of an impairment of motility;  irregular and oblique mucosal folds might be &#xA;present in the contracted region, and the pylorus might be patent.  Burge et al. (l963) &#xA;called the condition the &#34;pyloric channel syndrome&#34;, while Schrager et al (l967) termed it &#xA;&#34;stenosis of the antrum&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Motility disturbances of the pyloric region in cases of gastric ulceration of the corpus &#xA;were described by Garret et al. (l966) during manometric studies, by Kwong et al. (l970) &#xA;during myoelectrical investigations and by Miller et al. (l980) in gastric emptying studies.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;One case in which AHPS was associated with a gastric ulcer located 6.0cm proximal to &#xA;the pylorus was described by Skoryna et al. (l959), and another by Knight (l96l) (Chap. &#xA;24);  the latter author considered AHPS to be the cause of the ulcer.  According to &#xA;Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l977) nodular or fusiform thickening in the &#xA;pyloric and prepyloric musculature, with mucosal and submucosal changes, reduction in &#xA;the number of Auerbach&#39;s plexuses and fibrosis, occurred not uncommonly in association &#xA;with gastric ulceration more proximally in the stomach;  these alterations caused a &#xA;disturbance of normal motility and of the &#34;antral pump mechanism&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The cases described here show that a chronic, benign gastric ulcer, situated away from &#xA;(i.e. orally to) the pyloric region, may be associated with contraction of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.  In a recent series of 65 consecutive cases of chronic gastric &#xA;ulceration, where the ulcer was located more proximally in the stomach (usually in the &#xA;region of the angulus on or near the lesser curvature), we noted a constant contraction of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in 10.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  Although histology of the &#xA;ulcer was obtained in all instances, microscopic examination of the pyloric region was &#xA;not considered to be a routine examination and was not done).  This confirms the findings &#xA;of Lilja (l953, l954), and will probably also explain some of the appearances described by &#xA;Steigmann (l943), Schrager et al. (l967), and others.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder may be associated with increased &#xA;duodenogastric reflux (Chap. 27), fixation of the pyloric aperture in the &#34;open&#34; position &#xA;(Chap. 20), decreased cyclical activity (Chap. 20), delayed emptying of solids (Chap. 18) &#xA;and diminished trituration (Chap. 18).  Among the abnormalities encountered in patients &#xA;with gastric ulceration in the corpus of the stomach, Brooks (l985) mentioned increased &#xA;bile reflux, incompetent pylorus, reduced amplitude of gastric &#34;antral&#34; contractions and &#xA;delayed gastric emptying of solids.  It appears possible that contraction of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder may be a factor in the pathophysiology of these cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Why some cases of ulceration in the gastric corpus should be associated with contraction &#xA;of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and others not, is not known.  It is not clear whether &#xA;gastric ulceration or contraction of the cylinder is the primary event.  We have not been &#xA;able to establish a clear relationship between the size, chronicity or exact situation of the &#xA;ulcer on the one hand, and contraction of the cylinder on the other.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;malignant-gastric-ulcer&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Malignant Gastric Ulcer&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#malignant-gastric-ulcer&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in the presence of an ulcer in the corpus &#xA;does not necessarily indicate a benign ulcer.  During the present investigation the &#xA;following case, proving the opposite, was encountered.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-report&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Report&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-report&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.4&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; F.F., 29 year old female, presented with epigastric pain and loss of weight.  &#xA;Radiographic examination showed an ulcer 1.5 cm in diameter on the lesser curvature of &#xA;the stomach at the incisura angularis (Fig. 29.4 (&lt;em&gt;A-D&lt;/em&gt;).  A cylindrical &#xA;contraction, 3.0 cm in length and containing a longitudinal mucosal fold, was seen in the &#xA;pyloric region;  a prominent pseudo-diverticulum was evident on the greater curvature &#xA;side of the contraction, the appearances tallying with contraction of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.  Occasionally a minor degree of relaxation occurred, but most of the &#xA;time the contraction remained as illustrated, with absence of normal cyclical activity.  &#xA;(Fig. 29.4 &lt;em&gt;A-D&lt;/em&gt;).  Response to anti-ulcer therapy was poor.  Endoscopic &#xA;biopsy 6 months later showed an ulcer at the angulus with surrounding induration.  &#xA;Microscopically the base of the ulcer consisted of fibrinopurulent material, fibrotic tissue &#xA;and well-differentiated adenocarcinoma cells.  Billroth II partial gastrectomy confirmed &#xA;the large ulcer with indurated edges on the lesser curvature.  Microscopically a well-&#xA;differentiated adenocarcinoma, infiltrating locally through the muscularis externa into the &#xA;subserosal tissue, was seen.  The adjacent gastric mucosa showed areas of intestinal &#xA;metaplasia.  Microscopic examination of l7 lymph nodes revealed no carcinoma cells.  It &#xA;was concluded that the appearance of a chronic ulcer with dense fibro-collagenous tissue &#xA;and carcinoma cells in the base, was compatible with so-called &#34;ulcer cancer&#34;, i.e. &#xA;carcinoma originating in a chronic gastric ulcer.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-4a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-4b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-4c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-4d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.4 A-D &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case F.F. Malignant ulcer at incisura angularis (open arrow). Constant contraction of pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder with absent cyclical activity (filled arrows)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;guwtpsc&#34;&gt;Gastric Ulceration Within the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Golden (l937) pointed out that the narrowing of antral gastritis and spasm, as seen on &#xA;radiographs, was confined to that part of the stomach which normally exhibited antral &#xA;systole and diastole, i.e. the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 28).  A similar &#xA;contraction could occur in cases of prepyloric ulceration, where the ulcer was surrounded &#xA;by contraction of the &#34;fan-shaped muscle&#34;.  According to Golden (l937) it had been &#xA;customary to attribute &#34;antral spasm&#34; in these cases to the ulcer, but as the same spasm &#xA;could occur in gastritis without ulceration, it was more likely that the spasm was due to &#xA;the inflammatory change in the gastric wall.  As pointed out above, an identical &#xA;contraction might occur in cases where the ulcer was located more proximally in the &#xA;stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Magnus (l954) examined various features of 421 surgical resection specimens in cases of &#xA;gastric ulceration.  A total of 131 ulcers were located within 2.5 cm of the pylorus, 50 &#xA;were situated between 2.5 to 5.0 cm from the pylorus and the remainder were located &#xA;further proximally.  No morphological difference was found between the ulcers in the &#xA;various situations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Raffensperger (l955) described an adult case in whom a prepyloric gastric ulcer, situated &#xA;on the greater curvature 1.0 cm proximally to the pylorus, was diagnosed radiologically.  &#xA;Initially no associated narrowing was seen, but as the ulcer healed a prepyloric narrowing &#xA;containing prominent irregular mucosal folds, became evident.  Five weeks after the &#xA;original diagnosis the radiographic appearance of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis &#xA;(AHPS) was seen, and at operation the gross appearance was that of typical AHPS.  &#xA;Microscopically the thickening consisted solely of muscular tissue without evidence of &#xA;associated oedema or inflammation.  A healed gastric ulcer was also present.  The &#xA;condition was considered to be AHPS which had developed within five weeks around a &#xA;healing, prepyloric gastric ulcer.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It has been mentioned that Johnson (l957, l965) and Johnson et al. (l964) divided gastric &#xA;ulcers into three types, depending on the associated acid secretory characteristics.  &#xA;Prepyloric ulcers (occurring within 2.54 cm of the pylorus) and other antral ulcers &#xA;(occurring to the right of the angulus but further than 2.54 cm from the pylorus) were &#xA;associated with acid hypersecretion, resembled duodenal ulcers clinically, and constituted &#xA;Type III gastric ulcers.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Foulk et al. (l957) stated that the &#34;pyloric channel&#34; was not a well-delineated anatomical &#xA;entity, and that gastric landmarks and boundaries differed in their details for the &#xA;radiologist, the endoscopist, the surgeon and the pathologist (Chap. 2).  For that reason &#xA;the literature on &#34;pyloric and pyloric-channel&#34; ulcers was confusing.  The proximal &#xA;boundary of the so-called pyloric channel was difficult to define, and the term merely &#xA;described a region of the stomach near the pylorus rather than a definite anatomical &#xA;entity.  The length of the anatomical pyloric channel was variable, but was approximately &#xA;2.0 cm.  Pyloric channel ulcers were defined as ulcers occurring between the &#xA;gastroduodenal junction and an imaginary line 2.0 cm above the junction;  the term &#xA;pyloroduodenal ulcers was used to indicate ulcers which straddled the junction.  These &#xA;authors studied three groups of patients with surgically treated peptic ulcer near the &#xA;pylorus.  There were 35 cases with pyloric channel ulcers, 29 with pyloroduodenal and l9 &#xA;with duodenal ulcers.  Clinically there were no features which permitted a differentiation &#xA;of pyloric channel ulcers from the other two groups.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In their description of 6 cases of AHPS, Skoryna et al. (l959) included one case in which &#xA;an ulcer of the pyloric canal was associated with hypertrophy of the musculature of the &#xA;canalis egestorius as described by Torgersen (l942) (Chap. 24).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Texter et al. (l959) also drew attention to the confusion which existed concerning the &#xA;terminology of the distal portion of the stomach.  These authors looked upon the pyloric &#xA;sphincter as the muscular ring surrounding the lumen of the gastroduodenal junction, and &#xA;the pyloric channel or pyloric canal as the narrow space encompassed by the ring.  &#xA;Ulceration of the pyloric channel consequently indicated an ulcer involving the ring.  &#xA;This concept of pyloric channel ulcers differed from that of Foulk et al. (l957), who &#xA;would have termed these pyloroduodenal ulcers.  In a clinical study of 67 cases of pyloric &#xA;channel ulcers Texter et al. (l959) found that although the symptoms were not &#xA;pathognomonic, they differed significantly from those of gastric ulcers occurring &#xA;elsewhere in the stomach, and from those of uncomplicated duodenal ulcers.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Burge et al. (l963) described a pyloric channel syndrome occurring in association with &#xA;gastric ulceration.  The ulcer in these cases could be located either high on the lesser &#xA;curvature or in the pyloric channel.  Pathologically the pylorus and prepyloric region &#xA;showed small round cell infiltration and muscle hypertrophy with fibrous replacement of &#xA;muscle cells.  These features were apt to cause a narrowing of the pylorus and prepyloric &#xA;region.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Murray et al. (l967) described features in 47 patients who underwent operation for pyloric &#xA;channel ulcers.  (&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  From the description it is clear that the pyloric &#xA;channel was equated with the pyloric aperture).  Preoperative radiologic examination was &#xA;obtained in 42 of the patients and the diagnosis of pyloric channel disease was confirmed &#xA;in 41.  There was associated duodenal ulcer disease in 25 cases, while 8 patients had an &#xA;associated lesser curvature gastric ulcer and 10 associated hiatus hernia.  Clinically &#xA;pyloric channel ulcer was frequently associated with a symptom complex called the &#xA;pyloric syndrome.  Dysfunction of the &#34;antral&#34; evacuation mechanism was noted in one &#xA;half of the patients.  The ulcer was usually associated with low gastric acidity, and &#xA;histologically it appeared to occur in gastric mucous membrane.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gear et al. (l97l) found gastritis associated with prepyloric ulcers to be much less severe, &#xA;and also less extensive, than that associated with ulcers in the body of the stomach.  In &#xA;both groups of ulcers the gastritis occurred predominantly in the distal part of the &#xA;stomach and along the middle of the lesser curvature.  Superficial or atrophic gastritis &#xA;was found to persist or even worsen after healing of the ulcer, whether the treatment was &#xA;medical or surgical.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l977, l98l), in their study of surgical resection &#xA;specimens, found that the changes in the antropyloric wall occurring in association with &#xA;pyloric ulceration, were similar to those seen in gastric ulceration elsewhere in the &#xA;stomach (see above);  these included abnormalities of Auerbach&#39;s plexuses and the &#xA;muscularis externa with replacement of contractile muscular tissue by fibrous tissue.  It &#xA;was thought that this might impair antropyloric motor function.&#xA;Lawson (l98l) stated that a prepyloric ulcer differed from a duodenal or mid lesser &#xA;curvature gastric ulcer in a number of ways.  For instance, it had a high recurrence rate &#xA;when treated by parietal cell vagotomy and it was associated with a variable level of &#xA;gastric acid secretion.  The degree and distribution of chronic severe gastritis in 15 &#xA;antrectomy specimens removed for prepyloric ulceration was examined.  In 6 of the cases &#xA;the prepyloric ulcer was on the lesser curvature;  in these cases there were localized areas &#xA;of severe chronic gastritis along the middle of the anterior and posterior walls of the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, with a tongue of gastritis extending upwards along the lesser curvature as far as &#xA;the fundus.  In 3 cases, where the prepyloric ulcer was situated on the greater curvature, &#xA;localized areas of gastritis also occurred, the least affected area being along the lesser &#xA;curvature.  The widest area of gastritis was seen on the anterior and posterior walls of the &#xA;greater curvature of the &#34;antrum&#34;, with a tongue-like extension to the fundus.  In 6 cases &#xA;the ulcer had healed at the time of histological examination.  The general pattern of the &#xA;distribution of severe gastritis was similar to that in the 9 other cases, the main area &#xA;affected being the lesser curvature in both the fundus and antrum.  It was concluded that &#xA;localized areas of severe chronic gastritis occurred in the &#34;antrum&#34; in all cases of &#xA;prepyloric ulceration.  A tongue-like process of gastritis extended from the &#34;antrum&#34; to &#xA;the fundus along the particular curvature on which the ulcer was situated.  In prepyloric &#xA;ulceration not the whole of the &#34;antrum&#34; was involved, as appeared to be the case in &#xA;many specimens resected for mid lesser curvature gastric ulcer.  The fact that the mucosa &#xA;failed to return to normal after healing of the ulcer in 6 cases, confirmed the previous &#xA;findings of Gear et al. (l97l), and suggested that chronic gastritis was not a secondary &#xA;effect of the ulcer but could be an important factor in its pathogenesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Brooks (l985) found that patients with pyloric and duodenal ulcers showed a similar &#xA;tendency to hypersecretion, but that peak acid outputs were significantly lower in the &#xA;prepyloric ulcer group.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lauritsen (l988, l989) stated that although it was generally believed that prepyloric ulcers &#xA;resembled duodenal ulcers with respect to their acid secretory patterns, clinical trials had &#xA;shown that patients with prepyloric ulcer disease were more resistant to treatment with &#xA;H2-receptor antagonists than patients with duodenal ulcer disease.  Their treatment &#xA;remained a therapeutic challenge; for that reason the effects of a proton pump inhibitor &#xA;(omeprazole) were studied in 176 patients with active prepyloric ulcers (all gastric ulcers &#xA;below the angulus were considered to be &#34;prepyloric&#34;).  The results were said to be &#xA;encouraging.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following are representative cases of ulceration within the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.5&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; S.S., 32 year old female, complained of heartburn and intermittent &#xA;epigastric pain of two years&#39; duration.  Radiographic examination showed a constant fleck &#xA;of barium, indicating an active ulcer, within the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;approximately 1.5 cm proximal to the pyloric aperture (Fig. 29.5).  The cylinder was &#xA;partially contracted, and remained contracted throughout the examination, with absence &#xA;of normal, cyclical contraction and relaxation.  Emptying of fluid barium was not &#xA;delayed.  Anti-ulcer therapy was commenced and proved beneficial.  Endoscopy 5 &#xA;months later showed a superficial, healing gastric ulcer in the anterior wall of the pyloric &#xA;region, without evidence of malignancy.  Follow-up endoscopy showed healing of the &#xA;ulcer.  The duodenum was normal.  Considerable duodenogastric reflux was present.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-5.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.5. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case S.S. Ulcer (open arrow) within confines of pyloric sphincteric cylinder, which is &#xA;partially contracted (filled arrows)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.6&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; M.T., 20 year old male, complained of dyspepsia, loss of appetite and &#xA;epigastric pain of several months&#39; duration.  Radiographic examination showed a constant &#xA;fleck of barium, 1.5 cm in diameter, indicating an active ulcer, on the lesser curvature &#xA;side of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Fig. 29.6).  The cylinder was somewhat &#xA;deformed, partially contracted and unchanging in appearance throughout the &#xA;examination, with absent cyclical activity;  it contained prominent oblique and circular &#xA;mucosal folds which were drawn in towards the ulcer and did not change in direction &#xA;(Fig. 29.6).  The duodenal bulb filled poorly.  Response to anti-ulcer therapy was poor.  &#xA;Endoscopy 3 months later confirmed the presence of a benign gastric ulcer in the pyloric &#xA;region.  Billroth I partial gastrectomy with truncal vagotomy in May l984 showed a &#xA;chronic, benign gastric ulcer 1.0 cm proximal to the pylorus.  Microscopic examination &#xA;revealed absence of malignancy.  The gastric mucosa showed evidence of chronic &#xA;gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-6.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.6. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case M.T. Ulcer (open arrow) in sphincteric cylinder, which is deformed and &#xA;permanently contracted (filled arrows). Circular, unchanging mucosal folds drawn in &#xA;towards ulcer&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.7&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; A.J., 35 year old female, complained of intermittent epigastric pain and &#xA;postprandial nausea of 5 years&#39; duration.  Radiographic examination showed an active &#xA;ulcer niche on the lower lesser curvature at the commencement of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder (Fig. 29.7).  Prominent oblique mucosal folds were drawn in toward the ulcer;  &#xA;(they may also be described as radiating fan-like from the ulcer).  The sphincteric &#xA;cylinder between the ulcer and the pyloric aperture was deformed, filled poorly, &#xA;contained prominent oblique mucosal folds, and remained unchanging in appearance with &#xA;absent cyclical activity.  The mucosal folds remained fixed in the same position, showing &#xA;no macroscopic movements.  The duodenal bulb filled poorly.  Endoscopic biopsy the &#xA;same month showed a chronic, active ulcer in the prepyloric region without evidence of &#xA;malignancy.  The duodenum was normal.  The gastric mucosa in the vicinity of the ulcer &#xA;showed acute inflammatory cells in the lamina propria with areas of fibrosis and &#xA;intestinal metaplasia, diagnosed as acute on chronic gastritis.  Anti-ulcer therapy was &#xA;commenced;  the patient failed to return for follow-up.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-7.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.7. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case A.J. Ulcer (arrow) in sphincteric cylinder, which is deformed.  Absent &#xA;cyclical activity.  Prominent, unchanging, oblique mucosal folds drawn in towards ulcer&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 29.8&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; L.J., 56 year old female, had a long history of dyspepsia and nocturnal &#xA;epigastric pain.  Radiographic examination showed a constant contraction of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder, the contracted region being approximately 2.0cm in length, with &#xA;absence of normal cyclical contractile activity (Fig. 29.8).  A constant niche on the &#xA;greater curvature side of the contracted cylinder indicated an active ulcer.  The pyloric &#xA;aperture was &#34;fixed&#34; in the open position and rapid emptying of fluid barium occurred.  &#xA;Anti-ulcer therapy resulted in symptomatic improvement.  Endoscopic biopsy a month &#xA;later showed two active ulcers in the pyloric region, without macroscopic evidence of &#xA;malignancy.  Biopsy was difficult on account of narrowing, only fibrino-purulent &#xA;material being obtained.  Repeat endoscopy after 4 months showed healing of both &#xA;ulcers; further endoscopy showed no residual ulceration, narrowing or other abnormality.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/29-8.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 29.8. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case L.J. Constant contraction of pyloric sphincteric cylinder (filled arrows). Ulcer in &#xA;contracted cylinder (open arrow)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The great majority, if not all, cases of chronic, benign ulcers in the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder are associated with contraction of the cylinder.  In a recent series of 20 &#xA;consecutive cases of gastric ulceration within 3.0 to 4.0 cm of the pyloric aperture, we &#xA;noted contraction of the cylinder in all.  The degree of contraction may vary from &#xA;moderate (Fig. 29.5) to severe (Fig. 29.8), and will have a bearing on the radiographic &#xA;appearance.  Contraction of the cylinder implies diminished or absent cyclical activity of &#xA;its musculature (Chap. 13) which, in turn, may delay emptying of solids and hamper &#xA;trituration (Chap.18).  In some cases contraction is associated with deformity of the &#xA;cylinder (Fig. 29.6, 29.7).  Cyclical activity is absent in these cases as well.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Normally mucosal folds lie in a circular or spiral direction in the distended pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder, changing to longitudinal when the cylinder contracts (Chap. 13).  &#xA;(This is one of the best examples of co-ordinated movements of the muscularis externa &#xA;and mucosa originally described by Forssell) (Chap. 13).  As movements of the cylinder &#xA;are diminished or absent in cases of local gastric ulceration, it is to be expected that &#xA;mucosal fold movements will also be curtailed or absent.  In addition some ulcers within &#xA;the cylinder are associated with an &#34;indrawing&#34; and fixation of mucosal folds (Fig. 29.6, &#xA;29.7), further hampering their movements.  It is surmized that the impeded or curtailed &#xA;mucosal fold movements seen in cases of gastric ulceration within the cylinder, may &#xA;further hamper the processes of expulsion and trituration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It has been said that the acid-secretory characteristics of pyloric and duodenal ulcers are &#xA;similar (Johnson l957, l966;  Stadelmann et al. l97l;  Brooks l985).  The present findings &#xA;show that there are important differences between ulcers within the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder on the one hand, and duodenal ulcers (Chap. 30) on the other hand, as far as &#xA;motility patterns of the cylinder are concerned.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Brooks FP.  The pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis &#xA;Sci&lt;/em&gt; l985, 30, Suppl ll, 15S-29S.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Burge H, Gill AM, Lewis RH.  The pyloric channel syndrome and gastric &#xA;ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l963, 1, 73-75.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Dragstedt LR, Oberhelman HA, Evans SO, et al.  Antrum hyperfunction and &#xA;gastric ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l954, 140, 396-404.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Du Plessis DJ.  The importance of the pyloric antrum in peptic ulceration.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;South Afr J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l963, 1, 3-11.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fisher RS, Cohen S.  Pyloric sphincter dysfunction in patients with gastric ulcer.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;New Engl J Med&lt;/em&gt; l973, 288, 273-276.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fisher RS, Boden G.  Reversibility of pyloric sphincter dysfunction in gastric &#xA;ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l975, 69, 591-597.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Foulk WT, Comfort MW, Butt HR, et al.  Peptic ulcer near the pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l957, 32, 395-403.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Garret JM, Summerskill WHJ, Code CF.  Antral motility in patients with gastric &#xA;ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l966, ll, 780-789.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gear MWL, Truelove SC, Whitehead R.  Gastric ulcer and gastritis.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 12, 639-645.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Golden R.  Antral gastritis and spasm.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/em&gt; l937, 109, &#xA;1497-1500.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Johnson HD.  The clasification and principles of treatment of gastric ulcers.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l957, 2, 518-520.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Johnson HD.  Love AHG, Rogers NC, et al.  Gastric ulcers, blood groups, and &#xA;acid secretion.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l964, 5, 402-411.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Johnson HD.  Gastric ulcer: classification, blood group characteristics, secretion &#xA;patterns and pathogenesis.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l965, 162, 996-1004.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Knight CD.  Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the adult.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l961, 153, 899-910.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kwong NK, Brown BH, Whittaker GE, et al.  Electrical activity of the gastric &#xA;antrum in man.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 57, 913-916.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lauritsen K.  Effect of omeprazole and cimetidine on prepyloric gastric ulcer:  &#xA;double blind comparative trial.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l988, 29, 249-253.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lauritsen K.  Omeprazole in the treatment of prepyloric ulcer:  review of the &#xA;results of the Danish Omeprazole Study Group.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l989, 24, Suppl l66, 54-57.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lawson HH.  The pyloric antrum in patients with gastric ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;South Afr &#xA;Med J&lt;/em&gt; l972, 46, 894-895.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lawson HH.  A histological assessment of prepyloric ulceration and a hypothesis &#xA;relating to acid secretion.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 16, Suppl 67, &#xA;141-147.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Liebermann-Meffert D, Allg&amp;#246;wer M.  The morphology of the antrum and &#xA;pylorus in gastric ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Prog Surg&lt;/em&gt; l977, 15, 109-139.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Liebermann-Meffert D, M&amp;#252;ller C, Allg&amp;#246;wer M.  Gastric &#xA;hypermotility and antropyloric dysfunction in gastric ulcer patients.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroent&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 16, Suppl 67, 5-7.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Liebermann-Meffert D, Allg&amp;#246;wer M.  Neuromuscular tissue defects and &#xA;antropyloric dysfunction in peptic ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroent&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 16, &#xA;Suppl 67, 111-113.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lilja B.  Gastric block:  a disturbance of gastric motive function.  &lt;em&gt;Acta &#xA;Rad&lt;/em&gt; l953, 39, 353-367.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lilja B.  Gastric motive function with particular reference to the activity of the &#xA;conducting system in the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l954, 41, 225-246.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lilja B.  Motor activity of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l959, Suppl l80, 1-&#xA;94.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Magnus HA.  The pathology of peptic ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Postgrad Med J&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l954, 30, 131-136.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Meister H, Holubarsch CH, Haferkamp O, et al.  Gastritis, intestinal metaplasia &#xA;and dysplasia versus benign ulcer in stomach and duodenum and gastric &#xA;carcinoma:  a histotopographical study.  &lt;em&gt;Path Res Pract&lt;/em&gt; l979, 164, &#xA;259-269.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Miller LJ, Malagelada JR, Longstreth GF, et al.  Dysfunctions of the stomach &#xA;with gastric ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l980, 25, 857-864.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Murray GF, Ballinger WF, Stafford ES.  Ulcers of the pyloric channel.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l967, 113, 199-203.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Raffensperger EC.  Time required for the development of pyloric muscle &#xA;hypertrophy in an adult.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l955, 28, 458-462.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schrager J, Spink R, Mitra S.  The antrum in patients with duodenal and gastric &#xA;ulcers.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l967, 8, 497-508.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Skoryna SC, Dolan HS, Gley A.  Development of primary pyloric hypertrophy in &#xA;relation to the structure and function of the pyloric canal.  &lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec &#xA;Obstet&lt;/em&gt; l959, 108, 83-92.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Stadelmann O, Elster K, Stolte M, et al.  The peptic gastric ulcer:  &#xA;histotopographic and functional investigations.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 6, 613-623.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Steigmann F.  Considerations on the diagnosis of large gastric ulcers and &#xA;implications as to treatment.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l943, 10, 88-93.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Texter EC, Smith HW, Bundesen WE, et al.  The syndrome pylorique:  clinical &#xA;and physiologic observations.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l959, 36, 573-579.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>30 - Duodenal Ulceration and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_30/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_30/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;duodenal-ulceration-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Duodenal Ulceration and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#duodenal-ulceration-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As far as we are aware the contractile behaviour of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in &#xA;cases of duodenal ulceration has not been described.  However, other features of the &#xA;pyloric part of the stomach in duodenal ulceration have been studied extensively, and a &#xA;consideration of some of these may give an indication of the type of motility which can &#xA;be expected.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Griffith et al. (l966) examined the rate of gastric emptying in a small number of cases of &#xA;uncomplicated duodenal ulceration by means of radio-isotope labelled solid meals, and &#xA;found it to be faster than normal.  Buckler (l967), in a study of 193 patients with &#xA;uncomplicated duodenal ulcer, found no significant difference in the total emptying time &#xA;of a solid meal as compared with normal subjects, and concluded that the pattern of &#xA;gastric emptying in duodenal ulcer patients was similar to that of normal individuals.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Schrager et al. (l967) performed histological examinations of the &#34;antrum&#34; in 75 surgical &#xA;resection specimens of duodenal ulceration.  In a third of the cases the duodenal ulcer &#xA;was adjacent to the pyloric mucosa, and in the remainder it was 2.0 cm distal to the &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34;.  The duodenal mucosa surrounding the ulcer was normal.  In all cases mild, &#xA;diffuse inflammatory alterations, involving the whole of the antral mucosa, were noted;  &#xA;these consisted of lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltration, with variable degrees of &#xA;pyloric gland destruction and intestinalization.  In the great majority of cases less than 25 &#xA;percent of pyloric glands were damaged;  in a small minority there was a 25 to 50 percent &#xA;reduction in glands, and in some of these an increase in fibrous tissue in the submucosa &#xA;was observed.  The changes were more severe along the lesser curvature near the &#xA;boundary zone between the &#34;antral&#34; and body mucosa, i.e. the part furthest removed from &#xA;the ulcer;  the body mucosa appeared completely normal.  It was concluded that duodenal &#xA;ulceration was associated with mild inflammatory change of the gastric antral mucosa, in &#xA;contrast to gastric ulceration, which was accompanied by much more severe &#xA;inflammatory alterations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Griffith et al. (l968), in a second series of cases, again found the gastric emptying rate of &#xA;solids to be more rapid in duodenal ulceration than in normal controls, while George &#xA;(l968) found that the mean emptying time of a fluid test-meal in 34 patients with &#xA;uncomplicated duodenal ulcer did not differ from that of controls.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kwong et al. (l970) studied the electrical activity of the distal 6.0 cm of the &#34;antrum&#34; by &#xA;means of serosal electrodes implanted at operation for duodenal ulceration.  The general &#xA;patterns of the wave forms, the amplitude of the waves and the conduction time of the &#xA;electrical impulses were the same as in normal controls.  However, the frequency of the &#xA;waves was increased, being approximately 6 cycles per minute in duodenal ulcer as &#xA;opposed to 3 cycles per minute in controls.  Cobb et al. (l97l), in a study of 12 duodenal &#xA;ulcer patients and normal controls, found no difference in the pattern of gastric emptying &#xA;of liquids in the two groups.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fordtran and Walsh (l973) studied gastric emptying of solid meals in 7 patients with &#xA;duodenal ulcer and 6 normal subjects.  Using an infusion of sodiumbicarbonate to control &#xA;intragastric pH and to act as a buffer, it was found that the duodenal ulcer patients &#xA;emptied the meal buffer at a much more rapid rate than normal controls.  It was &#xA;acknowledged that the emptying rate of the buffer might not necessarily be the same as &#xA;the emptying rate of the total mass in the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using a solid meal labelled with Indium &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;113m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt; DPTA, Howlett et al. (l976) &#xA;compared gastric emptying in 27 duodenal ulcer patients with 26 normal subjects.  The &#xA;half emptying time did not differ significantly in the two groups;  when applying a &#xA;method of principal component analysis to the results, a number of duodenal ulcer &#xA;patients showed a relative slowing of the rate during the later phase of gastric emptying.  &#xA;It was suggested that the faster emptying previously found by Griffith et al. (l966, l968) &#xA;and by Fordtran and Walsh (l973) might have been due to the fact that their meals had &#xA;twice the volume of that of Howlett et al. (l976).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Liebermann-Meffert et al. (l98l) studied the response of gastric musculature to electrical &#xA;vagal stimulation during intraoperative vagomotor tests in different groups of patients.  &#xA;Although a pressure rise occurred in all groups, it was found that the amplitude and &#xA;duration of the contractions, and the integrated motor response was significantly greater &#xA;in patients with gastric ulcer than in patients with duodenal ulcer.  It was concluded that &#xA;the motility disorder of the gastric musculature in duodenal ulceration was less evident &#xA;than in gastric ulceration and seemed to be of minor importance.  During histological &#xA;studies of the antropyloric wall in peptic ulcer disease, Liebermann-Meffert and &#xA;Allg&amp;#246;wer (l98l) found that less thickening occurred in duodenal ulcer than in &#xA;gastric ulcer;  the abnormal features of muscle and ganglion cells were also less severe in &#xA;duodenal ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lam et al. (l982), using a marker-dilution method, found that duodenal ulcer patients &#xA;emptied liquid meals more rapidly than normal subjects.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Earlam et al. (l985) found histological evidence of chronic &#34;antral&#34; gastritis in 33 of 36 &#xA;patients with duodenal ulceration who required surgery after prolonged but unsuccessful &#xA;medical therapy.  Of these, 24 had chronic superficial, and 9 chronic atrophic gastritis.  &#xA;The high incidence of antral gastritis was considered to be a striking finding;  it was &#xA;thought that it could be related to the severe symptoms in this particular group of cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Brooks (l985) duodenal ulceration should be looked upon as a &#xA;heterogeneous syndrome which includes the following:  (1) acute erosions;  (2) &#xA;uncomplicated ulcers;  (3) bleeding;  (4) perforation;  (5) gastric outlet obstruction;  (6) &#xA;ulcers resistant to healing under treatment, and (7) recurrent ulceration after surgery.  Not &#xA;all patients will exhibit the same abnormalities in function;  in some, gastric motor &#xA;function may show an increase in frequency and amplitude of &#34;antral&#34; contractions with &#xA;accelerated emptying of solids.  On the whole associated gastritis of antral mucosa is a &#xA;common finding.&#xA;Holt et al. (l986) pointed out that gastric emptying rate measurements in patients with &#xA;duodenal ulcer had produced conflicting results.  Many previous studies had failed to &#xA;identify any gastric emptying abnormality, while in others the rate was found to be faster &#xA;than in normal controls.  The conflicting results might have been due to factors such as &#xA;differences in experimental methods and differences in meal composition;  the exact &#xA;stage at which emptying was measured in relation to the treatment or healing of a &#xA;duodenal ulcer was also important.  Using &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;113m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt; In as a marker of the liquid, &#xA;and &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt; Tc as a marker of the solid phase, measurements of gastric emptying &#xA;rates were undertaken in duodenal ulcer patients before, during and after therapy with &#xA;cimetidine, as well as in control subjects.  Before therapy there were no significant &#xA;differences in the rate or pattern of gastric emptying in duodenal ulcer patients as &#xA;compared with normal controls.  This implied that gastric motor function in the two &#xA;groups was similar, and the results did not agree with the findings of previous &#xA;investigators who had found abnormally fast emptying in duodenal ulcer patients.  &#xA;During treatment, however, the emptying rate of particles became faster.  The findings &#xA;suggested that cimetidine had no marked effect on the emptying of the liquid component &#xA;of a meal, but that there was a specific effect of the emptying of the solid phase.  Gastric &#xA;emptying patterns from control subjects and from healed duodenal ulcer patients were &#xA;remarkably similar.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Williams et al. (l986) measured gastric emptying of citric acid, glucose and fat meals by &#xA;means of a double-sampling, dye-dilution technique, while maintaining intragastric pH at &#xA;a constant level.  Acid, glucose and fat inhibited gastric emptying in a dose-dependent &#xA;fashion in duodenal ulcer patients as well as in normal controls.  Duodenal ulcer patients &#xA;emptied all three types of meals faster than normals, but differences only occurred at the &#xA;lower doses of glucose or with the less potent doses of acid and fat.  It was concluded that &#xA;differences in gastric emptying of liquid meals in duodenal ulcer patients, as compared &#xA;with normals, were small;  the variable responses obtained with different concentrations &#xA;might explain some of the inconsistencies found by previous workers.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hui et al. (l986) performed endoscopic biopsies in 213 patients with active duodenal &#xA;ulceration and diagnosed active chronic antral gastritis in 99 percent.  The degree of &#xA;chronic inflammation was assessed histologically by the infiltration of polymorphs and &#xA;chronic inflammatory cells and by the severity of mucosal degeneration.  In the majority &#xA;of patients antral gastritis was considered to be of a moderate degree.  In non-ulcer &#xA;controls active chronic antral gastritis occurred in 50 percent and in a milder form.  It was &#xA;concluded that the exact relationship of chronic antral gastritis to duodenal ulceration was &#xA;uncertain.  Healing of the duodenal ulcer was accompanied by histological improvement &#xA;of the antral gastritis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;present-investigations&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Present Investigations&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#present-investigations&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We examined the contractile behaviour of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in duodenal &#xA;ulceration by means of upper gastrointestinal radiography in the following groups of &#xA;patients:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Group 1.&lt;/EM&gt;  Sixty consecutive patients with active duodenal ulceration receiving and &#xA;responding to medical treatment.  All had been referred from the outpatient department &#xA;with the clinical diagnosis of duodenal ulcer.  In most cases the symptoms had been &#xA;present for several months to a year;  some had had symptoms and signs of chronic, &#xA;recurrent duodenal ulceration and had received anti-ulcer therapy intermittently for the &#xA;previous one to four years.  Many had previous radiographic and/or endoscopic &#xA;examinations, in which the diagnosis had been confirmed.  Only patients in whom a &#xA;definite ulcer niche could be seen radiologically or endoscopically in the duodenal bulb, &#xA;were admitted to the study;  patients with additional upper gastrointestinal pathology, e.g. &#xA;gastric ulceration or hiatus hernia, were excluded.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;Group 2.&lt;/EM&gt;  Seventeen cases of chronic recurring duodenal ulceration not responding &#xA;satisfactorily to medical therapy.  All had endoscopically proven active duodenal &#xA;ulceration and all were candidates for the operation of sero-myotomy and parietal cell &#xA;vagotomy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 58 of 60 cases of the first group, and in 15 of l7 cases of the second group, &#xA;contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder were normal.  The following are examples &#xA;from the 58 cases of the first group:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 30.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; P.K., 44 year old male, a known case of duodenal ulceration, had received &#xA;anti-ulcer therapy for some months;  at the time of examination he was still symptomatic.  &#xA;Radiographic examination revealed no lesion in the oesophagus and stomach;  the &#xA;duodenal bulb was deformed and showed a niche on its lesser curvature side, indicating &#xA;an active duodenal ulcer.   Contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder were normal.  &#xA;The distended cylinder contained several transverse (i.e. circular) mucosal folds (Fig. &#xA;30.1&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  During contraction of the cylinder the folds changed in direction to &#xA;longitudinal, only longitudinal folds being evident in the maximally contracted cylinder, &#xA;with formation of the pyloric canal (Fig. 30.1&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  The rate of cyclical &#xA;contractions of the cylinder was normal at about 3 or 4 per minute.  It is not possible to &#xA;determine the amplitude of individual contractions radiographically;  descriptions such as &#xA;&#34;maximal&#34; or &#34;near maximal&#34; may give some indication of the degree of contraction.  &#xA;Radiographically the range and degree of contraction appeared to be normal.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/30-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/30-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 30.1 A,B. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case P.K. &lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Transverse (i.e. circular) mucosal folds in distended pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.  Ulcer niche in duodenal bulb. &lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Normal contraction of sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;Longitudinal mucosal folds in fully contracted pyloric canal.  Ulcer niche in duodenal bulb&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 30.2.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; W.C., 33 year old male, a known case of duodenal ulceration, presented &#xA;with epigastric pain and malaena.  Radiographic examination showed no abnormality in &#xA;the oesophagus and stomach.  The duodenal bulb was deformed and contained an ulcer &#xA;niche (not clearly visible in illustration) (Fig.30.2&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  Cyclical contractions &#xA;of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder occurred at a rate of 3 to 4 per minute;  the range of &#xA;individual contractions appeared to be normal, varying from full expansion (Fig. &#xA;30.2&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;) to maximal or near maximal contraction (Fig. 30.2&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  A &#xA;month after the examination the duodenal ulcer perforated, necessitating laparotomy and &#xA;omental plugging of the perforation;  the stomach was normal at operation.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/30-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/30-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 30.2 A,B. &lt;/b&gt;Case W.C. &lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Pyloric sphincteric cylinder distended. &#xA;Deformed duodenal bulb due to active ulceration. &lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Normal contraction of sphincteric &#xA;cylinder. Duodenal bulb deformed&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 73 of 77 cases of duodenal ulceration, cyclical contractions of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder were found to be normal in character, range and frequency.  (It has to be &#xA;reiterated that these features were determined while using a fluid barium suspension).  &#xA;Normal contractions were seen irrespective of the size of the ulcer, its exact position &#xA;(whether located in the apex, centre of base of the duodenal bulb) and irrespective of the &#xA;degree of deformity and/or narrowing of the bulb (in 9 of the cases there was appreciable &#xA;narrowing).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 2 of 60 cases in the first group in whom normal contractions of the cylinder were &#xA;absent, the stomach was aperistaltic, hypotonic and moderately dilated, with delayed &#xA;emptying in the erect position;  this was not due to duodenal narrowing or obstruction, &#xA;the cause of the aperistalsis being undetermined.  In 2 of 17 cases in the second group &#xA;with absent cyclical activity, atypical contraction of the cylinder was noted.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It has been stated that the acid-secretory characteristics of duodenal and pyloric ulcers are &#xA;similar (Chap. 29).  The present findings show that there are important differences in the &#xA;motility patterns of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in the two conditions.  Normal &#xA;contractions usually occur in duodenal ulceration while severe motility disturbances are &#xA;present in pyloric ulceration (Chap. 29).  The findings confirm those of Liebermann-&#xA;Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l98l), who stated that motor disorders of the gastric &#xA;musculature were less evident in duodenal than gastric ulceration and were, in fact, of &#xA;minor importance in duodenal ulceration.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#34;Antral&#34; gastritis may occur in cases of duodenal ulcer, but is usually of a mild, diffuse &#xA;type;  gastric ulceration is associated with much more severe inflammatory alterations, &#xA;according to Schrager et al. (l967).  Liebermann-Meffert and Allg&amp;#246;wer (l98l) found &#xA;that abnormal features of the muscular layers and ganglion cells were less severe in &#xA;duodenal than in gastric ulcer.  Earlam et al. (l985) described a high incidence of chronic &#xA;superficial and chronic atrophic antral gastritis in a selected group of duodenal ulcer &#xA;patients, all requiring operation after prolonged but unsuccessful medical therapy.  &#xA;Brooks (l985) looked upon gastritis of the antral mucosa as a common finding in &#xA;duodenal ulceration.  Hui et al. (l986) found active, chronic gastritis in almost all patients &#xA;with duodenal ulcer;  in the majority it was of moderate severity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The less severe grades of pyloric gastritis occurring in association with duodenal ulcer (as &#xA;opposed to the more severe gastritis in pyloric and other gastric ulcers) probably accounts &#xA;for the normal motility of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder in the former.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Brooks FP.  The pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis &#xA;Sci&lt;/em&gt; l985, 30, Suppl 11, 15S-29S.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Buckler KG.  Effects of gastric surgery upon gastric emptying in cases of peptic &#xA;ulceration.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l967, 8, 137-147.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cobb JS, Bank S, Marks IN, et al.  Gastric emptying after vagotomy and &#xA;pyloroplasty.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 16, 207-215.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Earlam RJ, Amerigo J, Kakavoulis T, et al.  Histological appearances of &#xA;oesophagus, antrum and duodenum and their correlation with symptoms in &#xA;patients with duodenal ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l985, 26, 95-100.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Fordtram JS, Walsh JH.  Gastric acid secretion rate and buffer content of the &#xA;stomach after eating;  results in normal subjects and in patients with duodenal &#xA;ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;J Clin Invest&lt;/em&gt; l973, 52, 645-657.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;George JD.  Gastric acidity and motility.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l968, 13, &#xA;376-383.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Griffith GH, Owen GM, Kirkman S, et al.  Measurement of rate of gastric &#xA;emptying using Chromium-51.  &lt;em&gt;Lancet&lt;/em&gt; l966, 1, 1244-1245.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Griffith GH, Owen GM, Cambell H, et al.  Gastric emptying in health and in &#xA;gastroduodenal disease.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l968, 54, 1-7.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Holt S, Heading RC, Taylor TV, et al.  Is gastric emptying abnormal in duodenal &#xA;ulcer?  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l986, 31, 685-692.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Howlett PJ, Sheiner HJ, Barber DC, et al.  Gastric emptying in control subjects &#xA;and patients with duodenal ulcer before and after vagotomy.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l976, l7, 542-550.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hui WM, Lam SK, Ho J, et al.  Chronic antral gastritis in duodenal ulcer:  natural &#xA;history and treatment with prostaglandin E1.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l986, &#xA;91, 1095-1101.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kwong NK, Brown BH, Whittaker GE, et al.  Electrical activity of the gastric &#xA;antrum in man.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 57, 913-916.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Lam SK, Isenberg JI, Grossman MI, et al.  Rapid gastric emptying in duodenal &#xA;ulcer patients.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l982, 27, 598-604.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Liebermann-Meffert D, M&amp;#252;ller C, Allg&amp;#246;wer M.  Gastric &#xA;hypermotility and antropyloric dysfunction in gastric ulcer patients.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 16, Suppl 67, 5-7.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Liebermann-Meffert D, Allg&amp;#246;wer M.  Neuromuscular tissue defects and &#xA;antropyloric dysfunction in peptic ulcer.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l98l, &#xA;16, Suppl 67, 111-113.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Schrager K, Spink R, Mitra S.  The antrum in patients with duodenal and gastric &#xA;ulcers.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l967, 8, 497-508.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Williams NS, Elashoff J, Meyer JH.  Gastric emptying of liquids in normal &#xA;subjects and patients with healed duodenal ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l986, 31, 943-952.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>31 - Pyloroduodenal Fistula or Acquired Double Pylorus</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_31/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_31/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;pyloroduodenal-fistula-or-acquired-double-pylorus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pyloroduodenal Fistula or Acquired Double Pylorus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pyloroduodenal-fistula-or-acquired-double-pylorus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Whereas a double pylorus had previously been presumed to be of congenital origin, &#xA;Hansen et al. (1972) described 2 cases in which the clinical and endoscopic findings &#xA;indicated that it was usually an acquired lesion.  The first case was a 55 year old male &#xA;with a known prepyloric gastric ulcer.  Follow-up gastroscopy showed that the ulcer had &#xA;perforated into the duodenum, forming a short fistulous communication between the &#xA;stomach and duodenum, which had the appearance of a second pyloric aperture.  In the &#xA;second case a known duodenal ulcer had perforated through the pyloric ring into the &#xA;stomach, with a similar result.  In both cases a mucosal septum was situated between the &#xA;2 apertures.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Drapkin et al. (1974) described a case in which a deep ulcer on the lesser curvature of the &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34; eventually perforated into the duodenal bulb, forming an acquired pyloro-&#xA;duodenal fistula.  At endoscopy two pyloro-duodenal openings, separated by a mucosal &#xA;septum, were seen.  A catheter inserted into one opening re-entered the &#34;antrum&#34; through &#xA;the other.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Engle (1975) collected 7 cases from the literature and described another case in which a &#xA;prepyloric gastric ulcer had penetrated into the duodenum.  The radiological appearance &#xA;was that of a short gastroduodenal fistula, extending from the distal stomach to the &#xA;duodenal bulb on the lesser curvature side.  The accessory canal was separated from the &#xA;normal pylorus by a septum or bridge of mucosa, which conceivably could simulate a &#xA;filling defect or mass lesion at a radiographic study.  It was stated that cases had probably &#xA;been misdiagnosed previously and that the condition was more common than the number &#xA;of reported cases would suggest.  A similar case was reported by Bender and Soffa &#xA;(1975).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Hegedus et al. (1978) studied the developmental history as well as the clinical, &#xA;endoscopic and radiological features of 11 cases of acquired double pylorus encountered &#xA;among 7,932 consecutive radiographic studies over a 3 year period.  They were able to &#xA;show how a known prepyloric gastric ulcer penetrated the wall and eventually perforated &#xA;into the duodenal bulb to form a second &#34;pyloric canal&#34;.  This left no doubt about the &#xA;acquired nature of the lesion.  In 7 of the patients peptic ulcer symptoms disappeared at &#xA;the time of formation of the fistula, rendering surgical interference unnecessary.  It was &#xA;said that the gastric side of the fistula might not be visible endoscopically, as it could be &#xA;covered by fibrin or necrotic material;  it was easier to recognize the condition &#xA;radiologically.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Tallman et al. (1979) reported another 4 cases.  In the first case 2 constantly patent &#xA;pyloric openings with intact mucosal margins were seen gastroscopically.  The duodenum &#xA;could be visualized through both channels.  The patient had had a prepyloric gastric ulcer &#xA;for the previous 8 years.  In another case a radiographic study showed a short fistulous &#xA;tract leading from the superior portion of the &#34;antrum&#34; to the superior fornix of the &#xA;duodenal bulb.  In a third case gastroscopy showed a rosary of oedematous mucosal &#xA;folds;  although a fistula was not visible initially, a pediatric endoscope inserted through &#xA;the occluded opening entered the duodenum.  Two subsequent radiographic studies failed &#xA;to reveal the fistula.  In the fourth case a lesser curvature prepyloric ulcer had led to 2 &#xA;fistulous communications between the stomach and duodenum, resulting in a tri-&#xA;channelled pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Thompson et al. (1982) estimated that approximately 60 cases had been described up to &#xA;that time.  The fistulous communication usually extended from the lesser curvature of the &#xA;&#34;distal antrum&#34; to the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb;  less commonly it was located &#xA;on the greater curvature side.  The radiological appearance was usually characteristic;  &#xA;endoscopy sometimes failed to diagnose the condition.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;During 6810 consecutive radiographic studies over a 2 year period we encountered 5 &#xA;cases of acquired double pylorus (Keet and Bezuidenhout 1984).  Four will be described &#xA;briefly:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 31.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; S.K., 67 year old male, was admitted with a history of burning epigastric &#xA;pain of 4 months&#39; duration.  It commenced a few hours after meals, woke him at night and &#xA;was relieved by food and antacids.  Occasionally it radiated to the back.  There was no &#xA;history of haematemesis or malaena.  Twenty years prior to admission he had had a bout &#xA;of similar symptoms.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Physical examination revealed epigastric tenderness.  A radiographic study, done &#xA;elsewhere, showed an irregular narrowing 3.5 cm in length at the pylorus (Fig. &#xA;31.1&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;);  it had been interpreted as a carcinoma.  Repeat radiological &#xA;examination showed that the narrowing was in reality a fistulous connection between the &#xA;distal end of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and the base of the duodenal bulb on the &#xA;lesser curvature side.  It was adjacent to, and located on the posterior aspect of the &#xA;pylorus.  The sphincteric cylinder remained partially contracted as illustrated, neither &#xA;maximal contraction nor maximal expansion occurring.  The duodenal bulb was &#xA;deformed.  The condition was diagnosed as an acquired double pylorus, i.e. a &#xA;pyloroduodenal fistula as a result of a perforating ulcer.  Endoscopy showed a benign &#xA;pyloric ulcer filled with necrotic material.  It had perforated into the duodenum and the &#xA;instrument could be manipulated into the duodenum through the pylorus as well as &#xA;through the channel formed by the perforation.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/b&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/31-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/31-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 31.1 A,B. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case S.K. &lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Narrow, irregular channel between pyloric sphincteric cylinder and &#xA;duodenal bulb, diagnosed as carcinoma.  Normal pyloric aperture not filled with barium. &#xA;Cylinder partially contracted. &lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Resection specimen. Arrow through pyloroduodenal &#xA;fistula.  Pyloric aperture visible behind arrow&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At operation considerable fibrotic reaction was encountered and the duodenum had to be &#xA;dissected from the pancreas.  A truncal vagotomy, antrectomy and Billroth I anastomosis &#xA;was performed.  The resection specimen showed a second aperture between the stomach &#xA;and duodenum next to the normal pylorus, with a bridge of mucosal tissue between the 2 &#xA;apertures (Fig. 31.1&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;) confirming the diagnosis of pyloroduodenal fistula or &#xA;so-called double pylorus.&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 31.2.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; J.N., 55 year old male, complained of burning epigastric pain of 4 months&#39; &#xA;duration.  It commenced an hour after meals and was relieved by food and antacids.  &#xA;There was intermittent nausea with some loss of appetite and weight.  Previously he had &#xA;been treated for ischaemic heart disease, gout, ethanol and aspirin abuse.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Physical examination revealed gouty tophi at various joints, moderate hypertension and &#xA;epigastric tenderness.  A radiographic study showed an extra channel extending from the &#xA;distal end of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder to the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb &#xA;on the lesser curvature side (Fig. 31.2).  The sphincteric cylinder remained partially &#xA;contracted throughout the examination, with a deep incisura on the greater curvature due &#xA;to contraction of the left pyloric loop, as illustrated.  There was some deformity of the &#xA;duodenal bulb.  The condition was diagnosed as an acquired double pylorus, presumably &#xA;the result of penetration of a pyloric ulcer into the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/31-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 31.2. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case J.N. Fistula between pyloric sphincteric cylinder and base of duodenal bulb on lesser &#xA;curvature side (arrow).  Constant contraction of sphincteric cylinder. Pyloric aperture patent&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Anti-ulcer treatment was commenced.  Initially the patient was lost to follow-up, but &#xA;endoscopy 3 months later showed a posteriorly situated, deep prepyloric ulcer.  No &#xA;definite penetration into the duodenum could be demonstrated, but the examination was &#xA;difficult and incomplete on account of fixation of tissues.  After an episode of &#xA;haematemesis a month later, a second endoscopy showed the same ulcer to be filled with &#xA;blood clot.  Because of increasing fixation it was not possible to manipulate the &#xA;instrument through the pylorus into the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The patient returned a year later after a massive haematemesis.  Following ressuscitation, &#xA;a laparotomy was performed at which an inflammatory mass was palpated on the &#xA;posterior aspect of the pylorus.  After a truncal vagotomy had been performed it was &#xA;found that a pyloric ulcer had penetrated deeply into the pancreas, necessitating &#xA;considerable dissection.  The pancreas formed the base of the ulcer;  from here it had &#xA;burrowed into the duodenum.  The pyloric ring was intact.  The findings confirmed the &#xA;presence of a gastro-duodenal fistula as a result of a penetrating pyloric ulcer.  An &#xA;antrectomy with Billroth I anastomosis was done.  Histologically the ulcer was benign, &#xA;with chronic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia in the surrounding gastric mucosa.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 31.3&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; S.D., 44 year old female, was a known case of pyloric ulceration.  Three &#xA;years before admission an active ulcer on the lesser curvature of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder had been diagnosed at radiological examination.  Follow-up endoscopy after &#xA;anti-ulcer therapy had shown healing of the ulcer with some residual deformity of the &#xA;pyloric region.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;She then presented with a recurrence of symptoms.  Endoscopy showed pyloric &#xA;deformity.  Radiographic examination three weeks later revealed an ulcer on the lesser &#xA;curvature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, on the immediate oral side of the ring, with &#xA;a fistulous communication between the ulcer and the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb &#xA;(Fig. 31.3).  Prominent, permanent circular mucosal folds were present in the cylinder, &#xA;which remained partially expanded throughout the examination with complete absence of &#xA;cyclical contraction and relaxation.  Repeat endoscopy the following week confirmed the &#xA;presence of a prepyloric ulcer with a pyloro-duodenal fistula.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/31-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 31.3. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case S.D. Ulcer lesser curvature side of sphincteric cylinder with fistula (arrow) to base &#xA;of duodenal bulb. Partial expansion of cylinder. Permanent, circular mucosal folds in cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 31.4&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; W.S., 54 year old male, presented with a history of intermittent epigastric &#xA;pain, aggravated by meals, relieved by alkalies and at times associated with vomiting, of &#xA;4 years&#39; duration.  Physical examination revealed epigastric tenderness.  The first &#xA;endoscopic examination showed a small, superficial, benign ulcer on the lesser curvature &#xA;of the stomach approximately l.0cm proximal to the pylorus.  After initial improvement &#xA;the symptoms recurred.  Radiographic examination three years later showed a narrow &#xA;fistula extending from the lesser curvature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, 1.0cm &#xA;proximal to the pylorus, to the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb.  The cylinder &#xA;remained in a state of partial contraction throughout the examination, while the pyloric &#xA;aperture appeared normal.  Control endoscopic examination confirmed the presence of a &#xA;benign prepyloric ulcer, described as &#34;deep&#34;;  the first part of the duodenum was &#xA;deformed but a pyloro-duodenal fistula could not be identified.  A second radiographic &#xA;study confirmed the findings of the first.  At the third radiological study (six months after &#xA;the first) a fistulous communication was again noted between the prepyloric lesser &#xA;curvature ulcer and the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb  (Fig. 31.4&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  &#xA;The pyloric sphincteric cylinder remained partially contracted throughout the &#xA;examination, occasionally reaching the pseudo-diverticulum stage, but never relaxed &#xA;fully (Fig. 31.4&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  Subsequently truncal vagotomy and antrectomy was done &#xA;elsewhere for &#34;chronic prepyloric ulcer&#34;.  Unfortunately the resection specimen was &#xA;discarded and was not available for examination.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/31-4a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=center&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/31-4b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 31.4 A,B. &lt;/b&gt; &#xA;Case W.S. &lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Fistula (arrow) between sphincteric cylinder and duodenal bulb on &#xA;lesser curvature side.  Cylinder partially contracted.  Pyloric aperture patent.&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Sphincteric cylinder contracted to pseudo-diverticulum stage. It never relaxed fully&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Einhorn et al. (1984) reviewed the literature of acquired double pylorus and reported 4 &#xA;new cases with long term follow-up.  In 36 cases the fistula extended from the lesser &#xA;curvature of the &#34;antrum&#34; to the superior portion of the duodenal bulb.  In 28 of these it had &#xA;originated from &#34;antral&#34; ulcers, in 2 from &#34;pyloric channel&#34; ulcers and in 6 from duodenal &#xA;ulcers.  In 9 cases the fistula was situated between the greater curvature and the inferior &#xA;portion of the duodenal bulb, 7 originating from antral ulcers, one from a pyloric channel &#xA;ulcer and one from a duodenal ulcer.  The radiological appearance of a double pylorus &#xA;was said to be characteristic, consisting of two channels of barium separated by a smooth &#xA;band of soft tissue which represented the intervening mucosal septum.  The endoscopic &#xA;appearance was also typical, the aperture of the fistula being clearly visible in the &#xA;majority of cases.  With the endoscope in the &#34;distal antrum&#34;, it was frequently possible to &#xA;insert a biopsy instrument into the fistula and visualize its tip within the duodenum by &#xA;viewing through the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;None of the cases of acquired double pylorus reported up to 1984 had been associated &#xA;with malignancy (Einhorn et al. 1984).  Friehling and Rosenthal (1985) subsequently &#xA;described an unusual case of gastric carcinoma in which the radiological appearance of a &#xA;double-channel pylorus was the result of partition of the pyloric aperture by the tumor, no &#xA;fistula being present.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The radiological features of two more (unconfirmed) cases of benign, acquired pyloro-&#xA;duodenal fistula were subsequently described by Hurwitz and Friedman (1987).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Acquired double pylorus or pyloro-duodenal fistula occurring as a result of perforation of &#xA;a peptic ulcer has also been known by the terms pseudo-pylorus, tunnel ulcer, pyloric &#xA;diaphragm, antral mucosal band and pyloric septum (Drapkin et al. 1974;  Hegedus et al &#xA;1978).  None of the authors quoted, with the exception of Keet and Bezuidenhout (1984), &#xA;described the condition in relation to the concept of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Our cases had the following features in common:  In all the pyloro-duodenal fistula &#xA;extended from the superior aspect of the distal part of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder to &#xA;the superior fornix of the duodenal bulb, i.e. it was situated on the lesser curvature side.  &#xA;(As reported in the literature the fistula may occasionally occur on the greater curvature &#xA;side).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In all 4 cases the sphincteric cylinder remained partially contracted (or, in other words, &#xA;incompletely expanded) throughout the radiological examination;  although minor &#xA;degrees of contraction and relaxation did occur, these movements were never maximal.  &#xA;This is best illustrated in Fig. 31.2, in which a permanent contraction of the left pyloric &#xA;loop on the greater curvature, opposite the commencement of the fistula, is seen.  In Case &#xA;31.4 the contraction at times reached the pseudo-diverticulum stage (Fig. &#xA;31.4&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;), before reverting to incomplete expansion (Fig. 31.4&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is concluded that our cases of acquired pyloro-duodenal fistula were associated with &#xA;motility disturbance of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, consisting of a restriction in the &#xA;range of contraction and relaxation.  Theoretically this could have an effect on emptying &#xA;and trituration of solids (Chap. 18).  Emptying of liquid barium occurred without undue &#xA;delay through both orifices. &#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Bender MD, Soffa DJ.  Acquired double pylorus:  a case report.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l975, 116, 325-326.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Drapkin RL, Otsuka AL, Castellanos HL et al.  Acquisition of a pyloric septum or &#xA;pyloric duodenal fistula.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l974, 66, 1234-1236.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Einhorn RI, Grace ND, Banks PA.  The clinical significance and natural history of &#xA;the double pylorus.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l984, 29, 213-218.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Engle R.  Tunnel ulcer with double pyloric canal.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l975, &#xA;116, 323-324.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Friehling JS, Rosenthal LE.  Gastric carcinoma presenting as double-channel &#xA;pylorus on upper gastrointestinal series.  &lt;em&gt;Dig Dis Sci&lt;/em&gt; l985, 30, 269-&#xA;273.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hansen HO, Kronborg O, Pedersen T.  The double pylorus.  &lt;em&gt;Scand J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l972, 7, 695-696.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hegedus V, Poulsen PE, Reichardt J.  The natural history of the double pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l978, 126, 29-34.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Hurwitz J, Friedman L.  Pyloroduodenal fistula:  a benign complication of peptic &#xA;ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;South Afr Med&lt;/em&gt; J 1987, 72, 56-58.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Keet AD, Bezuidenhout DJJ.  Dubbele pilorus en piloroduodenale fistels.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;South Afr Med J&lt;/em&gt; l984, 66, 740-742.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Tallman JM, Clements JL, Gilliam JH, et al.  The multi-channelled pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Clin Rad&lt;/em&gt; l979, 30, 337-341.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Thompson WM, Kelvin FM, Gedgaudas RK, et al.  Radiologic investigation of &#xA;peptic ulcer disease.  &lt;em&gt;Rad Clin North Amer&lt;/em&gt; l982, 20, 701-720.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>32 - Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_32/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_32/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;gastro-oesophageal-reflux-disease-gerd-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastro-oesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastro-oesophageal-reflux-disease-gerd-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;hiatus-hernia-in-infants&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Hiatus Hernia in Infants&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#hiatus-hernia-in-infants&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Roviralta (l951) described 3 cases of partial thoracic stomach in infants associated with &#xA;hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (IHPS), and called the combination the phreno-pyloric &#xA;syndrome.  It was believed that raised intragastric pressure secondary to the obstruction at &#xA;the pylorus forced the stomach into the chest.  Among 115 children with a partial thoracic &#xA;stomach, Astley and Carr&amp;#233; (l954) encountered 5 who also had hypertrophic pyloric &#xA;stenosis, while another 3 had &#34;infantile pylorospasm&#34;.  The pylorospasm in all 3 cases &#xA;was described as an inconstant narrowing of the pyloric &#34;antrum&#34;, (Chap. 20), the &#xA;radiographic appearance simulating IHPS to such a degree that Astley (l956) later called &#xA;them cases of pseudo-hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  The symptomatology suggested that &#xA;initially there was gastroesophageal reflux due to a partial thoracic stomach, followed by &#xA;the superimposition of hypertrophic stenosis a few weeks later.  Thus vomiting &#xA;commenced soon after birth, and at the age of 2 to 3 weeks the symptoms and signs of &#xA;hypertrophic stenosis, such as projectile vomiting, visible peristalsis and a palpable mass &#xA;were superadded.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Forshall (l955) described the findings in 93 infants with gastroesophageal reflux and &#xA;hiatus hernia.  In 58 cases the cardia was incompetent but situated below the diaphragm.  &#xA;Eight of these required Ramstedt&#39;s operation for IHPS, while others had visible gastric &#xA;peristalsis with temporary palpable masses in the pyloric region.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Astley (l956) stated that the association of hiatus hernia and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis &#xA;was not a very common combination, but that the frequency was enough to suggest &#xA;something more than a chance occurrence.  He found no ready explanation for the &#xA;association of these two conditions.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Stewart (l960), in discussing a paper by Herrington (l960), was impressed by the &#xA;frequency of pyloric hypertrophy in cases of hiatus hernia;  in many instances it &#xA;resembled infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Johnston (l960), in a series of 76 cases of hiatus hernia in childhood, found that 8 (10.5 &#xA;percent) also had hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.  Some of those without hypertrophic &#xA;stenosis showed visible gastric peristalsis with forcible or even projectile vomiting, which &#xA;to him was an indication of a gastric emptying disorder, giving rise to functional pyloric &#xA;obstruction.  It was reasoned that this raised the intragastric pressure, thus forcing the &#xA;cardia into the chest.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bowen (l988) pointed out that criteria for diagnosing hiatus hernia in infants remained &#xA;unsettled, but that it was generally agreed that the retrograde passage of material from the &#xA;stomach into the oesophagus was the crux of the matter, regardless of whether or not a &#xA;hiatal hernia could be demonstrated convincingly.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a number of infants we have noted a combination of hiatus hernia and IHPS;  however, &#xA;no systematic study was done in infants to determine in which percentage of hiatus hernia cases &#xA;IHPS also occurred.  The following is an example of one of our cases:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;Case Reports&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 32.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; E.B., 5 weeks old female infant, was admitted with a history of vomiting &#xA;after feeds and recurrent bilateral pneumonia.  Radiographic examination showed a &#xA;severe, constant narrowing of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, with a &#34;string sign&#34; typical &#xA;of IHPS (Fig. 32.1&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  The gastro-oesophageal junction was patulous with &#xA;free and persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux, diagnosed radiographically as a sliding &#xA;hiatus hernia (Fig. 32.1&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  Some aspiration of refluxed barium occurred.  At &#xA;operation the next day a pyloric &#34;olive&#34; measuring approximately 2.3 cm x 0.8 cm, &#xA;typical of IHPS, was found.  Ramstedt pyloromyotomy was done;  post-operatively &#xA;vomiting stopped and the patient made an uneventful recovery.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/32-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 32.1 &lt;b&gt;A,B.&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case E.B. &lt;b&gt;A&lt;/B&gt; Constant narrowing of pyloric sphincteric cylinder with string sign (arrows), &#xA;typical of idiopathic hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.&#xA;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt; Patulous gastro-oesophageal junction with free reflux (arrow)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/32-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;hiatus-hernia-in-adults&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Hiatus Hernia in Adults&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#hiatus-hernia-in-adults&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Wieser et al. (l963), describing the radiographic appearances of adult hypertrophic &#xA;pyloric stenosis (AHPS), noted that a fifth of their 44 patients with pyloric hypertrophy &#xA;also had hiatus hernia (Chap. 24).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Burge (l964) found a high incidence of &#34;pyloric channel disease&#34; in cases of hiatus &#xA;hernia.  The pyloric pathology in these cases consisted of pyloric and prepyloric muscle &#xA;hypertrophy, mucosal stenosis and external scarring, in varying combinations.  Some had &#xA;previous ulcers in the immediate vicinity of the pyloric ring.  Of 5 cases operated on for &#xA;hiatus hernia, 2 had pyloric mucosal stenosis and 3 stenosis of the pyloric ring with &#xA;external scarring (presumably due to previous ulceration.)  One of these cases also had &#xA;considerable prepyloric muscular hypertrophy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Burge et al. (l966) found that pyloric channel disease was more frequently associated &#xA;with symptomatic hiatus hernia than duodenal ulceration.  It was stated that this benign &#xA;disease at the pylorus had previously frequently been overlooked, both during the &#xA;radiological examination and at operation.  The pylorus and duodenum were studied in 44 &#xA;consecutive cases of hiatus hernia subjected to operation.  Concomitant duodenal &#xA;ulceration was present in 22 and pyloric channel disease in 34.  (The apparent &#xA;discrepancy was due to the frequent association of duodenal ulceration and pyloric &#xA;channel disease in the same patient.)  It was reiterated that pyloric channel disease &#xA;included mucosal stenosis, gastritis, pyloric and prepyloric muscle hypertrophy, and &#xA;scarring.  It is clear that Burge (l964) and Burge et al. (l966) described pathological &#xA;changes in the pylorus not limited to muscular hypertrophy, and presumably due to &#xA;previous ulceration in many of the cases.  However, pyloric channel disease also occurred &#xA;without evidence of ulceration, and in those cases there was not only pyloric ring change &#xA;but also a definite prepyloric component, as shown by a contracted and deformed &#xA;prepyloric region on radiography, and by muscle hypertrophy at operation.  In all these &#xA;cases a long history of duodenal or pyloric disease almost invariably preceded the &#xA;symptoms of hiatus hernia.  Burge (l964) and Burge et al. (l966) did not refer to the &#xA;findings of Cunningham (1906) and Torgersen (l942), and it appears that few of their &#xA;cases of pyloric channel disease would fit into the category of muscular hypertrophy of &#xA;the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;radiographic-studies&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Radiographic Studies&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#radiographic-studies&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a previous study of 134 consecutive adult cases of hiatus hernia, we noted a contracted &#xA;pyloric region, conforming to contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, in l9 (Table &#xA;32.1) (Keet and Heydenrych l97l).  Strict criteria were adhered to in the radiographic &#xA;diagnosis of hiatus hernia.  A sliding hernia was only diagnosed if it could be &#xA;demonstrated from below the diaphragm, and if it is was associated with free and &#xA;persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux in the Trendelenburg position.  In order to achieve &#xA;this, the patient was instructed to swallow 6 to 7 mouthfuls of a commercial barium &#xA;suspension, followed by a swallow of water in the erect position.  This served to fill the &#xA;stomach with contrast medium, while the water cleared the oesophagus.  The patient was &#xA;then placed in the Trendelenburg position, and various manoeuvres were done in an effort &#xA;to demonstrate a sliding hernia.  An irreducible hiatus hernia was diagnosed if it was &#xA;obvious that a part of the stomach was situated permanently above the diaphragm in both &#xA;the erect and Trendelenburg positions.&#xA;&lt;P&gt;&#xA; &lt;tt&gt;&#xA; &lt;b&gt;Table 32.1.&lt;/b&gt; Contracted Pyloric Segment in Hiatus Hernia&#xA; &lt;/tt&gt;&#xA; &lt;table border=0 width=100%&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;Series 1&lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;n&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA; &lt;td align=right&gt;Series 2&lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;n&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Sliding hiatus hernia without contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;112&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;65&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Sliding hiatus hernia with contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;16&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;27&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Irreducible hiatus hernia without contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;3&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;24&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Irreducible hiatus hernia with contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;9&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Sliding and rolling hiatus hernia with contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;1&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;0&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;Total&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;&lt;B&gt;134&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;&lt;B&gt;125&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Total hiatus hernia cases without contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;115&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;89&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Total hiatus hernia cases with contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;19&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;36&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Per cent hiatus hernia cases with contracted pyloric segment&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;14.2&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td align=right&gt;28.8&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=3&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA; &lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;P&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In all cases gastric peristaltic waves and contractions of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;were carefully observed radiographically.  Normal cyclical contractions of the cylinder &#xA;(Chap. 13) were evident in 112 cases of sliding, and in 3 cases of irreducible hiatus &#xA;hernia.  Contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder was diagnosed if this region failed &#xA;to relax fully during the examination, which implied markedly diminished or absent &#xA;cyclical activity.  This was seen in 16 cases of sliding hiatus hernia, in 2 of irreducible &#xA;hiatus hernia and in one where the hernia was of a combined sliding and rolling type.  In &#xA;these cases contraction of the cylinder ranged from what can be described as moderate &#xA;(Fig. 32.5&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;), to severe (Fig. 32.2&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;) grades;  perhaps more &#xA;important is the fact that in all, the range and/or frequency of cyclical contraction and &#xA;relaxation of the cylinder was severely curtailed.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;More recently we examined a second series of 125 cases of hiatus hernia.  Permanent &#xA;contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, to greater or lesser degree, was present in &#xA;36 (28 percent).  There were 92 cases of sliding hernia, 27 showing a contracted cylinder, &#xA;and 33 cases of irreducible hiatus hernia, 9 with a contracted cylinder (Table I).  &#xA;Comparison of the two series of cases shows that the total percentage of cases of hiatus &#xA;hernia with a contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder, has almost doubled in the second &#xA;series.  The reason for this is not clear, but it is presumed that only the more severe &#xA;grades of contraction were included in the first series.&#xA;Few cases of contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder could be controlled surgically, as &#xA;almost all our cases of hiatus hernia which came to operation had a transthoracic &#xA;approach for the repair of the hernia.  The following cases were done via an abdominal &#xA;route:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;H3&gt;Case Reports&lt;/H3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 32.2.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; A.G.C., female aged 64 years.  Ten years previously a hiatus hernia had &#xA;been diagnosed radiographically.  At the present examination a large, sliding hiatus &#xA;hernia with free gastro-oesophageal reflux was demonstrated in the Trendelenburg &#xA;position (Fig. 32.2&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  A constant contraction of the sphincteric cylinder, 5.0 &#xA;cm in length, was seen (Fig. 32.2&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  Its walls were smooth and regular, &#xA;without evidence of local mucosal destruction, a niche, filling defect or other organic &#xA;lesion.  Emptying of fluid barium suspension was not delayed.  At operation there was a &#xA;hard, tumour-like contraction in the pyloric part of the stomach, extending proximally &#xA;from the pyloric ring for a distance of 5.0 cm.  The contraction was of such severity that &#xA;the mass appeared avascular and greyish and at first simulated a carcinoma.  However, &#xA;gentle massaging caused it to relax, followed immediately by recurring contraction.  A &#xA;pylorosplasty was done at which the muscularis externa was seen to be three times the &#xA;normal thickness.  The mucosa bulged through the incision and the surgeon had no doubt &#xA;that it was a case of adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (AHPS).  There was no other &#xA;local lesion.  The hernia was repaired and a truncal vagotomy performed.  Repeat &#xA;radiological examination 7 months later showed a post-pyloroplasty appearance.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/32-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/32-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 32.2 &lt;b&gt;A,B&lt;/b&gt;. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case A.G.C. Large, sliding hiatus hernia (black arrows). Contracted pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder (white arrows)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It seems that, while the radiological abnormality may be unequivocal, the operative &#xA;findings, as far as the pyloric part is concerned, may be of an uncertain nature, as in the &#xA;following case:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 32.3.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; F.V., male aged 75 years, was admitted for mild obstructive jaundice of 10 &#xA;days&#39; duration.  There had been colicky epigastric pain for the previous 5 months, as well &#xA;as acidity and heartburn for years.  Oral and intravenous cholecystography revealed poor &#xA;concentration of the opaque medium with calculi in the gallbladder and a dilated common &#xA;bile duct containing stones.  (At the time sonography of the gall bladder had not been &#xA;perfected).  The radiological examination showed a large, irreducible hiatus hernia (Fig. &#xA;32.3).  A contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, 4.5 cm in length, with a tendency &#xA;toward formation of a pseudodiverticulum on its greater curvature side, was constantly &#xA;present;  there was no evidence of any other lesion locally or in the remainder of the &#xA;stomach.  The diagnosis of contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder, resembling AHPS, in &#xA;association with hiatus hernia was made.  At operation a cholecystectomy was done and &#xA;calculi were removed from the common bile duct.  The surgeon stated that the pyloric &#xA;area of the exposed stomach felt a little thicker than usual.   Had his attention not been &#xA;drawn to it beforehand, it is doubtful if he would have commented on it in his operative &#xA;notes.  No other gastric lesion was detected.  Because of the patient&#39;s age, it was decided &#xA;not to repair the hernia at that time.  Repeat radiographic examination 5 months later &#xA;showed the irreducible hiatus hernia and the contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder to be &#xA;unchanged.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/32-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 32.3. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case F.V. Large irreducible hiatus hernia (black arrow).  Contracted pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In this case two points are worth noting:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>33 - Pyloric Carcinoma</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_33/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_33/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;pyloric-carcinoma&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pyloric Carcinoma&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pyloric-carcinoma&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As pointed out by Castleman (l936), there was a time when it was widely believed that &#xA;gastric carcinoma did not invade the duodenum.  In most of the earlier text-books of &#xA;surgery and surgical pathology it was stated that, while carcinoma of the stomach spread &#xA;extensively in many directions by means of lymphatic and haematogenous metastases &#xA;and through direct extension, it stopped abruptly at the pyloric ring.  However, on &#xA;reviewing the literature, Castleman (l936) collected 38 case reports of gastric carcinoma &#xA;in which duodenal spread of the tumor had occurred.  In the majority the extent of &#xA;duodenal invasion was not more than 1.0 to 2.0 cm, but in isolated cases it could be as &#xA;much as 5.0 cm.  In view of these findings it was necessary to remove most of the first &#xA;part of the duodenum in resections for gastric carcinoma.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In his own investigation Castleman (l936) examined microscopic &#xA;preparations of 134 surgical and 65 autopsy specimens of pyloric carcinoma which had &#xA;accumulated in his department during the previous 34 years.  There was microscopic &#xA;invasion of the duodenum in 6 (9 percent) of the autopsy, and in 15 (11 percent) of the &#xA;surgical specimens.  The extent of duodenal spread in the 21 cases varied from 4.0 mm to &#xA;2.3 cm.  (In most of the surgical specimens carcinoma cells were found at the distal cut &#xA;edge, i.e. the tumor had been transected).  Spread usually occurred along the submucosa, &#xA;often in the lymphatics, and rarely involved the mucosa.  It was stated that spread had &#xA;taken place deep to Brunner&#39;s glands (i.e. between Brunner&#39;s glands and the muscularis &#xA;externa) and in the accompanying illustrations it appeared as if these glands were not &#xA;involved.  Usually duodenal infiltration was so slight that the surgeon had difficulty in &#xA;palpating the thickened duodenal wall and it could only be detected microscopically.  It &#xA;was recommended that at least 3.0 cm of the duodenum be removed during gastric &#xA;resection for carcinoma at the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Dixon and Stevens (l936) drew attention to 6 cases of linitis plastica of the stomach in &#xA;which histologically similar but separate, discrete lesions were found elsewhere in the &#xA;gastrointestinal tract, namely in the oesophagus, jejunum, colon and rectum.  No mention &#xA;was made of direct extension into the duodenum in these cases.  The authors had &#xA;encountered 37 similar case reports in the literature.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Coller et al. (l941) studied the routes and extent of spread in 53 cases of gastric &#xA;carcinoma.  Duodenal involvement was seen in 14 cases (26.4 percent).  In some it had &#xA;occurred through direct extension of the tumor, and in others via submucosal and &#xA;intermuscular lymphatic channels.  The exact extent of duodenal spread was not &#xA;mentioned.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Zinninger and Collins (l949) studied microscopic sections of gastric resection specimens &#xA;in 36 cases of carcinoma of the stomach without any gross evidence of invasion of the &#xA;duodenum.  Microscopically 9 (25 percent) showed duodenal invasion by carcinoma.  If &#xA;only those cases were considered in which the lesion was situated within 5.0 cm of the &#xA;pylorus, there were 9 cases out of 30 (30 percent) in which duodenal invasion had &#xA;occurred.  The extent of duodenal spread was as follows:  in 2 cases it was 3.0 mm, in 4 &#xA;cases 7.0 to 15.0 mm, in 2 cases 20.0 mm and in one case 60.0 mm.  (The latter was an &#xA;unusual case.  It appeared to be a benign gastric ulcer, but was diagnosed microscopically &#xA;as a mucoid scirrhous carcinoma with widespread extension.  The cell types in the other 8 &#xA;cases were not mentioned).  The invasion of the duodenum seemed to be mostly by direct &#xA;infiltration of the muscle or extension through the subserosal lymphatics.  In 3 of the 9 &#xA;cases spread had taken place in the submucosa.  In some cases an isolated lymph node &#xA;adjacent to the duodenum beyond the pylorus contained metastases without any &#xA;carcinoma being found in the duodenal wall.  No mention was made of carcinomatous &#xA;infiltration in relation to Brunner&#39;s glands.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Eker (l951) studied the lymphatic spread of gastric carcinoma in 70 total and 100 partial &#xA;gastrectomy specimens.  Generally speaking extension into the oesophagus was much &#xA;more frequent than spread into the duodenum.  In the 70 specimens of total resection, &#xA;32.8 percent showed involvement of the oesophagus, while in the entire material of 170 &#xA;cases only 2 tumors were found to have extended into the duodenum.  It appeared as if &#xA;the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34; formed a barrier which prevented distal spread of carcinoma;  &#xA;similar circumstances did not pertain at the gastro-oesophageal junction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Subsequently Eker and Efskind (l952) analyzed the frequency and extent of spread of &#xA;gastric carcinoma within the different layers of the wall.  For this purpose 42 total and 38 &#xA;partial gastrectomy specimens were examined.  Duodenal extension of the tumor was &#xA;apparent in 14 of the 80 specimens.  In all 14 cases the distance of duodenal infiltration &#xA;beyond Brunner&#39;s glands was said to be short.  Microscopically the cases were divided &#xA;into adenocarcinomas, mucinous scirrhus carcinomas and colloid carcinomas.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It was found that gastric adenocarcinoma spread mainly in the mucosa and submucosa of &#xA;the stomach, with spread decreasing gradually in the muscle layers toward the subserous &#xA;layer.  Spread in the subserous layer was slight, a fact which was especially obvious in &#xA;the highly differentiated adenocarcinomas.  In the 6 cases of gastric adenocarcinoma with &#xA;duodenal extension, the spread in the mucous membrane stopped at the point where &#xA;Brunner&#39;s glands commenced, i.e. at the line of demarcation between the stomach and &#xA;duodenum.  In other words, the duodenal mucosa was not involved by spread of gastric &#xA;adenocarcinoma across the pylorus, while the other duodenal layers were.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In gastric mucinous scirrhus carcinomas conditions were found to be different.  In most &#xA;of these cases there was little spread in the gastric mucosa, most of the spread occurring &#xA;in the submucosa and deeper layers of the gastric wall.  In 6 of these cases duodenal &#xA;extension of the tumor had occurred;  in 4 of the 6 cases mucosal involvement stopped at &#xA;the gastroduodenal junction, the duodenal mucosa being spared.  In the other 2 cases the &#xA;duodenal mucosa was involved for a distance of 2.0 mm in the first and 7.0 mm in the &#xA;second case.  All the other duodenal layers were involved in the spread.&#xA;In gastric colloid carcinoma, the characteristics of spread in the gastric wall resembled &#xA;those of adenocarcinoma in some cases, and mucinous scirrhus carcinoma in others.  On &#xA;the whole the greatest spread occurred in the submucous layer.  In 2 cases infiltration of &#xA;the duodenum had occurred, but further particulars of these were not given.  The results &#xA;seemed to justify the conclusion that the less differentiated carcinomas spread more &#xA;readily to the duodenum than the highly differentiated tumors.  In addition, the tendency &#xA;to spread in the various layers of the wall was stronger in the stomach than in the &#xA;duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a wide-ranging study of gastrectomy specimens obtained from cases of gastric &#xA;carcinoma, Eker and Efskind (1960) found the following:  In 865 partially resected &#xA;stomachs infiltration of the lower border was seen in 2.4 percent.  In 256 totally resected &#xA;stomachs infiltration of the lower border was present in 0.8 percent.  Tumors involving &#xA;the sphincteric cylinder (both adenocarcinoma and scirrhus carcinoma) infiltrated the &#xA;lower border in 3.6 percent.  The rarity with which distal extension of tumor occurred &#xA;was ascribed to a barrier effect of the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34;, or to different peristaltic effects &#xA;in the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Majima et al. (l964) examined 833 subtotal resection specimens of cases of gastric &#xA;carcinoma.  Duodenal invasion was encountered in 151 cases (18.1 percent);  the &#xA;frequency of duodenal invasion depended on the location of the tumor in the stomach.  If &#xA;only those tumors within 1.0cm of the pyloric ring were considered, the incidence of &#xA;duodenal invasion was 37.0 percent.  In cases where the gastric tumor was located 3.0 to &#xA;4.0 cm proximal to the ring, the incidence was 4.1 percent.  (Almost all these cases were &#xA;associated with spread of carcinoma to other structures, e.g. the peritoneum and lymph &#xA;nodes).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Of the cases with duodenal invasion, the serosa of the duodenum was involved in 115 &#xA;(76.2 percent);  in none of these cases could a continuous extension into the mucosal coat &#xA;of the duodenum be demonstrated.  However, in a few cases carcinoma of the prepyloric &#xA;region extended directly into the duodenal submucosa at an early stage, in the absence of &#xA;extragastric spread.  In 92 percent of cases the extent of spread into the duodenum was &#xA;1.0 cm or less.  In 6.6 percent it was between 1.0 and 2.0 cm, and in 0.7 percent it varied &#xA;from 2.0 to 2.4 cm.  In some of these cases the line of division of the duodenum was &#xA;involved by carcinomatous infiltration, indicating that the duodenal invasion extended &#xA;further than the distance given.  The pattern of duodenal invasion was continuous in 54 &#xA;percent of cases, discrete in 34 percent, and both continuous and discrete in 10 percent.  &#xA;In the 5 cases of duodenal mucosal invasion, spread had occurred via the lymphatic &#xA;channels and not through continuous direct extension.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Fernet et al. (l965) described 7 cases of scirrhous carcinoma of the stomach (linitis &#xA;plastica) which had spread within the wall of long segments of the alimentary tract, &#xA;producing an appearance of leathered induration similar to that seen in the stomach.  &#xA;Occasionally the process extended downward as far as the sigmoid colon.  This tubal &#xA;spread was due to a neoplastic infiltrate in the intramural tissue spaces, producing a &#xA;diffuse induration and separation of the mucosa, submucosa and muscularis.  Spread &#xA;occurred in the longitudinal lymph channels, mainly in the submucosa and subserosa, &#xA;leaving the muscular layer relatively intact;  the lymph spaces were clogged with small &#xA;round or oval undifferentiated cells with a positive mucin reaction.  Metastatic spread &#xA;also occurred to the mesenteric lymph nodes and the intestinal serosa.  It appeared as if &#xA;the longitudinal spread in linitis plastica was quite different from that of glandular &#xA;carcinoma, as the appearance of leathered induration was not observed in well-&#xA;differentiated adenocarcinoma.  Tubal spread seemed to occur only in linitus plastica or &#xA;similar undifferentiated forms of carcinoma.  No detailed description of conditions at the &#xA;pyloro-duodenal junction in these cases was given.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Paramanandhan (l967) reviewed the literature on duodenal spread of gastric carcinoma &#xA;for the period 1865 to 1965, and found great variations in the reported incidences.  He &#xA;studied the frequency and extent of duodenal invasion in 29 necropsy specimens of &#xA;gastric adenocarcinoma.  Invasion of the serosa and lymph nodes was apparent in all &#xA;cases.  The subpyloric group of lymph nodes was involved in 24 cases, 20 of these &#xA;showing invasion of the duodenum.  Thus duodenal spread had occurred in 20 of the 29 &#xA;cases, giving an incidence of 68.9 percent.  There was a discrepancy between the &#xA;macroscopic and microscopic appearances, as only 3 of the 20 cases showed macroscopic &#xA;evidence of duodenal invasion.  Microscopically the spread often involved the duodenal &#xA;mucosa and submucosa.  The submucosal layer was the most frequently affected, being &#xA;followed by the serosa and the other layers of the wall.  In 17 cases duodenal invasion &#xA;occurred chiefly via the lymphatics, but it was difficult to determine whether this was &#xA;primarily via the submucous or via the subserosal lymph vessels.  In 3 cases extension &#xA;appeared to be by direct infiltration of sheets of anaplastic cells.  The duodenal surface &#xA;epithelium appeared to remain intact.  Although they were often compressed by dilated &#xA;lymphatics containing tumor cells, Brunner&#39;s glands appeared to be particularly resistant.  &#xA;In all cases there was some degree of lymphocytic infiltration of the duodenum, due to &#xA;lymphatic stasis.  As all cases with duodenal invasion showed involvement of the &#xA;subpyloric group of glands, spread could be due to a downward or retrograde lymph flow &#xA;resulting from a block of the nodes.  The extent of duodenal spread varied from 0.5 cm to &#xA;22.6 cm.  In more than half the cases no tumor tissue occurred beyond the first 3.0 cm of &#xA;the duodenum, while in one case extension was seen for a distance of 22.6 cm.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In discussing the pathology and prognosis of carcinoma of the stomach, Hawley et al. &#xA;(l970) analyzed the findings in 205 patients who underwent total or partial gastrectomy.  &#xA;Cases were divided into the following types:  (1) well-differentiated adenocarcinoma;  (2) &#xA;poorly differentiated or anaplastic carcinoma;  (3) linitis plastica type.  One of the &#xA;difficulties in the grading was the great variability in the degree of cellular differentiation &#xA;in different parts of the same tumor.  The amount of lymphocytic and plasma cell &#xA;infiltration had a significant effect on the prognosis;  five out of 7 patients with a heavy &#xA;infiltration of such cells survived over 5 years.  The feature with the worst influence on &#xA;prognosis was lymph gland involvement.  Linitis plastica was a type of carcinoma which &#xA;had to be considered separately;  here submucosal and muscular infiltration involved part &#xA;or all of the stomach, sometimes without mucosal ulceration.  Three cases of mucosal &#xA;carcinoma, in which areas of malignant change were confined to the mucous membrane, &#xA;were encountered;  these were discovered incidentally during histological examinations &#xA;of gastrectomy specimens removed for peptic ulceration.&#xA;According to &amp;#214;hman et al. (l972) gastric carcinomas could be graded histologically &#xA;into the following types:  (1) highly differentiated adenocarcinoma;  (2) moderately &#xA;differentiated adenocarcinoma;  (3) poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma;  (4) &#xA;undifferentiated or expansive carcinoma;  (5) linitis plastica;  (6) gelatinous type.  The &#xA;highly differentiated adenocarcinomas had the best prognosis while there was no &#xA;prognostic difference between the moderately and poorly differentiated and &#xA;undifferentiated types.  The prognostic significance of the degree of differentiation was &#xA;probably linked to dissimilarities in longitudinal growth along the wall and the &#xA;occurrence of lymph node metastases.  Linitis plastica, which was also undifferentiated, &#xA;spread in a different, infiltrative manner and had the worst prognosis of all.  While all &#xA;gastric carcinomas contained some amount of mucus, abundant mucinous masses were &#xA;present in gelatinous carcinoma.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Ming (l973) reiterated that gastric carcinomas are highly infiltrative tumors, extending &#xA;rapidly to the serosa.  From here tumor cells may implant on other parts of the &#xA;peritoneum;  lymphatic and vascular spread is common.  On gross examination of his &#xA;cases the lesion often appeared to end sharply at the gastroduodenal junction, but it had &#xA;been documented repeatedly that tumor extension into the duodenum was not uncommon.  &#xA;In many of those cases the duodenal invasion was mostly subserosal and the mucosa was &#xA;not involved.  The reason for the latter phenomenon was not known.  Intramural spread &#xA;of a highly infiltrative tumor to other parts of the small bowel and colon as reported by &#xA;Fernet et al. (l965) appeared to be very rare.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Koehler et al. (l977) reviewed 111 consecutive cases with gastric adenocarcinoma.  &#xA;Spread of tumor to the duodenum was evident on gross inspection of the resected &#xA;specimens in 7 cases (6 percent).  In 6 patients (5 percent) radiographic abnormalities of &#xA;the duodenum due to the transpyloric extension of gastric carcinoma were evident.  (In &#xA;the other case gastric outlet obstruction prevented radiological evaluation of the &#xA;duodenum).  In 2 patients without duodenal invasion, radiographic deformities of the &#xA;duodenal bulb were due to inflammatory changes adjacent to the gastric tumor, and in &#xA;one case the duodenal bulb was deformed due to metastatically enlarged adjacent lymph &#xA;nodes.  Microscopically the duodenum was involved in 20 cases (18 percent).  Tumor &#xA;cells were noted predominantly in the muscular and submucous layers of the duodenum, &#xA;but mucosal invasion was noted occasionally.  From the literature they concluded that in &#xA;as many as half the cases with duodenal involvement, the tumor extended no more than &#xA;1.0 cm beyond the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Joffe et al. (l977) described 4 cases with intraluminal filling defects of the duodenal bulb &#xA;secondary to transpyloric prolapse of polypoid gastric carcinomas.  It was pointed out &#xA;that primary adenocarcinoma of the duodenum practically never arose in the bulb, and &#xA;that intraluminal filling defects of the duodenum due to malignant lymphoma or &#xA;metastatic malignancy were rare.  Radiologically the cases had to be differentiated from &#xA;prolapse of gastric mucosa (Chap. 38).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;present-investigations&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Present Investigations&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#present-investigations&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Patients and Methods&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#patients-and-methods&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In an effort to further elucidate duodenal spread and some other features of pyloric &#xA;carcinoma, we did a retrospective study of 50 consecutive cases encountered in the &#xA;radiological department over a period of 3 years.  These patients had been referred for &#xA;examination from the out-patient department during the ordinary course of events.  At the &#xA;time a barium radiographic study was the primary investigation for suspected gastric &#xA;carcinoma.  Because of the heavy work load and other reasons endoscopy was generally &#xA;reserved for conditions such as haematemesis and radiologically negative dyspepsia, and &#xA;for obtaining biopsies in cases of gastric ulceration.  Moreover endoscopy was considered &#xA;to have certain shortcomings in the diagnosis of gastric malignancy, especially in the &#xA;pyloric region.  Whereas the oral border of the lesion is usually clearly visualized &#xA;endoscopically, narrowing and deformity may preclude passage of the instrument and the &#xA;full extent of the lesion, as well as possible duodenal involvement, may not be evident.  &#xA;The barium suspension, on the other hand, usually traverses most narrowings to enter the &#xA;duodenum, and the aboral border of the lesion may be seen.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Pyloric carcinoma was defined, somewhat arbitrarily, as a gastric carcinoma which, at the &#xA;radiographic investigation, was seen to extend to the pyloric ring or to within 2.0 cm of &#xA;the ring.  Cases in which the aboral border of the lesion was more than 2.0 cm away from &#xA;the ring were excluded.  On average the duration of symptoms in these patients was from &#xA;4 to 12 months, i.e. they presented at a rather late stage of the disease;  radiologically the &#xA;lesions left little room for doubt.  Cases of early gastric carcinoma, in which the lesion is &#xA;limited to the mucosa, were not encountered, presumably because of the late &#xA;presentations.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;All cases were subsequently confirmed by endoscopic biopsy and/or operation, and the &#xA;histology was obtained in 40 (Table 33.1).  In 10 of the unresectable cases the surgeons &#xA;deemed histological confirmation unnecessary.  The 44 operations consisted of 24 &#xA;Billroth II and 2 Billroth I partial gastrectomies, 16 palliative gastro-enterostomies and 2 &#xA;exploratory laparotomies (in which widespread metastases precluded surgical palliation).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;table width=100%&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=4&gt;&lt;b&gt;Table 33.1&lt;/b&gt; Fifty cases of Pyloric Carcinoma&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=4&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;Radiographic examination&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Endoscopic biopsy&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Operation&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;Histology&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=4&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;50&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;38&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;44&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td&gt;40&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=4&gt;&lt;hr&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The following are representative cases:&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>34 - Malignant Lymphoma</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_34/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_34/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;malignant-lymphoma&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Malignant Lymphoma&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#malignant-lymphoma&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a historical review of malignant lymphoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract, Dawson &#xA;et al (l96l) found that these tumors had been reported more frequently in the stomach than &#xA;in the remainder of the digestive tract.  Up to that time at least 293 reports of lymphoid &#xA;tumors of the stomach had appeared in the literature, but no clear distinction had been &#xA;made between lymphomas originating primarily in the stomach and those affecting the &#xA;stomach as a manifestation of generalized, disseminated lymphomatous disease.  &#xA;According to these authors the tumors could be classified as primary if the following &#xA;conditions were met:  there should be no palpable superficial lymphadenopathy and no &#xA;enlargement of the mediastinal lymph nodes;  the total and differential white blood count &#xA;should be within normal limits;  at laparotomy the bowel (or gastric) lesion should &#xA;predominate, the only lymph nodes obviously affected being those in its immediate &#xA;neighbourhood;  and finally the liver and spleen should be free of tumor.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Rappaport (l966) proposed a histological classification of the lymphomas which also &#xA;included Hodgkin&#39;s disease.  For the past two or three decades his classification, as well &#xA;as five or six others, have been widely used.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Naqvi et al. (l969) found that approximately 1,200 cases of gastric lymphomas had been &#xA;recorded, and reviewed 100 cases of their own.  In their experience the stomach was the &#xA;part of the gastrointestinal tract most frequently involved, and the prepyloric region the &#xA;site most commonly affected.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In discussing the pathology Ming (l973) stated that, in the stomach, malignant lymphoma &#xA;develops in the mucosa, from where the tumor cells infiltrate the submucosa and &#xA;muscularis.  Seeing that this mode of growth is similar to that of carcinoma, it often &#xA;assumes the gross characteristics of carcinoma and macroscopic differentiation of the two &#xA;conditions may be difficult.  Grossly the tumors may be ulcerated with rolled borders, &#xA;while others are polypoid.  There may be extensive infiltration and thickening of the &#xA;gastric wall and/or mucosal folds.  Histologically there is dense infiltration, with varying &#xA;degrees of admixture of mature and immature lymphoid cells and histiocytic (reticulum) &#xA;cells;  there is a lack of fibrous tissue proliferation.  While mucosal glands may be absent, &#xA;the remaining gastric glands usually retain their normal architecture.  The presence of &#xA;reticulum fibres and absence of stainable mucin are features in favour of lymphoma (as &#xA;opposed to carcinoma).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Katz et al. (l973) described 15 cases of disseminated lymphoma with gastric involvement.  &#xA;The following abnormal findings were noted at gastroscopy:  enlarged, nondistensible &#xA;rugae in 13 cases, multiple superficial ulcerations in 11, nodular ulcerations in 8 and large &#xA;polypoid masses in 4.  Biopsy furnished a positive diagnosis in not more than 2 of the 15 &#xA;cases.  The poor yield was ascribed to the infiltrative submucosal nature of secondary &#xA;lymphoma and the superficial capacity of endoscopic biopsies.  The gastroscopic &#xA;appearance was found to be of greater help in the diagnosis of gastric lymphoma than &#xA;biopsies, directed brush cytology or cytology washings.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Meyers et al. (l975) pointed out that the radiographic features of primary gastric &#xA;lymphoma were not specific and included polypoid masses, ulcerations, thickening of the &#xA;walls and generalized enlargement of the rugae.  These appearances could simulate &#xA;ulcerated carcinoma, gastric ulceration, granulomatous disease or hypertrophic rugae due &#xA;to other causes, e.g. Menetrier&#39;s disease.  While lymphoma may occur anywhere in the &#xA;stomach, they reiterated that it commonly involved the pyloric and prepyloric area.  In 7 &#xA;proved cases they noted a definite tendency for the condition to spread submucosally &#xA;from the distal stomach into the duodenum, resulting in radiographically discernible &#xA;contour deformities, filling defects or ulcerations in the duodenal bulb.  These features &#xA;seldom occur in gastric adenocarcinoma (Chap. 33), and were regarded as characteristic &#xA;of lymphoma, permitting a specific diagnosis to be made.  In one of their cases, which &#xA;was described in detail, duodenal spread occurred both superficial and deep to the lamina &#xA;propria.  This surrounded, but apparently did not invade, the glands of Brunner.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Koehler et al. (l977) analyzed the records of l9 patients who underwent gastric resection &#xA;for lymphoma.  Three of these had microscopic evidence of invasion of the duodenum, &#xA;and in one of these the duodenal involvement was evident radiographically and grossly.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Lim et al. (l977) defined primary gastric lymphoma as a tumor apparently originating in &#xA;the stomach, with no clinical, laboratory or radiographic evidence of systemic &#xA;involvement at the time of initial evaluation.  They analyzed 50 consecutive cases and &#xA;found the most common localities to be the &#34;antrum&#34;, the pyloric area and lesser &#xA;curvature.  According to Rappaport&#39;s (1966) classification, the diffuse histiocytic type &#xA;occurred in 23 of their 50 patients, the well differentiated lymphocytic type in 12, the &#xA;mixed lymphocytic histiocytic in 5, the poorly differentiated lymphocytic in 5, Hodgkin&#39;s &#xA;disease in 3, and unclassified lymphoma in 2 cases.  The prognosis for survival was much &#xA;better than in gastric carcinoma since the latter condition presented with a far higher &#xA;incidence of serosal penetration and nodal and distant metastases.  The treatment of &#xA;choice was gastric resection (44 of their cases being resectable), while radiotherapy and &#xA;chemotherapy constituted additional therapeutic options.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Seeing that the therapy and prognosis of gastric lymphoma differ significantly from those &#xA;of adenocarcinoma, Hricak et al. (l980) reiterated that correct diagnosis was essential.  By &#xA;reviewing the radiographic and pathological features in 81 cases, they investigated the &#xA;incidence of spread from the stomach into the oesophagus, and from the stomach into the &#xA;duodenum.  In 60 of the cases the tumor appeared to have originated primarily in the &#xA;stomach, and only 5 of these showed involvement of adjacent nodes, the mesentery or &#xA;small bowel.  In 21 patients the involvement was mainly extrinsic, the stomach being &#xA;secondarily involved.  Radiographically transpyloric extension was seen in 27 of the 81 &#xA;cases.  In 7 the &#34;antrum&#34; was the only site of tumor involvement, 6 of these showing &#xA;transpyloric extension.  Histologically the tumor was found to have a submucosal origin &#xA;(according to Ming it originated in the mucosa).  Submucosal extension across the &#xA;pylorus was seen in l9 of the 27 cases.&#xA;Zornoza and Dodd (l980) pointed out that the gross appearance and microscopic &#xA;characteristics of the lesion were identical in the primary gastric and disseminated forms.  &#xA;The only differences between them were the distribution of the disease and the potential &#xA;for future spread.  Disseminated lymphoma was a lethal process that ran a rapid course.  &#xA;Although moderate stiffening of the gastric walls might occur in the intraluminal &#xA;fungating form, peristaltic waves were not completely absent.  The diffusely enlarged and &#xA;distorted gastric rugae appeared to be more or less fixed.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Craig and Gregson (l98l) reiterated that one of the findings strongly suggesting the &#xA;diagnosis of lymphoma was mucosal involvement extending across the pylorus into the &#xA;duodenum.  The US National Cancer Institute (l982), in a retrospective study of over &#xA;1,000 cases, published a revised and modified classification of non-Hodgkin&#39;s lymphoma &#xA;based on six previous classifications, including that of Rappaport (l966).  This has &#xA;become known as the &#34;Working Formulation for non-Hodgkin&#39;s Lymphomas&#34;.  It is &#xA;based primarily on clinical correlations, especially survival curves, age, sex, presenting &#xA;sites and stage of the disease.  Other recent classifications have been based, in part, upon &#xA;modern concepts of the immune system and lymphoid physiology.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;According to Sandler (l984), whose views differ from those of Ming (l973), primary &#xA;gastric lymphomas arise from lymphoid tissue in the lamina propria and extend laterally &#xA;along the submucosal layer.  As the mucosa is not involved in the first place, endoscopy &#xA;and endoscopic biopsy are unreliable diagnostic modalities.  The muscular layer is &#xA;generally spared till a late stage of the disease.  The diffuse infiltration by mature and &#xA;immature lymphoid cells and histiocytic cells may result in large, rigid folds or the &#xA;appearance of linitis plastica.  The lesions may also be of a polypoid or fungating nature.  &#xA;They do not constrict the lumen or interfere with peristalsis, and pyloric obstruction is &#xA;unusual.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Because the tumor is predominantly submucosal, the diagnosis of gastric lymphoma by &#xA;endoscopic biopsy can be difficult, according to Fork et al. (l985);  in one report a &#xA;success rate of only 44 percent was achieved.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Only a few cases of malignant gastric lymphomatous disease have been encountered in &#xA;our department in many thousands of upper gastrointestinal barium investigations during &#xA;the past 3 to 4 years.  The following are two of the cases:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 34.1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&#x9;G.C., l7 year old male, had a two year history of epigastric pain, vomiting, &#xA;weight loss and retardation of growth.  Physical examination revealed severe iron &#xA;deficiency anaemia.  Radiographic study showed multiple lobulated filling defects in the &#xA;corpus and sinus of the stomach, constant irregularity of the greater and lesser curvatures &#xA;and a narrowing at the commencement of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, in the region of &#xA;the left pyloric loop (Fig. 34.1).  The cylinder was partially contracted throughout the &#xA;examination, never contracting or relaxing maximally;  this was associated with a patent &#xA;pyloric aperture measuring 4.0 mm in diameter.  Gastric emptying of fluid barium was &#xA;delayed.  Endoscopy showed diffuse, nodular infiltration of the entire corpus and &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, with contact bleeding.  The infiltration surrounded the pyloric orifice, which &#xA;was patent.  The duodenum could not be visualized.  Histology, according to the &#xA;&#34;Working Formulation&#34;, revealed a high grade, malignant, non-Hodgkin lymphoma.  &#xA;Bone marrow biopsy was normal.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/34-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 34.1. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case G.C. Irregularities of lesser and greater curvatures extending to &#xA;commencement of pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  Cylinder partially contracted (arrows).  &#xA;Pyloric aperture patent&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At operation the entire stomach from the gastro-oesophageal junction to the pylorus was &#xA;found to be involved by lymphomatous infiltration, and a total gastrectomy with an &#xA;oesophago-jejunal anastomosis was performed.  Macroscopically the resection specimen &#xA;showed diffuse thickening of the walls with effacement of the normal mucosal pattern.  &#xA;Microscopically tumor cells extended from the mucosa into the muscular layer and in &#xA;several areas as far as the serosa.  Electron microscopically the cells were determined to &#xA;belong to the lymphoma group, the condition being diagnosed by a combination of light &#xA;microscopy, electron microscopy and immunocytology as a large cell (B-cell), &#xA;immunoblastic lymphoma.  The distal border of the resection specimen was free of tumor &#xA;cells and liver biopsy was normal.  A few enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes proved to be &#xA;of reactive type.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 34.2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&#x9;J.J., 43 year old male, presented with intermittent epigastric pain, &#xA;vomiting, loss of appetite and loss of weight, of one year&#39;s duration.  Physical &#xA;examination revealed epigastric tenderness.  Radiographic study showed a constant &#xA;irregularity of the lower part of the lesser curvature, with a permanent, ulcer-like &#xA;projection;  a large, lobulated filling defect was present in the duodenal bulb (Fig. 34.2).  &#xA;The pyloric sphincteric cylinder remained expanded throughout the examination, failing &#xA;to contract, and the pyloric orifice remained patent.  The appearances were ascribed to a &#xA;mass lesion, probably with ulceration, infiltrating the distal lesser curvature of the &#xA;stomach and the first part of the duodenum.  At endoscopy a deformity of the gastric &#xA;&#34;antrum&#34;, presumably due to external compression was seen, while the pyloric ring &#xA;appeared normal.  A large polypoid, lobulated mass measuring approximately 4.0 cm in &#xA;diameter, was present in the duodenal bulb;  the surrounding duodenal mucosa appeared &#xA;normal.  The biopsy specimen was inadequate but the possibility of malignant lymphoma &#xA;was mentioned.  Abdominal sonography showed no abnormality in the pancreas, liver, &#xA;gall bladder and kidneys.  Chest radiographs and bone marrow trephine biopsies were &#xA;normal.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/34-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 34.2 &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case J.J. Irregularity lower lesser curvature with ulcer-like projection.  Pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder expanded.  Pyloric aperture patent (arrow).  Large, lobulated filling &#xA;defect in duodenal bulb&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At laparotomy two apparently separate mass lesions were found, one in the first part of &#xA;the duodenum and the other in the distal stomach.  Several enlarged perigastric lymph &#xA;nodes were present.  The liver and spleen appeared normal.  Frozen sections suggested &#xA;malignant lymphomatous disease, and a Billroth II partial gastrectomy was performed.  &#xA;Macroscopically the resection specimen showed several tumor nodules, varying in &#xA;diameter from 1.5 cm to 4.0 cm, in the mucosa;  some were ulcerated.  The surrounding &#xA;mucosa felt indurated.  Microscopically the nodules consisted of mixed cellular &#xA;infiltration;  the majority of cells were of a lymphoid type while histiocytes, plasma cells &#xA;and eosinophils were also present.  Similar cells, as well as Reed Sternberg cells were &#xA;seen in the lymph nodes.  The condition was diagnosed as mixed cellularity Hodgkin&#39;s &#xA;lymphoma.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although primary malignant lymphoma may occur anywhere in the stomach, several &#xA;authors commented on the fact that the pyloric region is the site most commonly affected &#xA;(Naqvi et al l969;  Meyers et al. l975;  Lim et al. l977).  It usually develops from &#xA;lymphoid tissue in the mucosa (Ming l973), submucosa (Hricak et al. l980) or lamina &#xA;propria (Sandler l984).  In the early stages peristalsis may be impaired (Ngan and James &#xA;l973), but it is usually not completely absent (Zornoza and Dodd l980), as the muscular &#xA;layer is not infiltrated till a late stage (Sandler l984).  In Case 34.1 radiographic &#xA;examination showed widespread infiltration of the proximal part of the stomach, &#xA;extending as far as the commencement of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, which was in a &#xA;state of partial contraction with absent cyclical activity;  this is an uncommon &#xA;presentation of malignant gastric lymphoma. &#xA;In Case 34.2 there was radiographic and operative evidence of widespread involvement &#xA;of the distal stomach, including the pyloric sphincteric cylinder and the first part of the &#xA;duodenum, with destruction of normal anatomical features. The failure of cyclical activity of&#xA;the sphincteric cylinder may be expected to hamper propulsion and trituration of solids.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Malignant gastric lymphoma has a definite tendency to extend across the pylorus into the &#xA;duodenum (Meyers et al. l975;  Hricak et al. l980;  Craig and Gregson l98l);  the spread &#xA;usually occurs submucosally (Meyers et al. l975;  Hricak et al. l980;  Sandler l984), &#xA;although mucosal spread has also been mentioned (Craig and Gregson l98l).  Spread of &#xA;gastric adenocarcinoma into the duodenum, although not as rare as postulated some &#xA;decades ago, is less likely to occur (Chap. 33).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In one of 7 cases of duodenal spread of malignant gastric lymphoma, Meyers et al. (l975) &#xA;noted that Brunner&#39;s glands were surrounded, but not invaded, by lymphomatous cells.  &#xA;(A possible relationship between pyloric adenocarcinoma and Brunner&#39;s glands of the &#xA;duodenum is discussed in Chap. 33).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Whether malignant gastric lymphoma affects cells of the APUD system in the stomach is &#xA;not known.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;&lt;a name=&#34;ref&#34;&gt;References&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Craig O, Gregson R.  Primary lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Clin &#xA;Rad&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 32, 63-71.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Dawson IMP, Cornes JS, Morson BC.  Primary malignant lymphoid tumors of the &#xA;intestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l96l, 49, 80-89.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Fork FT, Haglund U, Hogstrom H, et al.  Primary gastric lymphoma versus &#xA;gastric cancer:  an endoscopic and radiographic study of differential diagnostic &#xA;possibilities.  &lt;em&gt;Endoscopy&lt;/em&gt; l985, l7, 5-7.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Hricak H, Thoeni RF, Margulis AR, et al.  Extension of gastric lymphoma into the &#xA;esophagus and duodenum.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l980, 135, 309-312.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Katz S, Klein MG, Winawer SJ, et al.  Disseminated lymphoma involving the &#xA;stomach:  correlation of endoscopy with directed cytology and biopsy.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l973, l8, 370-374.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Koehler RE, Hanelin LG, Laing FC, et al.  Invasion of the duodenum by &#xA;carcinoma of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l977, &#xA;128, 201-205.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Lim FE, Hartman AS, Tan EGC, et al.  Factors in the prognosis of gastric &#xA;lymphoma.  &lt;em&gt;Cancer&lt;/em&gt; l977, 39, 1715-1720.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Meyers MA, Katzen B, Alonso DR.  Transpyloric extension to duodenal bulb in &#xA;gastric lymphoma.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l975, 115, 575-580.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ming SC.  Tumors of the esophagus and stomach.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Atlas of Tumor &#xA;Pathology&lt;/em&gt;.  2nd Series, Fasc 7, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Wash. &#xA;D.C. l973, pp 231-238.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Naqvi MS, Burrows L, Kark AE.  Lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract:  &#xA;prognostic guides based on 162 cases.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l969, 170, 221-231.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ngan H, James KW.  &lt;em&gt;Clinical Radiology of the Lymphomas&lt;/em&gt;.  &#xA;Butterworth Co, London l973, pp 105-131.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rappaport H.  Tumors of the hematopoietic system.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Atlas of Tumor &#xA;Pathology&lt;/em&gt;, Sect 3, Fasc 8, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Wash. &#xA;D.C. l966, pp 97-160.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Sandler RS.  Primary gastric lymphoma:  a review.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; l984, 79, 21-25.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;United States National Cancer Institute:  Sponsored Study of Classifications of &#xA;Non-Hodgkin&#39;s Lymphomas.  &lt;em&gt;Cancer&lt;/em&gt; l982, 49, 2112-2135.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Zornoza J, Dodd GD.  Lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract.  &lt;em&gt;Sem &#xA;Roentg&lt;/em&gt; l980, 15, 272-287.&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>35 - Malignancy at the Gastro-Oesophageal Junction</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_35/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_35/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;malignancy-at-the-gastro-oesophageal-junction&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Malignancy at the Gastro-Oesophageal Junction&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#malignancy-at-the-gastro-oesophageal-junction&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It has been shown that some cases of hiatus hernia are associated with motility &#xA;disturbances of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 32).  In most cases of malignancy &#xA;at, or in the immediate vicinity of the gastro-oesophageal junction, we have also noted &#xA;contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder to greater or lesser degree.  The &#xA;malignancy involved either the gastric fornix or the lower oesophagus;  in some cases it &#xA;was difficult to determine (for a variety of reasons) whether the lesion was primarily &#xA;gastric or primarily oesophageal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The incidence of contracted pyloric sphincteric cylinder in cases of malignancy at the &#xA;cardia has not been determined, but it appears if it occurs in the majority of cases.  We &#xA;have become aware of the association only recently;  to the best of our knowledge it has &#xA;not been described previously.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following are examples of 11 cases which have been encountered:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 35.1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;S.S., 67 year old male, presented with increasing dysphagia.  Radiographic &#xA;examination showed a constant, irregular filling defect of the lower 5.0 to 6.0 cm of the &#xA;oesophagus, typical of carcinoma;  it extended as far as the gastro-oesophageal junction, &#xA;i.e. through the oesophageal hiatus in the diaphragm (Fig. 35.1&lt;em&gt;D&lt;/em&gt;).  The &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder showed a constant contraction, appearing to be &#34;fixed&#34; &#xA;midway between maximum contraction and maximum dilatation, with absent cyclical activity (Fig. &#xA;35.1&lt;em&gt;A-C&lt;/em&gt;).  Most of the time the pyloric aperture contained barium, i.e. it was &#xA;patent;  at times it contained a single mucosal fold.  At oesophagoscopy only the upper &#xA;border of the carcinoma could be visualized;  biopsy was unsuccessful.  Repeat &#xA;radiography a month later showed extension of the oesophageal lesion with only a trickle &#xA;of barium entering the stomach.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-1c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-1d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 35.1. A-D&lt;/b&gt;Case S.S. &lt;B&gt;A-C&lt;/B&gt; Constant contraction pyloric sphincteric cylinder with absent cyclical activity. &#xA;&lt;B&gt;D&lt;/B&gt; Irregular filling defect lower oesophagus extending through diaphragmatic hiatus, indicating carcinoma.&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 35.2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;M.B., 59 year old female presented with dysphagia.  Oesophagoscopy and &#xA;biopsy revealed a poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus at &#xA;26.0cm.  Radiography confirmed the lesion, which appeared to extend to just above the &#xA;cardia.  There was constant contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, which &#xA;appeared to be &#34;fixed&#34; midway between maximum contraction and relaxation, with &#xA;absent cyclical activity;  this caused the pyloric aperture to remain widely patent (Fig. &#xA;35.2).  Laparotomy for staging the oesophageal carcinoma revealed metastatic &#xA;lymphadenopathy at the coeliac axis;  the stomach appeared normal, showing that the &#xA;contraction of the sphincteric cylinder was of a functional nature.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 35.2.&lt;/b&gt; Case M.B.  Double contrast examination.  Constant contraction of pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder with absent cyclical activity.  Pyloric aperture patent.&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 35.3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&#x9;M.A., female aged 50 years, presented with dysphagia of one year&#39;s &#xA;duration.  Radiographic examination showed a carcinoma 5.0 cm in length in the lower &#xA;oesophagus.  There was marked contraction or spasm of the entire pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder, with a prominent pseudo-diverticulum on its greater curvature side (Fig. 35.3).  &#xA;Occasionally a minor degree of movement was seen;  most of the time the appearance &#xA;remained as indicated.  Subsequent oesophagoscopies confirmed carcinomatous &#xA;involvement of the lower third of the oesophagus.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-3.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 35.3.&lt;/b&gt; Case M.A.  Constant, near maximal contraction of pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;with pseudo-diverticulum on greater curvature side.&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 35.4&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt;V.M., male aged 38 years.  Radiographic examination showed constant &#xA;irregularity and narrowing of the lower 4.0 cm of the oesophagus, extending through the &#xA;hiatus to the gastro-oesophageal junction (Fig. 35.4).  The diagnosis of carcinoma was &#xA;confirmed by oesophagoscopy.  Constant contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, &#xA;similar to that of the previous cases, was present.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/35-4.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 35.4.&lt;/b&gt; Case V.M.  Carcinoma lower oesophagus, extending through hiatus in &#xA;diaphragm (arrow).&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The area with the highest prevalence of oesophageal carcinoma in the world is the &#xA;Transkei region of South Africa (Sagar l989).  The majority of patients first consult &#xA;traditional healers, by whom they are treated, presenting at a hospital only when the &#xA;disease has reached an advanced stage.  At Tygerberg Hospital it is not unusual to see 3 &#xA;or 4 new cases of advanced oesophageal carcinoma per week.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Common factors in the 11 cases mentioned here, are:  (1) In all the malignant lesion &#xA;involves the gastro-oesophageal junction and/or the region immediately above the &#xA;junction, i.e. the intrahiatal part of the oesophagus.  This is well seen in Case 35.4.  (2)  In &#xA;all cases partial contraction (i.e. spasm) of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder was evident.  &#xA;Why the cylinder should show motility disturbances in these cases is not known.  One &#xA;possibility is that the malignant process may involve the vagus nerves in the oesophageal &#xA;hiatus of the diaphragm.  Keet and Heydenrych (l97l) showed that experimental &#xA;stimulation of the vagi at this site caused contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;(Chap. 32).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Permanent contraction or spasm of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder will impair trituration &#xA;and gastric emptying of solids (Chap. 18).  As the swallowing of solids becomes &#xA;impossible in advanced oesophageal carcinoma, this should have theoretical implications &#xA;only.  Gastric emptying of fluids is not delayed by moderate contraction of the &#xA;sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13, 18), and fluids reaching the stomach through the &#xA;oesophageal lesion should empty without undue delay.  Moderate contraction of the &#xA;cylinder &#34;fixes&#34; the pyloric aperture in the patent position (Chap. 20), so that increased &#xA;duodenogastric reflux may be expected (Chap. 27).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Keet AD, Heydenrych JJ.  Hiatus hernia, pyloric muscle hypertrophy and &#xA;contracted pyloric segment in adults.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl &#xA;Med&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 113, 217-228.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Sagar PM.  Aetiology of cancer of the oesophagus : geographical studies in the &#xA;footsteps of Marco Polo and beyond.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l989, 30, 561-564.&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>36 - Sessile Polyps in the Sphincteric Cylinder</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_36/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_36/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;sessile-polyps-in-the-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Sessile Polyps in the Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#sessile-polyps-in-the-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A number of gastric lesions may present as polyps;  however, the term polyp is usually &#xA;used to indicate a benign epithelial tumor (Marshak and Lindner l97l).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 2420 double-contrast radiographic studies of the stomach Gordon et al (l980) &#xA;encountered polyps in 38 (1.6 &amp;#37;).  Most were of an inflammatory or hyperplastic &#xA;nature;  none was associated with gastric malignancy.  Solitary polyps tended to occur in &#xA;the &#34;antrum&#34;, while multiple polyps (usually 2 or 3) were more often located in the &#xA;gastric fornix and body.  Two-thirds were less than 1.0cm in diameter, only one being &#xA;larger than 2.0cm;  most were sessile and could not be removed by a snare.  The &#xA;surrounding mucosa was either normal or showed evidence of acute or chronic gastritis.  &#xA;However, Laxen et al (l983), in a study of 183 patients with gastric polyps, found &#xA;epithelial dysplasia and increased prevalence of intestinal metaplasia in most.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following case shows interesting features:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-report&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Report&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-report&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 36.1.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; W.V.W., 46 year old male, presented with vague upper abdominal &#xA;symptoms.  Cholecystectomy had been done 3 years previously.  Radiographic &#xA;examination showed a round, polyp-like lesion 1.5cm in diameter and surrounded by a &#xA;circular mucosal fold, in the centre of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Fig 36.1A).  &#xA;Cyclical contractions of the cylinder were normal;  during contraction the polyp moved in &#xA;an orad direction, and with maximal contraction it was located approximately 2.0cm &#xA;more orally (Fig 36.1B).  Gastroscopy confirmed the presence of a benign, sessile polyp;  &#xA;histologically the mucosa was normal.  At gastrostomy the polyp could not be located.  &#xA;Follow-up radiography and gastroscopy 3 years later showed it to be unchanged.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/36-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/36-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 36.1 A,B. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case W.V.W. &lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt; Round, sessile, benign polyp (arrowed) in centre of pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.&#xA;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt; Near maximal contraction of sphincteric cylinder.  The polyp &#xA;(arrowed) has moved in an orad direction&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a case of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, a pair of sessile mucosal polyps in the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder also moved in an orad direction during contraction of the cylinder.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;peutz-jeghers-syndrome&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Peutz-Jeghers Syndrome&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#peutz-jeghers-syndrome&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The three salient features of this syndrome are polyp formation in the gastrointestinal &#xA;tract, mucocutaneous melanin pigmentation and inheritance through an autosomal &#xA;dominant gene (Morson and Dawson l979).  The polyps, which are hamartomas, are most &#xA;common in the small bowel, but not infrequently occur in the stomach and colon.  The &#xA;condition usually presents in childhood with attacks of recurrent colic due to &#xA;intussusception caused by the small bowel polyps, or it may present as iron deficiency &#xA;anaemia due to haemorrhage.  Macroscopically the polyps may be sessile but not &#xA;infrequently they are pedunculated with short, broad pedicles (Morson and Dawson &#xA;l979).  Microscopically there is proliferation of the muscularis mucosae to form a &#xA;branching pattern, clothed with essentially normal gastric mucosa.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following case is an example:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-report-1&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Report&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-report-1&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Case 36.2.&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; A.P., girl aged 16 years, was admitted with a history of recurrent malaena &#xA;(for which blood transfusions had been necessary) and symptoms of iron deficiency &#xA;anaemia.  On examination hyperpigmented &#34;freckles&#34; were seen around the mouth, on the &#xA;buccal mucosa and on the fingers and feet.  (Her father had similar areas of &#xA;pigmentation).  Other findings were a hypochromic microcytic anaemia and &#xA;sedimentation rate of 20.0 mm/hr.  Rectal examination revealed no abnormality but tests &#xA;for stool occult blood were positive.  Radiological examination showed two round, &#xA;polypoid defects, each l.5cm in diameter, within the confines of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder (Fig 36.2A).  The distal margins of the defects were 1.0 and 3.0cm respectively &#xA;from the pyloric aperture;  no stalks were seen.  During contraction of the cylinder the &#xA;defects moved in an orad direction, the distance from their distal margins to the pylorus &#xA;increasing to 4.0cm and 5.2cm respectively (Fig 36.2B).  These movements occurred &#xA;regularly during the examination.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/36-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 36.2&lt;/b&gt; Case A.P. Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.&#xA;&lt;b&gt;A&lt;/b&gt; Sessile polyps close to pyloric aperture in relaxed pyloric sphincteric cylinder.         &#xA;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/36-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 36.2 B.&lt;/b&gt;Sphincteric cylinder contracted.  &#xA;The polyps have moved in an orad direction&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A number of polyps were also seen in the second and third parts of the duodenum, &#xA;at the duodeno-jejunal junction and in the upper jejunum.  A double-contrast barium &#xA;enema examination revealed no abnormality in the colon.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#x9;At endoscopy the presence of 2 sessile prepyloric mucosal polyps was confirmed.  &#xA;In addition 2 smaller but similar polyps were seen in the body of the stomach;  none of &#xA;the polyps had a stalk.  Because of technical complications biopsies were not done.  A &#xA;clinical and radiological diagnosis of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome was made.  While under &#xA;investigation symptoms of upper small bowel obstruction supervened, necessitating a &#xA;laparotomy.  A jejuno-jejunal intussusception was found and reduced.  Gastrostomy, &#xA;duodenostomy and jejunostomy were done at which polyps were removed from the &#xA;stomach, duodenum and jejunum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&#x9;The histology of the gastric polyps showed prominent, branching processes of &#xA;muscularis mucosae with overlying columnar cell epithelium, without evidence of &#xA;dysplasia.  The diagnosis of hamartomatous polyps of the Peutz-Jeghers type was made.  &#xA;The patient made an uneventful recovery.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;It is not unusual for pedunculated polyps in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder to be &#xA;extruded into the duodenum.  Consequently they may be visualized either in the pyloric &#xA;region of the stomach or in the duodenum at a single radiographic examination.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The 2 cases described here had sessile polyps on the mucosa of the sphincteric cylinder.  &#xA;During contraction of the latter the polyps moved in an orad direction, and with maximal &#xA;contraction were clearly situated farther from the pyloric aperture than in the partially &#xA;contracted or non-contracted phases.  This seems to confirm the fact that the pyloric &#xA;mucosa may move in an orad direction during contraction of the sphincteric cylinder, a &#xA;phenomenon first described by Golden (l937) (Chap 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Golden R.  Antral gastritis and spasm.  &lt;EM&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/EM&gt; l937, 109, 1497-1500.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gordon R, Laufer I, Kressel HY.  Gastric polyps found on routine double-contrast &#xA;examination of the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;Radiology&lt;/EM&gt; l980, 134, 27-30.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Laxen F, Kekki M, Sipponen P, et al.  The gastric mucosa in stomachs with &#xA;polyps: morphologic and dynamic evaluation.  &lt;EM&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/EM&gt; l983, l8, 503-511.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Marshak RH, Lindner AE.  Polypoid lesions of the stomach.  &lt;EM&gt;Sem Roentg&lt;/EM&gt; l97l, 6, &#xA;151-167.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Morson BC, Dawson IMP.  &lt;EM&gt;Gastrointestinal Pathology&lt;/EM&gt;, 2nd ed, Blackwell &#xA;Scientific Publications, London l979, p 82.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>37 - Diabetes Mellitus</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_37/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_37/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;diabetes-mellitus&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Diabetes Mellitus&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#diabetes-mellitus&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Disturbances in gastrointestinal motility with associated symptoms such as vomiting, &#xA;diarrhoea and constipation have long been recognized as complications of diabetes &#xA;mellitus.  Rundles (1945) described 4 diabetic patients with diarrhoea or alternating &#xA;diarrhoea and constipation who also had pronounced anorexia and nausea.  Radiological &#xA;examination in all revealed abnormal gastric retention.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Kassander (1958) described 6 cases of poorly controlled diabetes mellitus with upper &#xA;gastrointestinal manifestations, a condition he called &#34;gastroparesis diabeticorum&#34;.  In all &#xA;cases the stomach showed sluggish peristalsis with retention of barium.  There was no &#xA;evidence of an organic lesion causing obstruction and all cases had a patulous pylorus &#xA;through which the gastric contents could be expressed by hand.  It was concluded that &#xA;these cases represented a disturbance of propulsion, and more specifically of expulsion, &#xA;of gastric contents.  The gastric retention was considered to be similar to that occurring &#xA;after truncal vagotomy and to be due to diabetic neuropathy involving the vagus nerves.  &#xA;The gastric manifestations could also occur in asymptomatic diabetic patients.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Marshak and Maklansky (l964) mentioned 4 similar cases and reiterated that diabetic &#xA;gastropathy consisted of gastric retention in the absence of an obstructing lesion at the &#xA;pylorus.  In some cases there was a marked decrease in peristalsis while in others &#xA;peristalsis was normal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Zitomer et al. (l968) found that gastric neuropathy typically occurred in patients with a &#xA;long history of inadequately controlled, moderately severe diabetes mellitus.  The &#xA;symptoms were generally mild and nonspecific, vomiting of undigested food from the &#xA;previous day being one of the main manifestations.  Radiologically the most constant and &#xA;striking finding, occurring in 34 of their 35 cases, was sluggish, ineffectual and &#xA;irregularly occurring peristalsis;  on occasion peristalsis was absent altogether.  There &#xA;appeared to be decreased or absent propulsive motor activity, associated with abnormal &#xA;gastric retention of food residues and barium, resembling a bezoar.  The malfunction of &#xA;gastric emptying and consequent unpredictable food absorption probably contributed to &#xA;poor diabetic control.  Despite the considerable delay in gastric emptying, barium could &#xA;invariably be expressed by palpation through the pylorus, which remained patulous.  If &#xA;the patient was placed on his right side, passive gravitational emptying of liquid contents &#xA;occurred, while solids tended to be retained.  Overall the incidence of clinically &#xA;significant gastric neuropathy was extremely low in diabetes mellitus, a figure of less &#xA;than one per cent being mentioned.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Goyal and Spiro (l971) agreed that clinical manifestations of diabetic gastropathy &#xA;occurred in a very small proportion of cases.  While the gastric retention resulting from &#xA;the reduction of peristaltic contractions resembled the hypomotility of truncal vagotomy, &#xA;suggesting an autonomic neuropathy, other factors might play a role.  It was known, for &#xA;instance, that hyperglycaemia as well as glucagon inhibited gastric motility.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Scarpello et al. (l976) measured the rate of emptying of isotopically labelled solid meals, &#xA;using &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;99m&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;Tc-labelled sulphur colloid as a marker and a gamma camera.  The &#xA;gastric emptying rate in 29 insulin-dependent well-controlled diabetics was compared &#xA;with that in l8 normal controls.  No statistically significant difference in gastric emptying &#xA;rate between controls and diabetics with or without autonomic neuropathy was found.  &#xA;Only 3 diabetics had greatly delayed gastric emptying, but in one of these the test had &#xA;previously given a normal result.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Campbell et al. (l977) used a double isotope scintiscanning technique in order to &#xA;differentiate between solid and liquid emptying in 12 patients with diabetes mellitus (6 &#xA;with and 6 without objective evidence of autonomic neuropathy), and in 20 non-diabetic &#xA;controls.  Gastric stasis was demonstrated in 3 patients with autonomic neuropathy.  In &#xA;patients without stasis the normal differentiation between solid and liquid emptying was &#xA;impaired, suggesting an abnormality of &#34;antral&#34; peristalsis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Gramm et al. (l978) reviewed the radiological findings in 43 patients with diabetic gastric &#xA;neuropathy.  (It was said that the condition was seen more often on account of the &#xA;increased longevity of diabetic patients).  In the majority the stomach had an elongated, &#xA;sausage-shaped configuration;  there was sluggish, irregular gastric peristalsis with &#xA;retention of solid food and barium in the absence of an organic obstruction at the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Feldman et al. (l979) found that many patients with longstanding, insulin-dependent &#xA;diabetes mellitus had reduced acid secretory responses to sham feeding (suggesting vagal &#xA;neuropathy) and normal responses to infused food.  Both in diabetics with nausea and &#xA;vomiting and in patients without upper gastrointestinal symptoms, abnormal gastric &#xA;retention of a nonabsorbable meal marker occurred.  The findings supported earlier &#xA;observations that gastric secretory and motor functions could be impaired in &#xA;asymptomatic diabetics.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Malagelada et al. (l980) studied gastric motility by means of pressure transducers in the &#xA;fornix, &#34;antrum&#34; and duodenum in fasting diabetic patients with symptomatic &#xA;gastroparesis, as well as in asymptomatic diabetics and normal controls.  Healthy subjects &#xA;and asymptomatic diabetes mellitus patients averaged 2 phase III migrating motor &#xA;complexes per 180 minutes, while most diabetics with gastroparesis had no such &#xA;complexes.  Whether analogous &#34;antral&#34; muscle dysfunction occurred postprandially in &#xA;diabetic patients with gastroparesis was uncertain.  However, as the emptying of solids &#xA;might be delayed, it seemed likely that &#34;antral&#34; motor activity could be abnormal as it &#xA;was the main mechanism responsible for the emptying of solids (Chap. 18).&#xA;According to Feldman and Schiller (l983) the pathogenesis of diabetic gastroparesis &#xA;remained uncertain, but the evidence supported the view that a vagal autonomic &#xA;neuropathy was responsible.  Feldman et al. (l984), using a radioloic method for &#xA;assessing gastric emptying of radio-opaque, indigestible solid particles with simultaneous &#xA;radionuclide scintigraphy of an &lt;small&gt;&lt;sup&gt;111&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/small&gt;In-labelled standard meal, showed that patients &#xA;with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus had an abnormally slow gastric emptying rate &#xA;for indigestible solids;  emptying of digestible solids and liquids was close to normal.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Camilleri and Malagelada (l984) studied the fasting and fed manometric profiles of the &#xA;stomach and proximal small intestine in 14 patients with the clinical diagnosis of diabetic &#xA;gastroparesis.  In 11 of the patients reduction in &#34;antral&#34; pressure activity with absent &#xA;interdigestive migrating motor complexes was seen.  Three patients exhibited a &#34;peculiar &#xA;continuous 3 minute antral contractile activity&#34;.  In the small intestine abnormal &#xA;manometric patterns were observed in 12 patients, in 9 of whom non-propagated, long &#xA;bursts of powerful contractions occurred.  The findings indicated that both in the stomach &#xA;and small bowel the motility disorder was not invariably of a paretic type.  In the stomach &#xA;a reduction in frequency of amplitude of &#34;antral&#34; motor activity was the rule, but in a &#xA;minority of patients prolonged periods of contraction of low amplitude (less than 20 mm &#xA;Hg), occurred.  This motor pattern indicated an abolition of the physiological cyclic &#xA;activity and was distinctly abnormal;  the consistently low amplitude might be &#xA;insufficient to triturate solid food and empty the stomach.  Clinically these patients had &#xA;the same symptoms as those with &#34;antral&#34; hypomotility, for whom the term gastroparesis &#xA;was perhaps more appropriate.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In symptomatic diabetic gastroparesis patients Achem-Karam et al. (l985) demonstrated &#xA;abnormal &#34;antral&#34; and duodenal activity, characterized by absence of phase III of the &#xA;interdigestive migrating motor complex;  in 3 out of 6 patients the complex was also &#xA;absent in the remainder of the proximal small bowel.  The findings confirmed some of &#xA;those previously described by Malagelada et al. (l980) and Camilleri and Malagelada &#xA;(l984).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Using a dual radionuclide technique, Wright et al. (l985) investigated gastric emptying of &#xA;solids and liquids in diabetic gastroparesis patients and normal controls.  In both groups &#xA;the emptying rate of liquids was normal;  emptying of solids was markedly delayed in the &#xA;diabetic group.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;With a similar technique Horowitz et al. (l987) determined the effects of the prokinetic &#xA;drug cisapride in 20 insulin-dependent diabetic patients who had delayed gastric &#xA;emptying of the solid or liquid component of a meal, or both.  It was found that cisapride &#xA;increased the emptying rate of both solids and liquids.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Yoshida et al. (l988) found no morphologic abnormalities of the abdominal vagus nerves, &#xA;the gastric musculature and myenteric plexuses in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In a review Varis (l989) defined diabetic gastroparesis as a delay of gastric emptying &#xA;without gastric outlet obstruction in patients with long-standing insulin requiring diabetes &#xA;mellitus.  Characteristically the emptying of solids was delayed;  in most cases the &#xA;emptying rate of liquids was within the normal range, although it might be decreased in &#xA;some patients.  All normal motility patterns, e.g. adaptive relaxation and the maintenance &#xA;of tone in the proximal stomach, &#34;antropyloric&#34; peristaltic movements and phase III of &#xA;the interdigestive migrating motor complex might be lacking or abnormal.  The &#34;antral&#34; &#xA;motility disorder, leading to retention of solid foods, was considered to be the most &#xA;characteristic feature of the condition.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As endoscopy may fail to demonstrate motor disorders of the stomach (Varis l989), it &#xA;does not play an important role in the diagnosis.  However, endoscopy does show gastric &#xA;mucosal pathology such as acute erosions and gastritis, occurring in the majority of &#xA;patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (Carandang et al. l969), and it may help to exclude &#xA;mechanical pyloric obstruction (Camilleri and Malagelada l984).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;From the above it is clear that gastric motility disturbances may occur both in &#xA;symptomatic and asymptomatic diabetes mellitus patients.  In a small percentage of cases &#xA;these disorders may progress to diabetic gastroparesis, a condition usually occurring in &#xA;patients with a long history of inadequately controlled, insulin-dependent diabetes &#xA;mellitus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;We have had occasion to do upper gastrointestinal radiological examinations in numerous &#xA;diabetic patients for a variety of reasons, over a period of years.  Motility disturbances &#xA;were found in a small number of patients, both in insulin-dependent and non-insulin &#xA;dependent cases.&#xA;The following are some of the cases with radiologically recognisable abnormalities.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Case 37.1.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; D.R., 40 year old male had a long history of ethanol abuse and insulin-&#xA;dependent diabetes mellitus which had been treated inadequately.  For several weeks &#xA;there had been dyspepsia, loss of appetite and nausea.  Radiologically primary and &#xA;secondary oesophageal peristaltic waves were normal.  After an overnight fast the &#xA;stomach contained food residues;  the pyloric aperture was patent, measuring 9.0. mm in &#xA;diameter (Fig. 37.1&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  Gastric peristaltic waves were decreased both in &#xA;frequency (i.e. less than 3 per minute) and intensity (i.e. failing to &#34;bi-sect&#34; the organ).  &#xA;The pyloric sphincteric cylinder was in a state of partial contraction most of the time (Fig. &#xA;37.1&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  Cyclical contraction and relaxation of the cylinder, normally &#xA;occurring at a frequency of 3 per minute (Chaps. 13, 15), was lacking.  No obstructing &#xA;lesion was seen at the pylorus and the duodenum appeared normal.  Sonographically the &#xA;gall bladder, liver, spleen and kidneys were normal;  there was no ascites.  The patient &#xA;refused endoscopic examination.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 37.1. A,B. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case D.R.  &lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt; Food residues in stomach.  Pyloric aperture patent.  &#xA;Gastric peristaltic activity diminished.&#xA;&lt;b&gt;B&lt;/b&gt; Pyloric sphincteric cylinder (arrows) contracted most &#xA;of the time.&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-1c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-1d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-1e.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-1f.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 37.1. C-F. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case D.R. After treatment and clinical improvement. Lessened contraction of sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.  Some movement evident but normal cyclical activity absent.  Note pancreatic &#xA;calcification&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Six months later, after proper diabetic control, he had improved clinically.  On this &#xA;occasion the stomach contained less residual food.  Shallow gastric peristaltic waves &#xA;were present, while the pyloric sphincteric cylinder remained partially contracted &#xA;throughout the examination (Fig. 37.1&lt;em&gt;C&lt;/em&gt;).  Although this was less marked &#xA;than on the previous occasion, normal cyclical activity remained absent and no maximal &#xA;or complete contractions were seen.  Peristaltic activity in the duodenum appeared to be &#xA;decreased.  Active peristaltic contractions with a fast passage of barium was noted in the &#xA;jejunum.  The films also showed scattered areas of calcification in the pancreas and the &#xA;case was diagnosed as diabetic gastroparesis and chronic alcoholic pancreatitis.&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Case 37.2.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; T.M., 64 year old female with longstanding insulin-dependent diabetes &#xA;mellitus and psychotic symptoms, was admitted with epigastric pain and episodes of &#xA;vomiting.  Radiological examination showed a decrease in frequency and intensity of &#xA;gastric peristaltic waves;  there was a lack of cyclical contraction and relaxation of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder, which remained in a state of partial contraction throughout &#xA;the examination;  this was associated with a patulous pyloric orifice measuring 1.2 cm in &#xA;diameter.  Sonographically the gall bladder, liver, spleen, kidneys and aorta were normal.  &#xA;The pancreas could not be visualized owing to obesity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Attempts at controlling the diabetes in a peripheral hospital were only partially &#xA;successful. She was readmitted 14 months later in a disorientated state with uncontrolled &#xA;diabetes mellitus, diffuse abdominal pain and diarrhoea.  Abdominal sonography was &#xA;normal. Upper gastrointestinal radiological examination after an overnight fast showed &#xA;numerous food residues in the stomach.  Gastric peristalsis was decreased as before.  The &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder remained partially contracted with absent cyclical activity, &#xA;and contained food residues and unidentified tablets which she had found in the ward and &#xA;swallowed the previous day (Fig. 37.2).  (Each tablet measured 1.1 cm in diameter on the &#xA;films;  owing to magnification the true diameter would be in the region of 8.0 to 9.0 mm).  &#xA;The pyloric aperture remained patulous and no obstructing lesion was seen.  The &#xA;condition was diagnosed as diabetic gastroparesis.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 37.2. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case T.M.  Absent cyclical activity of pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  Pyloric &#xA;aperture patulous.  Retention of food residues and 8.0mm diameter tablets&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Case 37.3.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; F.J., 64 year old female with longstanding, non-insulin dependent diabetes &#xA;mellitus had received oral anti-diabetic therapy for 8 years.  She was admitted for &#xA;dyspepsia, epigastric pain and diabetic retinopathy.  Upper gastrointestinal radiological &#xA;examination showed a small benign-looking gastric polyp immediately below the gastro-&#xA;oesophageal junction.  Gastric peristaltic waves were shallow and appeared sluggish.  &#xA;The pyloric sphincteric cylinder was partially contracted throughout the examination;  &#xA;while minor degress of movement of the walls were discernable, there was a total lack of &#xA;cyclical contraction and relaxation, the appearance remaining more or less unchanged &#xA;(Fig. 37.3).  The pyloric aperture remained patent, having a diameter of approximately &#xA;1.0 cm;  continuous emptying of fluid barium occurred through the patulous pylorus.  At &#xA;gastroscopy a small, benign polyp was removed.  The remainder of the stomach, the &#xA;pylorus and duodenum showed no lesion.  The motility disturbance of the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder with the patulous pyloric aperture was thought to be compatible with &#xA;diabetic gastroparesis.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-3a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-3b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-3c.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-3d.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=2&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 37.3. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;A-D&lt;/b&gt; Case F.J. Pyloric sphincteric cylinder permanently contracted. Cyclical activity &#xA;absent. Pyloric aperture patulous with diameter of 1.0 cm&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;B&gt;Case 37.4.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/B&gt; M.J., 63 year old female was admitted for ischaemic heart disease, &#xA;loss of weight and anorexia.  She was a known case of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus &#xA;and had received oral therapy for the previous 10 years.  There was severe target organ &#xA;involvement with diabetic retinopathy.  Upper gastro-intestinal radiological examination &#xA;showed a constant contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder which remained &#xA;unchanged throughout the examination (Fig. 37.4);  this was thought to be compatible &#xA;with early diabetic gastroparesis.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/37-4.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 37.4. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case M.J. Permanent contraction of pyloric sphincteric cylinder (arrows)&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The above patients all had symptoms and signs warranting the clinical diagnosis of &#xA;diabetic gastroparesis.  Radiological studies in all showed absent cyclical activity of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  It has been shown that normal motility of the sphincteric &#xA;cylinder consists of alternating cycles of contraction and relaxation, occurring at a rte of &#xA;approximately 3 per minute (Chap. 13);  in diabetic gastroparesis these cycles are absent, &#xA;the cylinder remaining in a state of permanent, partial contraction.  As a maximal or &#xA;complete contraction of the cylinder does not occur, there is a failure of muscular closure &#xA;of the pyloric aperture (Chap. 13), which remains patent.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The patulous pylorus allows continuous emptying of fluid barium (Case 37.3).  Emptying &#xA;of solid food residues is retarded (Cases 37.1 and 37.2) due to failure of normal cyclical &#xA;contraction of the sphincteric cylinder, i.e. failure of the normal mechanism of propulsion &#xA;of solids.  The retention of solid tablets with a diameter of 8.0 mm (Case 37.2) indicates &#xA;failure of trituration of these tablets.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;These conclusions tally with some of those of previous authors, and especially with those &#xA;of Malagelada et al. (l980) and Camilleri and Malagelada (l984).  However, we believe &#xA;that the &#34;antral&#34; motor dysfunction mentioned by them as well as by Achem-Karam etal &#xA;(l985) and others, can be placed on a firm anatomical footing if reference is made to the &#xA;findings of Cunningham (l906), Forssell (l913) and Torgersen (l942) (Chap. 3).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The sustained contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder seen radiologically in &#xA;diabetic gastroparesis will also explain the &#34;peculiar continuous 3 minute antral &#xA;contractile activity&#34; found by Camilleri and Malagelada (l984) during manometric studies &#xA;in some of their patients.  One agrees with these authors that the disorder is not invariably &#xA;of a paretic type;  in fact, there appears to be hypomotility due to a spastic or hypertonic &#xA;condition of the gastric smooth musculature, and in particular of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;OL&gt;&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Achem-Karam SR, Funakoshi A, Vinik AI, et al.  Plasma motilin concentration &#xA;and interdigestive motor complex in diabetic gastroparesis:  effect of &#xA;metoclopramide.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l985, 88, 492-499.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Camilleri M, Malagelada JR.  Gastric motility in disease.  In:  &lt;em&gt;Gastric and &#xA;Gastroduodenal Motility, ed Akkermans&lt;/em&gt; LMA, Johnson AG, Read NW.  &#xA;Praeger Publ, New York l984, pp 213-214.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Camilleri M, Malagelada JR.  Abnormal intestinal motility in diabetics with the &#xA;gastroparesis syndrome.  &lt;em&gt;Eur J Clin Invest&lt;/em&gt; l984, 14, 420-427.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Campbell IW, Heading RC, Tothill P, et al.  Gastric emptyin in diabetic &#xA;autonomic neuropathy.  &lt;em&gt;Gut&lt;/em&gt; l977, l8, 462-467.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Carandang NV, Schuman BM, Whitehouse FW.  The gastric mucosa of patients &#xA;in diabetic ketoacidosis:  a gastro-camera study.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroint Endosc&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l969, 16, 156-158.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edin&lt;/em&gt; l906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Feldman M, Corbett DB, Ramsey EJ, et al.  Abnormal gastric function in long-&#xA;standing, insulin-dependent diabetic patients.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l979, &#xA;77, 12-17.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Feldman M, Schiller LR.  Disorders of gastrointestinal motility associated with &#xA;diabetes mellitus.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Int Med&lt;/em&gt; l983, 98, 378-384.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Feldman M, Smith HJ, Simon TR.  Gastric emptying of solid radio-opaque &#xA;markers:  studies in healthy subjects and diabetic patients.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l984, 87, 895-902.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Forssell G,  &amp;#220;ber die Beziehung der R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder des menschlichen &#xA;Magens zu seinem anatomischen Bau.  &lt;em&gt;Fortschr Geb &#xA;R&amp;#246;ntgenstr&lt;/em&gt; 1913, Suppl 30, 1-265.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Goyal RK, Spiro HM.  Gastrointestinal manifestations of diabetes mellitus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Med Clin North Amer&lt;/em&gt; 1971, 55, 1031-1044.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Gramm HF, Reuter K, Costello P.  Radiologic manifestations of diabetic gastric &#xA;neuropathy and its differential diagnosis.  &lt;em&gt;Gastrointes Radiol&lt;/em&gt; l978, 3, &#xA;151-155.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Horowitz M, Maddox A, Harding PE, et al.  Effect of cisapride on gastric and &#xA;oesophageal emptying in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l987, 92, 1899-1907.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Kassander P.  Asymptomatic gastric retention in diabetics (gastroparesis &#xA;diabeticorum).  &lt;em&gt;Ann Int Med&lt;/em&gt; l958, 48, 797-812.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Malagelada JR, Rees WDW, Mazzotta LJ, et al.  Gastric motor abnormalities in &#xA;diabetic and postvagotomy gastroparesis:  effect of metoclopramide and &#xA;bethanecol.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l980, 78, 286-293.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Marshak RH, Maklansky D.  Diabetic gastropathy.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l964, 9, 366-370.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Rundles RW.  Diabetic neuropathy:  general review with report of 125 cases.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Medicine&lt;/em&gt; l945, 24, 111-160.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Scarpello JHB, Barber DC, Hague RV, et al.  Gastric emptying of solid meals in &#xA;diabetics.  &lt;em&gt;Brit Med J&lt;/em&gt; l976, 2, 671-673.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; l942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Varis K.  Diabetic gastroparesis (a review).  &lt;em&gt;Scand J Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l989, 24, 897-903.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Wright RA, Clemente R, Wathen R.  Diabetic gastroparesis:  an abnormality of &#xA;gastri emptying of solids.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Med Sci&lt;/em&gt; l985, 289, 240-242.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Yoshida MM, Schuffler MD, Sumi SM.  There are no morphologic abnormalities &#xA;of the gastric wall or abdominal vagus in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; l988, 94, 907-910.&#xA;&lt;LI&gt;Zitomer BR, Gramm HF, Kozak GP.  Gastric neuropathy in diabetes mellitus:  &#xA;clinical and radiologic observations.  &lt;em&gt;Metabolism&lt;/em&gt; l968, l7, 199-211.&#xA;&lt;/OL&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>38 - Prolapse of Gastric Mucosa into the Duodenum</title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_38/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_38/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;prolapse-of-gastric-mucosa-into-the-duodenum&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Prolapse of Gastric Mucosa into the Duodenum&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#prolapse-of-gastric-mucosa-into-the-duodenum&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In 1911 Schmiedin described a case of gastric outlet obstruction in which, at operation, a &#xA;fold of gastric mucous membrane was found to have acted like a ball-valve at the pylorus.  &#xA;The fold could be pushed into the pyloric aperture.  While the pre-operative radiographs &#xA;demonstrated the fold, they did not show definite evidence of prolapse into the &#xA;duodenum.  At operation the fold was excised, resulting in complete recovery of the &#xA;patient.  This appears to be the first description of a case in which redundant gastric &#xA;mucosa caused significant symptoms.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Eliason and Wright (l925) described a case of a 56 year old male who was operated on &#xA;for a suspected benign tumor of the stomach.  Before opening the stomach a doughy mass &#xA;was felt projecting through the dilated pylorus into the duodenum.  During palpation the &#xA;mass slipped into the stomach and could not be pushed back into the duodenum.  &#xA;Gastrostomy showed that the entire mucous membrane of the pyloric region was freely &#xA;mobile on the underlying muscle coat and that it could be pushed through the pylorus, &#xA;causing invagination of a complete mucous membrane cuff into the duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Eliason et al. (l926) described a case of a 61 year old male in which the pre-operative &#xA;radiographs showed a defect extending through the pylorus into the base of the duodenal &#xA;bulb.  It was thought to be a pedunculated tumor of the stomach but operation revealed &#xA;redundant gastric mucosal folds extending through the pylorus into the duodenum.  In &#xA;another case, that of a 29 year old male, radiographs showed a similar defect in the base &#xA;of the duodenal bulb.  At operation it was found that the pyloric mucous membrane was &#xA;freely mobile upon the muscle coat and that it had prolapsed through the pylorus into the &#xA;duodenum.  A healed duodenal ulcer was also present.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;These appear to be the first recorded cases of prolapse of gastric mucosa into the &#xA;duodenum.  Since that time additional cases have been reported, and by l952 at least 80 &#xA;verified and 177 unverified cases had been described in the literature.  &#xA;(&lt;em&gt;Comment&lt;/em&gt;:  &#34;Unverified&#34; indicates cases diagnosed radiologically but not &#xA;verified by other means.  It is possible that the radiological appearances in some of these &#xA;cases might have been due to normal anatomical variations).  These case reports were &#xA;collected and analyzed in a thesis in which various aspects of the condition were &#xA;considered (Keet 1952).  Subsequently more cases have been reported (vide infra).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;At present there appears to be uncertainty, if not scepticism, about the diagnosis, and a &#xA;need exists for continued investigation of different aspects of the condition.  In particular, &#xA;it seems necessary to determine to what extent the pyloric mucosa is normally mobile in &#xA;relation to the underlying layers of the wall, and if it is capable of prolapsing into the &#xA;duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;normal-mobility-of-the-mucosa&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Normal Mobility of the Mucosa&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#normal-mobility-of-the-mucosa&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cunningham (1906) pointed out that the mucosa of the stomach is closely bound to the &#xA;submucosa which, in turn, is loosely attached to the muscularis externa.  Forssell (l923, &#xA;l939) showed that two types of mucosal movements exist:  (1) co-ordinated movements &#xA;of the muscularis externa and the muscularis mucosae, which determine to a large extent &#xA;the size, shape and position of the macroscopic folds;  (2) &#34;mucosal autoplastik&#34;, i.e. the &#xA;inherent ability of the mucosa to move, which accounts for the fine, surface mucosal &#xA;patterns (Chaps. 2, 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cole (l928) showed that the pyloric valve is normally displaced into the duodenum after &#xA;death.  This normal appearance may be mistaken for prolapse of gastric mucosa, and has &#xA;to be kept in mind whenever the diagnosis of prolapse has to be considered at autopsy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Golden (l937) stated that the gastric mucosa was normally freely mobile on the muscular &#xA;layers.  This could readily be demonstrated by the separation of mucosa from muscle wall &#xA;in the fresh specimen at autopsy, as well as by the projection of the mucous membrane &#xA;over the edge of the muscle when the living stomach was cut at operation.  Scott (l946) &#xA;confirmed this view, but stated that normally the extent of movement was not sufficient &#xA;to allow prolapse of gastric mucosa into the duodenum.  he found it impossible to pull the &#xA;gastric mucosa through the pylorus into the duodenum by means of surgical forceps in a &#xA;series of 126 autopsies in which the stomach was normal.  There was one exception, a &#xA;case of severe cardiovascular disease and myocardial infarction.  In this case the gastric &#xA;mucosal folds could be manipulated into the duodenum comparable to the appearance &#xA;seen in prolapse of the mucosa at operation.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bralow and Melamed (l947) examined a number of normal stomachs within three hours &#xA;post mortem and found that a small amount of gastric mucosa could be pulled through the &#xA;pylorus, simulating a minor degree of prolapse.  Ferguson (l948) concluded from &#xA;observations at autopsy that the mucosa of the normal stomach was movable relative to &#xA;the muscularis externa, but in no case sufficiently mobile to allow it to be drawn into the &#xA;duodenum.  Manning and Highsmith (l948) confirmed Golden&#39;s observation that the &#xA;gastric mucosa was freely movable over the muscular coat.  Manning and Gunter (l950) &#xA;concluded that there was a certain looseness of the antral mucosa in the normal.  In &#xA;prolapse it was exaggerated and redundant folds could lie in the pyloric aperture or could &#xA;easily be drawn through the aperture into the duodenum for variable distances.&#xA;Keet l952 examined 10 normal stomachs approximately 24 hours post-mortem and found &#xA;that a fold of pyloric mucous membrane (the mucosal/submucosal component of the &#xA;pyloric ring) projected into the lumen of the duodenum in every case, confirming the &#xA;observation of Cole (l928).  Surgical forceps were used to determine to what extent the &#xA;mucosa could be elevated from, or shifted on, the underlying layers in a 2.0 cm wide &#xA;band on the oral side of the pyloric aperture, i.e. in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  In a &#xA;child 8 years of age it was not possible to elevate or shift the mucosa.  In all adults the &#xA;mucous membrane could be lifted from 5.0 mm to 1.0 cm from the muscular coat.  Such &#xA;a fold could be pulled beyond the pyloric ring (right pyloric loop) for a distance of 5.0 to &#xA;10.0 mm into the duodenum.  At distances greater than 2.0 cm from the aperture it was &#xA;still possible to elevate the mucosa into folds, which could be moved in all directions but &#xA;could not be drawn into the duodenum.  It was concluded that a certain degree of &#xA;prolapse of the gastric mucosa could be produced artificially in adults at autopsy by &#xA;traction on the mucosa close to the pyloric aperture.  The greatest extent to which the &#xA;mucosa could be drawn into the duodenum was one centimeter.  Anything greater than &#xA;this should probably be regarded as abnormal, and in young persons the distance was &#xA;probably much less.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Williams (l962) examined aspects of the mucosa in 48 fresh post-operative partial &#xA;gastrectomy specimens, removed because of gastric or duodenal ulceration.  The gastric &#xA;mucosa was found to be soft and pliable and to move easily over the muscularis externa.  &#xA;This was due to the fact that the gastric submucosal coat is normally much wider than &#xA;that of the duodenum (Chapter 4).  Finger pressure could push the mucosa into the &#xA;pyloric ring, but owing to its attachment at the ring it rose in thebase of the duodenal bulb &#xA;in a circumferential, two-layered fashion, like a clerical collar.  In all cases a mucosal &#xA;protrusion of 1.0 to 3.0 cm into the duodenum could be produced in this way.  According &#xA;to Williams (l962) a similar minor degree of physiological herniation of gastric mucosa &#xA;into the base of the duodenal bulb frequently occurs during forceful contraction of the &#xA;&#34;pyloric press&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;pathoanatomical-diagnosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Pathoanatomical Diagnosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#pathoanatomical-diagnosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the 2 cases of Hawley et al. (l949) which came to autopsy it was found that the gastric &#xA;mucosa slid easily over the muscularis and could be lifted through the pylorus for &#xA;distances of as much as 2.5 cm.  This was considered to be definitely abnormal.  In 2 of &#xA;the 6 cases studied by Manning and Gunter (l950) the submucosa was very loose, &#xA;slipping freely over the muscularis, and the redundant antral folds could be drawn into &#xA;the duodenum for a distance of 2.0 cm.  In both cases the entire circumference of the &#xA;mucosa was involved.  Histological examination showed chronic inflammatory change in &#xA;the prolapsed mucosa, submucosa and muscularis mucosae.  There appeared to be some &#xA;hypertrophy of the musculature of the pyloric &#34;sphincter&#34;.  In 2 of the cases the prolapse &#xA;consisted of tongue-like projections of gastric mucosa extending into the duodenum.  In &#xA;the 2 other cases in whom a radiological diagnosis of prolapsed gastric mucosa had been &#xA;made, the patho-anatomical findings were not quite convincing and in our opinion could &#xA;have been due to post mortem projection of the mucosal part of the pyloric ring into the &#xA;duodenum.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Zimmer (l950) as well as Manning and Gunter (l950) stated that many pathologists failed &#xA;to search for the condition at autopsy.  The following features were considered to be &#xA;typical of gastric mucosal prolapse:  (1) gross protrusion of gastric mucosa into the &#xA;duodenal bulb which is quite evident as soon as the stomach and duodenum are opened;  &#xA;(2) the mucosa may not protrude through the aperture but can easily or readily be drawn &#xA;through it.  The latter statement should probably be qualified by the provision that &#xA;normally the gastric mucosa can be drawn into the bulb for a distance of one centimeter.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;surgical-diagnosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Surgical Diagnosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#surgical-diagnosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;If the stomach and duodenum are exposed and inspected at operation, no abnormality will &#xA;be seen in uncomplicated cases.  At palpation no abnormality may be felt in either the &#xA;stomach or duodenum, as the prolapsing mucosa is so soft that it cannot be felt through &#xA;the walls (Rendich l923;  Eliason et al.  l926).  A softish mass may be felt in the &#xA;duodenum (Ferguson l948) or in the pyloric region while the duodenum feels normal &#xA;(Schmiedin 1911;  Norgore and Shuler 1945;  MacKenzie et al. 1946;  Zacho 1948;  &#xA;Nygaard and Lewitan 1948;  Teng 1962).  In some cases a doughy, tumor-like mass &#xA;could be felt in the duodenum, which disappeared under palpation (Eliason et al. 1926;  &#xA;Bohrer and Copleman 1938).  In others it could be slipped back and forth between the &#xA;stomach and duodenum (MacKenzie et al. 1946;  Nygaard and Lewitan 1948).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Because of these features all stomachs should be opened at operation whenever the &#xA;condition is suspected (Scott 1946).  In the cases quoted above, folds of redundant gastric &#xA;mucosa were seen after the stomach had been opened.  In several cases big prepyloric &#xA;folds occluded the aperture, acting like a valve (Schmieden 1911;  Eliason et al. 1926;  &#xA;Zacho 1948;  Keet 1952, 1953).  In other ocases the incision was carried through into the &#xA;duodenum.  When both the stomach and duodenum were opened, redundant folds of &#xA;gastric mucosa protruding into the duodenum were usually quite evident (Meyer and &#xA;Singer 1931;  Bohrer and Copleman 1938;  MacKenzie et al. 1946).  In most cases the &#xA;prepyloric folds were movable on the muscular coat and could easily be pulled into the &#xA;duodenum for variable distances (Rees 1937;  Ferguson 1948;  Hawley et al. 1949).  In &#xA;the case of Hawley et al. (1949) for instance, the pyloric mucosa could be drawn through &#xA;the aperture for a distance of 2.0 cm.  In one of the cases described by Rees (1937) the &#xA;largest gastric mucosal fold was 3.0 cm in height and 4.0 cm in length.  It could be &#xA;pushed through the pylorus into the duodenum with ease.&#xA;Rees (1937) described another case in which the duodenum was opened first.  A soft &#xA;mass of tissue consisting of a ring of gastric mucosa was seen to project through the &#xA;pyloric aperture.  A similar appearance was seen in a case of Archer and Cooper (1939), &#xA;where a protrusion of gastric mucosa through the pylorus, viewed from the duodenal side, &#xA;resembled external haemorrhoids about the anus.  In a case of K&amp;#246;hler (1950) the &#xA;duodenum was also opened first.  Initially no sign of prolapse was seen but compressing &#xA;the prepyloric area caused mucosal folds to escape from the pylorus.  In the case of White &#xA;et al. (1966), a scope inserted through a duodenal incision showed gastric mucosa &#xA;protruding through the pylorus.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In cases where partial gastrectomy is performed because of prolapse per se, or because of &#xA;an associated lesion (e.g. gastric or duodenal ulceration), the resection specimen may &#xA;show large circumferential folds of gastric mucosa which can be manipulated into the &#xA;duodenum.  When such a specimen is placed in formalin, the range of movement of the &#xA;mucosa becomes progressively less with the passage of time (Keet 1952).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Although the entire circumference of the prepyloric mucosa is usually involved in &#xA;prolapse of the gastric mucosa, a case of active duodenal ulceration was encountered at &#xA;surgery in which tongue-like, linear processes of gastric mucosa had prolapsed into the &#xA;duodenal bulb (Keet 1952).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;gastroscopic-diagnosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Gastroscopic Diagnosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#gastroscopic-diagnosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Moersch and Weir (1942) and later Tesler (1947) visualized large tumor-like masses of &#xA;redundant gastric mucosa projecting into the lumen of the stomach at gastroscopy.  &#xA;However, in their cases the folds did not prolapse into the duodenum.  Scott (1946) did &#xA;not obtain postive recognition of folds of redundant gastric mucosa slipping though the &#xA;pylorus in his cases.  Manning and Highsmith (1948) reported gastroscopic confirmation &#xA;in one case.  Ten of the cases of Hawley et al (1949) were examined gastroscopically, the &#xA;condition being visualized in 2.  At gastroscopy White et al. (1966) visualized large, &#xA;hyperaemic oedematous prepyloric folds which pushed back into the stomach as the &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34; closed, in their case.  The mucosa had a granular and inflammatory &#xA;appearance and oozed fresh blood.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The diagnosis of prolapse of gastric mucosa into the duodenum has been confirmed &#xA;gastroscopically in a few cases only.  The value of gastroscopy was to rule out gastritis &#xA;and erosions in cases which had been diagnosed radiologically (Scott 1946).  Van Noate &#xA;et al. (1948) believed that failure to recognize the condition at gastroscopy might be due &#xA;to inflation of the stomach, the distension causing the previously prolapsed mucosa to &#xA;return to a more normal position.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;radiological-diagnosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Radiological Diagnosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#radiological-diagnosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The radiological diagnosis of circumferential prolapse of gastric mucosa into the &#xA;duodenum depends primarily on the demonstration of a rounded or irregularly lobulated &#xA;filing defect situated centrally in the base of the duodenal bulb.  The defect has been &#xA;described as circular (Eliason et al. 1926;  Rees 1937;  Bohrer and Copleman 1938;  &#xA;Zimmer 1950), semicircular (Pendergrass and Andrews 1935), irregularly circular &#xA;(Eliason et al. 1926;  Bohrer and Copleman 1938) or arch-shaped (K&amp;#246;hler 1950).  &#xA;The shape of the defect caused by the extruded or prolapsed gastric mucosal folds has &#xA;been likened to an umbrella (Rees 1937;  Van Noate et al. 1948;  Fermin 1950;  &#xA;K&amp;#246;hler 1950;  Manning and Gunter 1950), a mushroom (Scott 1946;  Bralow and &#xA;Melamed 1947;  Hawley et al. 1949;  Fermin 1950) and a cauliflower (Scott 1946;  &#xA;Bralow and Melamed 1947;  Nygaard and Lewitan 1948).  It should be possible to show &#xA;that the defect is continuous with gastric rugae stretching from the prepyloric area &#xA;through the pyloric aperture (Scott 1946;  Nygaard and Lewitan 1948;  Hawley et al. &#xA;1949;  Todd and Brennan 1957).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The defect in the base of the bulb is not constant, but varies in size and shape (Scott &#xA;1946;  Nygaard and Lewitan 1948;  Hawley et al 1949;  K&amp;#246;hler 1950;  Keet 1952).  &#xA;This variation is evident not only at different examinations, but also during different &#xA;stages of the same examination.  Most authors seem to associate this characteristic with &#xA;the position of the patient.  It has been frequently stated that the defect is more readily &#xA;seen with the patient in the horizontal position (Eliason et al. 1926;  Rubin 1942;  &#xA;MacKenzie et al. 1946;  Manning and Gunter 1950;  Zimmer 1950), while others state &#xA;that it is best seen in the upright position (K&amp;#246;hler 1950).  According to some it is &#xA;equally well seen in the prone and upright positions (Bohrer and Copleman 1938;  Scott &#xA;1946;  Nygaard and Lewitan 1948;  Fermin 1950).  At times the prolapse may be reduced &#xA;(Scott 1946) and no defect will be evident (Rees 1937).  In our experience the upright &#xA;position has proved preferable.  The duodenal bulb can usually be seen to advantage in &#xA;this position, and as pointed out by K&amp;#246;hler (1950), the erect posture is the best for a &#xA;study of peristalsis and for finding a suitable degree of compression.  It seems as if the &#xA;changing nature of the defect may be the result of contractile activity in the distal &#xA;stomach, rather than changes in the position of the patient.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bralow and Melamed (1947) thought that mucosal prolapse ensued whenever there was a &#xA;failure of the normal orad movement of the mucosa during antral systole as described by &#xA;Golden (1937) (Chap 13).  Nygaard and Lewitan (1948) stated that the duodenal defect &#xA;changed its volume coincident with antral systole and diastole, being more extensive &#xA;during systole and less obvious in diastole.  In the illustrations of one of the cases of &#xA;Manning and Highsmith (1948) prolapse was only evident during &#34;antral systole&#34;.  &#xA;Manning and Gunter (1950) reasoned that inflammatory change in the muscularis &#xA;mucosae in these cases interfered with its contractility, thus preventing the normal orad &#xA;movement of the mucosa.  Zimmer (1950) noted that changes in the duodenal defect took &#xA;place during peristaltic activity, and Fermin (1950) stated that prolapse seemed to &#xA;disappear when gastric peristalsis became less and when the tone of the stomach &#xA;decreased.&#xA;In three of our verified cases the size of the defect in the duodenal bulb was seen to be &#xA;related to the degree of contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Keet 1952).  In &#xA;these cases a shallow defect might be visible during relaxation or inactivity of the &#xA;cylinder.  During contraction the duodenal defect became more extensive, reaching its &#xA;greatest volume with maximal contraction of the cylinder.  The same feature was seen in &#xA;most of our unverified cases as well.  It was not unusual for the duodenal bulb to appear &#xA;normal prior to contraction of the cylinder, with the defect only appearing during &#xA;contraction.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In contrast, Stiennon (1960) noted that tortuous prepyloric rugae sometimes &#34;prolapsed &#xA;backward&#34;, i.e. in an orad direction, through an advancing peristaltic wave.  In most cases &#xA;a somewhat stronger or tighter wave finally forced the mucosa through the pylorus.  A &#xA;similar phenomenon was described by White et al. (1966), who reported that the &#xA;hyperaemic and oedematous prepyloric folds pushed back into the stomach as the &#xA;&#34;sphincter&#34; closed.  It was shown in Chapter 13 that orad movement of the mucosa in the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder may occur normally during contraction of the cylinder.  &#xA;Furthermore sessile mucosal polyps in the cylinder may move in an orad direction during &#xA;contraction of the cylinder (Chap. 36).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Levin (l97l) again stated that the duodenal defect of prolapsed gastric mucosa became &#xA;more prominent during &#34;gastric systole&#34;, and that the shape of the bulb reverted to normal &#xA;during &#34;gastric diastole&#34;.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The following are examples of further cases encountered by us:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3&gt;Case Reports&lt;/h3&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 38.1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt; J.S., 35 year old male had intermittent, burning epigastric pain apparently &#xA;related to meals, for the previous 5 years.  Large meals occasionally caused vomiting.  &#xA;Clinical examination was negative.  Radiology revealed no abnormality in the &#xA;oesophagus and stomach.  During phases of distension or partial contraction of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder, the duodenal bulb appeared normal (Fig. &#xA;38.1&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  With maximal contraction of the sphincteric cylinder an umbrella-&#xA;like or mushroom-like defect appeared in the base of the duodenal bulb;  it was &#xA;continuous with longitudinal mucosal folds extending through the fully formed pyloric &#xA;canal (Fig. 38.1&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;), and the diagnosis of prolapse of gastric mucosa into the &#xA;duodenum was made.  Gastroscopy showed a few prominent mucosal folds which &#xA;appeared to be redundant and capable of prolapsing into the duodenum.  No evidence of &#xA;ulceration or other pathology was seen.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/38-1a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 38.1 A. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case J.S. Partial contraction of pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  &#xA;Base of duodenal bulb normal&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/38-1b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 38.1 B. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case J.S. Maximal contraction of sphincteric cylinder.  &#xA;Umbrella-like defect base of bulb, continuous with longitudinal mucosal folds in pyloric &#xA;canal&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 38.2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt; A.A., 20 year old male, a known case of duodenal ulceration, had received &#xA;anti-ulcer therapy for the preceding year.  Because of a recurrence of symptoms &#xA;radiographic examination was requested.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Several prominent, tortuous mucosal folds were seen in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder &#xA;while it was relaxed;  the base of the duodenal bulb appeared normal, but there was a &#xA;possible ulcer near its apex (Fig. 38.2&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  During maximal contraction of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder an umbrella-like defect appeared in the base of the duodenal &#xA;bulb, continuous with longitudinal gastric mucosal folds stretching through the fully &#xA;formed pyloric canal (Fig. 38.2&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  The case was diagnosed as prolapse of &#xA;gastric mucosa and probable active duodenal ulceration.  Control double contrast &#xA;radiographic examination a month later failed to show the prolapse.  At this examination &#xA;administration of an anticholinergic substance relaxed the gastric walls and insufflation &#xA;of air caused luminal distension, factors which prevented the sphincteric cylinder from &#xA;contracting.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/38-2a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 38.2 A. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case A.A. Prominent, tortuous mucosal folds in relaxed pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder.  Base of duodenal bulb normal.  Possible duodenal ulcer&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/38-2b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 38.2 B. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case A.A. Maximal contraction of sphincteric cylinder. Umbrella-like defect base of bulb, &#xA;continuous with longitudinal mucosal folds in pyloric canal&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 38.3&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt; M.W., 51 year old male, complained of vague upper abdominal symptoms &#xA;of 4 months&#39; duration.  Clinical examination revealed no abnormality and he was referred &#xA;for radiological examination.  During partial contraction of the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder the base of the duodenal bulb showed a shallow, concave indentation (Fig. &#xA;38.3&lt;em&gt;A&lt;/em&gt;).  During maximal contraction of the cylinder an umbrella-like defect &#xA;was seen in the base of the bulb, with longitudinal mucosal folds in the fully formed &#xA;pyloric canal (Fig. 38.3&lt;em&gt;B&lt;/em&gt;).  The case was diagnosed as prolapsed gastric &#xA;mucosa.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/38-3a.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/38-3b.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 38.3 A,B. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case M.W. &lt;B&gt;A&lt;/B&gt; Partial contraction of sphincteric cylinder.  Shallow, &#xA;concave indentation base of duodenal bulb.&#xA;&lt;B&gt;B&lt;/B&gt; Case M.W.  Maximal contraction of cylinder.  Umbrella-like &#xA;defect base of bulb continuous with longitudinal mucosal folds in pyloric canal&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Most of the authors quoted agree that normally there is a certain looseness of the mucosa &#xA;in the pyloric region of the stomach (i.e. presumably in the pyloric sphincteric cylinder).  &#xA;Scott (l946) found that this was not sufficient to allow prolapse of gastric mucosal folds &#xA;into the duodenum.  Manning and Gunter (l950) stated that in patients with marked &#xA;prolapse of the gastric mucosa the mucosal looseness was exaggerated and the redundant &#xA;folds could lie either in the pyloric canal (presumably the pyloric aperture), or could &#xA;easily be drawn through it into the duodenum for variable distances.  Keet (l952) &#xA;confirmed a certain looseness of the mucosa of the sphincteric cylinder in normal, adult, &#xA;fresh post-mortem specimens.  Williams (l962) showed that a minor degree of extrusion &#xA;of the gastric mucosa through the pyloric aperture, of not more than 3.0 mm, might occur &#xA;normally during forceful contraction of the &#34;pyloric press&#34; (presumably the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cases verified at surgery and post-mortem leave little doubt that prolapse of gastric &#xA;mucosa into the duodenum does occur and that the condition should be recognized as a &#xA;separate entity.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;types-and-grades-of-prolapse&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Types and Grades of Prolapse&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#types-and-grades-of-prolapse&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Circumferential.&lt;/B&gt; In the majority of cases transpyloric prolapse of gastric mucosa &#xA;is of a circumferential nature, in which a whole cuff of gastric mucosa prolapses into the &#xA;duodenal bulb.  This has sometimes been divided into mild (synonyms: minimal, slight, early), &#xA;moderate and severe grades (Scott 1946;  Nygaard and Lewitan 1948;  Manning and Gunter 1950).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Linear or Tongue-like.&lt;/B&gt; &#xA;Occasionally 2 or 3 tongue-like processes of gastric mucosa, involving only part of the &#xA;circumference, extend into the duodenum (Hawley et al. 1949;  Manning and Gunter &#xA;1950).  This appearance may be associated with duodenal ulceration as found in verified &#xA;cases (Zimmer 1950;  Keet 1952).  In these cases the typical mushroom-like defect of &#xA;circumferential prolapse is not evident, but 2 or more longitudinal folds extend through &#xA;the pyloric aperture, each ending independently in the bulb.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Not infrequently a single gastric mucosal fold is seen to extend through the pyloric &#xA;aperture into the base of the bulb.  This is considered to be a normal appearance (Scott &#xA;1946;  Bralow and Melamed 1947;  Hawley et al. 1949) and may have a phylogenetic &#xA;basis.  Torgersen (1942) found a similar appearance in certain lower vertebrates and &#xA;considered it to be a functional mucosal &#34;torus&#34; in man.&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;relationship-to-cyclical-activity-of-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Relationship to Cyclical Activity of Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#relationship-to-cyclical-activity-of-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In the present cases as well as in some of those described previously (Keet l952) it is &#xA;clear that prolapse of gastric mucosa may only occur during maximal contraction of the &#xA;pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  A number of other authors came to essentially similar &#xA;conclusions, although they used terms such as &#34;antral systole&#34;, &#34;gastric systole&#34; and &#xA;&#34;peristaltic activity&#34; to indicate the concept of contraction of the sphincteric cylinder &#xA;(Nygaard and Lewitan l948;  Fermin l950;  Zimmer l950;  Levin l97l).  According to &#xA;Bralow and Melamed (l947) prolapse ensued when there was failure of the normal orad &#xA;movement of the mucosa during &#34;antral systole&#34; as originally described by Golden (l937) &#xA;(Chap. 13).  In our view prolapse almost amounts to expulsion of gastric mucosal folds &#xA;into the duodenum, together with luminal contents.  It is surmized that it may indicate &#xA;failure of the normal mechanism of &#34;independent but co-ordinated&#34; contractions &#xA;involving the muscularis externa and mucosa, as described by Forssell (l923, l939) &#xA;(Chap. 2, 13).  It seems as if the occurrence of prolapse depends on the degree of &#xA;contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder, rather than the position of the patient, in &#xA;many cases.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;On the other hand prolapse of gastric mucosa into the duodenum may also be fickle and &#xA;unpredictable;  its occurrence and extent may vary between examinations and even &#xA;during a single examination.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;the-radiological-differential-diagnosis&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  The Radiological Differential Diagnosis&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#the-radiological-differential-diagnosis&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Normal. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;A number of authors have commented on the fact that the base of the duodenal bulb may &#xA;normally have a semicircular or concave outline, which may easily be mistaken for a &#xA;semicircular or mushroom-shaped defect due to prolapsed mucosa (Scott 1946;  Bralow &#xA;and Melamed 1947;  Manning and Highsmith 1948;  Hawley et al. 1949;  Keet 1952;  &#xA;Todd and Brennan 1957).  The concave defect often becomes more prominent during &#xA;maximal contraction of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Chap. 13).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Depending on the direction of the pyloro-duodenal axis, the circular indentation of the &#xA;base of the bulb caused by the normal pyloric ring, may sometimes appear to be &#xA;exaggerated.  This is especially evident when the bulb is seen obliquely from the base.  If, &#xA;in addition the sphincteric cylinder is contracted, producing longitudinal mucosal folds &#xA;running toward the aperture, the appearance may mimic prolapse closely.  In one of the &#xA;illustrations of Rappaport et al. (1952), a round defect of the base of the bulb with radial &#xA;striae of barium was said to indicate prolapse of gastric mucosa;  however, this could just &#xA;as well have been a normal stage of contraction of the cylinder.  There seems to be little &#xA;doubt that in many instances, and perhaps even in the majority of non-verified cases, the &#xA;radiological diagnosis rested upon faulty interpretation of these normal appearances, &#xA;leading to false positive diagnoses.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Adult Hypertrophic Pylorid Stenosis. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;A number of authors mentioned adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the differential &#xA;diagnosis (Pendergrass and Andrews 1935;  Scott 1946;  Hawley et al. 1949;  Keet 1952).  &#xA;In this condition the hypertrophied musculature of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder indents &#xA;the base of the duodenal bulb, producing a concave defect which may be mistaken for &#xA;prolapse.  The narrowed pyloric canal contains longitudinal mucosal folds converging on &#xA;the aperture, again mimicking prolapse (Chap. 24).  In adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis &#xA;the bulbar defect is due to pressure from without, and tends to be constant.  In prolapse &#xA;there is an intraluminal bulbar defect which tends to change in size and shape.  &#xA;Differences are also seen in the motility of the cylinder in the two conditions.  Whereas &#xA;the cylinder may contract and expand normally in prolapse, it remains more or less &#xA;permanently contracted in hypertrophic stenosis.  A complicating factor is that prolapse &#xA;of gastric mucosa may co-exist with adult hypertrophic pyloric stenosis or narrowing and &#xA;constriction of the cylinder (Pendergrass and Andrews 1935;  Archer and Cooper 1939;  &#xA;MacKenzie et al. 1946;  Zacho 1948;  Manning and Gunter 1950;  Keet 1952).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Prolapsed Benign Pedunculated Gastric Polyps. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Prolapsed polyps have long been known to produce rounded defects in the duodenal bulb &#xA;(Eliason et al 1926;  Pendergrass and Andrews 1935).  Short and Young (1968) collected &#xA;30 cases from the literature and found the majority to be benign adenomas.  However, &#xA;prolapsing lipomas, myomas, fibromyomas and other types of benign gastric polyps may &#xA;occur.  A feature of these defects is that they may vary in position, at times being seen in &#xA;the confines of the sphincteric cylinder and at other times in the duodenal bulb.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Prolapsed Primary Gastric Carcinoma. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Occasionally a prolapsed primary gastric carcinoma may produce a rounded intraluminal &#xA;filling defect in the first part of the duodenum.  Joffe et al. (1977) described 4 cases of &#xA;this nature, all gastric adenocarcinomas, 2 being pedunculated and 2 sessile (Chap. 33).&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;associated-gastroduodenal-lesions&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Associated Gastroduodenal Lesions&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#associated-gastroduodenal-lesions&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Most cases of prolapse of gastric mucosa into the duodenum occurred de novo, in the &#xA;absence of other lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.  However, in a considerable &#xA;number of cases other lesions were also encountered during the radiological, surgical or &#xA;post mortem examinations.  The most frequent associated conditions were the following:&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Duodenal Ulceration. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Not infrequently active duodenal ulceration was encountered (Pendergrass 1930;  Scott &#xA;1946;  Manning and Gunter 1950;  Zimmer 1950;  Keet 1952).  Cases associated with &#xA;healed duodenal ulceration were also described (Eliason et al. 1926;  Archer and Cooper &#xA;1939;  Fermin 1950).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Gastric Ulceration. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Melamed and Hiller (1943) described a case in which a large gastric ulcer was situated on &#xA;the prolapsed mucosa.  In other cases active gastric ulceration was located elsewhere in &#xA;the stomach, i.e. away from the prolapsing mucosa (Hawley et al. 1949;  Keet 1952).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Changes in the Pyloric Musculature. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Changes of a hypertrophic or fibrotic nature in the pyloric musculature with consequent &#xA;narrowing of the pyloric aperture were reported by various authors.  Meyer and Singer &#xA;(1931), Archer and Cooper (1939) and Zacho (1948) noted a perceptible thickening in the &#xA;pyloric musculature in some of their cases.  In a verified case of Ferguson (1948) the &#xA;pyloric muscle was greatly hypertrophied.  In his 3 cases Rees (1937) found the pyloric &#xA;muscle to be constricted, having the appearance of a white fibrous ring in one case.  &#xA;Manning and Gunter (1950) noted thickening of the pyloric muscular ring in 4 of their 6 &#xA;cases.  Zimmer (1950) described a case with a duodenal ulcer and acute inflammatory &#xA;changes in the pyloric mucosa and musculature.  From these descriptions no clear picture &#xA;emerged as to the nature and extent of the pyloric hypertrophy.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Cases with an abnormally wide pyloric aperture have also been described.  Eliason et al. &#xA;(1926) noted this feature in one case which came to operation.  In the cases described by &#xA;Nygaard and Lewitan (1968) and by K&amp;#246;hler (1950), the radiographs showed the &#xA;pyloric aperture to be widely dilated.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Gastritis. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Differences of opinion regarding the histology, pathogenesis and classification of gastritis &#xA;have been referred to previously (Chap. 28).  In the present context it is to be expected &#xA;that different authors may have used different criteria in diagnosing gastritis.  A number &#xA;of cases of transpyloric prolapse of gastric mucosa have been described in which &#xA;&#34;gastritis&#34; was mentioned as an associated lesion.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Bohrer and Copleman (1938) described one case in which there was associated acute and &#xA;subacute gastritis.  In two verified cases of Norgore and Shuler (1945) the pyloric region &#xA;showed evidence of chronic gastritis.  Histological examination of the resected mucosa in &#xA;5 operated patients described by Scott (1946), showed a slight increase in lymphocytes, &#xA;plasma cells and eosinophils throughout the mucosa and submucosa;  however, this was &#xA;not considered sufficient to warrant a diagnosis of gastritis.  Judd and Moe (1947) &#xA;described a case in which erosive gastritis and infiltration by plasma cells were present.  &#xA;A verified case described by Nygaard and Lewitan (1948) had chronic gastritis and &#xA;healed erosions.  One of the 3 verified cases of Hawley et al (1949) showed a moderate &#xA;infiltration of the gastric mucosa with plasma cells and lymphocytes.  The second case &#xA;showed no gross evidence of gastritis, and the third, in which 2 gastric ulcers were also &#xA;present, had acute on chronic inflammatory reaction in the pyloric area.  Two cases of &#xA;verified circular prolapse studied by Manning and Gunter (1950) both showed chronic &#xA;gastritis with heavy infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells in the prolapsed mucosa, &#xA;submucosa and muscularis mucosae.  In his verified case Teng (1962) found the &#xA;submucosa to be thickened and oedematous;  there was mild inflammatory reaction &#xA;without ulceration.  White et al. (1966) found the prepyloric mucosal folds to be &#xA;hyperaemic and oedematous with a granular, inflammatory appearance.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;possible-true-complications&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Possible True Complications&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#possible-true-complications&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Ulceration and Haemorrhage. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Cases with superficial ulceration of the prolapsed mucosa and consequent slow oozing of &#xA;blood from the ulcerated surfaces were described by a number of authors (Pendergrass &#xA;and Andrews 1935;  Bohrer and Copleman 1938;  Archer and Cooper 1939;  MacKenzie &#xA;et al 1946;  Scott 1946;  White et al. 1966).  In some cases massive gastro-intestinal &#xA;haemorrhage occurred (Ferguson 1948;  Moon and Speed 1949;  Fredel 1960).  The &#xA;above authors usually regarded ulceration and haemorrhage as a true complication of the &#xA;condition.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;B&gt;Obstruction of the Pyloric Aperture by Redundant Gastric Mucosal Folds. &lt;/B&gt;&#xA;Gastric mucosa prolapsing into the duodenum may, at times, pile up in the form of large, &#xA;redundant prepyloric folds causing obstruction at the gastric outlet (Schmiedin 1911;  &#xA;Eliason et al 1926;  Scott 1946;  Judd and Moe 1947;  Zacho 1948;  Fredell 1960).  (In &#xA;the 2 cases of Zacho there was associated pyloric muscular hypertrophy).  It seems that &#xA;redundant prepyloric mucosal folds, causing obstruction, may also be regarded as a true &#xA;complication.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;malignancy-and-prolapse-of-gastric-mucosa&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Malignancy and Prolapse of Gastric Mucosa&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#malignancy-and-prolapse-of-gastric-mucosa&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Malignancy does not appear to be a complication of gastric mucosal prolapse.  The &#xA;presence of benign papillomata on prolapsed mucosa was reported by Pendergrass and &#xA;Andrews (1935).  In one of the polyps a small plaque of malignant tissue was &#xA;encountered;  it was considered to be an incidental finding not directly related to the &#xA;prolapse.  One other case associated with malignancy was described, namely that of Rubin &#xA;(1942), in which the malignant polypoid process involved the entire gastric mucosa.  This &#xA;appeared to be a case of general gastric polyposis with malignant degeneration, not &#xA;confined to the prolapsed mucosa.  According to Nygaard and Lewitan (1948) no &#xA;instance of malignant change in a true case of transpyloric mucosal prolapse had been &#xA;reported up to that time.  This statement still appears to be valid at the present time.  &#xA;However, a primary gastric carcinoma may prolapse into the duodenum, causing a &#xA;rounded, intraluminal filling defect in the bulb, as described by Joffe et al. (1977).&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;ol&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Archer VW, Cooper G.  Prolapse of the gastric mucosa.  &lt;em&gt;South Med J&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;l939, 33, 252-256.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Bohrer JV, Copleman B.  Prolapsing redundant gastric mucosa.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; 1938, 31, 220-222.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Bralow SP, Melamed M.  Prolapse of redundant or hypertrophied gastric mucosa.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; 1947, 14, 215-221.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Cole LG.  The living stomach and its motor phenomenon.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;1928, 9, 533-545.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Cunningham DJ.  The varying form of the stomach in man and the anthropoid &#xA;ape.  &lt;em&gt;Trans Roy Soc Edinb&lt;/em&gt; 1906, 45, 9-47.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Eliason EL, Wright VWM.  Benign tumors of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec &#xA;Obstet&lt;/em&gt; 1925, 41, 461-472.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Eliason EL, Pendergrass EP, Wright VWM.  The roentgen-ray diagnosis of &#xA;pedunculated growths and gastric mucosa prolapsing through the pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l926, 15, 295-322.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ferguson IA.  Prolapse of the gastric mucosa:  report of six cases.  &lt;em&gt;Ann &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; 1948, 127, 879-886.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Fermin HEA.  Prolaps van het maagslijmvlies in het duodenum.  &lt;em&gt;Ned &#xA;Tijdschr Geneesk&lt;/em&gt; 1950, 94, 3522-3528.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Fredel CH.  Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage due to prolapse of pyloric &#xA;gastric mucosa in a child:  report of a case.  &lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; 1960, 80, &#xA;1052-1053.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Forssell G.  Studies of the mechanism of movement of the mucous membrane of &#xA;the digestive tract.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther&lt;/em&gt; 1923, 10, 87-104.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Forssell G.  The role of the autonomous movements of the gastro-intestinal &#xA;mucous membrane in digestion.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther&lt;/em&gt; 1939, 41, &#xA;145-165.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Golden R.  Antral gastritis and spasm.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/em&gt; 1937, 109, &#xA;1497-1500.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Hawley C, Meyer PD, Felson B.  The roentgenologic diagnosis of prolapsed &#xA;gastric mucosa.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther&lt;/em&gt; 1949, 61, 784-796.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Joffe N, Goldman H, Antonioli DA.  Transpyloric prolapse of polypoid gastric &#xA;carcinoma.  &lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; 1977, 72, 1326-1330.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Judd ES, Moe AE.  Chronic hypertrophic gastritis complicated by obstruction:  &#xA;report of a case.  &lt;em&gt;Proc Staff Meet Mayo Clin&lt;/em&gt; 1947, 22, 241-245.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Keet AD.  &lt;em&gt;The Diagnosis of Gastric Mucosal Prolapse&lt;/em&gt;.  Thesis, Univ &#xA;Amsterdam l952, pp 1-97.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Keet AD.  Prolapse of gastric mucosa into the duodenum.  &lt;em&gt;South Afr Med &#xA;J&lt;/em&gt; 1953, 27, 117-123.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;K&amp;#246;hler R.  Prolapse of redundant gastric mucosa into the duodenum.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; 1950, 33, 69-82.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Levin B.  Miscellaneous gastric lesions.  &lt;em&gt;Sem Roent&lt;/em&gt; l97l, 6, 193-206.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;MacKenzie WC, MacLeod JW, Bouchard JL.  Transpyloric prolapse of redundant &#xA;gastric mucosal folds.  &lt;em&gt;Canad Med Assoc J&lt;/em&gt; 1946, 54, 553-558.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Manning IH, Highsmith GP.  Prolapse of the gastric mucosa through the pyloric &#xA;canal into the duodenum:  report of 16 cases diagnosed roentgenologically.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Gastroenterology&lt;/em&gt; 1948, 10, 643-659.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Manning IH, Gunter JU.  Prolapse of redundant gastric mucosa through the &#xA;pyloric canal into the duodenum.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Path&lt;/em&gt; 1950, 26, 57-73.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Melamed A, Hiller RI.  Prolapsed gastric mucosa:  roentgenologic demonstration &#xA;of ulcer crater in prolapsed polypoid mucosa.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; 1943, &#xA;10, 93-95.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Meyer KA, Singer HA.  Intermittent gastric ileus due to mechanical causes.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; 1931, 53, 742-749.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Moersch HJ, Weir JF.  Redundant gastric mucosa simulating carcinoma of the &#xA;stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; 1942, 9, 287-289.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Moon AF, Speed T.  Prolapse of gastric mucosa through the pylorus:  presentation &#xA;of a case with severe haemorrhage.  &lt;em&gt;Southern Med J&lt;/em&gt; 1949, 42, 839-&#xA;844.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Norgore M, Shuler IJD.  Extrusion of gastric mucosa through the pylorus.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Surgery&lt;/em&gt; 1945, l8, 452-457.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Nygaard KK, Lewitan A.  Transpyloric herniation of redundant gastric mucosa.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Surg&lt;/em&gt; 1948, 75, 502-515.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Pendergrass EP.  Prolapse of pedunculated tumors and gastric mucosa through &#xA;pylorus into duodenum:  roentgenologic diagnosis.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med &#xA;Assoc&lt;/em&gt; 1930, 94, 317-321.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Pendergrass EP, Andrews JP.  Prolapsing lesions of the gastric mucosa.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther&lt;/em&gt; l935;  34, 337-350.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rappaport EM, Rappaport EO, Alper A.  Incidence and clinical significance of &#xA;transpyloric prolapse of gastric mucosa.  &lt;em&gt;J Amer Med Assoc&lt;/em&gt; 1952, &#xA;150, 182-188.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rees CE.  Prolapse of the gastric mucosa through the pylorus:  surgical treatment.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Surg Gynaec Obstet&lt;/em&gt; 1937, 64, 689-694.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rendich RA.  The roentgenographic study of the mucosa in normal and &#xA;pathological states.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther&lt;/em&gt; 1923, 10, 526-537.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Rubin JS.  Prolapse of polypoid gastric mucosa into the duodenum, with &#xA;malignant change.  &lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; l942, 38, 362-364.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Schmiedin V von.  Die Differentialdiagnose zwischen Magengeschw&amp;#252;r und &#xA;Magenkrebs:  die pathologische Anatomie dieser Erkrankungen in Beziehung zu &#xA;ihrer Darstellung im R&amp;#246;ntgenbilder.  &lt;em&gt;Arch klin Chir&lt;/em&gt; 1911, 96, &#xA;253-344.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Scott WG.  Radiographic diagnosis of prolapsed redundant gastric mucosa into &#xA;the duodenum, with remarks on the clinical significance and treatment.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Radiology&lt;/em&gt; 1946, 46, 547-568.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Short WF, Young BR.  Roentgen demonstration of prolapse of benign polypoid &#xA;gastric tumors into the duodenum, including a dumbbell-shaped leiomyoma.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; 1968, 103, 317-320.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Stiennon OA.  Prolapse of the antral mucosa:  a clinical radiologic entity? &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; 1960, 84, 1142-1143.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Teng CT.  Prolapse of gastric mucosa:  report of an unusual case.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; 1962, 87, 729-731.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Tesler J.  The value of gastroscopy as a diagnostic aid in gastric lesions.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; 1947, 14, 104-109.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Todd MC, Brennan JE.  Transpyloric prolapse of the gastric mucosa.  &lt;em&gt;Arch &#xA;Surg&lt;/em&gt; 1957, 74, 746-752.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Torgersen J.  The muscular build and movements of the stomach and duodenal &#xA;bulb.  &lt;em&gt;Acta Rad&lt;/em&gt; 1942, Suppl 45, 1-191.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Van Noate HE, Arnold WT, Palmer FD.  Clinical and gastroscopic observations &#xA;on prolapse of the gastric mucosa.  &lt;em&gt;Rev Gastroenterol&lt;/em&gt; 1948, 15, 696-&#xA;701.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;White RR, Bargen JA, Saghafi MM.  Prolapse of gastric mucosa into the &#xA;duodenum:  a cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding.  &lt;em&gt;Postgrad Med&lt;/em&gt; &#xA;1966, 39, 512-516.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Williams I.  Closure of the pylorus.  &lt;em&gt;Brit J Rad&lt;/em&gt; 1962, 35, 653-670.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Zacho A.  Relaxation of the gastric mucosa producing pyloric obstruction.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; 1948, 57, 45-50.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Zimmer EA.  Klinik und R&amp;#246;ntgenologie des Prolapses von &#xA;Magenschleimhaut in den Pylorus und in den Bulbus duodeni.  Schweiz med &#xA;Wochenschr 1950, 14, 351-358.&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>39 - Acid Corrosive Injuries and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder - </title>
      <link>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_39/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pylorus.keet.net/Chapters/_39/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;acid-corrosive-injuries-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Acid Corrosive Injuries and the Pyloric Sphincteric Cylinder&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#acid-corrosive-injuries-and-the-pyloric-sphincteric-cylinder&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h1&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Acid and alkali corrosives affect the body tissues in different ways (Donner et al l98l).  It &#xA;is generally agreed that ingestion of corrosive acids primarily damages the stomach, and &#xA;particularly its distal half, with little involvement of the oesophagus.  Alkali ingestion on &#xA;the other hand, primarily damages the pharynx and oesophagus, and only rarely involves &#xA;the stomach (Steigmann and Dolehid l956;  Marks et al l963;  Poteshman l967;  Ritter et &#xA;al l968;  Allen et al l970;  Franken l973;  Nicosia et al l974;  Donner et al l98l;  Gimmon &#xA;and Durst l98l;  Jena and Lazarus l985).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Acid corrosives cause rapid coagulation necrosis of one or more layers of the gastric wall &#xA;(Steigmann and Dolehid l956;  Donner et al l98l;  Gimmon and Durst l98l).  Occasionally &#xA;this may be limited to the mucosa, in which case healing may occur, but the process is &#xA;much more likely to involve the deeper layers as well (Gimmon and Durst l98l).  The &#xA;squamous epithelium of the oesophagus apparently offers resistance to acid compounds.  &#xA;In 16&amp;#37;-20&amp;#37; of cases of acid corrosive gastritis however, associated oesophageal &#xA;injury is seen (Karon l962;  Poteshman l967;  Gimmon and Durst l98l).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;Alkaline corrosives tend to dissolve tissues in the mouth, pharynx and oesophagus, and is &#xA;neutralized by gastric acid in the stomach.  However, in 20&amp;#37; of cases of alkaline &#xA;corrosive injury the stomach is also affected (Nicosia et al l974).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;By l98l over 200 cases of acid corrosive gastric injury had been documented (Gimmon &#xA;and Durst l98l), while only a few cases of alkaline corrosive injury had been reported in &#xA;the literature (Ritter et al l968;  Allen et al l970;  Nicosia et al l974).  The degree and &#xA;extent of gastric involvement in corrosive injuries depends on a number of factors, &#xA;including the nature of the caustic substance, its concentration and viscosity, the quantity &#xA;swallowed, the duration of contact with the gastric wall, and whether it was taken on an &#xA;empty or a full stomach (Ritter et al l968;  Allen et al l970;  Franken l973;  Nicosia et al &#xA;l974;  Jena and Lazarus l985).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As described by Marks et al (l963), Ritter et al (l967), Franken (l973) and others, the &#xA;course of corrosive damage can be divided into different phases.  In the immediate, acute &#xA;phase an inflammatory exudate occurs on the mucosal aspect of the gastric wall;  there is &#xA;mucosal ulceration and necrosis, accompanied by oedema and an intense inflammatory &#xA;reaction in the surrounding tissues.  Full thickness burns of the wall are seen with diffuse &#xA;gangrenous areas in the submucosa and muscularis externa, and fibrinous peritonitis.  &#xA;This is soon followed by marked inflammatory reaction and vascular congestion, with &#xA;resultant haemorrhage.  After 2 to 5 days sloughing and ulceration may occur with a &#xA;distinct possibility of perforation.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;In patients who do not succumb during the acute phase, fibroblastic activity commences.  &#xA;There is progressive cicatrization during the following 2 to 4 weeks, leading to stricture &#xA;formation.  In cases of severe burns the mucosa and submucosa do not regenerate.  The &#xA;fibrosis produces a narrow, non-distensible lumen of varying length, but often extending &#xA;proximally from the pylorus as far as the incisura angularis.  Symptoms of gastric outlet &#xA;obstruction usually commence 4 to 6 weeks after the acute phase.&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;The damage to the gastric walls also entails loss of gastrin producing and other endocrine &#xA;cells as well as loss of intrinsic nerves in the affected parts (Steigmann and Dolehid &#xA;l956).  Karon (l962) described a delayed gastric syndrome, occurring 2 to 6 weeks after &#xA;ingestion of acid.  This consists of tight stenosis in the distal two-thirds or distal half of &#xA;the stomach, producing obstruction and vomiting, while the damage to the gastrin &#xA;producing cells causes a histamine-fast achlorhydria.  Similar cases, some having &#xA;additional gastric ulcers, were described by Marks et al (l963) and Gimmon and Durst &#xA;(l981).  The gross anatomical and radiological resemblance to carcinoma of the stomach &#xA;was stressed by Karon (l962), Marks et al (l963), Franken (l973), Gimmon and Durst &#xA;(l98l) and Jena and Lazarus (l985).&#xA;The following cases are examples of acid corrosive injuries:&#xA;&lt;h3 id=&#34;case-reports&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Case Reports&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#case-reports&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h3&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 39.1&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt; L.M., female aged 29 years, accidentally swallowed a cupful of &#xA;hydrochloric acid.  This was followed by burning restrosternal and epigastric pain and &#xA;continuous vomiting.  Radiographic examination a week later revealed no abnormality in &#xA;the oesophagus.  A severe stricture, causing almost total occlusion of the lumen and &#xA;commencing as a funnel-shaped narrowing in the region of the incisura angularis, was &#xA;seen in the distal third of the stomach (Fig 39.1).  At times a trickle of barium traversed &#xA;the stricture, which was constant;  the sphincteric cylinder and pyloric aperture were &#xA;unidentifiable, with total absence of cyclical contraction and relaxation.  Repeat &#xA;examination after another week showed similar features, although the stricture appeared &#xA;to be somewhat less severe.  Antrectomy and Billroth I anastomosis 3 weeks after the &#xA;incident showed the distal 5.0 to 6.0cm of the stomach to be oedematous and stenotic;  &#xA;the duodenum appeared normal.  Microscopically severe fibrotic change was seen in the &#xA;submucosa, with areas of necrosis and partial regeneration in the mucosa.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/39-1.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 39.1. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case L.M. Funnel-shaped, severe stricture in distal stomach&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;&lt;b&gt;&lt;em&gt;Case 39.2&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/b&gt; D.P., 23 year old male, swallowed half a tumblerful of hydrochloric acid &#xA;in an attempted suicide.  After some hours he was admitted to a peripheral hospital where &#xA;gastric lavage with dilute alkali was performed.  Dysphagia and continuous vomiting &#xA;necessitated oesophagoscopy after 10 days.  This showed mucosal erosions and moderate &#xA;oesophageal stenosis at 33cm.  Upper gastrointestinal barium examination revealed a &#xA;constant narrowing of the distal third of the stomach with absent cyclical contraction and &#xA;relaxation of the pyloric sphincteric cylinder (Fig 39.2).  This was associated with a &#xA;patent pylorus and rapid emptying of fluid barium.  The entire duodenum showed loss of &#xA;mucosal pattern with rigid walls;  immediately beyond the duodeno-jejunal flexure a &#xA;3.0cm long stenotic area was evident.&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;table border=0 width=90% align=center&gt;&#xA;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td&gt;&lt;img src=&#34;../images/39-2.gif&#34;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&#xA;&lt;td&gt;&lt;tt&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fig. 39.2. &lt;/b&gt;&#xA;Case D.P. Constant narrowing distal third of stomach.  Pyloric aperture &#xA;patent. Absent cyclical activity of pyloric sphincteric cylinder.  Duodenal walls rigid.  &#xA;Stenosis proximal jejunum&#xA;&lt;/tt&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&#xA;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;discussion&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  Discussion&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#discussion&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;As can be expected, the above cases show that acid corrosive injury of the stomach is not &#xA;contained by anatomical boundaries, and therefore not necessarily limited to the pyloric &#xA;sphincteric cylinder or to the pyloric mucosal zone. Usually the walls of the cylinder are &#xA;damaged as part of a more extensive injury;  the result is that the pyloric sphincteric &#xA;cylinder is no longer recognizable as a functional unit.  In Case 39.1 the cylinder was &#xA;almost totally occluded as part of a more extensive stricture, causing obstruction to the &#xA;flow of fluid barium.  In Case 39.2 partial contraction of the cylinder &#34;fixed&#34; the pyloric &#xA;aperture in the open position, leading to rapid emptying of fluid barium;  theoretically the &#xA;lack of cyclical contraction of the cylinder in this case should hamper trituration (Chap &#xA;18) and delay the emptying of solids (Chap 18).&#xA;&lt;p style=&#34;text-align: justify&#34;&gt;&#xA;A consequence of corrosive injury of the pyloric mucosal zone is that gastrin producing &#xA;G-cells in this location may be affected, leading to a histamine-fast achlorhydria. &#xA;It is probable that cells producing other &#xA;regulatory peptides, e.g. somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and enkephalin (Chap &#xA;9) will also be damaged.&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;references&#34;&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  References&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;  &lt;a class=&#34;anchor&#34; href=&#34;#references&#34;&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&#xD;&#xA;  &#xD;&#xA;&lt;/h2&gt;&#xD;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Allen RE, Thoshinsky MJ, Stallone RJ, et al.  Corrosive injuries of the stomach.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Arch Surg&lt;/em&gt; l970, 100, 409-413.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Donner MW, Saba GP, Martinez CR.  Diffuse diseases of the oesophagus:  a &#xA;practical approach.  &lt;em&gt;Sem Roentg&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 16, 198-213.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Franken EA.  Caustic damage of the gastrointestinal tract:  roentgen features.  &#xA;&lt;em&gt;Amer J Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l973, 118, 77-85.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Gimmon Z, Durst AL.  Acid corrosive gastritis:  a plea for delayed surgical &#xA;approach.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Surg&lt;/em&gt; l98l, 141, 381-383.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Jena GP, Lazarus C.  Acid corrosive gastritis.  &lt;em&gt;South Afr Med J&lt;/em&gt; l985, 67, 473-&#xA;474.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Karon AB.  The delayed gastric syndrome with pyloric stenosis and achlorhydria &#xA;following the ingestion of acid:  a definite clinical entity.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l962, 7, 1041-&#xA;1046.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Marks IN, Bank S, Werbeloff L, et al.  Natural history of corrosive gastritis:  &#xA;report of five cases.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J Dig Dis&lt;/em&gt; l963, 8, 509-524.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Nicosia JF, Thornton JP, Folk FA, et al.  Surgical management of corrosive &#xA;gastric injuries.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Surg&lt;/em&gt; l974, 180, 139-143.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Potesham NL.  Corrosive gastritis due to hydrochloric acid ingestion.  &lt;em&gt;Amer J &#xA;Roentg Rad Ther Nucl Med&lt;/em&gt; l967, 99, 182-185.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Ritter FN, Newman MH, Newman DE.  A clinical and experimental study of &#xA;corrosive burns of the stomach.  &lt;em&gt;Ann Otol Rhin Laryng&lt;/em&gt; l968, 77, 830-841.&#xA;&lt;li&gt;Steigmann F, Dolehid RA.  Corrosive (acid) gastritis:  management of early and &#xA;late cases.  &lt;em&gt;New Engl J Med&lt;/em&gt; l956, 254, 981-986.&#xA;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
